Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : ISEJ

Development Of A Two-Tier Multiple Choice Question Assessment Instrument To Measure Students Science Process Skills On Acid-Base Material Meri Andaria; Hadiwinarto Hadiwinarto
ISEJ : Indonesian Science Education Journal Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): Januari 2023
Publisher : Yayasan Darussalam Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62159/isej.v4i1.141

Abstract

This development research aims to: 1) develop a two-tier multiple choice question assessment instrument that is able to measure the science process skills of high school students, 2) determine the feasibility of a two-tier multiple choice question assessment instrument to measure high school students' science process skills, 3) determine the response teachers regarding the two-tier multiple choice question assessment instrument applied in schools. This research uses the Borg and Gall procedure which has been reduced to 9 stages, namely: 1) preliminary stage, 2) planning stage, 3) initial product design development stage, 4) initial trial stage, 5) initial product revision stage, 6) field trial stage, 7) field trial product revision stage, 8) operational trial stage, 9) final product revision stage. The research was conducted at SMA N 1 Bengkulu and SMA N 2 Bengkulu in the 2014/2015 academic year. Data collection techniques were carried out through questionnaires, observation, and tests. The types of data obtained are qualitative and quantitative data. The effectiveness of the assessment instrument product was carried out by means of a mean difference test using a sample of two classes for each school. This test is to compare the scores of students in the experimental class using the two-tier multiple choice question assessment instrument and the control class using the multiple choice question assessment instrument. The results showed that: 1) a two-tier multiple choice question assessment instrument that was able to measure the science process skills of high school students was successfully developed through 9 stages of Borg and Gall. 2) The feasibility of the TTMCQ assessment instrument product is guaranteed through the content validity which is considered good by material experts, the construct validity is considered good by the assessment instrument expert, the validity of the items is good, the reliability is high, has a difficulty level with the proportion of 53% easy, 42% moderate, and 5% difficult, has sufficient distinguishing power with minimal interpretation, and has a good level of practicality, which means it is suitable for use in learning. 3) Teacher responses include that the teacher has never used questions in the form of two-tier multiple choice questions, the question form is good and neat, teachers are willing to reuse multilevel multiple choice questions on the grounds that this form of questions challenges students to improve science process skills.
Assessment Instruments of Learning Motivation and Science Learning Outcomes of Class V Elementary School Students Ahmad Walid; Hadiwinarto Hadiwinarto
ISEJ : Indonesian Science Education Journal Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): Januari 2021
Publisher : Yayasan Darussalam Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62159/isej.v2i1.156

Abstract

This research aims to evolve an instrument of learning motivation assessment and natural science learning outcomes. The development model used in this research was 4D, consists of define, design, develop, and disseminate. This study was only carried out until the develop stage. The subject of this research was a science learning evaluation instrument consisting of a grid, questionnaire sheet and a test of natural science learning outcome. Data collected using questionnaire and test methods. The data would be analyzed for the validity and reliability of each instrument. The average value 0.92 and 1 obtained from the results of the learning motivation assessment and learning outcome instrument validity analysis, which means that both of these assessment instruments have a very high validity. While the results of the learning motivation assessment instruments reliability analysis 0.86 and natural science learning outcome 0.87, which means that both of these instruments have a high level of reliability. From these results, it could be explained that the development of learning motivation assessment and natural science learning outcome instrument were feasible to be developed and used to make assessment of student.
Analysis Of The Quality Of Items for VIII Class IPA Teachers MTs.N I Kota Bengkulu Study Year 2019/2020 Raden Gamal Tamrin Kusumah; Hadiwinarto Hadiwinarto
ISEJ : Indonesian Science Education Journal Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): Januari 2021
Publisher : Yayasan Darussalam Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62159/isej.v2i1.158

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the validity, reliability, level of difficulty, differentiation power, and item distractors made by science subject teachers of class VIII MTs.N 1 Bengkulu, Academic Year 2019/2020. Samples were taken by saturated sampling technique. The instrument in this study was a daily test sheet made by a science subject teacher for grade VIII, which amounted to 20 multiple choice questions. Analysis of the construct validity of multiple choice questions in terms of material, construction and language is appropriate, there are several questions that still need to be improved in terms of construction. Analysis of the validity of the UH 1 items showed that 40% of the questions were valid; reliability of 0.76 means that it has high consistency; the difficulty level of the questions was 40% difficult, 55% moderate and 5% easy questions; difference power 45% bad, 35% sufficient and 20% good; 80% of cheaters are functional. At UH 2 60% of the questions are valid; reliability of 0.78 means it has high consistency; 35% for difficult questions and 65% for medium questions; difference power 30% bad, 45% sufficient and 25% good; 75% of cheaters are functioning.