I Wayan Parsa
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Published : 65 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

IMPLIKASI YURIDIS LEGALITAS KEWENANGAN (RECHTMATIGHEID) MAJELIS KEHORMATAN DALAM PEMBINAAN NOTARIS SEBAGAI PEJABAT PUBLIK I Wayan Parsa; Kadek Sarna; Nengah Suharta
Acta Comitas Vol 1 No 2 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2016.v01.i02.p04

Abstract

Diundangkannya UU Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang No.30 Tahun 2004 yaitu Undang Undang No.2 Tahun 2014, memunculkan lembaga baru yang disebut Majelis Kehormatan Notaris yang mempunyai tugas melaksanakan pembinaan sebagaiman diatur dalam Pasal 66A ayat (1).Disisi lain berdasarkan Pasal 1 angka (6) mengenai Majelis Pengawas Notaris disebutkan mempunyai kewenangan dan kewajiban untuk melaksanakan pembinaan dan pengawasan terhadap Notaris. Implikasi yuridis yang terjadi adalah adanya pertentangan norma antara ketentuan yang diatur dalam ketentuan Pasal 1 Angka (6), Pasal 66A dan pasal 67Undang-Undang No.2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang No.30 Tahun 2004. Dengan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatanperundang-undangan (Statue Approach) dan Pendekatan Analisis Konsep Hukum (Analitical Conceptual Approach), penulis akan menganalisa ruang lingkup kewenangan keberadaan Majelis Pengawas Notaris dan Majelis Pengawas Notaris serta legalitas kewenangan fungsi Majelis Kehormatan Notaris dalam lembaga notariat sehingga tidak terjadi pertentangan kewenangan diantara kedua lembaga notariat tersebut.
Kepastian Hukum Pendaftaran Persekutuan Komanditer Pada Sistem Administrasi Badan Usaha Dentria Cahya Sudarsa; I Wayan Parsa
Acta Comitas Vol 5 No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i03.p09

Abstract

The writing of this article is based on the issuance of new regulations regarding the establishment and registration of limited partnership / CV in the business administration system (SABU) in accordance with the provisions of Article 5 paragraph (1) Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 17 of 2018 concerning Registration of Limited Partnerships, Firms, and the Civil Union which previously was only regulated in the Trade Law Book. Type of research used in this article is normative legal research. The purpose of this article is to determine the mechanism and legal certainty in the registration of the Limited Partnership after the enactment of business administration system. The results of the research and writing of this article are that there is an overlap in the registration mechanism for the Limited Partnership based on these two rules, it can be concluded that due to the provisions in KUHD and Minister Regulation No. 17 of 2018 both are still valid, the principle of legal preference can be used, namely lex specialis derogat legi lex generalis, means that a more specific law can override a more general law. The advice that can be given is to conduct a study of the enactment of the Minister Regulation whether to follow or not the provisions in the Trade Law Books due to avoid conflicting norms in the registration of a limited partnership.
The Role of Notaries and Land Titles Registrar in Collecting Duties on The Land and Building Rights Acquisition on The Making of Sale and Purchase Deeds in Singaraja City Nyoman Edy Febriana; I Wayan Parsa; I Gede Artha; I Nyoman Bagiastra
Jurnal Akta Vol 9, No 2 (2022): June 2022
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v9i2.21362

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to know the role of Land Titles Registrar (PPAT) in collecting duties on the Land and Building Rights Acquisition (BPHTB) on the sale and purchase transactions in Singaraja City. Furthermore, we investigate the duties and obligations of the PPAT in supervising the payment of BPHTB. The research was conducted using a qualitative approach with empirical juridical methods. The main finding is the role of PPAT as the official who makes BPHTB quotations during sales and purchase transactions in Singaraja City shows a very important role. Also, we have presented the duty and obligation of PPAT in supervising the payment of BPHTB is to make taxpayers aware that taxes are paid in accordance with applicable regulations.  
Kewenangan Pemerintah Provinsi Bali dalam Pemberian Perizinan terhadap Usaha Pertambangan Mineral Bukan Logam dan Batuan I Made Sudharma; I Wayan Parsa
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 4 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i04.p12

