Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2019 - 2024

1.642

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

All Journal Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah LEGITIMASI: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman MAHKAMAH: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum PETITA: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah (PJKIHdS) SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Media Syari'ah: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Indonesian Journal of Shariah and Justice As-Siyadah: Jurnal Politik dan Hukum Tata Negara Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum

Dedy Sumardi

Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, Banda Aceh

Author-ID : 5962819

Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

1 2

HUDÛD DAN HAM: ARTIKULASI PENGGOLONGAN HUDÛD ABDULLAHI AHMED AN-NA’IM Dedy Sumardi
MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman Vol 35, No 2 (2011)
Publisher : State Islamic University North Sumatra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/miqot.v35i2.149

Abstrak:Hudûd adalah ancaman hukuman yang ditegaskan al-Qur’an dan Sunnah berdasarkan teori hukuman yang menganut aspek reformasi. Penggolonganhudûd ke dalam enam macam merupakan hasil ijtihad fukaha yang bersifat tekstual, dan nash sebagai sumber pengambilanhudûd masih diperdebatkan. Sehingga muncul reaksi pemikir hukum Islam Modern, terutama penerapan hukumanhudûd dalam konteks negara-bangsa berbenturan dengan prinsip penologis dan keuniversalan norma HAM. Tulisan ini mengkaji pemikiran an-Na’im dalam upaya menemukan kesesuaian antara syarî‘ah dan HAM. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan titik temunya adalah membatasi penerapan hudûd ke dalam empat jenis, sesuai dengan prinsip ayat Makkiyah yang mengandung nilai mashlahah terealisir dalam teori naskh.Abstract: Punishment and Human Rights: The Articulation of Abdullahi Ahmed an-Na’im’s Categorization of Hudûd. Hudûd is an offence for which punishment prescribed by the Qur’an and Sunnah based on the theory of punishment constituting reformation aspect. The classification of hudûd into six categories is the product of literal legal deduction of Islamic jurisprudents, and that the legal argument forhudûd is still debatable which lead to reactions of modern Islamic legal thinkers, especially on the application of hudûd in the context of those countries which are against penological principles and the universality of human right norms. This article studies the thoughts of an-Na’im in an attempt to seek confirmity between syarî‘ah. This research reveals that the meeting point between the two would be the restriction of the application of hudûd into four types, in line with the prinples of Meccan verses bearing public interest values realized in the theory of abrogation.Kata Kunci: hudûd, HAM, mashlahah

TRADISI PEMIKIRAN HUKUM ISLAM DINASTI TIMUR TENGAH Dedy Sumardi
Mahkamah : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Vol 1, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Artikel ini bertujuan menguraikan karakteristik pemikiran hukum Islam pada masa Dinasti Umayyah yang sarat dengan nuansa kedaerahan. Dominannya penguasa yang berasal dari suku Arab turut mempengaruhui sejumlah kebijakan terkait dengan perkembangan hukum Islam pada saat itu. Penggunaan riwayat sahabat diberlakukan sebagai rujukan utama dalam memutuskan hukum. Kebijakan ini sangat erat kaitannya dengan hubungan emosional dan geografis dengan tradisi ulama Hijaz yang masih memegang kuat hadis Nabi. Namun demikian, penguasa Dinasti Umayyah memberikan kewenangan berkreasi pada lembaga peradilan sebagai lembaga independensi yang berfungsi menjalankan putusan-putusan hukum yang berasal dari pendapat para tabi’in. Pendapat tabi’iin menjadi rujukan para hakim dalam memutskan perkara disamping mereka melakukan ijtihad melalui penalaran deduksi yang selanjutnya menjadi yurispridensi hukum Islam pada saat itu. The aim of this article is to describe the characteristics of Islamic legal thought during the Umayyad era laden with regional nuances. The dominance of rulers who came from Arab tribes also affect a number of policies related to the development of Islamic law at the time. The use of companions’ reports imposed as the main reference in the judgment. This policy is very closely related to the emotional and geographical ties with the tradition of Hijaz scholars who still holds strong traditions of the Prophet. However, the ruling Umayyads ruling authorizes the independence of the judiciary as an institution that functions execute decisions of law derived from the opinions of tabi'in. Tabi'in a reference opinion of the judges in deciding cases in addition to those doing ijtihad through deductive reasoning which subsequently became yurispridensi Islamic law at the time.

