cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Buletin Peternakan
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : 01264400     EISSN : 2407876X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak
Core Subject : Health, Education,
Veterinary Other
Bulletin of Animal Science is published every four months. The Annual subscription rate is Rp. 150.000,-/year. Bulletin receives original papers in animal science and technology which are not published at any other journals.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 44, No 3 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (3) AUGUST 2020" : 10 Documents clear
Effect of Bay Leaf Infusion on Microbiological, Chemical and Physical Quality of Chicken Meat Edi Suryanto; Yuny Erwanto; Sylvie Astuti
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 3 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (3) AUGUST 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i3.36507

Abstract

Contamination that decreased chicken meat quality could be prevented using natural preservatives. Bay leaves (Syzygium polyanthum) contain volatile fatty acids, tannin, and flavonoid that possess bacteriological and fungicidal activity as well as preventing bacterial spore growth. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of fresh bay leaf infusion on microbiological, chemical, and physical qualities of chicken meat. This study used bay leaves, water, chicken meat, eight strain of bacteria, chemicals and materials for the analysis of chicken meat. The experiment consisted of two steps, the first was the antibacterial properties of bay leaves and the second was the application of bay leaf infusion for chicken meat. Eight bacteria was used for the bacterial inhibition of bay leaf at the concentration of 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20%. The experiment on antibacterial properties of bay leaf (Syzygium polyanthum) used one way randomized design with five concentration treatments, while the application of bay leaf infusions on chicken meat using factorial completely randomized design 2x5 (2 types of soaking and 5 observation time). At the second step, chicken meat was divided into 2 groups, the first group was soaked in water only and the second group was soaked in 15% bay leaf infusion. They were then stored for 0 (control), 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours at the room temperature. Each treatment was repeated four times. The microbiological, chemical, physical qualities of chicken meat were observed. The results showed that bay leaf infusion had the ability to inhibit the growth of bacteria (P<0.05). The highest growth inhibition was found on Leuconostoc mesenteroides, whereas the lowest growth inhibition was on Pseudomonas putida. Bay leaf infusion influenced the number of bacteria in chicken meat. The concentration of 15% bay leaf infusion could decrease bacterial number amounting to 1 log CFU/mL compared to control. The number of bacteria of chicken meat stored significantly increased during the storage (P<0.05). However, the number of bacteria of chicken meat soaked in bay leaf infusion was significantly lower than the control. Bay leaf infusion has no significant effect on the chemical quality of chicken meat but it did on the physical quality of chicken meat. The conclusion of the study was bay leaf infusion could inhibit the bacterial growth and reduced the amount of bacteria in chicken meat, whereas storage time influenced the microbiological and physical qualities of chicken meat.
The Influence of Socio Economics Characteristics and Meat Self-Sufficiency Policy on Beef Cattle Farmer’s Income in Indonesia Wisnu Bawono; Sudi Nurtini; Ahmad Romadhoni Surya Putra
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 3 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (3) AUGUST 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i3.47786

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the influence of the implementation of the meat self-sufficiency policy on the cattle farmers’ income in Indonesia. This study used secondary data of Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS) that were collected in 2014. The IFLS are household data taken by survey at national level. This study used IFLS 5 data. The observed variables in this study included characteristics of farmer's household such as age, area of land cultivated, number of family members, education level, patterns integration of livestock farming and government assistance. Household income is derived from reduced revenue from agricultural sector and it cost as the dependent variable. The results of the study showed that mixed farming or livestock farming integration influenced farmer household income significantly (P<0.01). The cultivated land size affected the household income of farmers (P<0.01). The level of education, number of family members, type of assistance and age did not affect the income of household farmers. The Respondents were divided in two group, group that were exposed and those that were not to the meat self-sufficiency program. The results of study showed that government policy in meat self-sufficiency did not have a significant impact on the household income of farmers. The development of livestock in order to achieve self-sufficiency in meat needs to be
Economic and Technical Analysis of Utilization Pistia Stratiotes as Magelang Duck Alternative Feed: An Agribusiness Paradigm Agus Setiadi; Siswanto Imam Santoso; Edjeng Suprijatna; Teysar Adi Sarjana; Suryani Nurfadillah
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 3 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (3) AUGUST 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i3.51049

