Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Unes Law Review

SURAT PERNYATAAN PENGUASAAN FISIK BIDANG TANAH SECARA SPORADIK YANG AKAN DIJADIKAN SEBAGAI DASAR PEMBERIAN PEMBIAYAAN PADA BANK BSI KCP PASAMAN BARAT Suci Sofiani; Rembrandt Rembrandt; M. Hasbi
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.483

Abstract

Tujuan pendaftaran tanah menurut Pasal 3 huruf a Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah yaitu untuk memberikan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang hak atas suatu bidang tanah, Surat Penyataan Fisik Bidang Tanah (Sporadik) merupakan gerbang awal dari pihak yang mendaftarkan tanahnya secara sporadik. Kegunaan dari surat ini ialah sebagai bentuk penegasan bahwa yang bersangkutan telah menguasai sebidang tanah tersebut secara sah sebelum memohon pengajuan hak atas tanah tersebut. Di sebagian besar Daerah Kabupaten Pasaman Barat Provinsi Sumatera Barat masih sangat banyak tanah-tanah yang belum terdaftar atau belum bersertipikat. Dalam penulisan ini menggunakan metode yuridis empiris. Dari hasil penelitian disimpulkan bahwa 1) Bank Bsi KCP Pasaman Barat menerima agunan berupa Surat pernyataan penguasaan fisik bidang tanah secara sporadic untuk dijaminkan sebagai anggunan untuk pinjaman KUR dibawah 100 juta 2). pihak Bank Bsi KCP Pasaman Barat hanya menjadikan surat sporadik tersebut sebagai pegangan untuk menjadi jaminan pada kredit KUR karena sporadik tidak bisa diikat hak tanggungannya dan tidak dibunyikan dalam akad kredit KUR tersebut.
OPERASI PENINDAKAN OBAT TRADISIONAL TANPA IZIN EDAR OLEH BADAN PENGAWAS OBAT DAN MAKANAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN Taufiqurrahman Taufiqurrahman; Busyra Azheri; Rembrandt Rembrandt
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.670

Abstract

Rapid economic development has created various goods and/or services that can be used and consumed. With the increasing variety of goods and/or services in circulation, and supported by advances in information technology, the distribution is increasingly expanding across national boundaries. So this is also a new demand for the government to oversee the distribution of products that are widely circulated in the market, especially in the health sector. One of the important human needs and cannot be left behind in daily activities is medicine. People's fear of the negative stigma of using modern medicine increases people's desire to seek alternatives to traditional medicine. However, there are many distributions of traditional medicines without a Distribution Permit (TIE) from the Center for Drug and Food Control (BBPOM) in Pekanbaru. Based on this, the researcher examines 1) What is BPOM's responsibility for the circulation of medicinal products without distribution permits in the community. 2) What is the legal protection for consumers who use medicinal products without a Distribution Permit from BPOM. Writing this thesis using the approach empirical juridical. From the results of the study, it was found that the most cases were found at Licensed Drug Stores (TOB) facilities. There are 2 (two) responsibilities of BPOM in conducting supervision, namely: pre-market andpost-market, both are supported by the Drug and Food Control System (SisPOM). The form of legal protection by BPOM is preventive and repressive efforts. Establishing a distribution permit is a preventive action taken by BPOM in carrying out aspects of security, comfort and safety for consumers. Repressive protection, namely by carrying out enforcement operations or spot checks on various drug distribution facilities. Furthermore, if a dispute occurs, it will be resolved through the courts and out of court.