Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan

Risk Assesment Pada Pekerjaan Pengambilan Contoh Uji Di PT. XYZ Mohamad Nurhamzah Ramadani; Merry Sunaryo; Friska Ayu; Ratna Ayu Ratriwardhani
Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Vol 8 No 13 (2022): Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (203.102 KB) | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6962400

Abstract

Good occupational health and safety (K3) needs to be done in an effort to reduce the possibility of accidents when doing work. To reduce the number of work accidents, it is necessary to control risk in the workplace through risk management, one of the methods is HIRARC. PT XYZ is a company engaged in providing environmental laboratory services. This company has several fields namely administration, analyst, test sample taker. Thearea most at risk is the part of the test sample taker. The purpose of this study is a Risk Assessment on the work of taking test samples at PT. XYZ. This type of research is qualitative with descriptive observational method, by describing the results of hazard identification and risk assessment on the work of taking test samples, in order to obtain a recommendation for hazard risk control using the HIRARC (Hazard Identification Risk Assessment Risk Control) method. Data collection techniques were carried out by observation, in-depth interviews and documentation. Sampling work carried out by test sampling officers PT. XYZ has 26 potential hazards. Test sample taker officer PT. XYZ has a low including the risk of skin irritation, eye irritation, minor injury, moderate includes the risk of muscle pain, fractures.and high includes the risk of injury to death, fire, heat stress, dehydration, respiratory infections. The recommended control refers to the control hierarchy, namely elimination, substitution, engineering, administrative and personal protective equipment. The conclusion of the test sampling job shows that the hazard identification stage of this work produces 26 potential hazards and has a risk level of low, moderate, high. The recommended risk control that has the most priority is the implementation of the OHS management system because the company is required to apply 64 basic criteria
Evaluasi APAR Berdasarkan Permenakertrans Nomor 4 Tahun 1980 di PT.XY Alfina Novita Dewi; Muslikha Nourma Rhomadhoni; Ratna Ayu Ratriwardhani; Bondan Winarno
Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Vol 8 No 13 (2022): Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (121.983 KB) | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6961038

Abstract

Losses caused by fires that occur in industry are very large, because they involve high asset values, and can cost lives. Fires can occur anywhere, one of which is in the office building of PT. XY which is classified as a light fire hazard. One form of security and prevention against fires is the installation of fire extinguishers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the application of a light fire extinguisher. The type of research in this study is qualitative, namely by comparing the actual condition of light fire extinguishers in the field with the Minister of Manpower and Transmigration Regulation Number 04 of 1980 through observation, interviews, documentation and measurement of the height and distance of the fire extinguisher. The results showed that the number of fire extinguishers as a whole was not appropriate, the type of fire extinguisher had been fulfilled properly, the condition of the fire extinguisher was still not up to standard, the placement of the fire extinguisher was still quite good at the distance between fire extinguishers but there were still some that were not suitable, the maintenance of the fire extinguisher was well maintained but still needs control and the level of knowledge of workers regarding the use of fire extinguishers is quite good but needs to be improved again because there are still some employees who have not received fire training. The conclusion that PT.XY, the, has implemented fire prevention by installing fire extinguisher, there are several indicator components that are not appropriate. Suggestions that can be given are to improve the fire extinguisher indicators that are not appropriate and always carry out routine monitoring to improve fire extinguisher maintenance and provide fire training to workers.
Analisis Postur Kerja Dengan Metode Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (Rula) dan Nordic Body Map Pada Pekerja Produksi di PT. Jayamas Medica Industri Kab. Sidoarjo Adini Anggun Risanti Putri; Ratna Ayu Ratriwardhani; Merry Sunaryo; Muslikha Nourma Rhomadhoni
Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Vol 8 No 13 (2022): Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (152.05 KB) | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6960962

