Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
2.74
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Wacana Hukum Perspektif Nagari Law Review Unes Law Review Buletin Ilmiah Nagari Membangun Jurnal Yudisial Jurnal Syntax Transformation UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Andalas International Journal of Socio-Humanities (AIJOSH) Delicti : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Kriminologi
Aria Zurnetti
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Andalas
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
PENGAJUAN SURAT PENOLAKAN OLEH TERSANGKA TERKAIT ACCESS TO JUSTICE UNTUK MEMPEROLEH BANTUAN HUKUM SECARA CUMA-CUMA PADA TINGKAT PENYIDIKAN DI POLRESTA PADANG Putri Cempaka Mukhti; Ismansyah Ismansyah; Aria Zurnetti
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.694

Abstract

Surat penolakan adalah surat pernyataan yang dibuat oleh Tersangka untuk menyatakan bahwa Tersangka tidak perlu didampingi oleh Penasihat Hukum untuk memperoleh bantuan hukums secara cuma-cuma dalam tingkat pemeriksaan. Pelaksanaan Surat Pernyataan Penolakan oleh Tersangka tidak Didampingi oleh Penasihat Hukum untuk memperoleh bantuan hukum secara cuma-cuma di tingkat penyidikan adalah praktik yang tidak ditemukan aturan hukumnya di dalam KUHAP. Dalam Pasal 56 KUHAP hanya mengatur bahwa aparat penegak hukum wajib menunjuk Penasehat Hukum pada semua tingkat pemeriksaan dalam proses peradilan bagi Tersangka. Adapun Rumusan Masalah (1) Bagaimanakah tata cara pengajuan surat penolakan oleh Tersangka terkait access to justice untuk memperoleh bantuan hukum secara cuma-cuma pada tingkat penyidikan di Polresta Padang? (2) Apakah pertimbangan atau alasan Tersangka melakukan penolakan untuk memperoleh bantuan hukum secara cuma-cuma pada tingkat penyidikan di Polresta Padang dan (3) Bagaimanakah konsekuensi Tersangka melakukan penolakan untuk memperoleh bantuan hukum secara cuma-cuma pada tingkat penyidikan di Polresta Padang?. Jenis penelitian adalah yuridis empiris. Sumber data meliputi data primer dan data sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data adalah wawancara dan studi dokumen. Data di analisis secara kualitatif. Kesimpulan hasil penelitian ini adalah: (1) Pengajuan Surat Pernyataan Penolakan oleh Tersangka untuk memperoleh bantuan hukum secara cuma-cuma di tingkat penyidikan adalah praktek yang tidak ditemukan aturan hukumnya di dalam KUHAP. Pasal 56 KUHAP tidak dilaksanakan dengan baik oleh aparat penegak hukum, terutama para penyidik dan terlihat dari rendahnya penggunaan Penasehat Hukum dalam pendampingan penyidikan di wilayah Polresta Padang. (2) Alasan Tersangka melakukan penolakan untuk memperoleh bantuan hukum secara cuma-cuma pada tingkat penyidikan adalah karena Tersangka dapat memberikan dan menjawab pertanyaan dari Penyidik dengan sendiri. (3) Konsekuensi bagi Tersangka dapat menimbulkan akibat hukum yang berat karena tidak didampingi oleh Penasehat hukum, bisa saja Tersangka yang seharusnya dapat dihukum dengan hukuman minimal apabila didampingi oleh Penasehat Hukum, menjadi mendapatkan hukuman yang maksimal karena tidak didampingi oleh Penasehat Hukum.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM OLEH PENYIDIK PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL (PPNS) BALAI BESAR PENGAWAS OBAT DAN MAKANAN (BBPOM) PADANG TERHADAP PANGAN OLAHAN TANPA IZIN EDAR (Studi Kasus: di Wilayah Hukum BBPOM Kota Padang) Febrian Akhirama Saputra; Najmi Najmi; Aria Zurnetti
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.737

