Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Sinkron : Jurnal dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika

AHP-SMART Method as Evaluation Decision Support for Employee Promotion Akmaludin Akmaludin; Adhi Dharma Suriyanto; Nandang Iriadi; Toni Sukendar; Budi Santoso
Sinkron : jurnal dan penelitian teknik informatika Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): Articles Research Volume 7 Issue 2, April 2022
Publisher : Politeknik Ganesha Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33395/sinkron.v7i1.11228

Abstract

Evaluation of the quality of employees in an institution is very necessary, especially for promotions which are the rights of every employee in leading a company that is full of competition. The purpose of this paper is to contribute in terms of the evaluation process in selecting employees who are ready to be promoted in a particular institution. With the support of various parties, a consistent and optimal method is needed to carry out the evaluation process, which is a popular priority, it is recommended to use the AHP-SMART method, where this method will be collaborated to become a core unit of problem solving, especially in terms of promotion as evaluation and selection material. Selection of the best employees, The AHP method will be used to conduct an assessment of the criteria used with the concept of Multi-criteria Decision Making (MCDM) which utilizes the results obtained from the eigenvector through iteration to minimize differences in the assessments of a number of respondents, while the SMART method is used to determine the results of decisions in collaboration with the AHP method, especially in terms of benefit utility and cost utility. The criteria used as an assessment measure consist of Planning, Solution Capture, Knowledge of Job, Reaction Behavior, Quantity of Works, Failed of Jobs, and Depandibility. The final result of the collaboration process of the two methods AHP and SMART gives a ranking of 26 employees with the highest score and being selected through an evaluation process for promotion won by K23 with a ranking weight (73.19) and the second is followed by K2 (76.17) and ranked the third was won by K3 (56.95). Thus the selection and evaluation process for promotion can be recommended and used as an optimal process from the selection stages of employee selection for promotion in every company agency.
Application of the AHP-ELECTRE Method for Selection OOP Based Apps Programs Akmaludin Akmaludin; Adhi Dharma Suriyanto; Nandang Iriadi; Budi Santoso; Bilal Abdul Wahid
Sinkron : jurnal dan penelitian teknik informatika Vol. 7 No. 4 (2022): Article Research: Volume 7 Number 4, October 2022
Publisher : Politeknik Ganesha Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33395/sinkron.v7i4.11370

Abstract

Object-based programming (OOP) has become a trend among programming language users, this is because many functions, procedures and techniques for using features are so widely available. By utilizing the advantages of these facilities, it is possible to provide convenience for programmers who use object-based programming languages. The purpose of this study is to provide an objective scoring system for a number of programming applications that have been made equipped with the assessment criteria. Assessment criteria that can be used for object-based apps programs with eleven criteria, namely Class structure, Inheritance, Encapsulation, Pollymorphys, Constructur, Accessor, Mutator, Visibility, Overriding, Overloading, and Price. With these many criteria, it provides a level of difficulty in choosing an object-based program application. To determine the appropriateness of an apps program, source testing will be carried out in the form of coding that has been previously constructed which affects the eleven predetermined measurement criteria. The assessment process recommends using the Electre method as a measure of the results of the calculation and ranking process. While determining the weight of the criteria using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. From the results of the assessment of 23 object-based apps programs, ranking assessments are based on aggregate dominant matrices as follows, the first rank with a weight of 22 as the largest weight is owned by 4 apps programss, namely AP16, AP17, AP18, and AP19. Based on the results of the ranking process, it can be said that the ELECTRE and AHP methods can be used as a selection process for object-based apps programs with optimal results.
Decision Support System for SmartPhone Selection with AHP-VIKOR Method Recommendations Akmaludin Akmaludin; Adhi Dharma Suriyanto; Nandang Iriadi; Budi Santoso; Toni Sukendar
Sinkron : jurnal dan penelitian teknik informatika Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): Research Article, Volume 8 Issue 2 April, 2023
Publisher : Politeknik Ganesha Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33395/sinkron.v8i2.11845

Abstract

Produce products that have various features and diverse functions, which are able to provide convenience with the reliability of their features and functions. The advantages possessed by SmartPhone become more confident for users to assess the level of product intelligence, the more trustworthy. The purpose of this research is to provide additional knowledge on the selection of SmartPhone to the user in having a product with various benefits. The more criteria that become a barometer, the more difficult it is to choose a product in the form of a SmartPhone. Thus, the right method is needed to perform the selection of the SmartPhone. There are several methods offered to carry out the selection process for SmartPhones, namely the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method combined with the VIKOR elimination method. Both of these methods are very supportive in the selection process with many types of criteria and their meanings against these criteria. A number of criteria that serve as a barometer for selecting object-based applications are Operating System, Processor, Internal Memory, External Memory, Back Camera, Front Camera, Battery, Cassing Model, Screen Size, Wight and Price. Of the eleven criteria have two different characteristics of understanding. The results of this study can be seen explicitly on the selection of SmartPhones through the acquisition of the smallest Qi index with the three highest ratings, namely the first ranked Samsung Galaxy A3 (0.00) the second is the Xiaomi Mi 4C with an index of 0.19, the third is the Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus with index 0.31. Thus it can be said that the collaboration of the AHP and VIKOR Elimination methods is able to provide optimal decision-making support.
Decision Making for the Best Hospital Evaluation Using the AHP-COPRAS Method Akmaludin Akmaludin; Adhi Dharma Suriyanto; Nandang Iriadi
Sinkron : jurnal dan penelitian teknik informatika Vol. 8 No. 4 (2023): Article Research Volume 8 Issue 4, October 2023
Publisher : Politeknik Ganesha Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33395/sinkron.v8i4.12313

Abstract

The assessment of the Hospital is very important in providing a rating as a measure of accreditation. Hospitals should provide the best service to visiting patients. The purpose of this study is to provide a ranking of hospitals that should be a measure of the appropriateness of a hospital as seen from a number of criteria as a true assessment. The criteria used as a barometer for the assessment consist of ten criteria, namely Administrative Services, Doctor Services, Pharmaceutical Installation Services, Cleanliness, Convenience, Security, Number of Administrative Personnel, Number of Pharmaceutical Personnel, Administrative Complaints, and Pharmacy Installation Complaints. The scoring system that will be applied uses the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method as a determinant of the weight of each criterion and the Fuzzy assessment uses the Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) method. The two methods will be collaborated as a determinant in the process of giving a rating system to the ten hospitals that are included in the priority assessment. The results obtained from the ranking process of the two AHP and COPRAS methods are seen from the acquisition of the utility value produced, the largest value obtained from the utility gives the best rating. The utility value is obtained from the total assessment of a number of criteria for each hospital and the largest utility rating does not exceed one. The highest value of the utility generated by the RS10 alternative with a utility scale of 0.098 as the best value.