cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dewanta Arya Nugraha
Contact Email
dewanta.an@gmail.com
Phone
+6289673449687
Journal Mail Official
jmme@fkip.uns.ac.id
Editorial Address
Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta Jl. Ir. Sutami No. 36A Kentingan Surakarta 57126
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : 20898878     EISSN : 27158276     DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.20961/jmme
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics
Journal Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) is a peer-refereed open-access journal which has been established for the dissemination of state-of-the-art knowledge in the field of mathematics and mathematics education. This journal was founded by the Magister of Mathematics Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret. It is published twice in a year (June and December). The JMME welcomes high-quality manuscripts resulted by researchers, scholars, teachers, and professionals from a research project in the scope of Pure Mathematics, Computing Mathematics, Statistics, Mathematics Learning, Evaluation and Assessment in Mathematics Learning, STEAM, Ethnomathematics, ICT in Mathematics Education, Design / Development Research in Mathematics Education
Arjuna Subject : Matematika - Matematika (Lain-Lain)
Articles 8 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education" : 8 Documents clear
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI INTERAKSI SOSIAL Heri Cahyono; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v5i2.10022

Abstract

Abstract. The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from student’s social interaction. The learning models compared were TAI with scientific approach, TPS with scientific approach, and classical with scientific approach. The type of the research was a quasi experimental research with the factorial design of 3 x 3. The population were all eight grade students of Junior High School in Ngawi regency on academic year 2014/2015. The sample consisted of students of SMPN 3 Ngrambe, SMPN 2 Paron, and SMPN 2 Widodaren, which taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The data of the research were collected through documentation, questionnaire, and test. The data was analyzed using unbalanced two-ways anova at the significance level of 0,05. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded as follows. (1) TAI with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than TPS with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach, TPS with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach gives same mathematics achievement. (2) Students with high social interaction have better mathematics achievements than students with medium social interaction and low social interaction, while students with medium social interaction have better mathematics achievements than students with low social interaction. (3) For TAI with scientific approach, students with high and medium social interaction have the same mathematics achievements, and both have better mathematics achievement than low social interaction. For TPS with scientific approach, students with high social interaction have better mathematics achievement than students with medium and low social interaction, and students with medium and low social interaction have the same mathematics achievement. For classical with scientific approach, students with high social interaction have better mathematics achievement than students with medium social interaction, and both have the same mathematics achievement as students with low social interaction. (4) For students with high and low social interaction, all learning models gives the same mathematics achievement. For students with medium social interaction, TAI with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than TPS with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach, TPS with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach gives the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: TAI with scientific approach, TPS with scientific approach, classical learning, social interaction, learning achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK TALK WRITE (TTW) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN STRATEGI TALKING STICK DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MAJEMUK SISWA KELAS VII SMPN KOTA SURAKARTA Kirana, Arinta Rara; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v5i2.10024

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of research were to find out: 1) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, TTW by using talking stick model, TPS by using talking stick model or classical learning model, 2) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, linguistic intelligence, mathematics logic intelligence or interpersonal intelligence, 3) in each multiple intelligence level, which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, TTW by using talking stick model, TPS by using talking stick model or classical learning model, and 4) in each learning models, which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, linguistic intelligence, mathematicslogic intelligence or interpersonal intelligence. This research used the quasi experimental research method. The design of the research was  3 × 3 factorial. The population was the students of the seven class of Junior High School in Surakarta City on academic year 2014/2015. The tecnique of sampling was stratified cluster random sampling. The proposed hypothesis of the research were tested by using the unbalanced two-way analysis of variance.The conclusions of this research were as follows: 1) TTW by using talking stick model provided better mathematics achievement than TPS by using talking stick model and classical learning model. 2) the mathematics logic intelligence students had mathematics achievement better than linguistic intelligence, the mathematics achievement of linguistic intelligence is the same as interpersonal intelligence, and the mathematics logic intelligence students had mathematics achievement better than interpersonal intelligence. 3) in each of multiple intelligence categories, students mathematics learning achievement is in constancy with result of learning models.4) in each learning models, the students mathematics learning achievement is in constancy with  result of multiple intelligence categories.Keywords: TTW, TPS, classical learning, multiple intelligence, talking stick, achievement of learning.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTERPERSONAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KOTA MADIUN Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati; Budiyono Budiyono; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v5i2.10026

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research were to find out the different effect of each categories of learning model, students interpersonal intelligence and their interaction towards students mathematics learning achievement on the subject of plane geometry. The research was quasi experimental with 3×3 factorial design. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School in Madiun City on the second semester of 2013/2014 academic years. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample of this research consisted of the students of SMP N 3 Madiun, SMPN 7 Madiun, and SMPN 10 Madiun. The sample consisted of 260 students. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance at the significance level of 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it can be concluded that: (1) the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model; (2) students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; (3) on the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type, NHT type and direct learning model, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; and (4) on students interpersonal intelligence high, medium and low, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model.Keywords:  Jigsaw, NHT, interpersonal intelligence
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DAN TIPE ROUNDTABLE DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO Yolan Kusumaningtyas; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Budi Usodo
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v5i2.10028