Abstract

Processed food is everything that originates from agricultural, plantation, forestry, fishery, water and water products, either processed or not processed, which are intended as food or drink for human consumption, including processed food additives, processed food raw materials, and processed food ingredients. other products that are used in the process of preparing, processing and/or making food or drink, in order to maintain the safety of processed food, this is where the role of the government through the Food and Drug Supervisory Agency (BPOM) is needed to oversee drug and food distribution. The ineffectiveness of supervision and law enforcement on the distribution of drugs and food is due to the poor legal culture of society which is one of the factors causing the high circulation of processed food without a distribution permit, besides that it is also influenced by the weakness of substance and legal structure. Efforts to tackle crime with criminal law are essentially part of law enforcement efforts. The issue raised in this study is how is law enforcement by Civil Servant Investigators (PPNS) Padang Food and Drug Supervisory Agency (BBPOM) against the circulation of processed food without a distribution permit and what are the obstacles and obstacles. The research used is a sociological juridical approach which is analytically descriptive in nature, namely analyzing the link between applicable laws and regulations and legal theories and implementation practices related to the research object which then produces several conclusions. In carrying out surveillance of processed food circulating in the community, BBPOM still often finds processed food without a distribution permit that does not meet processed food standards. In carrying out law enforcement, BBPOM already has several mechanisms in accordance with statutory regulations where these rules have a juridical aspect that can guarantee certainty that the law functions as a rule that must be obeyed. In fact, the investigation and supervision carried out by BBPOM has not guaranteed legal certainty, because existing regulations are not adhered to and the constraints faced are the lack of availability of human resources and the weak authority of BBPOM in taking action against processed food without a distribution permit.
PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA ANAK YANG BELUM BERUMUR 12 (DUA BELAS) TAHUN PADA TINGKAT PENYIDIKAN DI POLRESTA PADANG Suryadinata LBN Gaol; Elwi Danil; Aria Zurnetti
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.806

Abstract

Investigators, social counselors and professional social workers must work together and coordinate with each other so that the stages as stipulated in Government Regulation No. 65 of 2015 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversion and Handling of Children Who Are Not Yet 12 Years Old, the initial initiative for implementing this government regulation in The investigator's hand is supported by the role of social counselors and professional social workers in making decisions whether the perpetrators of children who are not yet 12 years old are returned to their parents/guardians or put in LPKS. The type of research used in this study is an empirical juridical approach and is descriptive analysis in nature. The roles of Investigators, Community Counselors and Professional Social Workers have their respective roles in coordinating the decision making of perpetrators of children under the age of 12 as stipulated in Government Regulation No. 65 of 2015 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversion and Handling of Underage Children 12 years old. the initial initiative for implementing these government regulations lies in the hands of investigators supported by the role of social counselors and professional social workers in making decisions whether the perpetrators of children who are not yet 12 years old are returned to their parents/guardians or admitted to LPKS.
Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Anak Yang Belum Berumur 12 (Dua Belas) Tahun pada Tingkat Penyidikan di Polresta Padang Suryadinata LBN Gaol; Elwi Danil; Aria Zurnetti
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.898

Abstract

Investigators, social counselors and professional social workers must work together and coordinate with each other so that the stages as stipulated in Government Regulation No. 65 of 2015 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversion and Handling of Children Who Are Not Yet 12 Years Old, the initial initiative for implementing this government regulation in The investigator's hand is supported by the role of social counselors and professional social workers in making decisions whether the perpetrators of children who are not yet 12 years old are returned to their parents/guardians or put in LPKS. The type of research used in this study is an empirical juridical approach and is descriptive analysis in nature. The roles of Investigators, Community Counselors and Professional Social Workers have their respective roles in coordinating the decision making of perpetrators of children under the age of 12 as stipulated in Government Regulation No. 65 of 2015 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversion and Handling of Underage Children 12 years old. the initial initiative for implementing these government regulations lies in the hands of investigators supported by the role of social counselors and professional social workers in making decisions whether the perpetrators of children who are not yet 12 years old are returned to their parents/guardians or admitted to LPKS.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Korban Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Oleh Dinas Pemberdayaan Perempuan, Perlindungan Anak, Pengendalian Penduduk, dan Keluarga Berencana (Dp3ap2kb) Kota Padang Trisanti Trisanti; Aria Zurnetti; Khairani Khairani
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.916

Abstract

Children are very vulnerable to becoming victims of crime, many children are targets of acts of violence. In Padang city violence against children in 2021 there was 63 cases of violence recorded. Based on Article 59 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection, local governments are obliged to provide protection for child victims. This research focuses on two issues, First: How is the legal protection of child victims of violent crimes committed by DP3AP2KB Padang City, Second: How is the implementation of legal protection for child victims of violent crimes committed by DP3AP2KB Padang City.This study uses empirical juridical research methods with analytical descriptive characteristics. Sources were obtained from interviews, reports and documents. Secondary data comes from related laws and regulations, articles, journals, and internet sites. The results of the research, First, the legal protection carried out by DP3AP2KB is to provide consulting services and legal process assistance to ensure the fulfillment of children's rights so that they can recover and be able to carry out social functions in their environment, social field. Second, the implementation of legal protection for child victims of violent crimes by DP3AP2KB experienced several obstacles, namely a lack of human resources, a lack of special experts such as child clinical psychologists and a lack of budget, facilities and infrastructure. so it must coordinate with other agencies.
Pertimbangan Penuntut Umum Memilih Tempat Terjadinya Tindak Pidana Dalam Mendakwa Pelaku Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana di Luar Daerah Hukumnya Pada Surat Dakwaan Register Perkara: Pdm-15/Ppjng/Eoh.2/03/2021 Yunita Eka Putri; Ismansyah Ismansyah; Aria Zurnetti
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.940

