Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Logika : Jurnal Penelitian Universitas Kuningan Pancasila and Law Review Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Dewi Haryanti
Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
The Strategy of Strengthening Pancasila Ideology In The Digital Age Oksep Adhayanto; Nazaki Nazaki; Nanik Rahmawati; Dewi Haryanti; Nurhasanah Suwardi; Rilo Pambudi
Pancasila and Law Review Vol 2 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (851.125 KB) | DOI: 10.25041/plr.v2i2.2396

Abstract

This research attempts to analyze the implementation of the Pancasila ideology amid current digitalization. One of the markers of this digital era is the erosion of space and national boundaries for every citizen. Indonesia's large population can be a strength or weakness of the Pancasila ideology. For this reason, systematic steps are needed to make the values of Pancasila remain as a way of life for the Indonesian. This type of research is normative research that uses literature as a primary data source. The presentation of the data is conveyed by a qualitative descriptive method. The conclusion of this study is the need to strengthen Pancasila ideology in the digital era through efforts to reaffirm the fundamental values of Pancasila to society in general and the younger generation in particular. To ground the values of Pancasila, it is deemed necessary to involve millennial participation through digital influencer programs and the development of digital literacy based on Pancasila values and the doctrine of national values.
Mewujudkan Nilai Demokrasi Rasional dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Langsung dan Serentak di Indonesia Dewi Haryanti; Haris Budiman
LOGIKA : Jurnal Penelitian Universitas Kuningan Vol 13, No 01 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25134/logika.v13i01.6652

Abstract

Pemilihan kepala daerah secara langsung dan serentak merupakan bentuk nyata pelaksanaan otonomi daerah karena rakyat bisa memilih secara langsung para pemimpin yang dikehendakinya. Oleh karena itu pemerintah telah menyiapkan perangkat perundang-undangan untuk mendukung kegiatan pemilihan kepala daerah secara langsung tersebut. Permasalahan yang dibahas dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana pelaksanaan serta permasalahan yang terjadi dalam Pemilihan kepala daerah secara langsung dan serentak serta upaya yang bisa dilakukan untuk menyelesaikan problematika tersebut untuk mewujudkan pemilihan yang lebih demokratis dan ideal bagi daerah. Metode penelitian berupa penelitian hukum empiris yang bersifat deskriptif dengan pendekatan socio legal research. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa pelaksanaan pemilihan kepala daerah secara langsung dan serentak pada tahun 2015, 2017 dan 2018 masih ditemukan berbagai permasalahan dari sejak tahapan dimulai sampai pada hasil Pemilihan, untuk itu perlu dilakukan pembaharuan perundang-undangan Pemilihan kepala daerah berdasarkan prinsip-prinsip demokrasi yang rasional agar pelaksanaan pemilihan kepala daerah berikutnya dapat terlaksana lebih demokratis sesuai aspirasi masyarakat dan kondisi daerah.   The direct and simultaneous election of regional heads is a tangible form of implementing regional autonomy because the people can directly elect the leaders they want. Therefore, the government has prepared legislation to support the direct election of regional heads. The problems discussed in this study are how the implementation and problems that occur in direct and simultaneous regional head elections and the efforts that can be made to resolve these problems to realize a more democratic and ideal election for the region. The research method is in the form of descriptive empirical legal research with a socio legal research approach. The results of the study show that the implementation of direct and simultaneous regional head elections in 2015, 2017 and 2018 still found various problems from the stage starting to the election results, for this reason it is necessary to reform the legislation on regional head elections based on rational democratic principles. so that the implementation of the next regional head election can be carried out more democratically according to the aspirations of the people and regional conditions.
Tinjauan Pemahaman Masyarakat Terhadap Pidana Politik Uang Pada Pemilu Trianda Lestari; Syahrando Muhti; Siti Nurhaliza; Dewi Haryanti
Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): April : Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/humif.v1i2.161

Abstract

Money politics is a gift or promise to bribe someone so that the person does not exercise their rights in a certain way during the general election. The purchase can be in the form of goods or money, as found by researchers regarding the phenomenon of money politics which is still widespread in three regions, namely , Kijang Bintan, Kawal Bintan, and Lingga, people who are still relatively ignorant and have economic constraints are one of the factors in society being entangled in giving and receiving political money. Apart from damaging democracy due to forms of fraud, this problem has a negative impact on the givers and recipients who have clearly violated the provisions of the election law and violated criminal provisions. However, this problem is still difficult to resolve due to the lack of supervision and firm action. This research uses empirical legal research. This research is a legal research method that uses empirical facts taken from people's behavior, both verbally obtained from interviews and behavior carried out through direct observation. The theory used in this research is not to use critical legal theory, in order to find the problems that occur, as well as reveal how much the public understands money politics. So from these problems it can be drawn with the title Review of Community Understanding of Money Politics
Co-Authors Gios Adhyaksa Nanik Rahmawati Nazaki Nazaki Nurhasanah Nurhasanah Oksep Adhayanto, Oksep Rilo Pambudi Siti Nurhaliza Syahrando Muhti Trianda Lestari