Islam, Pluralisme Hukum dan Refleksi Masyarakat Homogen Dedy Sumardi
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 50, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law - Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.2016.50.2.481-504

THE DISCOURCE OF DRESS CODE IN ISLAMIC LAW Rusjdi Ali Muhammad; Dedy Sumardi
PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH Vol 4 No 2 (2019)
Publisher : LKKI Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

The discussion concerning dress code or clothing will always be closely related to the debate of aurat or ‘awrah, as the clothing mainly serves to cover aurat. The ‘awrah (in Arabic) or aurat (in Bahasa) is the parts of the body which must be covered with clothing. The boundary of the aurat in the Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) study is associated with the prayer (salah), which is then ascribed to the boundary of the aurat beyond prayer, based on qiyas. The thinking framework of fuqaha’ (the expert in Islamic law) in their attempt to cover the aurat of Muslim men and women refers to common terms, such as hijab, jilbab, khimar, dir sabigh and milhaf. Even though these terms do not represent the standard form and model of dressing, they are adequate to reveal the restriction of dressing based on Islamic teaching (shariah). The absence of a standard formulation for the form and model of Islamic dressing indicates that Islamic teachings are flexible for the discovery of ideal forms and models of clothing adhering to religious norms, ethics and moral teachings. Clothing is part of the cultural product as well as religious and moral requirements without denying the custom of society. Abstrak: Pembahasan tentang busana/pakaian akan senantiasa terkait erat dengan pembahasan aurat, karena fungsi utama pakaian adalah sebagai penutup aurat. Batasan aurat dalam kajian fiqh Islam dikaitkan dengan ibadah shalat, yang kemudian diaplikasikan kepada batasan aurat di luar shalat, berdasarkan qiyas. Landasan berpikir yang digunakan fuqaha' dalam upaya menutup aurat laki-laki dan perempuan muslim merujuk pada istilah umum seperti hijab, jilbab, khimar, dir sabigh dan milhaf. Meskipun istilah-istilah ini belum mewakili bentuk dan model busana/pakaian yang baku, tetapi mampu mengungkap batasan makna busana/pakaian dalam ajaran Islam. Tidak adanya rumusan baku tentang bagaimana bentuk dan model busana/pakaian islami mengindikasikan bahwa ajaran Islam memberi keleluasaan dalam menemukan bentuk dan model pakaian ideal yang tetap mengacu pada norma-norma agama, etika dan ajaran moral. Pakaian merupakan bagian dari produk budaya sekaligus tuntunan agama dan moral tanpa menafikan adat kebiasaan suatu masyarakat. Kata Kunci: Pakaian, Aurat, Fiqh

Transition of Civil Law to Public Law: Integration of Modern Punishment Theory in Criminal Apostasy Dedy Sumardi; Mukhsin Nyak Umar; Ruslan Sangaji; Firdaus M Yunus; Rahmatul Akbar
AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol 22, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v22i1.26359

