cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ebit Bimas Saputra
Contact Email
ebitbimas99@gmail.com
Phone
+6281365118590
Journal Mail Official
lppmunes.jselr@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Veteran Dalam No.26B, Padang Pasir, Padang Barat, Padang Pasir, Padang Barat Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 28291298     EISSN : 28290305     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/jselr.v1i1
Core Subject : Social,
Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
urnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review (JSELR) adalah jurnal online blind peer-review, open access, dan online tentang penelitian, laporan, resensi buku, dan komentar tentang semua aspek ilmu hukum yang diterbitkan oleh Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum dan LPPM Universitas Ekasakti. JSELR diterbitkan tiga kali setahun pada bulan April, Agustus dan Desember. JSELR bertujuan untuk menyediakan tempat bagi akademisi, peneliti dan praktisi untuk menerbitkan artikel penelitian asli atau artikel ulasan. Ruang lingkup artikel yang diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini membahas masalah hukum, dan setiap perkembangan dan kemajuan baru di bidang hukum. Ruang lingkup jurnal kami meliputi: Filsafat dan Teori Hukum Perbandingan Hukum Sosiologi Hukum Hukum Internasional Hukum Tata Negara Hukum Perdata Hukum Bisnis Hukum Ekonomi Hukum Lingkungan Hukum Pidana Hukum Administrasi Negara Hukum Teknologi, Informasi, dan Komunikasi Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Hukum Islam dan Keluarga Hukum Agraria
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 22 Documents
 1   2   3 
PENEGAK HUKUM SEBAGAI GARDA TERDEPAN PERWUJUDAN NEGARA HUKUM DI INDONESIA Eko Wigiyanto
JURNAL SAKATO EKASAKTI LAW REVIEW Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review (April 2022)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, LPPM Universitas Ekasakti dan Dharma Indonesia Tercinta (DINASTI) Publisher Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (190.211 KB) | DOI: 10.31933/jselr.v1i1.537

Abstract

Indonesia is a state of law that always puts the law as a reference in all activities of the state and society. Indonesia's commitment to become a state of law is clearly stated in the 1945 Constitution "Indonesia is a state of law". As a state of law, judicial institutions have been established in charge of maintaining and supervising the application of law so that it can be effective in Indonesia. The judiciary is also present as a form of media for the public to obtain justice and appropriate action in the eyes of the law. As a citizen, it is the duty to be positive in the process of protecting and enforcing the law in Indonesia. The state wants a judicial institution in which it has law enforcement officers and law enforcement agencies that are fair and firm, indiscriminately. There is no sabotage, discrimination and specialization in handling every legal case, whether criminal or civil. However, nowadays we often hear the phrase, 'Point to the bottom Blunt to the top'. This expression can be present because it is considered to reflect the state of law enforcement in Indonesia. The author's search results show that the state of law enforcement in Indonesia is not running as expected. Law enforcement by the judiciary in Indonesia is often tainted by entrenched judicial corruption. Various legal cases that are currently happening seem to prove that this expression is true. The focus of this article is related to how law enforcement is currently in Indonesia. The question in this article is whether law enforcement has become the front line in the realization of the rule of law in Indonesia
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENENTUKAN SUBJEK TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA PEMERINTAH Putri Deyesi Rizki
JURNAL SAKATO EKASAKTI LAW REVIEW Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review (April 2022)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, LPPM Universitas Ekasakti dan Dharma Indonesia Tercinta (DINASTI) Publisher Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (195.279 KB) | DOI: 10.31933/jselr.v1i1.538

Abstract

Criminal liability in the Corruption Crime Act as stated in Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3. Judges' Considerations in Determining the Subject of the Criminal Acts of Corruption in the Procurement of Goods and Services in Court Decision Number 2421 K/PID.SUS/2016, namely there are Human subject. The consideration was that Defendant I had malicious intentions starting from planning tenders, conducting tenders, carrying out work and completing work, based on the facts that the Defendant tried to influence the auction process by appointing officials who did not have the expertise as PPK so that the PPK was incompetent and directed and ordered the tender committee. to win a friend's company by privileging and not evaluating. The Transfer of Legal Responsibility From Commitment Making Officials (PPK) to PA and KPA In the Decision Case Number: 2421 K/PID.SUS/2016 there are irregularities, where the Commitment Making Officer (PPK) as well as the Technical Implementation Officer of Activities (PPTK) are not made suspects but made witness. The existing legal issue is regarding the flow of case investigations that make the Commitment Making Officer (PPK) a witness. Based on the facts of the trial, there is some corroborating evidence that the Commitment Making Officer (PPK) as well as the Technical Implementation Officer (PPTK) must be responsible for the act.
DISPARITAS PENJATUHAN PIDANA PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA (Analisis Putusan Nomor: 898/Pid.Sus/2020/PN. Pdg Dan Putusan Nomor: 940/Pid.Sus /2020/PN. Pd Sari Wiranarta
JURNAL SAKATO EKASAKTI LAW REVIEW Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review (April 2022)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, LPPM Universitas Ekasakti dan Dharma Indonesia Tercinta (DINASTI) Publisher Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (287.73 KB) | DOI: 10.31933/jselr.v1i1.539

