cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. ogan ilir,
Sumatera selatan
INDONESIA
Sriwijaya Law Review
Published by Universitas Sriwijaya
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Science, Social,
The Sriwijaya Law Review known as the SLRev launched on the 31st January 2017 and inaugurated formally by the Rector of the university is a forum which aims to provide a high-quality research and writing related to law. Areas that relevant to the scope of the journal cover: business law, criminal law, constitutional law, administrative law, and international law
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 11 Documents
Search results for , issue "Volume 7 Issue 2, July 2023" : 11 Documents clear
Criticising the Implementation of the ACTIP in Southeast Asia Belardo Prasetya Mega Jaya; Ridwan Ridwan; Rully Syahrul Mucharom; Dwi Edi Wibowo; Siti Nur Aisah; Sulastri Sulastri; Novia Bella Alifvia
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 7 Issue 2, July 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.2542.pp350-367

Abstract

The legal framework for ASEAN cooperation in combating the crime of trafficking in persons, particularly women and children, led to the establishment of the ASEAN Convention Against Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children (ACTIP). This convention recognises that trafficking constitutes a violation of human rights and a crime against human dignity. However, the implementation of ACTIP faces numerous challenges that require strategic solutions. This research aims to examine the implementation of the ACTIP policy concerning human trafficking, assess ASEAN's efforts in tackling trafficking in women and children in the Southeast Asian region, and criticise the implementation of ACTIP. The research adopts a descriptive-normative method. The ACTIP Convention regulates provisions for dealing with trafficking problems, both prevention and handling, which are the responsibility of the central and local governments as well as the community by establishing various task forces in the implementation of prevention and control of human trafficking that occurs. ASEAN has taken several steps in the fight against human trafficking. Many obstacles must be faced to eradicate the criminal act of trafficking in persons. So. it is necessary to take several actions in implementing the ACTIP. ASEAN Members must cooperate either bilaterally or multilaterally so that the ACTIP arrangement can be implemented effectively.
“Originalism” of Interpretation in the United States Constitution I Dewa Gede Palguna; Bima Kumara Dwi Atmaja
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 7 Issue 2, July 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.2134.pp190-208

Abstract

Originalism is a viewpoint that is one of the methods and theories of constitutional interpretation. It remains controversial in its application, particularly in the decisions of the United States Supreme Court. Originalism first held that the interpretation of the United States Constitution must follow the original intent of the constitutional drafters or those who ratified it. However, in the 1990s, this stance changed, namely that the interpretation of the Constitution must follow the original meaning of the constitutional text. The aim of this research is to understand the anti-mainstream concepts of originalism interpretation. The fundamental problem lies not to answer which one is better between originalist and non-originalist. Instead, it rather depends on how to use this approach in several cases. It is possible that in one case using an originalist approach will be more relevant and appropriate, while in another case it will be absurd, and it is happened in several decisions in the United States. The Normative legal research method was used in this research with five major approaches. Those are the statute, conceptual, historical, casuistry, and comparative approaches. The result of this study indicates that: first, originalism is a stance directly related to perspective on the issue of interpretation of the Constitution. Meanwhile, the interpretation of the Constitution itself is an attempt to understand the definitions contained in the Constitution and the objectives it aims to achieve. Second, reflecting on the practice in the United States, the originalism approach may be more relevant on some occasions. However, originalism will be absurd if applied on other occasions because society has changed so much. Therefore, in such circumstances, getting out of originalism is a necessity.
The State Administrative Decision-Making in the Adoption of Maslahah Mursallah Principle in Indonesia Efik Yusdiansyah
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 7 Issue 2, July 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.2557.pp287-299

Abstract

The development of State Administration Law is a prerequisite for constitutional development in realising good governance. From the perspective of national administration, administrative reform is a revision of several legal policies related to structure, process, and management in the areas of finance, supervision, staffing, accountability and transparency, and political decision-making processes and their implementation. Political decision-making process and its implementation. State administration reform also means reform in the field of state administration law. As one of the efforts to use the Islamic Law approach, one of which is the principle of maslahah mursalah, which prioritises the benefit of the people. So what if this principle is applied to policy making by State Administrative Officials. This study aims to determine the application of the principle of maslahah mursalah to State Administrative Decisions. The method used is normative legal research method, using deductive analysis method. It is hoped that the results of this research will be able to provide an overview of the role of the maslahah mursalah principle in efforts to realise State Administrative Decisions based on good values, as well as providing a sense of justice and prioritising benefits and avoiding mischief.
A Discourse on the Malaysian Geographical Indications Act Manique Cooray; Jia Chern Lee; Justin Johari Azman
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 7 Issue 2, July 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.2741.pp368-383