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the economic analysis, performance analysis and chemical quality of the meat of the utilization of pistia stratiotes (PS) in Magelang duck feed. Most duck feed is still very dependent on imports from other countries so there is a need to find alternative feedstuff that are not competing with humans. The experimental research was conducted at the Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Agriculture Undip using 4 treatments, namely T0 duck feed without the addition of PS in feed, T1 added 6% PS in feed, T2 added 12% PS in feed and T3 added 18% PS in duck feed. Parameters observed were final body weight, feed consumption, Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR), mortality, cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL, HDL, antioxidants, feed costs, income over feed costs, return on investment (ROI) and RC ratio. Feed consumption on T3 was the highest. Final body weight on T3 was not significantly different (P> 0.05) compared to T1 and T2 but higher than T0 (P<0.05). The FCR between T3, T2 and T1 was not significantly different (P>0.05), but was lower than T0, duck mortality in this study 0. Blood chemistry analysis (cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL, HDL) showed that T2 and T3 were significantly better than T0 and T1. The results of the economic analysis showed that ducks given PS at T2 and T3 had significant lower feed costs compared to T0 and T1, while ROI from T1, T2 and T3 were significantly higher than T0. The highest IOFC was achieved when duck were fed (T2), while the lowest IOFC was at T0. R/C ratio of T1, T2 and T3 was not significantly different, but higher when compared to T0. Based on the results of technical and economic analysis, the use of PS in 12% duck feed gave the best result of technical and economic performance
The Effect of Young Coconut Husk on the Quality of Goat Manure-Chicken Excreta Bioculture Dwi Ahmad Priyadi; Dyah Triasih; Sefri Ton; Ari Istanti
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 3 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (3) AUGUST 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i3.51434

Abstract

The negative impact of chemical fertilizers use is soil fertility declining. The situation occurs because of biological, physical, and chemical properties of the soil is decreased. Agricultural waste is a large commodity which utilization can still be optimized, for example by using as raw material for organic liquid fertilizer. Agricultural wastes that have good quality as fertilizer include goat manure, chicken excreta, and coconut husk. The utilization of agricultural waste as organic fertilizer is one way of creating sustainable agriculture. This study aims to test the quality of liquid fertilizer (bioculture) of goat manure and chicken excreta by adding various levels of coconut husk. Bioculture is made by anaerobic fermentation for 21 days. The parameters observed included levels of C-organic, N, P, and K bioculture, as well as germination tests to determine the presence of phytotoxins. The data were analyzed using one way ANOVA. The treatment of P5 (5% coconut husk) showed the highest levels of N and P, while the K content was not significantly different from the treatment of P4 (2.5% coconut husk). The germination test showed no phytotoxin activity in bioculture.
Performances of Broiler Chickens Fed the Commercial Diets Partially Substituted with Feeds Containing Fermented and Non Fermented Leubim Fish Meal (Canthidermis maculata) zulfan zulfan; Muhammad Aman Yaman; Allaily Allaily; Enten Juni Marlina
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 3 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (3) AUGUST 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i3.52732

Abstract

The purpose of present study was to evaluate the performance of broilers fed the commercial diet partially substituted with leubim fish (Canthidermis maculata) waste meal (LFWM) treated by fermentation and without fermentation. As many as 100 broiler chicks, MB 202 strain, unsex, were reared up to 5 weeks in this study. The research was set up into randomized block design (RBD) consisting of 5 treatments and 4 blocks with 5 birds each. Blocks were as replicate based on the body weights of the birds at the beginning of feeding experimental diets. The experimental diets were commercial diets partially replaced with LFWM administered by either fermentation or not with the level of 6 and 12% each, 6.5% and 13% yellow corn, and 0.5% topmix. The data was analyzed using an Analysis of Variance (AOV) and continued by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) only if significant effects were detected among the treatments. The result of recent study indicated that the inclusion of feeds containing LFWM treated by either or not fermented combined with yellow corn and topmix as partially substitution of commercial diets significantly increased (P<0.05) FBW, BWG, feed intake, and protein intake compared to those fed full commercial diet. However, FCR and PER were not significantly affected. DMRT indicated there were no significant diferences in broiler performances fed the feeds containing LFWM treated by fermentation vs without fermentation.
Study of Pasture Productivity for Semi-Intensive Cattle System during Dry Season in the South Konawe Regency, Southeast Sulawesi Ahmat Endang Two Sulfiar; Bayu Andri Atmoko; Budi Guntoro; I Gede Suparta Budisatria
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 3 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (3) AUGUST 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i3.52742

