Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
2.978
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SUPREMASI: Jurnal Pemikiran, Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, Hukum dan Pengajarannya Jurnal Tomalebbi Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Phinisi Integration Review Jurnal Office Seminar Nasional Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Ash-Shahabah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam IPTEK: Jurnal Hasil Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Panrita Inovasi: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian LP2M UNM PEDAMAS (Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat)
Wahyudi Gani, Andika
Fakultas Ilmu Sosial, Universitas Negeri Makassar
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemistry Computer Science & IT Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM

 1 
Unifikasi Hukum Nasional Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berlatar Belakang Hukum Adat Andika Wahyudi Gani; Muhammad Takbir
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 27 No. 1: JANUARI 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss1.art6

Abstract

This research describes the form of unification of national law on legal plurality in Indonesia. This is a case study research conducted in two regions in South Sulawesi, namely Jeneponto and Gowa Regencies. The aim is to investigate the unequal legal relations between positivistic national law and customary law. The methods used Werner Menski socio-legal approach and legislation approach. The results of this study are, first, law enforcers, in this case the Public Prosecutor and the Panel of Judges, in deciding cases only refer entirely to the law while ignoring customary law. On the other hand the defendant believes instead that his actions to be the right actions and should not be regretted based on his customary law. This is because of its position as a community law enforcer. Second, national law stands very dominant from other laws, especially customary law.
Co-Authors Al Hamzir Aqbar Andi Sadriani Asmunandar Asmunandar Asriati Bakhtiar Bakhtiar Darman Manda Manda Dewi Ratnasari Dr. Bakhtiar Bakhtiar Dyan Paramitha Darmayanti Hamsu Abdul Gani Hamsu Abdul Gani Hasnawi Haris Husnayaini Husnayaini Imam Suyitno Jamil Resa Jumardi Jumardi Masni Masni Masni Maya Kasmita Mudrikah Mudrikah Muhammad Akbal Muhammad Asriadi Muhammad Luthfi Siraj muhammad qasash hasyim Mustari Mustari Nur Haera Nurharsyah Khaer Hanafi Rahim, Abd S, Muh. Rizal Sirajuddin Saleh Siti Nur Rahmayanti Siti Syarifah Wafiqah Wardah St. Syarifah Wafikah Suci Rahmadani Suhardi Syarifuddin Syarifuddin Tri Angriawan Tri Angriawan Yusi Irensi Seppa