Abstract

The Malaysian Parliament approved three Bills on Intellectual Property rights. One of it is the Geographical Indications Bill 2021, repealing the Geographical Indications Act 2000 (the Old Act). The new Bill received royal assent on 16 March 2022 and came into operation on 18 March 2022, known as the Geographical Indications Act 2022 (the New Act). The revisions made in the New Act were essential to harmonise intellectual property standards in Malaysia and facilitate the country’s accession to the Marrakesh Treaty. These amendments ensure that Malaysia adheres to the World Trade Organization’s Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) and fulfils its obligations under the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). The purpose of this paper is to examine the salient features introduced by the provisions of the New Act and to examine how the enhanced provisions attempt to realign intellectual property standards in Malaysia concerning Malaysia's broader obligations under the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership which have come into effect in Malaysia on 18 March 2022. The methodology employed in this research is doctrinal, especially focusing on the interpretation and analysis of the statutory provisions. In light of the changes in the New Act, New Regulations and the New Guidelines, the paper concludes by forwarding several recommended best practices to be considered by registered proprietors in the country.
Relationship between the Obligations from the European Convention on Human Rights and the Accession to the European Union Harun Halilović
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 7 Issue 2, July 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.2502.pp209-227

Abstract

Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H) has difficulty integrating and moving closer to the goal of becoming a member of the European Union (EU). From the legal perspective, the main issue is the need to fulfil the accession criteria. The article aims to examine the relationship between the obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights and Basic Freedoms (ECHR) and the obligations related to the European Union (EU) accession process, with emphasis on Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H) as an EU membership candidate country. At first sight, those two obligations are separate. However, upon close examination, a strong link between those two obligations can be established using normative research with a historical approach, statute and case-based approach. On the other hand, the constitutional system of B&H has been described as discriminatory by numerous judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and, most prominently, by the Sejdic-Finci case. B&H has difficulties implementing those judgments. Implementing those judgments is also set as one of the requirements of EU accession. Even if the two obligations seem separate at first sight, the ECHR has a special position within the law of the EU and is especially important in the accession of new Member States, including B&H. The research results show a special position of the ECHR in EU law and a link between the obligations under the ECHR and EU accession.
Protection of Performers’ Rights in Indonesian Copyright Law: Copyrighted Works Uploaded to YouTube Yulia Yulia; Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol; Fatahillah F
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 7 Issue 2, July 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.1092.pp300-317

Abstract

The Beijing Treaty allows performers to benefit from using audiovisual fixation for commercial purposes. This treaty is the first treaty specifically to protect against the head of the show. Indonesia has ratified the Beijing Treaty in order to give protection to the performers. There are provisions that performers can maintain moral rights until death (but not after death) and until the end of economic rights and refuse all forms of distortion, excision and modification that damage the reputation of performers. This article analyses the protection of the rights of performers whose works were uploaded without permission to YouTube under Indonesian Copyright Law 2014. This research is normative juridical research with a conceptual and statutory approach. The result is that the show performers’ performance rights under the Beijing Agreement have been adopted in the 2014 Indonesian Copyright Act, even though there are some differences in defining the fixation and scope of the show rights to the fixed performance terms. The 2014 Indonesian Copyright Law has indefinitely maximised the protection of performers' moral rights. Moreover, the Indonesian Copyright Law 2014 Act No. 28 states that the rights of performers cannot be eliminated or cannot be removed for any reason, including their economic rights, such as a  right to carry out themselves, give permission, prohibit broadcast or communication the performance to other parties, come under by using online media. Therefore, when an illegal act such as uploading the performance of performers without permission violates Copyright Law, dan perpetrators can be sued.
Finding the Truth in A Virtual Courtroom: Criminal Trials in Indonesia during the COVID-19 Febby Mutiara Nelson; Intan Hendrawati; Rafiqa Qurrata A’yun
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 7 Issue 2, July 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.2465.pp228-243