Abstract

This study was aimed to evaluate the characteristics and productivity of pasture for semi-intensive cattle system in South Konawe Regency during dry season. The study was conducted in August-September 2019 as dry season based on the weather condition and was determine by Department of Statistics Center of South Konawe Regency. A total of 55 selected smallholder farmers in two areas in South Konawe Regency, namely West Ranomento (30) and Konda (25) Districts. Data were obtained by interview to find out the farmers profile and pasture characteristics. Production was measured by forage sampling (1x1m) to calculate annual production. Samples were proximately analyzed to calculate dry matter production and the carrying capacity. Data were analyzed descriptively and statistically with an independent sample t-test. The botanical composition in both locations was highly dominated (>90%) by field grasses. The grassland ownership was not different between two areas. Grassland ownership at West Ranomento and Konda were 0.78±0.14 and 0.21±0.04 Ha/farmer, respectively. The pasture production between West Ranomento (2.27±0.10 ton/ha) and Konda District (1.76±0.05 ton/ha) was significantly different (p<0.05),. Pasture production and carrying capacity indicated that conditions in West Ranomento were significantly higher (p<0.05) compared to Konda District. The fresh forages production was 10.98±2.26 vs. 2.17±0.51 ton/year, forages that can be consumed was 3.30±0.67 vs. 3.30±0.67ton/year, dry matter production was 0.72±0.15 vs. 0.18±0.04 ton/year and carrying capacity was 0.22±0.04 vs. 0.05±0.01 AU/year respectively. It was concluded that the pasture productivity at the study area during dry season was very low based on productivity and carrying capacity.
Nutrient Quality and in Vitro Digestibility of Bio-Ammoniated Rice Straw Bales Cuk Tri Noviandi; Dibya Ratnopama; Ali Agus; Ristianto Utomo
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 3 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (3) AUGUST 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i3.53409

Abstract

This study was done to determine the effects of bale sizes of bio-ammoniated rice straw on its nutrient quality and in vitro digestibility. Rice straw were bio-ammoniated by adding 2 g urea and 1 g probiotic/kg DM. By following a completely randomized design, rice straw was baled in 3 different weights (15, 25, and 35 kg) with six replications for each treatment, and then stored for 3 weeks. In the end of the week 3, bales were opened, aired, and then sampled for proximate analysis (dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, and crude fiber) and digestibility by in vitro gas production method. Using analysis of variance method, the proximate data showed that greater the bales size (15, 25, and 35 kg) increased crude protein (7.59, 7.86, and 9.95%, respectively; P<0.05) and decreased crude fiber contents (24.1, 22.1, and 18.8%, respectively; P<0.05). By increasing the size of bales also increased a, b, and c fractions (-0.79, 0.26, and 0.82 mL/100 mg DM; 20.2, 18.2, and 17.6 mL/100 mg DM; 0.012, 0.014, and 0.019 mL/h, respectively; P<0.05) as well as gas production (11.4, 11.5, and 13.8 mL/100 mg DM, respectively; P<0.05). It can be concluded that packing bio-ammoniated rice straw in 35 kg bale is the most effective way in increasing nutrient quality and digestibility of rice straw.
Identification of Locus GH/Alui Polymorphisms of Kuantan and Pesisir Cattle Hidayati Hidayati; Robbana Saragih
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 3 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (3) AUGUST 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i3.54183