This paper aims to analyze the determination of death penalty in apostasy through modern criminal theories and human rights considerations. The approach is used to objectively view the purpose of death penalty on a criminal act in the context of religious freedom. This study is a conceptual study using the library research and descriptive-analytical approach. Based on the analysis of punishment theories, it is found that the determination of the death penalty in apostasy takes a combined pattern of punishment theories: retributive, deterrence, and reformative theories. The combination of these theories leads to an integration, as it does not focus only on the retributive and deterrence aspects, but it also emphasizes on the reformative aspect, as a means of therapy for apostate criminals so they will not repeat the same acts. The integration of the theories seems perfect when accompanied by moral education that can provide “spiritual enlightenment”, so that criminals can be accepted back into the community. The integrity-morality theory or pulse-integrity theory is expected to neutralize the difference in views on the purpose of punishment in Islamic criminal law, which has long been considered not in line with the norms of human rights under the pretext of the sovereign system of the nation-state, where citizenship status is limited by territorial areas. The equality of rights, justice, morality, and individual accountability is a universal principle of the teachings of the Qur’an which inspire the conception of human rights norms by every citizen.AbstrakArtikel ini menganalisis penetapan hukuman mati dalam pidana murtad menggunakan pendekatan teori pemidanaan dan pertimbangan hak asasi manusia. Pendekatan ini digunakan untuk melihat secara objektif tujuan ditetapkan hukuman mati sebagai perbuatan pidana dalam konteks kebebasan beragama. Studi ini merupakan kajian konseptual, dianalisis menggunakan data kepustakaan melalui pendekatan deskriptif-analitis. Berdasarkan analisis teori pemidanan ditemukan bahwa penetapan hukuman mati dalam pidana murtad mengambil pola perpaduan teori pemidanaan; teori retributif,deterrence dan reformatif. Perpaduan ketiga teori melahirkan integritas, tidak terfokus pada aspek retributif dan deterrence, tetapi lebih menekankan pada aspek reformatif, sebagai terapi pelaku kajahatan murtad agar tidak mengulangi perbuatan yang sama. Pengintegrasian ketiga teori ini terlihat sempurna manakala diiringi pendidikan moral yang dapat memberikan “pencerahan spiritual”, sehingga pelaku kejahatan dapat diterima kembali dalam kehidupan masyarakat. Teori integritas-moralitas atau teori integritas-plus diharapkan dapat menetralisir perbedaan pandangan tujuan pemidanaan Islam. Persamaan hak, keadilan, moralitas dan pertanggunjawaban individu merupakan prinsip universal ajaran al-Qur’an menjadi inspirasi lahirnya norma hak asasi manusia setiap warga negara.

LEGITIMASI PEMUNGUTAN JIZYAH DALAM ISLAM: OTORITAS AGAMA DAN PENGUASA Dedy Sumardi
Media Syari'ah Vol 15, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Sharia and Law Faculty

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/jms.v15i2.2051

Jizyah is obliged to Non Muslim ahl dhimmah status as a voluntary compensation for protection both internally and externally. The legitimacy of the poll voting procedures derived from sources "religious" is the Qur'an, Hadith, and ijma ', and not as a ruling authority. The state has the authority to set the revenue from jizyah limited to the issue of voting systems and mechanisms. In practice, the poll voting procedures has been a shift and change in patterns over time. At the time of the prophet., The hallmark of the collection is a simple poll. While on the leadership of Umar bin Khatab friend, poll voting authority granted to the province and is fully accountable to the central government. Results of voting poll distributed to all public sector priorities based on community needs that can not be financed by the proceeds of zakat.

MODEL PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WARIS DALAM MASYARAKAT ACEH Sayuthi Sayuthi; Dedy Sumardi
Indonesian Journal of Shariah and Justice Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, Program Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Ternate

This article analyzes the models of the application of the theory of the inheritance dispute resolution in Bireuen community, Aceh. The inheritance dispute resolution in Aceh is not always done through the litigation system, but can also be done through non-litigation channels. This study is limited to the practice of the application of the alternative dispute resolution theories that took place in Bireuen community, Aceh, and describes the tendency of the Bireuen community to choose to resolve the inheritance disputes through the gampoeng justice system. The field data collection was carried out by observing the practice of dispute resolution in the community, and in-depth interviews with village officials and the disputing parties. The results show that the Bireuen community, Aceh tends to use the theory of negotiation, conciliation and facilitation through the customary justice system, namely the gampoeng court and the mukim court. Both of the gampoeng justice systems prioritize peaceful efforts and ensure privacy between family members. This principle is a consideration for the Bireuen community, Aceh chooses to resolve the inheritance disputes following the customary justice system compared to the official state justice system as a characteristic of the modern justice system implemented by the nation state.