Abstract

Public Prosecutor is a prosecutor at the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia who is authorized by law to conduct prosecutions, which process includes the authority to compose indictments. In exercising this authority, Article 15 and Article 137 of the Criminal Procedural Code (KUHAP) provide limitations for Public Prosecutors to conduct prosecutions within their jurisdictions, however, in practice it is found that Public Prosecutors indict criminal offenders who committed crimes outside their given jurisdiction (extra-jurisdictional). To study this phenomenon and its legal consequences, this research examines the consideration of the Public Prosecutor at Padang Panjang District Prosecutor's Office who indicted the perpetrator of criminal offense outside its given jurisdiction, as found in indictment No. PDM-15/PPJNG/Eoh.2/03/2021 on behalf of the defendant Aziarlis Bin Ameh Pgl Ziar, by employing empirical legal research methods based on primary data obtained by interviewing related Judges, lawyer and Public Prosecutors and also based on secondary data obtained through literature studies of various regulations and references that are analyzed qualitatively. This study finds that despite the restrictions imposed by KUHAP, extra-jurisdictional indictment is made possible through several provision in legislation, including Article 2 paragraph (3) of Law Number 16 Year 2004 concerning the Attorney General’s Office of the Republic of Indonesia. This study also recommends that the Supreme Court should consistently apply Article 4 paragraph (1) of Law No. 49 year 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law No. 2 Year 1986 concerning General Courts, which is included as a consideration in Chief Justice Decree No. 200/KMA/SK/X/2018.
Penyidikan Tindak Pidana di Bidang Ketenagakerjaan oleh Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PPNS) Dinas Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi Provinsi Sumatera Barat Zaifi Surya Gemilang; Aria Zurnetti; Khairani Khairani
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1006

Abstract

Criminal activities in the labor industry are illegal acts carried out by laborers, employers, or other persons not affiliated with the firm that face criminal penalties under the Criminal Code, Manpower Law, and/or other legislation, either alone or in combination. In the course of Civil Servant Investigators' criminal inquiries in the labor sector. The Manpower and Transmigration Service (Disnakertrans) employs Civil Servant Investigators who carry out their work in accordance with the Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower and the Regulation of the Chief of the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 of 2010 concerning Investigation Management by Civil Servant Investigators (PPNS). Both laws provide authority for their operations. It seems sense in this instance that PPNS Disnakertrans's inquiry is coordinated with the police as well. One of the issues preventing the inquiry from operating at its best in its execution is the ineffective coordination. The following issues may be created based on the backdrop of the aforementioned difficulties: 1. How are criminal investigations in the area of labor being carried out by Civil Servant Investigators (PPNS) of the Manpower and Transmigration Office of West Sumatra Province? 2. What are the challenges facing the Civil Servant Investigators (PPNS) of the Manpower and Transmigration Office of the Province of West Sumatra in carrying out criminal investigations in the area of labor? Based on the study's descriptive methodology and empirical juridical approach, the following conclusions may be drawn from it: 1. The implementation of criminal investigations in the field of labor by PPNS Disnakertrans is a series of: examination, processing of crime scenes, Sprindik, SPDP, examination of witnesses and suspects, completion and submission of Case Files to be submitted by PPNS to the public prosecutor through police investigators. 2. The obstacles experienced by PPNS Disnakertrans in carrying out criminal investigations in the field of labor are the lack of supervisors and PPNS both in quantity and quality. In addition, the lack of facilities and infrastructure as well as limited budget are obstacles in the investigation. SOPs that are not fully implemented and lack of coordination between PPNS and the Police as Korwas are obstacles found in the implementation of criminal investigations in the field of labor. For better implementation of investigations, PPNS Disnakertrans West Sumatra must be able to improve coordination with Police Investigators. In addition, Disnakertrans is expected to be able to overcome internal obstacles so that the enforcement of criminal acts in the labor sector can run even better.
Pengaturan Hukum Pidana Adat dalam KUHP Baru dari Perspektif Asas Legalitas Yonatan Iskandar Chandra; Elwi Danil; Aria Zurnetti
Nagari Law Review Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Nagari Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Andalas University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/nalrev.v.7.i.1.p.93-106.2023