Abstract

Kuantan cattle is a local beef cattle of Riau Province that adaptive and breed well along the Kuantan river flow, found in Indragiri Hulu Regency and Kuantan Singingi Regency, have smaller morphometric performance compared to other local beef cattle and are relatively the same as Pesisir cattle. One of the genetic markers of growth determinant in beef cattle is the GH/AluI gene locus. Identification of the diversity of the GH/Alu I gene was carried out using the PCR-RFLP. Fifty four samples of Kuantan cattle consisting of 25 samples from Indragiri Hulu Regency and 29 samples from Kuantan Singingi Regency, as well as 25 samples of Pesisir cattle from BPTU-HPT Padang Mengatas Payakumbuh, West Sumatra, were used in this study. The oligonucleotida forward F-5’GCTGCTCCTGAGGGCCCTTC-3’ and reverse R-5’CATGACCCTCAGGTACGTCTCCG-3’ used in this study along 211 bp of GH Gene. The PCR mixture consisted of DNA templates 20 - 25 ng, 0.4 µL  primer forward dan primer reverse (10 ng primer forward and primer reverse), 25 µL dream tag green master mix and ddH2O up to a 50 µL. PCR machine conditions consisted of 940C pradenaturation for 5 minutes, 940C denaturation for 30 seconds, annealing 650C for 1 minute, 720C extension for 50 seconds and 720C final extension for 5 minutes. Identification of GH gene diversity using AluI at an incubation temperature of 370C for 3 hours. The results in this study were found monomorphic of GH/AluI genes in Kuantan and Pesisir cattle. The monomorphic in Kuantan cattle can be used as an indicator to assess the purity of Kuantan cattle in this areas. 
Factors Associated with the Level of Knowledge of Dairy Cattle Farmers Towards Brucellosis in Kawasan Usaha Peternakan (Kunak), Bogor District Muhammad Hilman bin Jahaluddin; Yusuf Ridwan; Chaerul Basri
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 3 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (3) AUGUST 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i3.54390

Abstract

Level of farmer’s knowledge have an importance role in the disease prevention and control of livestock. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the level of KUNAK dairy cattle farmer’s knowledge regarding brucellosis and factors that associated to it. A series of questions were asked to the respondents regarding their knowledge of brucellosis. Respondents of 70 farmers were selected with cluster random sampling technique for this research. Data were collected through interviewing respondent using the questionnaire regarding the knowledge of brucellosis in terms of its mode of transmission, symptoms, prevention and treatment. Questionnaire was done in the form of closed question. The analysis was done using chi square test in determining the association of factors affecting level of dairy cattle farmer’s knowledge and odds ratio (OR) in determining the strength of affecting level of dairy cattle farmer’s knowledge. The general result of the level of knowledge of farmers in KUNAK were good being the majority of them were in that category. The farmers of KUNAK had a higher level of knowledge in terms of prevention and symptoms of brucellosis than mode of transmission or treatment of it. The factor that has the most significance to the level of knowledge of KUNAK dairy farmers are the ones with a working experience more than 5 years in this field with 18 times more knowledgeable than farmers with less than 5 years of working experience. The need of disease awareness programs was required for the farmers in broadening their minds towards other aspects of a disease for them to better combat the problems in their day to day business.
Growth Patterns, Body Weight, and Morphometric of KUB Chicken, Sentul Chicken and Arab Chicken Depison Depison; Nabilah Ika Puteri; Gushairiyanto Gushairiyanto
Buletin Peternakan Vol 44, No 3 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (3) AUGUST 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i3.57016

