cover
Contact Name
Ridwan Arifin
Contact Email
ulj.journal@mail.unnes.ac.id
Phone
+6281225294499
Journal Mail Official
ulj.journal@mail.unnes.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Kampus Timur, Gedung K, Kampus Sekaran Gunungpati, Semarang
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Unnes Law Journal
ISSN : 22526536     EISSN : 27224503     DOI : https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj
Core Subject : Social,
Unnes Law Journal (Unnes L.J.) is a double-blind peer-reviewed legal journal (ISSN Print 2252-6536 ISSN Online 2722-4503) publishes research and review papers concerning to Legal Studies. Unnes L.J. published biannually by the Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang on April & October. Focus and Scope of Unnes L.J. are concerning (but are not limited to): Criminal Law, Private Law, Administrative Law, International Law, Procedure Law, Tax Law, Customary Law, Islamic Law, Environmental Law, State Administrative Law, Law Land, Insurance Law, Law and Human Rights, Politics of Law, Sociology of Law, Anthropology of Law, Philosophy of Law, Agrarian Law, Forestry Law, Law of the Seas, Ocean Law, Climate Change Law, Maritime Law, Diplomatic Law, Humanitarian Law, Special Criminal Law, Economic Law, Business Law, Consumer Protection Law, Intellectual Property Rights Law, Capital Market Law, Comparative Law, Regional Financial Law, Regional Autonomy Law, Sharia Economic Law, Health Law, Law and Society, Law and Forensics, Criminology, Victimology, Penitentiary Law, Law and Technology, Law and Gender Studies, and other related issues on Law in broader aspects (including Social, Economic, Politic, Security, Education, and Culture).
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 241 Documents
Pelaksanaan Pemberian Remisi Terhadap Narapidana Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Klas I Semarang Wibowo, Dimas Hario
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 2 No 1 (2013): Unnes L.J. (April, 2013)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (352.475 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v2i1.2898

Abstract

The purpose of this study to determine the perceptions of law enforcement against remissions for corruption convicts, and to investigate how the efforts of Class I Semarang Prison in effecting remission. In writing this paper, the problem is: (1) How do perceptions of law enforcement in granting remissions for corruption convicts? (2) efforts - efforts that are being undertaken by Corrections Corporation of Class I Semarang in effecting remissions? This research uses a sociological approach to the study of law juridical associated legal aspects and regulations - laws and regulations are then linked to the fact that occur in the community. The results of research on the perception of law enforcement to remissions for corruption convicts that law enforcement has a different perception - different, law enforcement agree on tightening requirements remissions for corruption convicts on the grounds of corruption, including in particular criminal group. Regarding Penitentiary efforts in effecting remission for prisoners, granting remissions for corruption convicts have a direct impact to the behavior and attitudes. These impacts include inmates become a better person and have a passion to get back into society. Conclusions from this research is the perception of law enforcement is different - different regarding remissions for corruption convicts. Prosecutors and judges agree on remissions for corruption convicts while police disagree. Law enforcement agencies agree on tightening remissions for corruption convicts. Efforts are made of Class I Semarang Prison in an effort to streamline the provision of remission for prisoners have a positive impact on inmates during their formation in Class I Semarang Prison
Kebijakan Formulasi Pidana Bagi Korporasi Yang Tidak Membayar Denda dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Bryantonio, Maulana
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 2 No 1 (2013): Unnes L.J. (April, 2013)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (338.325 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v2i1.2900

Abstract

This research aims to find out and analyze criminal regulation and policy formulation forward criminal for corporations that did not pay the fines in criminal acts of corruption. This research is the juridical normative legal research. The methods used in the collection of legal materials is the study of librarianship and documents. Legal material has been collected and then analyzed using descriptive reasoning methods. The result of this research is 1) the constitution of corruption currently don't control what that means of employment relation and relation to another as well as criminal sanctions alternatif other than criminal penalties for corporate if a fine not paid by corporations, 2) the policy criminal forward for corporate who is not paying a fine in corruption arranged in the concept of KUHP 2012 article 82 and article 85. Conclusions that can be drawn in this thesis is the absence of a guideline and a regulation that is clear about sanctions a criminal offense for corporate who is not paying the sanction, in the constitution corruption eradication, whereas sanction a criminal offense for corporate who is not paying the sanction, is set in the concept of KUHP 2012 article 82 and article 85.
Urgensi Penunjukan Pejabat Pengelola Informasi dan Dokumentasi Badan Publik di Kota Semarang Warisno, Fitriana Riscadewi
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 2 No 1 (2013): Unnes L.J. (April, 2013)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (358.707 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v2i1.2901