Abstract

Video conferencing through video call platforms, such as Zoom and Google Meet, has become a useful option for judges holding criminal trials during the COVID-19 pandemic in many countries. This trend also occurred in Indonesia. Some judges believe that video conferencing technology will help them accomplish justice in an emergency, referring to the legal maxim 'salus populi suprema lex esto’ or ‘let the welfare of the people be the supreme law’. Although virtual trials assist courts in preventing the spread of the deadly virus, they have also affected the work of judges to reach the substantive truth. This paper examines the challenges concerning the rights of the accused and technological matters that have emerged under the use of virtual courtrooms and, in some ways, led to unfair trial procedures. We argue that the absence of laws that regulate virtual courtrooms, along with an outdated the Code of Criminal Procedure in Indonesia (KUHAP), can lead to miscarriages of justice. The arguments presented in this article are based on survey data conducted from December 2020 to January 2021. The respondents are judges from Indonesia's western, middle, and eastern regions who used video conference facilities for criminal court hearings during the COVID-19 outbreak of 2020-2021.
Enhancing Restorative Justice in Indonesia: Exploring Diversion Implementation for Effective Juvenile Delinquency Settlement Nashriana Nashriana; Desia Rakhma Banjarani; Marwin S Del Rosario; Vera Novianti
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 7 Issue 2, July 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.2427.pp318-334

Abstract

Indonesia’s juvenile delinquency is rapidly increasing in a high number every year. At the same time, restorative justice’s implementation through the diversion mechanism is ineffective. This circumstance indicates that efforts to enhance juvenile delinquency settlement are essential. Hence, this research elaborates on diversion challenges in settling cases involving juveniles in Indonesia. Moreover, it will analyse efforts to optimise diversion implementation in strengthening restorative justice in settling juvenile cases in Indonesia. This is normative research that uses a statutory approach and is described qualitatively. The research illustrates numerous obstacles in applying diversion during juvenile delinquency resolution in Indonesia. Amongst the difficulties are legal factors; law enforcer factors; factors of means or supporting facilities; societal factors, and cultural factors. These challenges incline the necessity to improve diversion applications in Indonesia’s juvenile delinquency. The effectiveness of diversion will contribute positively to the restorative justice system in Indonesia. Furthermore, optimising diversion is possible through reformulating regulation and prioritising prevention efforts to prevent juvenile delinquency from reaching litigation settlement.
In Search of Ummah Welfare Model: The Revitalisation of Sharia Economic Law in Indonesia Erie Hariyanto; Harisa Harisah; Moh. Hamzah; Fatekhul Mujib; Hidayatullah Hidayatullah; Cut Linda Marheni
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 7 Issue 2, July 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.1080.pp244-261

Abstract

Sharia economic law in Indonesia has been revitalised through legal unification and codification to improve national economic development. In this context, the Sharia economy has become a guideline in every transaction. Therefore, people must understand the Islamic economic concept to create maslahah (goodness) in every aspect of life. Sharia economic law is not a new system, as it has been implemented since the era of the Prophet. However, there is a need for adjustment in the implementation of the Sharia economic law from time to time to enable it responding the current development. This study employs qualitative inquiry, using library research to analyse Sharia economic law's history and legal development. Legal documents used include state laws and regulations, the regulations of the Bank of Indonesia, the fatwa of DSN-MUI, and others. This paper argues that the revitalisation of the Sharia economic law in Indonesia is in line with the efforts made by the predominantly Muslim population to conserve and develop the system. This includes non-legalised and legalised implementation of the Sharia economic system, such as Sharia banking. Furthermore, the system does not contradict the value of Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution’s pillars of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. Sharia economic law, prioritising moral and religious principles, has proven to create maslahah and become a solution to the economic crisis. This was shown by the survival of Sharia banks during the 1998 economic crisis, maintaining the Sharia-standardised contract to create justice in society.
The Paradox of Downstream Mining Industry Development in Indonesia: Analysis and Challenges Atik Krustiyati; Gita Venolita Valentina Gea
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 7 Issue 2, July 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.2734.pp335-349

Abstract

Development of downstream on the mining industry has been encouraged by the government of Indonesia these past years. With the increasing demand for nickel ore, the government focused on implementing downstream in this sector. Establishing an export ban and domestic processing requirement on nickel ore caused the EU to challenge Indonesia before the DSB WTO. In its report to the Panel, it was concluded that Indonesia had violated the provisions of GATT 1994. While it is understandable that Indonesia has absolute sovereignty over its natural resources, it is also bounded to international organisations and regulations, for it has expressed its consent. This paper aims to examine the analysis by the Panel on what caused Indonesia to decide as the losing party and how Indonesia would implement the development downstream in the middle of its sovereignty and obligations on an international level. Through a juridical normative method, it is concluded that Indonesia had failed to comply with the provisions of GATT 1994 that obliged it. It does not mean it has no sovereignty towards its natural resources, for it has agreed to be bound by the provisions. In order to exercise downstream development, it is recommended that Indonesia create national policies or regulations related to adhering to the provisions of the WTO. A cautious approach to governing the downstream may prevent potentially damaging disputes.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 11