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explain the authority of the Bali Provincial Government in granting non-metallic and rock mineral mining business permits based on the Bali Provincial Regulation Number 4 of 2017 concerning Non-Metal and Rock Mineral Mining Management and the implications arising from the transfer of authority based on Law Number 3 Year 2020 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining. This paper uses normative legal research. The results of the study indicate that there are changes in the leading sector in granting mining permits from the Governor to the Central Government, including: 1) The authority to determine the Mining Business Permit Area (WIUP) and Mining Business Permit (IUP) which is carried out based on the Business Licensing. 2) Authority in fostering and supervising the implementation of mining activities. This authority is delegated to the Provincial Government based on Presidential Regulation Number 55 of 2022 concerning Delegation of Granting Business Licensing in the Mineral and Coal Mining Sector. The implications of the transfer of authority to grant mining permits include: 1) Changing the procedure for obtaining attributive authority to being a delegation in the business licensing model which can be given in the form of standard certificates and permits. 2) The still involvement of the Central Government causes the concept of delegation to reflect the paradigm of centralization in the mining sector. 3) The abolition of the authority of Regency/Municipal Governments in granting permits, supervision, guidance and resolution of community conflicts has created obstacles in mining activities. Tujuan penelitian ini menjelaskan mengenai kewenangan Pemerintah Provinsi Bali dalam memberikan perizinan usaha pertambangan mineral bukan logam dan batuan berdasarkan Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Bali Nomor 4 Tahun 2017 tentang Pengelolaan Pertambangan Mineral Bukan Logam dan Batuan serta implikasi yang ditimbulkan akibat pengalihan kewenangan tersebut berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara. Tulisan ini mempergunakan penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa adanya perubahan leading sektor pemberian perizinan pertambangan dari Gubernur ke Pemerintah Pusat antara lain: 1) Kewenangan menetapkan Wilayah Izin Usaha Pertambangan (WIUP) dan Izin Usaha Pertambangan (IUP) yang dilaksanakan berdasarkan Perizinan Berusaha. 2) Kewenangan dalam pembinaan serta pengawasan penyelenggaraan kegiatan pertambangan. Kewenangan tersebut didelegasikan kepada Pemerintah Provinsi berdasarkan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 55 Tahun 2022 tentang Pendelegasian Pemberian Perizinan Berusaha di Bidang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara. Implikasi pengalihan kewenangan pemberian perizinan pertambangan tersebut antara lain: 1) Merubah tata cara memperoleh kewenangan secara atributif menjadi delegasi dalam model perizinan berusaha yang dapat diberikan dalam bentuk sertifikat standar dan izin. 2) Masih adanya keterlibatan Pemerintah Pusat menyebabkan konsep pendelegasian mencerminkan paradigma sentralisasi pada sektor pertambangan. 3) Dihapuskannya kewenangan Pemerintah Kabupaten/Kota dalam pemberian perizinan, pengawasan, pembinaan dan penyelesaian konflik masyarakat menjadikan hambatan dalam aktivitas pertambangan.
Expansion of Parties Entitled to Receive Safekeeping of Compensation for Losses in Land Acquisition Ketut Krisna Hari Bagaskara P.; I Wayan Parsa
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 13 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2024.v13.i01.p02

Abstract

This study examines the expansion of those entitled to the safekeeping of compensation under Article 89 paragraph (3) of PP (Government Regulation) on Land Acquisition and its effects. Land acquisition is based on the state's right to control and the government's provision of land for compensation. The district court can serve as a repository for compensation funds, allowing for their secure management and distribution. As a result of the amendment included in Article 89 paragraph (3) PP on Land Acquisition, compensation is also granted to unidentified persons, which can be understood as land parcels whose owners are unidentified. This study takes a statutory and philosophical approach to normative juridical research. Based on the findings of this study, it is clear that the amendment to PP on Land Acquisition Article 89 paragraph (3) is to include land parcels for which the rightful owners cannot be located. The planned expansion is counter to Article 33, paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, together with UUPA (Basic Agrarian Law) and Land Acquisition Law, which establishes the state's power to control. Furthermore, from the perspective of its development, it shows that the government cannot expand the PP on Land Acquisition provisions outside the Land Acquisition Law. Since those three values—justice, certainty, and benefit—were left out of the law's formulation, the expansion in Article 89(3) of PP on Land Acquisition did not serve the goal of lawmaking.
Co-Authors A. A Gede Putra Indranata Dharma A. A. Gede Aditya Kusuma A. A. Titah Ratihtiari A.A. Ngurah Anom Chandra Cahyadi Anak Agung Ayu Candrawilasita Anak Agung Ngurah Bagus Kresna Cahya x Putera Anak Agung Ngurah Fajar Nugraha Pandji Arief Haryanto Cok Istri Ida Andriani Cokorda Dalem Dahana Daniel Bagus Ariza Dentria Cahya Sudarsa Desi Adilia Wulandari Dewa Ayu Agung Chintya Devi Antari Fauziyah Fauziyah Gde Bagus Taruna Satria Arimbawa Gusti Ayu Indira Chandra Mahayani Gusti Ayu Putu Dela Werdi Absari I Dewa Gede Arie Kusumaningrat I Dewa Gede Herman Yudiawan I Gede Artha I Gede Deya Pramana I Gede Sarta I Gst Ngr Alit Adhitya Prakasa I Gusti Agung Putra Wiryawan I Gusti Ayu Werdhiyani I Gusti Ketut Ariawan I Gusti Ngurah Gede Permana Putra I Ketut Adhi Erawan I Ketut Asmara Jaya I Ketut Suardita I Ketut Sudiarta I Made Aditya Dwi Arista I Made Fajar Pradnyana I Made Indrayana I Made Kresnayana I Made Ksema Dharma Yogata I Made Sudharma I Made Sugiarta Nugraha I Made Surya Permana Putra I Nengah Suharta I Nyoman Bagiastra I Nyoman Sumardika I NYOMAN SUWIRYANATA I Putu Adi Sentana Janantara I Wayan Gede Phalosa Jitaksu Wahendra Ida Ayu Devi Putri Parahita Ida Ayu Iswariyati Ida Ayu Sintya Naraswari Manuaba Ida Bagus Paramaningrat Manuaba Ida Bagus Rehadi Yoya Brahmana Ida Purnama Sari Kadek Devi Ayu Anggari Kadek Sarna Kadek Sarna Ketut Krisna Hari Bagaskara P. Ketut Sunianingsih Dharma Yanthi Komang Gede Dianaputra M.Pd S.T. S.Pd. I Gde Wawan Sudatha . Made Bella Meisya Prihantini Nathania Agatha Lukman Nengah Suharta Nengah Suharta Ni Gusti Ayu Dyah Satyawati Ni Komang Devi Yurisia Dharmawati Ni Made Desy Ariyani Ni Made Dwita Setyana Warapsari Ni Made Emilia Ayu Safitri Ni Made Trevi Radha Rani Devi Ni Putu Suci Vikansari Ni Wayan Melda Ika Damayanthi Ni Wayan N. Irish Samantha Devi M. Nyoman Edy Febriana Putu Dewi Maharani Putu Gede Arya Sumertayasa Putu Indi Apriyani Ratih Wedhasari Wahyudi, Dian Barry