Abstract

The right to obtain information as mandated by Article 28F of the 1945. Constitution has not been implemented to full potential itself, it’s indicated by some difficulty from the public to access public information because PPID has not been appointed in public agency. Appointment of PPID is mandatory for all public agencies which outlined in Government Regulation No. 61 on 2010 about the Implementation of Law No. 14 of 2008 that mention about the transparency of Public Information. The problem in this research is how the urgency of the appointment of PPID and the constraints of PPID appointment on public agency in the city of Semarang. The purpose of this research was to describe the urgency as well as find any obstacles in the appointment of PPID. This research used qualitative research methods to analyze the data and the author used the stages of data collection, data reduction, data presentation and conclusion or verification. The results showed that in the city of Semarang, there are two factors urgency on PPID appointment, namely urgency normative and sociological importance. Urgency normative forms a pressure laws and urgency sociological form a community needs for information. There are obstacles during this appointment of PPID such a internal constraints which derived from the public agency in the form of a closed culture, bad bureaucracy and lack the capacity to PPID. The external constraints coming from public information users who do not understand the function of PPID. These obstacles can be overcome by using a model of management in the form of Socialization and Training (PPID / public agencies and the public itself), Community Assistance and the Threat of Disputable Information.
Peradilan In Absentia Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Perspektif HAM Terdakwa Harianja, Suriady
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 2 No 1 (2013): Unnes L.J. (April, 2013)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (356.262 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v2i1.2903

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to know and understand the basic idea of the application of trial in absentia in the case of the Corruption, and to know the trial in absentia in the case of the Corruption and human rights relation to the defendant. In this writing, the type of research that was used normative legal research collection of legal materials used are literature research. The results of this research are: (1) the basic idea of the application of trial in absentia in the case of corruption is that it allows the examination in the trial because the defendant intentionally absent the trial, so that will have law certainty of the evidence relating to the case which examined the state assets, in order to save the State financial in the public interest. (2) the administration of justice in absentia on corruption cases essentially violating human rights, but by using the principle of derogation from the rights of the defendant as stated in Act Number 8 of 1981 on Code of Criminal Procedure (Criminal Code/KUHAP) and other regulatory legislation in Indonesia and international documents on human rights, can be delayed fulfillment (derogable rights). The conclusions of this research are: (1) the application of the basic ideas trial in absentia in the case of Corruption for the benefit of the country's financial rescue. (2) by using the principle of derogation from the rights set forth in the Code of Criminal Procedure the defendant may be delayed fulfillment of public interest.
Pelaksanaan Pembimbingan dan Pengawasan Anak Pada Pidana Bersyarat Kholiq, Abdul
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 2 No 1 (2013): Unnes L.J. (April, 2013)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (280.004 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v2i1.2904

Abstract

Conditional punishment is a form of punishment that does not result in the deprivation of the rights from convicted person. In the juvenile justice system are different from adults. The purpose of this research is to know and understand the parole (conditional punishment) comparison of the Criminal Code, Act No. 3 of 1997, Criminal Law Concept of 2012 and Act No. 11 of 2012, as well as knowing how to transform and guiding the implementation and supervision of children in the parole (conditional punishment) conducted by Correctional Center Class I of Semarang and Prosecution Counsel of Semarang. This study uses sociological juridical approach (non-doctrinal) with data collection including interviews, literature study and documents study. The results of comparative of conditional punishment on some categories of comparison inclue the following : the sentencing limitation, general conditions, special requirements, lenght of trial, officials who helped the conditional punishment execution and implementation of education. Implementation guidance and supervision of children who undergo conditional punishment by Correctional Center Class I of Semarang and Prosecution Counsel of Semarang has not been implemented optimally considering coaching (guidance) do not have a standardized system of supervision and monitoring intergrated regulated in legislations and infrastructure constraints faced community supervising officer. The supervision to the convicted person only the implementation of a administrative is required to report row (child) by using the form P-51 as the card control must report to the prosecutor. Summary in this research i.e. basically the guidance and supervision of the implementation of compliance in the Act No. 3 of 1997, but it should be underscored diaris in practice there are still some obstacles and barriers that occur such as limited personnel and limited operational budgets.
Perluasan Kompetensi PTUN dalam Mengadili Sengketa Informasi Publik Naelufar, Riscan
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 2 No 1 (2013): Unnes L.J. (April, 2013)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (282.855 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v2i1.2905