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to determine the body weight, weight gain and morphometric characteristics of several local chicken strains. The research materials were KUB chicken, Sentul chicken, and Arab chicken. The method used was an experiment with a sample of 82 chickens from each strain. Data collected include body weight, weight gain, beak length, beak width, head length, head circumference, head height, neck length, neck circumference, wing length, back length, back height, chest length, chest width, shank length, shank circumference, tibia length, tibia circumference, third finger length, and pubic bone distance. Data collected were analyzed using the average difference test (t-test). The average value vector of body measurements of chicken lines was analyzed using the T²-Hotelling statistical test. Main Component Analysis statistical test was used to identify the shape and size characteristics of each chicken strain. The results showed that the body weight and morphometrics of KUB chickens at 3 months were significantly different (P<0.05) with Sentul chickens and Arab chickens. KUB chicken`s body weight gain at 3 months was not significantly different (P>0.05) from Sentul chickens, but it was significantly different (P<0.05) from Arab chickens. Body weight, weight gain, and morphometrics of KUB chickens were higher than Sentul chickens and Arab chickens. The size indicator in KUB chickens was the tibia length while in Sentul chickens and Arab chickens was chest length. The characteristic of KUB chickens was the back length, Sentul chickens was tibia length, and Arab chickens was the shank circumference.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 48, No 1 (2024): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 48 (1) FEBRUARY 2024 Vol 47, No 4 (2023): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 47 (4) NOVEMBER 2023 Vol 47, No 3 (2023): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 47 (3) AUGUST 2023 Vol 47, No 2 (2023): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 47 (2) MAY 2023 Vol 47, No 1 (2023): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 47 (1) FEBRUARY 2023 Vol 46, No 4 (2022): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 46 (4) NOVEMBER 2022 Vol 46, No 3 (2022): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 46 (3) AUGUST 2022 Vol 46, No 2 (2022): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 46 (2) MAY 2022 Vol 46, No 1 (2022): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 46 (1) FEBRUARY 2022 Vol 45, No 4 (2021): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 45 (4) NOVEMBER 2021 Vol 45, No 3 (2021): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 45 (3) AUGUST 2021 Vol 45, No 2 (2021): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 45 (2) MAY 2021 Vol 45, No 1 (2021): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 45 (1) FEBRUARY 2021 Vol 44, No 4 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (4) NOVEMBER 2020 Vol 44, No 3 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (3) AUGUST 2020 Vol 44, No 2 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (2) MAY 2020 Vol 44, No 1 (2020): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 44 (1) FEBRUARY 2020 Vol 43, No 4 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (4) NOVEMBER 2019 Vol 43, No 3 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (3) AUGUST 2019 Vol 43, No 2 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (2) MAY 2019 Vol 43, No 1 (2019): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 43 (1) FEBRUARY 2019 Vol 42, No 4 (2018): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 42 (4) NOVEMBER 2018 Vol 42, No 3 (2018): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 42 (3) AUGUST 2018 Vol 42, No 2 (2018): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 42 (2) MAY 2018 Vol 42, No 1 (2018): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 42 (1) FEBRUARY 2018 Vol 41, No 4 (2017): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 41 (4) NOVEMBER 2017 Vol 41, No 3 (2017): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 41 (3) AGUSTUS 2017 Vol 41, No 2 (2017): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 41 (2) MEI 2017 Vol 41, No 1 (2017): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 41 (1) FEBRUARI 2017 Vol 40, No 3 (2016): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 40 (3) OKTOBER 2016 Vol 40, No 2 (2016): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 40 (2) JUNI 2016 Vol 40, No 1 (2016): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 40 (1) FEBRUARI 2016 Vol 39, No 3 (2015): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 39 (3) OKTOBER 2015 Vol 39, No 2 (2015): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 39 (2) JUNI 2015 Vol 39, No 1 (2015): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 39 (1) FEBRUARI 2015 Vol 38, No 3 (2014): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 38 (3) OKTOBER 2014 Vol 38, No 2 (2014): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 38 (2) JUNI 2014 Vol 38, No 1 (2014): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 38 (1) FEBRUARI 2014 Vol 37, No 3 (2013): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 37 (3) OKTOBER 2013 Vol 37, No 2 (2013): BULETIN PETERNAKAN VOL. 37 (2) JUNI 2013 Vol 37, No 1 (2013): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 37 (1) Februari 2013 Vol 36, No 3 (2012): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 36 (3) Oktober 2012 Vol 36, No 2 (2012): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 36 (2) Juni 2012 Vol 36, No 1 (2012): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 36 (1) Februari 2012 Vol 35, No 3 (2011): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 35 (3) Oktober 2011 Vol 