Abstract

The judge's consideration is one of the most important aspects in determining the realization of the value of a judge's decision that contains justice, so that maximum and balanced judge considerations are obtained at the level of theory and legal facts.The results of the research on "the disparity of criminal penalties against narcotics criminals (decision analysis number: 898/pid.sus/2020/pn. pdg and decision number: 940/pid.sus /2020/pn. pdg)" which aims to answer the problem -problems as follows: (1) why there is a disparity in the punishment of narcotics criminals in the two decisions, (2) what are the factors that cause criminal disparities in the two decisions? This research is a descriptive analytical research. The approach used in this research is a normative juridical approach. The data used in this research is secondary data. All data and materials obtained from the research results are compiled and analyzed qualitatively and presented in a qualitative descriptive form. Based on the results of the discussion and analysis, it can be concluded that firstly, the disparity in sentencing criminals against narcotics criminals in the two decisions occurred because in the sentencing of the crime the judge saw from the evidence and evidence in the two decisions, so that in the sentencing of criminal offenses in the two decisions there was a disparity in the imposition of criminal penalties. different between the two decisions. The two factors that cause criminal disparities in the two decisions are that the judge in the decision considers mitigating and aggravating factors that are individual, different between one perpetrator and another (criminal individualization). The judge's considerations in imposing a sentence on the perpetrators of narcotics crimes are based on various things, namely: originating within the judge, originating from the law itself and the characteristics of the case in question and the severity of narcotic evidence.
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA JUAL BELI HAK ATAS TANAH YANG SERTIFIKAT KEPEMILIKANNYA BELUM DIBALIKNAMAKAN Tuti Kelana Sembiring; Telaga Analin
JURNAL SAKATO EKASAKTI LAW REVIEW Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review (April 2022)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, LPPM Universitas Ekasakti dan Dharma Indonesia Tercinta (DINASTI) Publisher Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (187.385 KB) | DOI: 10.31933/jselr.v1i1.541

Abstract

Sale and Purchase is an agreement in which the binding party submits an object and the other party pays the agreed price, as regulated in Article 1457 of the Civil Code. Buying and selling transactions are often disputed in court. As in the case of disputes over the sale of land rights whose certificates of ownership have not been improved, the names of objects in this study. This research is descriptive, with a normative juridical approach with the support of an empirical juridical approach. The data used are secondary data as main data and primary data as supporting data collected through library research and field studies with interview techniques. Results Based on research and discussion that the settlement of disputes over the sale of land rights for land whose ownership has not been renamed is carried out through a court session. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant (the seller) and the co-defendant (Office of ATR/BPN Padang City) for the land he had purchased, but the whereabouts of the defendant had not been changed. The plaintiff's claim was granted by the judge. Furthermore, the judge participated in the Defendant's ATR/BPN Office to transfer the name of the Certificate of Ownership to Land with No. 2475/Kelurahan Kuranji which is still registered in the name of the Seller (the Defendant) to the name of the Plaintiff without seeking approval from the defendant because of the verstek decision by the judge and also helping the defendant (Office of ATRBPN Padang City) to pay court fees.
PELAKSANAAN DAN BERAKHIRNYA GADAI TANAH HARTA PUSAKO TINGGI MASYARAKAT ADAT MINANGKABAU Iyah Faniyah; Della Monita
JURNAL SAKATO EKASAKTI LAW REVIEW Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review (April 2022)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, LPPM Universitas Ekasakti dan Dharma Indonesia Tercinta (DINASTI) Publisher Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (333.136 KB) | DOI: 10.31933/jselr.v1i1.542