Abstract

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are disorders of the skeletal muscles. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), there were 387,820 cases ofmusculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) from the total injuries and illnesses of workers in 2011. This study aims to analyze the level of risk, occupational risk at work. position using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) method. to production workers at PT. Jayamas Medica Industri, Sidoarjo Regency. This study used an analytic observational research design with a cross sectional approach. The population of this study are workers in the manufacturing section. The resulting sample is 29 using the Slovin formula and the sampling technique using a random sampling system. The variables of this research are personal and work factors, work posture, RULA method, and Nordic Body Map (NBM) questionnaire. This analytic data only generates the frequency and percent distribution of each variable and is interpreted as tables and stories. The results showed that most of the respondents complained about the lower neck as much as 79% and the upper neck as much as 69%. With this, the researchers calculated using the RULA method, the results obtained from the RULA method were respondents with serious complaints that needed further examination. Summarizing the results and discussing workers' complaints or disturbances, the recommended suggestions are stretching, designing the workplace according to the needs of workers, conducting training and socialization activities. Therefore, the researcher designed the workstation as a table and chair.
Gambaran Keluhan Subjektif dan Penilaian Risiko Ergonomi Menggunakan Metode NBM dan ROSA Pada Pengguna Komputer di Kantor Pusat PT.XYZ Norus Sholeha; Ratna Ayu Ratriwardhani; Muslikha Nourma Rhomadhoni; Friska Ayu
Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Vol 8 No 13 (2022): Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (265.271 KB) | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6962568

Abstract

Although it has a good impact on work efficiency and effectiveness, the use of computers in office workers also has aspects that can pose an ergonomic risk, namely musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). To describe the complaints of MSDs and the level of ergonomic risk in PT. XYZ employees can use the NBM and ROSA methods. This research is a quantitative descriptive with an observational and cross sectional approach. The population of this research is employees of the head office of PT. XYZ working on a computer. The sample collection technique used is stratified random sampling according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and data collection is done by filling out the Nordic Body Maps (NBM) questionnaire, direct observation and documentation. The results of the study based on the distribution of MSDs complaints and their percentages showed that the level of complaints often experienced by workers was on the left shoulder, buttocks, right forearm and fingers of the right hand. Furthermore, the measurement of the level of ergonomic risk using the ROSA method got the results of 52 people including the category of moderate risk level and 4 people belonging to the category of high risk level. In conclusion, the description of subjective complaints and the level of ergonomics risk on respondents needs to be considered and further corrective actions such as improvement of work stations and work postures of employees and socialization of office ergonomics to reduce the level of ergonomics risk using posters.
Penilaian Postur Kerja Dan Keluhan Musculoskeletal Disorders (Msds) Pada Pekerja Back Office di Hotel XY Yogyakarta Fina Nova Sa’diyah; Moch Sahri; Ratna Ayu Ratriwardhani; Merry Sunaryo
Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Vol 8 No 14 (2022): Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (233.063 KB) | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6982126

Abstract

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are disorders of the soft tissues (muscles, joints, ligaments, cartilage) and the nervous system of workers. The risk of MSDs can be found in work activities, one of which is the back office, where 80% of work activities are carried out in sitting, standing, squatting, and bending work postures for 1 working day (8 hours). The purpose of this study was to analyze work posture and complaints of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) in back office workers.This research is a descriptive quantitative research using an observational approach. The population in this study amounted to 25 workers from both the Finance and Engineering departments at Hotel XY Yogyakarta. The sampling technique in this study is to use a total sampling technique. Collecting data in this study by taking samples of Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) complaints using a Nordic Body Map (NBM) questionnaire and for work postures using the Ovako Working Analysist System (OWAS) method.The results of the study were obtained from the percentage of 44% in the low category and the total percentage of 56% of the MSDs risk value in the moderate category with that the need to make efforts to control or improve work position or posture in the future and from the results of the assessment (Ovako Work Posture Analysis System) OWAS obtained activity work with uncomfortable work postures, so it is necessary to improve the work posture of workers.Conclusions from the results and discussion have complaints about the level of risk of Musculuskeletal Disorders (MSDs) and work postures. So the advice that can be given is the need to improve an ergonomic work position, stretch the muscles on the sidelines of working hours and take a short break during breaks
Perbandingan Postur Kerja Dengan Metode Reba dan Qec Pada Pekerja Alat Kesehatan di PT. XYZ Hanifah Dwi Lestari; Ratna Ayu Ratriwardhani; Moch. Sahri; Bondan Winarno
Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Vol 8 No 14 (2022): Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (199.619 KB) | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6982180