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from emotional intelligence of the students. The learning models compared were learning model of the Numbered Head Together (NHT) with scientific approach, Roundtable with scientific approach, and classical with scientific approach. The type of this study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The population was all grade VIII students of Public Junior High Schools in Sukoharjo Regency. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and emotional intelligence questionnaire. The data analysis technique used was the two-way ANOVA  with unequal cell. Based on hypothesis, the results of the study concluded as follows. (1) Roundtable model with scientific approach got better learning achievement than NHT model with scientific approach and with classical model with scientific approach, NHT  model with scientific approach got better learning achievement than classical model with scientific approach. (2) Students with high emotional intelligence gave the same learning achievement with the students who had middle emotional  intelligence. In addition, students who had high and middle emotional  intelligence have better learning achievement than students who had low emotional  intelligence. (3) In each  learning models, student with high emotional intelligence gave the same learning achievement with the students who had middle emotional  intelligence, then  students who had high and middle emotional  intelligence have better learning achievement than students who had low emotional  intelligence. (4) In each category of emotional intelligence, Roundtable  model with scientific approach got better learning achievement than NHT with scientific approach and classical model with scientific approach, NHT  model with scientific approach got better learning achievement than classical model with scientific approach.Keywords : Numbered Head Together (NHT), Roundtable, Classical, Scientific Approach, Emotional Intelligence.
PENERAPAN STRATEGI ARCS DENGAN PEMBERIAN SCAFFOLDING : UPAYA MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN MATEMATIKA DAN PEMBENTUKAN KARAKTER MAHASISWA PADA MATA KULIAH MATEMATIKA DASAR Henny Ekana Chrisnawati; Budi Usodo; Ira Kurniawati; Yemi Kuswardi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v5i2.10018

Abstract

ABSTRACT                                                                                                       This research has purposes to increase mathematical understanding ability and build character of undergraduate in mathematics foundation which uses ARCS’s strategy with giving scaffolding. Mathematics foundation which has abstract’s characteristic and necessary from understanding ability both computational also fungtional become priority of researcher’s thought. Characteristic of mathematical concept which is pyramidal compel students to understanding basic concept correctly for the sake of understanding new concept.  Not only for understanding but also building character is one of affectionate factors priority to reach success in learning mathematics. Pay attention of developing character, undergraduate are wished to show positively character in learning so that gives positively implication to the results. This research is classroom activity research which gives some informations about the changes or increase that ae caused by an activity. This research uses undergraduate of physics education in year academic 2015/2016  as a subject. Technique of collecting data uses test and observation while learning and research’s instrument is developed by validation of professional judgment. The result from application of ARCS’s strategy with giving scaffolding in learning is exist an increase of mathematical understanding ability. It showed by the results of mathematical understanding ability’s test in first and second cycle which gave information that there exist an increase of completeness percentage for understanding mathematical concept which from 39, 5 % up to 77,4 % in first cycle then continued up to 82,6 % in second cycle. Like that, it also showed by the mean of the test’s result which gave an increase from 61 in first cycle up to 81,1 in second cycle. The application of ARCS’s strategy also increased the affectionate learning’s result. It showed by the results of observation in first and second cycle which showed that the mean percentage of    character building from indicators: honest, discipline, hardworking, creative, stand alone, has a curiosity, appreciate achievement, friendly, responsible which were developed. Those results increase from bottom category in pre-cycle became in middle and high category in second cycle. It means that   used motivation technique (attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction) in learning activity of mathematics foundation gave fact that those technique fulfilled need of undergraduate for reaching optimal achievement. Keywords : understanding concept ability, character, ARCS’s strategy, scaffolding
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION DENGAN SCAFFOLDING BERBASIS MODUL PADA MATERI GEOMETRIDIMENSI TIGA DITINJAUDARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA SMK KELAS XI DI KABUPATEN SRAGEN Hartono Hartono; Riyadi Riyadi; Imam Sujadi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v5i2.10030

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this research were to investigate: (1) which learning models of  Team Assisted Individualization learning model  with scaffolding based on  module (TAI-S), Team Assisted Individualization learning model (TAI), or direct learning model (DL) results in a better learning achievement in the material of three-dimensional geometry; (2) which independence category of student learning, high, medium or low results in a better learning achievement on the material of three-dimensional geometry;  (3) in each category of student learning independence, which  learning models of the TAI-S, TAI, or DL model results in better  learning achievement  on the material of  three-dimensional geometry. This research used the quasi experimental method with the factorial design of 3x3. Its population was all the students in Grade XI of Vocational High Schools in Sragen regency. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified random sampling technique. The data of the research were gathered through documentation, questionnaire, and test. The documentation was employed to investigate the scores of semester test in Mathematics of the students in Semester 1, Academic Year 2012/2013, and was used for balance test among the classes exposed to the TAI-S, TAI, and DL models. The questionnaire was used to find out the independence category of student learning. The test was used to know the students learning achievement in Mathematics with material of three-dimensional geometry. The data of the research were analyzed by using the unbalanced two-way analysis of variance at the significance level of 5%. The results of the research are as follows: (1) the TAI-S learning model result in a better learning achievement than both the TAI and DL models. There are no any differences in the learning achievement of the students with the TAI learning  model and DL model. (2) the students with the high independence category result in better learning achievement than students with medium and low independence category. The students with medium independence category result in better learning achievement than students in low independence category (3) in each category of student learning independence, based on  the material of  three-dimensional geometry, the TAI-S learning model, TAI learning  model and DL  model do not have correlation between one and another.Keywords : TAI-S learning model, TAI learning model,     DL    learning.   Three Dimensional Geometry, Learning  Independence.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK-PAIR-SHARE (TPS), THINK-TALK-WRITE (TTW) DAN TWO STAY-STRAY (TSTS) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI SELF-EFFICACY Khafittulloh Viqriah; Budiyono Budiyono; Sri Subanti
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v5i2.10020

