Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL POLI-TEKNOLOGI

TINJAUAN VARIASI TEBAL GROUTING SIKADUR® 31 CF NORMAL Dan PANJANG PENYALURAN TERHADAP DAYA LEKAT BAJA TULANGAN PADA BETON MUTU NORMAL Anis Rosyidah; Gilang Maulid R; Efendi Yasin
Jurnal Poli-Teknologi Vol. 10 No. 1 (2011)
Publisher : Politeknik Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (386.744 KB) | DOI: 10.32722/pt.v10i1.435

Abstract

Abstract One of the requirements in reinforced concrete structures is the existence of bonding between reinforcement and concrete, so that if the concrete structure of the given load will not slip between reinforcing steel and concrete, with a condition for disbursement length and diameter sufficient reinforcement. This research was conducted with laboratory experimental methods, this study used threaded steel bars 10 mm in diameter grown on cylindrical concrete specimens with a length variation of normal quality distribution of 100 mm and 200 mm, and for thickness variation Sikadur® 31 CF Normal used a thickness variation mm, 2 mm, 3 mm. Each specimen is tested with a method of "bond, a pull-out test". Based on the results obtained from voltage variations thick adhesive Sikadur® 31 CF Normal, with thick sticky voltage Sikadur®31 CF Normal 2 mm produces voltage optimium closely with the value of 8.412 MPa,the adhesive stresses are found for the distribution of the required length of 182.860 mm for thickness variation Sikadur® 31 CF Normal 1 mm, 97.586 mm for thickness variation Sikadur® 31 CF Normal 2 mm, while for thickness variation Sikadur® 31 CF Normal 3 mm can not be calculated and analyzed the test results because of the "bond, a pull-out" no reinforcing steelreaches the yield condition, caused by broken concrete and reinforcing steel cylinder apart before reaching the yield condition. Then the length distribution obtained by the above formula Park & Paulay compared with the length distribution of article 14.2 of SNI 30-2847-2002 obtained epoxy ratio of 2:13 for the thickness of 2 mm with a planting of 100 mm. In the epoxy thickness 1 mm with 200 mm obtained planting 2:7 ratio, and the planting of monoliths obtained 2:5 ratio. Bold use of Sikadur® 31 CF Normal apparently affect the pattern of damage to the concrete and steel. When planting steel bars are too short we need a thicker epoxy, planting reinforcement 100 mm with a thickness of 3 mm epoxy. When planting longer needed a thinner epoxy, the planting of 200 mm reinforced epoxy with a thickness of 1 mm. Based on the pattern of damage that occurs, the thickness of epoxy should consider the quality of concrete used to prevent the destruction of the concrete. Keyword: grouting thickness, development length, bond stress.
Perkuatan Struktur pada Bangunan Rumah Tinggal 3 Lantai Anis Rosyidah; Rinawati Rinawati; Dimas Wiratenaya; Muhammad Amitabh Pattisia
Jurnal Poli-Teknologi Vol. 9 No. 1 (2010)
Publisher : Politeknik Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (628.169 KB) | DOI: 10.32722/pt.v9i1.480

Abstract

Abstract Design on building a less mature may result in failure of the building functions. It can be seen from the emergence of cracks in structural elements. To handle these problems, to prevent any malfunction or possible collapse of the building, it is necessary to strengthen or repair the structural elements that are considered damaged. Damage to the structure elements can be seen from the comparison between the existing calculation of structural elements with ideal calculations buildings. If the ideal calculation is greater than the existing calculation of the structural elements considered necessary improvements. There are several options for strengthening methods. But the selection of methods must be based on the needs, circumstances and budget for strengthening the field itself. In this project the planners combine two methods for strengthening, the concrete jacketing and inject column. In each of these methods has advantages and disadvantages of each is conditioned by the field. Because of this, then inject column be the first choice at this stage of the selection method, this is because the advantages of this method can reduce the force in the received by beam. If this method can not be done due to limited field conditions will be the second selection method that is concrete jacketing. In this method of structural elements can add the capacity of strength to restrain load factored. Until the choosing of the appropriate method. Keyword: concrete strengthening, concrete jacketing, inject column.