Abstract

Pawn in Civil Law, regulated in Article 1150 of the Civil Code. Pawning is also regulated in customary law, such as the object of this paper's study, namely pawning the land of High Heritage in Nagari IV Koto Hilir, Batang Kapas District, Pesisir Selatan Regency. The implementation of Pawning for the Land of High Heritage in Nagari IV Koto Hilir was initiated by the pawning party conveying the desire to pawn the land, looking for the party who would receive the pledge, determining the amount of the pledged money, making a letter of agreement. This pawn agreement must be signed by the parties and there must be the signatures of the mamak, the head of the heirs of each party, and the head of the jorong. After the agreement letter is made and signed, the recipient of the pawn gives the loan money to the pawnbroker. The end of the process of pawning the land from the high pusako property is in accordance with what was agreed at the beginning of the agreement. If the pawnbroker has been able to pay the money he borrowed to the pawnee, then the agreement for the implementation of the high inheritance land in Nagari IV Koto Hilir ends. However, there are customary provisions that must be obeyed by the community who will return the land from the results of the Isalang-pisalang implementation, namely: a). If in the agreement the redemption period is determined, then before that period ends, the land owner must wait for the plants planted on the land that are the object of the pledge to be ready to be harvested by the recipient of the land pawn, b) If the land pawner is unable to pay the loan money until the time specified in the agreement letter, the land will remain in the possession of the pawnee until the land owner is able to pay the loan money, even though the pawned land is already one year old.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN INDIHOME AKIBAT TERJADINYA GANGGUAN JARINGAN INTERNET DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN Tuti Kelana Sembiring
JURNAL SAKATO EKASAKTI LAW REVIEW Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review (Agustus 2022)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, LPPM Universitas Ekasakti dan Dharma Indonesia Tercinta (DINASTI) Publisher Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (170.753 KB) | DOI: 10.31933/jselr.v1i2.639

Abstract

Advances in information technology make it easy for the public to be able to find all the information needed quickly. One of these telecommunications service providers is Plasa Telkom Indonesia. The use of this internet service does not always run smoothly as expected. Sometimes there are several factors that then interfere with the access to this internet service. Among them, the increasing number of users causes network disturbances, optical cable breaks, and other technical problems. This of course can harm consumers in the use of these services. Meanwhile, as a business actor, Plasa Telkom Indonesia must be responsible for providing good service to consumers. The specification of this research is descriptive by using normative empirical juridical method. The source of data in this study is secondary data. Secondary data were obtained through document studies and field research. The data collected were analyzed qualitatively and presented in a qualitative descriptive form. The results of the study show that the legal protection given to IndiHome consumers by Plasa Telkom as a business actor is preventive and repressive. This preventive protection is in the form of socialization and the use of standard clauses regarding subscription terms. Meanwhile, repressive protection is by conducting deliberation, providing compensation/compensation in accordance with the agreement of the parties and the compensation given by Plasa Telkom is usually not in the form of money, but in the form of benefits/services. Plasa Telkom's form of accountability to consumers is to implement a Service Level Guarantee, but in practice the Service Level Guarantee is not always given properly by Plasa Telkom.
PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN PEMINJAMAN DANA SECARA ONLINE PADA PERUSAHAAN FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY Bisma Putra Pratama; Susanti Sembiring
JURNAL SAKATO EKASAKTI LAW REVIEW Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review (Agustus 2022)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, LPPM Universitas Ekasakti dan Dharma Indonesia Tercinta (DINASTI) Publisher Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (187.817 KB) | DOI: 10.31933/jselr.v1i2.640

Abstract

Financial technology (fintech)-based companies are currently growing rapidly in Indonesia. Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection states that the terms of the agreement must be in line with the legal requirements of the agreement as regulated in Article 1320 BW in the reality of online-based (fintech) agreements. However, at the practical level, there is a standard clause containing an exoneration clause in the fintech agreement that has the potential to harm consumers. For this reason, the researcher raises the problem in this study, namely how to implement and/or violate Article 18 Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and whether the online agreement violates the provisions of Article 18 of Law Number 8 concerning Consumer Protection. The writing method of this research uses normative legal research, and uses a statutory approach, namely UUPK. The standard clause agreement can be seen in the electronic data-based loan agreement (fintech). In this case, it was made by the fintech business actor. And consumers/customers as the other party are harmed. Therefore, it is necessary to enforce consumer rights. The standard clause is actually allowed by the UUPK on the condition that it cannot include what is regulated in the UUPK. And a form of legal protection for consumers is that consumers can complain about the actions of business actors to the authorized institution, namely the Financial Services Authority (OJK) and business actors are subject to sanctions in the form of removing online-based media on the Google Play Store platform.
STRATEGI KOMUNIKASI PERSUASIF PENYANDANG DISABILITAS TUNAGRAHITA DALAM MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN INTERAKSI SOSIAL (SLB NUR RACHMAN LUBUK ALUNG) Syaiful Ardi; Indah Vionel
JURNAL SAKATO EKASAKTI LAW REVIEW Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review (Agustus 2022)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, LPPM Universitas Ekasakti dan Dharma Indonesia Tercinta (DINASTI) Publisher Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (418.342 KB) | DOI: 10.31933/jselr.v1i2.646