Restoratif Justice, Diversi dan Peradilan Anak Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 110/Puu-X/2012 Dedy Sumardi; Mansari Mansari; Maulana Fickry Albaba
Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Vol 11, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Islamic Criminal Law Department, Faculty of Sharia and Law, UIN Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/legitimasi.v11i2.16010

The Constitutional Court, by Decision No. 110/Law-X/2012, repealed Articles 96, 100, and 101 of Law No. 11 of 2012 on the Child Criminal Justice System, which establishes penalties for judges, prosecutors, and investigators who do not seek discrimination against children who face the law. These provisions have no more binding legal force for judges, police, and prosecutors who do not perform their duties. The study focuses on the implementation of diversity and the impact of child protection before and after the Constitutional Court rulings. The interview data is obtained from the Banda Aceh State Court, supported by library data, and analyzed using a juridico-empirical approach. Based on the analysis of the data, it was found that the execution of diversion in the Banda Aceh State Court before the birth of the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 110/PUU-X/2012 was in accordance with the regulations of the laws in force and was accompanied by the threat of criminal offenses. After the birth of the judgment of the Constitutional Court, the execution of differences is an obligation that must be carried out by the judge but is not accompanied by the threat of a criminal offense for a judge who does not perform it. The impact of the ruling of the Constitutional Court is that there is no criminal threat to the judge, JPU, and investigator because the Constitutional Court ruling has declared Articles 96, 100, and 101 to have no binding legal force. Nevertheless, the duty of diversification remains a duty that must be enforced by law enforcement.

The Implementation of Ta’zīr Punishment as an Educational Reinforcement in Islamic Law Muhammad Mawardi Djalaluddin; Bulqia Mas'ud; Dedy Sumardi; Isnawardatul Bararah; Kamus Kamus
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol 7, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/sjhk.v7i1.15101

This article aims to examine the application of ta’zīr punishment as a reinforcement of education in Islamic law. Humans are mulattoes or social beings who are related to one another, they cannot be separated from interactions with others. In order for this relationship to be in the corridor and frame of justice, Allah sent down rules in the form of orders and prohibitions. This study is a normative legal study using ushul fiqh theory and maslāhah theory. This study concludes that all commands and prohibitions contained in Islamic law are based on the Qur'an and the commands and prohibitions of the Prophet. which is formulated in fiqh, it will be seen that everything has a specific purpose, namely the benefit of mankind. If there is a violation of these rules, a penalty will be imposed, whether the punishment is in the form of ḥadd, qiṣaṣ or ta’zīr punishment. In addition to ḥadd, qiṣaṣ, kaffārah punishments, ta’zīr punishments are seen as punishments/sanctions that contain educational values because they aim to create a deterrent effect on the perpetrators and become a lesson for others not to commit similar violations. Therefore, this study argues that the imposition of punishment in Islamic law including ta’zīr contains beneficial values that educate humans and has a deterrent effect for perpetrators and for others.

Legal Pluralism within The Space of Sharia: Interlegality of Criminal Law Traditions in Aceh, Indonesia Dedy Sumardi; Ratno Lukito; Moch Nur Ichwan
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol 5, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/sjhk.v5i1.9303

This article aims to analyze various legal traditions working within the implementation of Islamic law after special autonomy in Aceh. Although Aceh's legal system follows the national legal system derived from civil law, diverse legal traditions still exist. The scope of this study is limited to the interaction of Aceh's legal traditions by taking the construction of juvenile and immoral criminal law and describing the social authorities who also operate the legal tradition to the parties in the case. This study presents the results using a case study model. Data obtained from interviews and documentation, analyzed using an interlegality approach. Based on the results of data analysis, it was found that the dialectic of legal traditions is determined by the role of actors acting as companions for victims to ensure that the rights of victims are not neglected. The traditions of Islamic law, customary law, and laws for protecting women and children are used interchangeably. The effort to combine these three legal traditions was carried out to obtain justice and guarantee the fulfillment of the victim's civil rights, such as the right to continue education, to relieve the trauma caused by the psychological pressure. The amalgamation of legal traditions in Aceh is an effective way to achieve justice for women and children and the construction of new laws to develop a national legal system that favors the interests of victims.

Co-Authors Azmil Umur Bulqia Mas'ud Difa Mutia Dara Firdaus M. Yunus Isnawardatul Bararah Kamus Kamus Lia Sahfitri Saraan Mansari Mansari Maulana Fickry Albaba Moch Nur Ichwan Muhammad Habibi MZ Muhammad Mawardi Djalaluddin Muhammad Yusuf Mukhsin Nyak Umar Rahmatul Akbar Ratno Lukito Rusjdi Ali Muhammad Ruslan Sangaji Sayuthi Sayuthi

Title

Found 14 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 14 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 14 Documents
Search