Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
1.383
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Dialektika Jurnal Ilmiah Informatika Komputer Abjadia, International Journal of Education G-Tech : Jurnal Teknologi Terapan International Journal Of Science, Technology & Management (IJSTM) Al-Muyassar: Journal of Arabic Education Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis International Journal of Language and Ubiquitous Learning
Sulaiman, Agus
Unknown Affiliation
Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mechanical Engineering Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Dialektika

 1 
Argumentasi Saksi Ahli dalam Sidang Penistaan Agama oleh Basuki Tjahaja Purnama di Kepulauan Seribu Subuki, Makyun; Erowati, Rosida; Sulaiman, Agus
Dialektika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Vol 10, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Department of Indonesia Language and Literature Teaching, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/dialektika.v10i2.31595

Abstract

Ahok's controversial statements on the Thousand Islands seem not only led to massive and repeated demonstrations, but also linguistic debates in the courtroom. This study aims to examine the arguments of linguists who give statements in the courtroom in response to Ahok's statement. As a qualitative study using discourse analysis as a method of analysis, this study uses a critical argumentation approach developed by Walton (2002 and 2006) to examine how the argument was constructed and evaluate the quality of the argument. The analysis in this study indicates that the opinion of linguists presented by public prosecutors is often inconsistent and not based on adequate linguistic evidence, not only inconsistent with other expert statements, but also with his own statement as a scientist. Conversely, the linguist presented by Ahok's counsel is more consistent and more able to present linguistic evidence more adequately.
Co-Authors Abdul Muntaqim Al Anshory Asep Juarna Fianty, Melissa Indah Hasaniyah, Nur Johan, Monika Evelin Makyun Subuki Muhammad Hasyim, Muhammad Muklis, Fauzan Patry, Him Putra, Muhamad Calvin Syah Rosida Erowati Setiawan, Johan Susanto, Meitio Wibisono, Giovanni Wiratama, Jansen