Abstract

Ergonomics hazard is one of the hazards caused by the relationship between work activities, use of tools, and a bad work environment that causes injury or illness to workers. In carrying out the work, it is still done manually and is done repeatedly in non-ergonomic and awkward positions every day for a long period of time. Therefore, there is a need for ergonomic hazards. This research was conducted in May 2022 using descriptive quantitative research. Ergonomics hazard risk level assessment using REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment) and QEC (Quick Exposure Checklsit) methods. The population in the study found 27 workers. The sample taken is 27 workers with total sampling technique. Data collection techniques were carried out using REBA worksheets and QEC questionnaires. The results showed that the ergonomic risk description using the REBA method was dominated by a moderate risk level of 20 workers, while the ergonomic risk description using the QEC method was dominated by a moderate risk of 21 workers. evaluation of the comparison of action levels using the REBA and QEC methods has resulted in 26 workers getting the risk level score at the same level. Each method that threatens ergonomics hazards has different characteristics and assessments in each body part so that it can affect the final score. Suggestions that can be recommended are to provide training on ergonomics to workers and provide facilities that make work easier
Analisis Risiko Bahaya Pada Kegiatan Bongkar Muat Batu Bara di PT. Delta Artha Bahari Nusantara Very Andriyansyah; Merry Sunaryo; Ratna Ayu Ratriwardhani; Muslikha Nourma Rhomadhoni
Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Vol 8 No 14 (2022): Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (163.25 KB) | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6994940

Abstract

Risk analysis of occupational accidents is a work activity in a company so that an effort is needed to analyze hazards and risks by using one of the existing methods, namely HIRARC to minimize the level of accident risk. The purpose of this study is to analyze the risk of hazards in coal loading and unloading activities at PT Delta Artha Bahari Nusanatara using the HIRARC method. The type of research used is descriptive research with observational methods where the techniques used in data collection are natural settings (natural conditions), primary data sources, discussions with K3L and the Head of Operations at the company and data collection techniques are mostly on observations during activities and activities. documentation. Based on the results of the study, at the time of hazard identification, 7 activities and 22 work processes contained 11 different potential hazards including falling into the sea, exposure to hot sunlight, exposure to and inhalation of coal dust, being pinched by mooring ropes, being crushed by loading and unloading equipment, being scratched by loading and unloading equipment. , hit by a dump truck vehicle, crushed by loading and unloading equipment, hit by a rampdoor tool, crushed by a sesek/bamboo board tool, flammable and combustible fuel. Then carry out a risk assessment, namely the results show that of the 11 potential hazards there are 5 low risk, 4 moderate risk, 1 high risk and 1 very high risk, therefore it is necessary to make recommendations for the control needed to reduce the level of risk to a lower level in order to minimize work accidents for reduce the risk of work accidents. Suggestions from company researchers must implement control recommendations, namely the addition of sophisticated trucks cleaning the dock area, Personal Protective Equipment (safety helmets, masks, vests, catelpaks, gloves, sunglasses, and safety shoes), Administrative Approach (Fit to work, MSDS Pertamina dex (Hydrocarbons and Additives) promotion of Occupational Safety and Health (K3)), and Engineering Control (pedestrian paths or pedestrian areas, refueling in a safe place, preparing for disasters (Emergency response plan))