Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Konflik Internal antara Bupati dan Wakil Bupati Aceh Besar Tahun 2019 Muhajir, Rahmad; Agustino, Leo; Muradi, Muradi
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), August
Publisher : Mahesa Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (348.377 KB) | DOI: 10.34007/jehss.v4i1.690

Abstract

The 2017 Aceh Besar Pilkada began with the people's desire for a new, better government in Aceh Besar, and in the end the candidate pairs of regents and vice regents namely Mawardi Ali and Tgk Husaini A Wahab won by winning 110,074 votes or winning with 57, 10 %. This victory was obtained from 18 sub-districts out of a total of 23 sub-districts, but after a year of serving as the Regent and his deputy, an internal conflict arose between the two. This research was conducted to dig deeper into the causes of the conflict, so that if possible, a resolution of this conflict could be obtained. The research method used is qualitative in which data is obtained through direct interviews with the two regional leaders (regent and deputy regent) and people who are in the vortex of the conflict. The results of this study indicate the conflict is due to differences in views between the two where the regent feels that his authority and work assignments are in accordance with their respective administrative positions. However, according to the deputy regent there is an agreement between the two that has not been fulfilled, resulting in conflict between the regent and deputy regent, but this conflict can be resolved properly through discussions or deliberations facilitated by a third party.
Evaluasi Formulasi Kebijakan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah Kabupaten Sumba Barat Lebu Gallu; Susanti Susanti; Leo Agustino
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), November
Publisher : Mahesa Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34007/jehss.v6i2.1933

Abstract

This article aims to evaluate the formulation of the Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBD) in West Sumba Regency, specifically during the fiscal year 2019/2020. The research focuses on the stages of APBD formulation, namely the drafting of APBD, the formulation of the General Budget Policy (KUA), the formulation of the Temporary Budget Ceiling (PPAS), the preparation of Regional Working Plans and Budgets of Regional Apparatus (RKA-SKPD), the verification of RKA-SKPD, and the enactment of the Regional Regulation on the APBD (Ranperda APBD). The qualitative method with a descriptive approach is used in this study. Data was collected through interviews and document studies. The Miles and Huberman data analysis method was employed. The findings indicate that, overall, the APBD formulation process adhered to the applicable legal provisions. However, several shortcomings were identified. Firstly, there were delays in the evaluation of the formulation. Secondly, many of the aspirations of the West Sumba community were not accommodated in the KUA during the APBD formulation. Thirdly, inconsistencies between Regional Medium-Term Development Plans (RKPD) and RKA SKPD were due to inadequate socialization during the preparation of RKA-SKPD. Fourthly, RKA-SKPD verification was hurried, impacting the effectiveness of the verification process. Finally, the West Sumba APBD Ranperda should have been socialized to the public before being ratified by the Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD), which was not carried out. These findings highlight the limited involvement of actors in the formulation of the West Sumba APBD due to the dominant role of the government in the formulation process. This contrasts with the policy network theory, which emphasizes the significance of involving various actors in decision-making to enhance the quality of decisions taken.