Abstract

Dispute public information (SIP) is a dispute between public agencies and users of public information relating to the right to obtain and use information based on legislation (Article 1 paragraph (5) Act No.14 of 2008 on KIP). With the enactment of Act No.14 of 2008 on KIP then the rising powers in the administrative court judge SIP. Problems were taken in this study is (1). How does the settlement process SIP Information Commission (2). How SIP Settlement Process in the Administrative Court (3). Ideal model to resolve SIP. This research Qualitative Deskripsif normative juridical approach to the type and validity of the data using triangulation techniques. The results showed that the process of finalizing the SIP through the Commission resolved a lot of information with non-litigation mediation than in adjudication, but related to non-litigation adjudication in the proposed appeal to the administrative court in the administrative court can be solved by using the Supreme Court Regulation No.2 of 2011 as procedural law. In connection with the completion of the SIP through both institutions komparasikan then the next will be to find a model or an ideal policy to resolve SIP and looking for a rule of law relating to legal ambiguity contained in Act No.14 of 2008 vis-à-vis the Supreme Court Regulation No.2 of 2011.
Potensi Penerapan Weekend Detention di Indonesia Sebagai Upaya Percepatan Resosialisasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Napitupulu, Tigor Hamonangan
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 2 No 1 (2013): Unnes L.J. (April, 2013)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (341.37 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v2i1.2907

Abstract

This study aims to determine the existence of weekend detention in prison and possible implementation and formulation of weekend detention in pidana permasalahan law reforms that were examined in this study werein this study the authors used research methods normative juridical approach to legislation, concepts, philosophies, perbandingan. For analyzing the data, researchers used descriptive analysis or presentation with an overview of the subject and object of research as research that has been didapatkan. Result research shows that in practice in prison with no coaching model of weekend detention. But in Indonesia has a program of assimilation regulated in Law Number 12 Year 1995 concerning Correctional further stipulated by Government Regulation No. 28 Year 2006 on Amendment to Government Regulation No. 32 Year 1999 on Terms and Procedures for Implementation of the Rights of prisoners, which basically resemble weekend Detenion system, only assimilationapplied to all inmates eligible administrative and substantive weekend detention while expressly formulated to be applied to all inmates who were threatened with a period of time corresponding provisions of existing law.
SENGKETA KAWASAN HUTAN LINDUNG ANTARA PERHUTANI DENGAN MASYARAKAT DESA KEMLOKO KECAMATAN TEMBARAK KABUPATEN TEMANGGUNG Koesoema, Asteris Melisa
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 3 No 1 (2014): Unnes L.J. (April, 2014)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (276.368 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v3i1.3628