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievements and learning interest viewed from students self-efficacy. The learning model compared were TPS, TTW, and TSTS. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The population were all of the students in grade 8th of Junior High School in Sleman regency. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were students of SMPN 1 Kalasan, SMPN 4 Kalasan, and SMPN 2 Ngemplak. The instruments used were mathematics achievement tests and self-efficacy questionnaire. The data was analyzed by using unbalanced two-ways Anova. The conclusions were as follows. (1) TPS gives better mathematics achievement than TTW, and both gives better mathematics achievement than TSTS. (2) Students who have high and medium self-efficacy have the same mathematics achievement, students who have medium and low self-efficacy have the same mathematics achievement, students who have high self-efficacy was better than students who have low self-efficacy. (3) For TPS and TTW, students who have high, medium, and low self-efficacy have the same mathematics achievement. For TSTS, students who have high and medium self-efficacy have the same mathematics achievement, students who have medium and low self-efficacy have the same mathematics achievement, students who have high self-efficacy was better than students who have low self-efficacy. (4) For students who have high and medium self-efficacy, TPS,TTW, and  TSTS gives the same mathematics achievement. For students who have low self-efficacy, TPS and  TTW gives the same mathematics achievement, TPS gives better mathematics achievement than TSTS, and TTW gives better mathematics achievement than TSTS .Keywords: Think-Pair-Share (TPS), Think-Talk-Write (TTW), Two Stay-Two Stray (TSTS), self-efficacy
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENTS DAN TEAMS ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI MOTIVASI BERPRESTASI SISWA KELAS VIII SMP Mishbahul Huda; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Budi Usodo
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v5i2.10032

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research are to investigate: (1) which learning model of the cooperative learning model of the TGT type, the cooperative learning model of the TAI type, and the direc learning model results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics; (2) which students of the the students with the high achievement motivation, the students with the moderate achievement motivation, and the students with the low achievement motivation have a better learning achievement in Mathematics; (3) in each category of the achievement motivations, which learning model of the cooperative learning model of the TGT type, the cooperative learning model of the TAI type, and the direc learning model results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics; and (4) in each learning model, which students of the the students with the high achievement motivation, the students with the moderate achievement motivation, and the students with the low achievement motivation have a better learning achievement in Mathematics. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3x3. Its population was the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Wonogiri regency in Academic Year 2013/2014. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples of the research were the students as many as 299 of State Junior Secondary School 1 of Purwantoro, State Junior Secondary School 1 of Jatisrono, and State Junior Secondary School 2 Puhpelem. The data of the research were analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with unbalanced cells at the significance level of 5%. The results of the research are as follows: 1) the students instructed with the cooperative learning model of the TGT type have a better learning achievement in Mathematics as those instructed with the cooperative learning model of the TAI type and direct learning model, the students instructed with the cooperative learning model of the TAI type have a better learning achievement in Mathematics as those instructed with the direct learning model. 2) The students with the high achievement motivation have a better learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the moderate achievement motivation and low achievement motivation, the students with the high achievement motivation have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low achievement motivation. 3) In each category of the achievement motivations, the students instructed with the cooperative learning model of the TGT type have a better learning achievement in Mathematics as those instructed with the cooperative learning model of the TAI type and direct learning model, the students instructed with the cooperative learning model of the TAI type have a better learning achievement in Mathematics as those instructed with the direct learning model. 4) In each learning model, the students with the high achievement motivation have a better learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the moderate achievement motivation and low achievement motivation, the students with the moderate achievement motivation have a better learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the low achievement motivation.Keywords: The cooperative learning model of the TGT type, the cooperative learning model of the TAI type, direct learning, and achievement motivation.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 8

 1 

Filter by Year

2015 2015


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 13, No 1 (2023): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 12, No 2 (2022): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 12, No 1 (2022): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 11, No 2 (2021): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 11, No 1 (2021): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 10, No 2 (2020): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 10, No 1 (2020): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 9, No 2 (2019): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 9, No 1 (2019): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 8, No 2 (2018): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 8, No 1 (2018): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 1 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 2 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 1 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 2, No 2 (2012): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 2, No 1 (2012): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 1, No 2 (2011): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 1, No 1 (2011): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education More Issue