35, No 2 (2011): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 35 (2) Juni 2011 Vol 35, No 1 (2011): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 35 (1) Februari 2011 Vol 34, No 3 (2010): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 34 (3) Oktober 2010 Vol 34, No 2 (2010): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 34 (2) Juni 2010 Vol 34, No 1 (2010): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 34 (1) Februari 2010 Vol 33, No 3 (2009): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 33 (3) Oktober 2009 Vol 33, No 2 (2009): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 33 (2) Juni 2009 Vol 33, No 1 (2009): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 33 (1) Februari 2009 Vol 32, No 3 (2008): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 32 (3) Oktober 2008 Vol 32, No 2 (2008): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 32 (2) Juni 2008 Vol 32, No 1 (2008): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 32 (1) Februari 2008 Vol 31, No 4 (2007): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 31 (4) November 2007 Vol 31, No 3 (2007): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 31 (3) Agustus 2007 Vol 31, No 2 (2007): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 31 (2) Mei 2007 Vol 31, No 1 (2007): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 31 (1) Februari 2007 Vol 30, No 4 (2006): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 30 (4) November 2006 Vol 30, No 3 (2006): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 30 (3) Agustus 2006 Vol 30, No 2 (2006): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 30 (2) Mei 2006 Vol 30, No 1 (2006): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 30 (1) Februari 2006 Vol 29, No 4 (2005): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 29 (4) November 2005 Vol 29, No 3 (2005): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 29 (3) Agustus 2005 Vol 29, No 2 (2005): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 29 (2) Mei 2005 Vol 29, No 1 (2005): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 29 (1) Februari 2005 Vol 28, No 4 (2004): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 28 (4) November 2004 Vol 28, No 3 (2004): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 28 (3) Agustus 2004 Vol 28, No 2 (2004): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 28 (2) Mei 2004 Vol 28, No 1 (2004): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 28 (1) Februari 2004 Vol 27, No 4 (2003): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 27 (4) November 2003 Vol 27, No 3 (2003): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 27 (3) Agustus 2003 Vol 27, No 2 (2003): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 27 (2) Mei 2003 Vol 27, No 1 (2003): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 27 (1) Februari 2003 Vol 26, No 4 (2002): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 26 (4) November 2002 Vol 26, No 1 (2002): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 26 (1) Februari 2002 Vol 25, No 4 (2001): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 25 (4) November 2001 Vol 25, No 3 (2001): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 25 (3) Agustus 2001 Vol 25, No 2 (2001): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 25 (2) Mei 2001 Vol 25, No 1 (2001): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 25 (1) Februari 2001 Vol 24, No 4 (2000): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 24 (4) November 2000 Vol 24, No 3 (2000): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 24 (3) Agustus 2000 Vol 24, No 2 (2000): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 24 (2) Mei 2000 Vol 24, No 1 (2000): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 24 (1) Februari 2000 Vol 23, No 4 (1999): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 23 (4) November 1999 Vol 23, No 3 (1999): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 23 (3) Agustus 1999 Vol 23, No 2 (1999): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 23 (2) Mei 1999 Vol 23, No 1 (1999): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 23 (1) Februari 1999 Vol 22, No 4 (1998): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 22 (4) November 1998 Vol 21, No 3 (1997): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 21 (3) November 1997 Vol 21, No 1 (1997): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 21 (1) April 1997 Vol 20, No 2 (1996): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 20 (2) Desember 1996 Vol 20, No 1 (1996): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 20 (1) Juni 1996 Vol 19, No 2 (1995): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 19 (2) Desember 1995 Vol 19, No 1 (1995): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 19 (1) Juni 1995 1995: BULETIN PETERNAKAN SPECIAL EDITION 1995 Vol 18, No 4 (1994): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 18 (4) Desember 1994 Vol 17, No 1 (1993): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 17 (1) Juni 1993 Vol 16, No 1 (1992): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 16 (1) Desember 1992 Vol 15, No 2 (1991): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 15 (2) Desember 1991 Vol 15, No 1 (1991): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 15 (1) Juni 1991 Vol 14, No 2 (1990): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 14 (2) Desember 1990 Vol 14, No 1 (1990): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 14 (1) Juni 1990 Vol 13, No 1 (1989): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 13 (1) September 1989 Vol 11, No 2 (1987): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 11 (2) September 1987 Vol 11, No 1 (1987): Buletin Peternakan Vol. 11 (1) Maret 1987 More Issue