Abstract

Penetapan status kawasan hutan Petak 23 KPH Kedu Utara seluas ± 141 hektar sebagai hutan lindung masih menjadi pro kontra di masyarakat sekitar kawasan tersebut. Masyarakat setempat mengklaim bahwa lahan kawasan hutan lidung tersebut merupakan lahan yang diperoleh secara turun temurun dari warisan nenek moyang mereka. Meski sudah ada Putusan MA, namun masih tetap terdapat kendala dalam pelaksanaannya. Latar belakang inilah yang membuat penulis tertarik untuk mengkaji tentang sengketa kawasan hutan lindung Petak 23 KPH Kedu Utara antara Perhutani dengan masyarakat Desa Kemloko Kecamatan Tembarak Kabupaten Temanggung. Berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan penulis mengenai sengketa kawasan hutan lindung Petak 23 KPH Kedu Utara antara Perhutani dengan masyarakat Desa Kemloko. Faktor yang melatar belakangi masyarakat tidak dapat menerima putusan MA, yaitu: masih adanya  klaim dari masyarakat mengenai kepemilikan lahan di kawasan hutan lindung tersebut, adanya faktor ekonomi yang disebabkan karena tingginya tingkat kebutuhan masyarakat akan tanah, dan adanya anggapan masyarakat setempat tentang pengelolaan kawasan hutan lindung dengan cara mereka merupakan tindakan yang merusak hutan. Upaya Perhutani dalam pelaksanaan putusan MA di kawasan hutan lindung Petak 23 KPH Kedu Utara adalah mengadakan sosialisasi, pemberdayaan masyarakat setempat, serta melakukan monitoring dan evaluasi. Sedangkan hambatan yang dialami Perhutani dalam upaya pelaksanaan putusan MA di kawasan hutan lindung Petak 23 KPH Kedu Utara yakni lemahnya pemahaman masyarakat, dan adanya stigma buruk mengenai Perhutani.  Determination of the status of forest plots 23 KPH North Kedu of ± 141 acres as protected forests still be pros and cons in communities around the region. Local people claim that the land is a an area of protected forests land acquired for generations of their heritage. Although there have been the Supreme Court ruling, but still there are problems in implementation . It is necessary to research conducted by the authors to examine the disputed area of protected forests of plots 23 KPH North Kedu between Perhutani with villagers Kemloko Tembarak District of Temanggung County. Based on the result of research by the author of the disputed area of ​​protected forests of plots 23 KPH North Kedu between Perhutani with Kemloko villagers, it is known that the factors underlying the background factors people can not accept the Supreme Court ruling, there are: the persistence of the claims of the public regarding land ownership in the region the protected forests, the existence of economic factors caused by the high level of community need for land, and the notion of local communities on forest management protected by the way they are not acts that destroy the forest. Perhutani efforts in the implementation of the Supreme Court ruling in the protected forests of plots 23 KPH North Kedu is the socialization, empowerment of local communities, as well as monitoring and evaluation. While the barriers experienced in the implementation of forestry the Supreme Court ruling in the ​​protected forest of plots 23 KPH North Kedu the lack of the public understanding, and the bad stigma about Perhutani
TINJAUAN YURIDIS SOSIOLOGIS TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN DIVERSI BAGI ANAK DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK Harahap, Halim Palindungan
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 3 No 1 (2014): Unnes L.J. (April, 2014)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (289.593 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v3i1.3629

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menemukan ide dasar kebijkan diversi dalam Undang-undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, mendeskripsikan budaya hukum masyarakat Indonesia sebagai latar sosial kebijakan diversi dalam Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, dan mengetahui penerimaan aparat penegak hukum serta masyarakat terhadap kebijakan diversi di Kabupaten Semarang.Metode penelitian menggunakan penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis sosiologis. Hasil penelitian yaitu ide dasar lahirnya kebijakan diversi dalam Undang-undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak yang berdasar konsideran atau pertimbangan dalam Undang-undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dan penjelasan dalam Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Nilai-nilai kearifan lokal masyarakat Indonesia yang memiliki kehendak atas perdamaian, menghargai kebersamaan dan sifat kekeluargaan dalam penyelesaian suatu sengketa atau perkara. Penerimaan kebijakan diversi di kabupaten Semarang oleh aparat penegak hukum dan masyarakat telah mencerminkan apa yang menjadi kehendak mereka dalam menyelesaikan kasus pidana anak dengan penerapan kebijakan yang mengarah pada diversi. Simpulan penelitian menunjukkan adanya keselarasan pola penyelesaian kasus pidana anak yang diselesaikan di luar jalur peradilan dengan kebijakan diversi yang ada dalam Undang-undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.  This study aims to find the basic idea of diversion policies in Act children criminal justice system, describe the legal culture of Indonesia society as social background diversion policies in Act No.11 of 2012 on the criminal justice system children, and knowing acceptance of law enforcement officers and the public policy of diversion in Semarang district. Research using qualitative research methods with socio-juridical approach. The results ofthe research that is the basic idea of​​ the birth of diversion policies in Act Children Criminal Justice System is based on considerations or considerations under the Act and the Criminal Justice System Children manuscript annotations in Academic Bill Children Criminal Justice System. The values ​​of indigenous people of Indonesia who have the will for peace, appreciate the nature of togetherness and family in the settlement of a dispute or law suit. Acceptance of diversion policies in Semarang district by law enforcement officials and the public have reflected what they will be in solving criminal cases children with policies that lead to diversion. Conclusion The study showed apattern of alignment settlement juvenile criminal cases are settled out o fcourt with a lane diversion of existingpoliciesin Act Children Criminal Justice System.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS MENGENAI KAWIN KONTRAK SERTA AKIBAT HUKUMNYA TERHADAP ISTRI DAN ANAKNYA Afifi, Ibnu Fiyan
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 3 No 1 (2014): Unnes L.J. (April, 2014)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (323.942 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v3i1.3630

