Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Palito: Politics, Humanities, Laws, International Relations and Social

Sekuritisasi Isu Imigran di Amerika Serikat di Masa Pemerintahan Donald Trump Anisa Usman; Haiyyu Darman Moenir; Bima Jon Nanda
Palito Vol. 1 No. 01 (2022): PALITO (Politics, Humanities, Laws, International Relations and Social)
Publisher : Palito

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/palito.1.01.45-58.2022

Abstract

The issue of securitization regarding immigrants in the US is an issue that has become a public discussion since Donald Trump campaign as a US presidential candidate in the 2016 election. He has publicly conveyed xenophobic anti-immigrant rhetoric. Researchers assume that the existence of securitization makes the issue of immigrants a threat that endangers US nationalsecurity. This is done by conveying speech acts to influence public opinion, thus making the issue of immigrants a problem that requires emergency handling or extraordinary policies that have never been carried out by the previous government. This study aims to describe the stagesof the securitization process on the issue of immigrants in the US during the Donald Trump administration. This research was analyzed with the conceptual framework of the securitization stages of Barry Buzan, Waever, and Jaap de Wilde, which consisted of the stage of raising the issue and the stage of convincing the audience. This research method uses a qualitative approach with descriptive-analytical research and uses secondary data sources. This study found that the securitization process begins with the stages of raising issues through the role of the mass media, the influence of the Republican party promoted by Donald Trump, then continues with the stage of convincing the audience through the delivery of speeches by Donald Trump, Sebastian Gorka, Michael Flynn and Jeff Sessions. Then by issuing emergency and securitization measures legitimized by the audience as evidenced by the increasing US public voice supporting the expansion of the US-Mexico border wall.
Persepsi Narendra Modi Dalam Kebijakan India Menarik Diri Dari Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Tahun 2019 Azhari Azhari; Haiyyu Darman Moenir; Maryam Jamillah
Palito Vol. 1 No. 02 (2022): PALITO (Politics, Humanities, Laws, International Relations and Social)
Publisher : Palito

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/palito.1.02.28-43.2022

Abstract

The Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi introduced the Act East Policy (AEP) which was presented at the ASEAN Summit in Myanmar, November 2014. The AEP policy is a reflection of the long-term economy and takes advantage of its strategic position to create closer relations with countries in the Asian region. Pacific. One of the ways to achieve India's economic growth is to establish various frameworks of economic cooperation. However, in the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) agreement in the negotiation stage, Modi withdrawal India from RCEP. This research aims to analyze The perception of Modi in formulating India policy of withdraw from the 2019 RCEP. This research has its urgency because India's political dynamics have initially participated in negotiations since 2012 during Modi's leadership period, then decided to withdraw from the RCEP.. This shows that Narendra Modi has his own perception of RCEP. To see Modi's perception, this research uses a framework of thinking about the relationship between perception and decision making according to Ole R. Holsti. This study uses a qualitative research method with a descriptive analytical approach using secondary data. Furthermore, based on a framework related to Holsti's perception, this study finds that Modi's belief system and image are not in line with RCEP because it is not in accordance with the belief system that influenced Modi, namely the rejection of domestic actors, the trade balance deficit, the rejection of the Three Tier Approach proposal, Hindu nationalist and Gandhiji Talisman and not in accordance with the image that should have happened according to Modi, namely realizing Make in India and India First.
Motif Bantuan Australia Terkait Isu Perubahan Iklim Di Pasifik Selatan Pada Masa Pemerintahan Scott Morrison Raysha Humaira; Haiyyu Darman Moenir
Palito Vol. 2 No. 01 (2023): PALITO (Politics, Humanities, Laws, International Relations and Social)
Publisher : Palito

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/palito.2.01.1-15.2023

Abstract

This article analyzes Australia's motives under Scott Morrison's administration regarding its climate fund for the South Pacific countries. Under Scott Morrison's leadership, Australia has been fundamentally skeptical about climate change issues, such as his policy of developing the coal and gas industries, which produce high emissions, until it withdrew as a global climate fund donor. On the other hand, Australia increased its climate fund, especially in the South Pacific region. This research used a qualitative method with a descriptive analysis approach. The data was collected through library research and then analyzed using the concept of foreign aid motives developed by John Degnbol-Martinussen and Poul Engberg-Pedersen. This study found that, behind moral and humanitarian motives, there are Australia's efforts to reduce poverty levels in the South Pacific region caused by climate change. Through political motives, it found that this climate fund was used as Australia's strategy in its battle with China to gain influence and improve security in the South Pacific region. Meanwhile, the environmental motive is based on the responsibility to help mitigate and adapt to climate change in developing countries. Based on these findings, political motives became the dominant and most significant motives behind Australia's climate fund for the South Pacific countries.