Abstract

Social interaction is an important thing for students to do in everyday life. However, mentally retarded children experience obstacles in interacting with their environment. SLB Nur Rachman is a school where children with disabilities study in the same class. The social interaction ability of mentally retarded children is able to increase with the help of effective persuasive communication strategies from the teacher. The results of this study found that the teacher's persuasive communication strategy to mentally retarded children in improving social interaction skills was carried out in 3 stages, namely planning, implementation, and evaluation. The first is the planning stage, so that persuasive communication can run according to the objectives, the planning of this communication strategy aims to set goals. media selection. The second is the implementation, the implementation of persuasive communication at SLB Nur Rachman delivering persuasive messages using the AIDDA communication stage model, where there are 5 stages, namely attention, interest, desire, decision, and action. The third is evaluation, at the evaluation stage of the persuasive communication strategy, it will be assessed and searched for whether there are social changes that occur during the persuasive process. In the implementation of communication, there are also supporting factors and inhibiting factors in the teacher's persuasive communication to children with intellectual disabilities.
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PEMBAKARAN YANG MENIMBULKAN BAHAYA BAGI ORANG LAIN (Analisis Putusan Nomor 581/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pdg dan Putusan Nomor 712/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pdg) J. Sam Miekhel; Susi Delmiati
JURNAL SAKATO EKASAKTI LAW REVIEW Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review (Agustus 2022)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, LPPM Universitas Ekasakti dan Dharma Indonesia Tercinta (DINASTI) Publisher Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (225.977 KB) | DOI: 10.31933/jselr.v1i2.698

Abstract

Tindak pidana pembakaran yang menimbulkan bahaya bagi orang lain diatur dalam Pasal 187 KUHP Buku Ke-2 Bab VII tentang kejahatan yang membahayakan keamanan umum bagi orang atau barang. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif yaitu suatu penelitian dengan menjabarkan dan menguraikan objek penelitian atau masalah yang diteliti. Objeknya adalah Putusan 581/Pid.B/ 2020/PN.PDG dan Putusan Nomor 712/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pdg. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif. Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Pemidanaan terhadap Tindak Pidana Pembakaran yang Menimbulkan Bahaya Bagi Orang Lain pada Putusan Nomor 581/Pid.B/2020/PN.PDG dan Pada Putusan Nomor 712/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pdg sudah merujuk pada pertimbangan yuridis dan non yuridis. Penerapan Pidana oleh Hakim terhadap Tindak Pidana Pembakaran yang Menimbulkan Bahaya Bagi Orang Lain pada Putusan Nomor 581/Pid.B/2020/PN.PDG hakim menjatuhkan putusan kepada terdalwa Novriadi panggilan Adi Bin Syafiii dengan pidana penjara selama 5 (lima) tahun sedangkan pada Putusan Nomor 712/Pid.B/2020/ PN.Pdg kepada terdakwa Nikman Sertius panggilan Nipe dengan pidana penjara selama 2 (dua) tahun.
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA SEPIHAK (Analisis Putusan Nomor 5/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020/PN.Pdg dan Putusan Nomor 32/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020/PN.Pdg) Afdal Novriadi; Neni Vesna Madjid
JURNAL SAKATO EKASAKTI LAW REVIEW Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review (Agustus 2022)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, LPPM Universitas Ekasakti dan Dharma Indonesia Tercinta (DINASTI) Publisher Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (216.854 KB) | DOI: 10.31933/jselr.v1i2.699

Abstract

Penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan kerja mengharuskan perundingan bipartit secara musyawarah untuk mufakat dilakukan terlebih dahulu dalam setiap perselisihan hubungan industrial sebelum diajukan kepada lembaga penyelesaian perselisihan sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial. Meskipun demikian kerap terjadi pemutusan hubungan kerja sepihak seperti dalam putusan Nomor 5/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020/PN.Pdg dan putusan Nomor 32/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020/PN.Pdg. Dari kedua putusan tersebut terdapat pertimbangan hakim yang memberikan putusan atas gugatan penggugat sebagai karyawan atas pemecatan oleh perusahaan. Hal ini menjadi penting untuk diteliti, sebab dalam setiap putusan pengadilan memiliki akibat hukum bagi para pihak.

Page 1 of 3 | Total Record : 22

 1   2   3 

Filter by Year

2022 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review (April 2023) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2022): Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review (Desember 2022) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review (Agustus 2022) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review (April 2022)