Abstract

Perkawinan sejatinya untuk membentuk keluarga yang bahagia dunia akhirat berdasarkan ketuhanan, namun seringkali ada pihak – pihak yang menjadikan perkawinan yang luhur ini sebagai kontrak biasa.Kawin kontrak tersebut dilakukan dalam waktu beberapa tahun,dan ketika pelaksanaan kawin kontrak tersebut berlangsung lahir seorang anak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tinjauan yuridis Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan Hukum Islam mengenai kawin kontrak dan bagaimana Akibat hukumnya terhadap anak dan istri. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, dimana dalam penelitian ini menggunkan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Metode pengumpulan data menggunakan studi kepustakaan sehingga dalam analisis data nantinya akan lebih konkret dalam menjawab masalah yang ada. Hasil dari penelitian serta simpulan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Undang–Undang Nomor 1 tahun 1974 tentang Perkawainan tidak mengatur mengenai kawin kontrak yang ada, serta Hukum Islam baik KHI atau sabda Rasul juga melarang yang kawin kontrak meskipun golongan syi’ah  menyatakan bahwa kawin kontrak diperbolehkan. Akibat hukum yang diperoleh adalah : a) bagi istri mengenai status perkawinan yaitu perkawinan tersebut tidak diakui oleh negara karena negara tidak mengatur kawin kontrak, istri hanya memperoleh status sosial dan ekonomi. Mengenai harta bersama karena kawin kontrak tidak diakui maka mengenai harta bersama Pasal 35 Undang – Undang Perkawinan juga tidak bisa dituntut.b) bagi anak   dengan berdasar Pasal 42, 43 Ayat 1 mengenai kedudukan anak, anak hanya mempunyai hubungan perdata dengan ibunya saja, anak tidak mempunyai hubungan saling mewarisi dengan bapaknya,karena anak kawin kontrak dianggap anak luar kawin yang tidak diakui. Kemudian mengenai harta dan wali, anak kawin kontrak juga tidak bisa menuntut apa – apa dari bapaknya.  Wedding of the truth is to create a happy family based on divine eternity, but often there are those - the making of a noble marriage as ordinary contracts. Wedding contract is done in the next few years, and during mating performance of the contract last birth of a child. This study aims to find out the opinions juridical Act No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage and the Law of Islam on the wedding contract and how the consequences of the ruling on the children and wife. This study used a normative method, which in this study use the approach of legislation and approach the concept. Methods of data collection using library research so that the analysis of data will be more concrete in answering the the problem. The results of the study and this study shows that knot: 1) Act No. 1 of 1974 on Weding not arrange the wedding contract available, as well as good KHI or Islamic law also prohibits the words of the Prophet married name despite the contract stating that the ring contract allowed. 2) obtained as a result of the law are: a) the wife of the marital status of the marriage that is not recognized by the state because the state does not regulate mating contract, the wife had only social and economic status. On the common property shall not be recognized as married contract then the property with Article 35 of Law - Law Marriage can not be claimed. b) for children with based on Article 42, verse 1 of the 43 children, only to have a civil relationship with her alone, children have no contact with each other to inherit his father, because his contract is considered child marries outside the ring which is not recognized. Then the property and guardian, the child can not marry contract claims - anything from father.

Page 3 of 25 | Total Record : 241