Abstract

The discussion on Adat Criminal Law has returned to attention after promulgating the National Criminal Code. This is because the provisions regarding Adat Criminal Law are unknown and are not contained in the Criminal Code, which was previously in effect in Indonesia. The regulation of Adat Criminal Law in the form of positive law resulted in a change in the form of Adat Criminal Law itself, which was previously unwritten law to become written law. The change in form is also related to the Legality Principle, which is still maintained in the National Criminal Code. Based on this, it can be stated that the formulation of the problem in this study: (1) How is the concept of Adat criminal law regulation in the National Criminal Code? (2) What is the relationship between the nature of the Adat Criminal Law as unwritten law and its provisions in the National Criminal Code?; and (3) How is the regulation of Adat Criminal Law in the National Criminal Code according to the perspective of the Legality Principle? The method used in this research is normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The nature of the exploratory research uses primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that regulations regarding Adat Criminal Law in the National Criminal Code are as stipulated in Article 2 of the National Criminal Code, where Adat Crimes are laws that live in society in the form of unwritten law, and are still valid and developing in people's lives in Indonesia. However, the regulation of Adat Criminal Law in the National Criminal Code will cause problems when viewed from the perspective of the Legality Principle. The formulation that the Adat Criminal Law should be legalized through local law contradicts the essence of Adat Law itself and is the legality principle.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Banyak Orang Pada Kasus Putusan Nomor 6/Pid.Sus.TPK/2023/PT.Pdg Vananda Putra; Elwi Danil; Aria Zurnetti
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1100

Abstract

The rise of criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia, and the very dangerous impacts they cause, can even destroy the socio-cultural, political, moral and legal pillars of national security, so in reality overcoming these disgraceful acts must be done in extraordinary ways, So it is appropriate to say that criminal acts of corruption are included in extraordinary crimes. No. Corruption is often committed jointly, criminal law already regulates criminal acts of joint conduct or what is called participation (deelneming). However, often in proving criminal acts of corruption, the prosecutor does not develop the existence of other perpetrators who can be held accountable. The problems in this research are 1) What is the form of error and criminal responsibility of each perpetrator in criminal acts of corruption committed by many people (Case Study Decision Number 6/Pid.Sus.TPK/2023/PT.Pdg 2) How is the Evidence in the Case Corruption committed by many people in Decision Number 6/Pid.Sus.TPK/2023/PT.Pdg. 3) What are the considerations of the Panel of Judges in Decision Number 6/Pid.Sus.TPK/2023/PT.Pdg? This type of research is normative juridical research, using a statutory and conceptual approach, with primary and secondary data collection techniques. Based on the results of research and discussion, the concept of criminal acts committed jointly in corruption crimes is if the criminal act of corruption is committed by more than one person or two more people who together have the intention or desire for the act to be carried out. The conclusion of this research is that the decision of the Padang High Court is correct, because it strengthens the decision of the Corruption Crime Court at the Padang District Court Number 46/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN.Pdg, but the responsibility of other perpetrators who participated in the crime corruption in this case, still not held accountable.
Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Pemerasan Dengan Ancaman Dalam Pembangunan Properti Di Kota Padang Kevin Lie; Aria Zurnetti; Edita Elda
Delicti : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Kriminologi Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/delicti.v.1.i.2.p.54-62.2023

Abstract

Crime is committed in various forms and developments. One of the things that occurs in society and receives little attention is the crime of extortion and threats. In Padang City there are cases of criminal acts of threats in property development. This was done by thugs under the pretext of security money. This is of course detrimental and requires action by the police. The formulation of the problem in this research is how to enforce the law against the crime of extortion with threats in property development in Padang City and what are the obstacles faced by the police in efforts to enforce the law for the crime of extortion with threats in property development in Padang City. The research method used is empirical legal research supported by field research at the Padang City Police Department by interviewing sources. Based on the results of the research, it shows that law enforcement for the criminal act of extortion with threats in property development carried out by the police is carried out by: 1. Repressive law enforcement through action based on the provisions of the criminal procedure law. 2. Preventive law enforcement, namely by prevention. The various obstacles faced by the Polresta Padang include limited personnel, the public accepting the practice of criminal acts of extortion with threats, criminal acts often occurring in remote areas and minimal reporting from the public
Co-Authors Awilda Awilda Edita Elda Elwi Danil Fadhilah Sabri Febrian Akhirama Saputra Fengki Andreas Henni Muchtar Herri Hendra Ismansyah Ismansyah Ismansyah Ismansyah Ismansyah Ismansyah Kevin Lie Khairani Khairani Khairani Khairani Khofifah Kusuma Wardani Maulana Fajri Adrian Najmi Najmi Nani Mulyati Oktriadi Kurniawan Putri Cempaka Mukhti Roni Efendi Suharizal Sukmareni Sukmareni Suryadinata LBN Gaol Suryadinata LBN Gaol Teguh Sulistia Trisanti Trisanti Vananda Putra Yonatan Iskandar Chandra Yunita Eka Putri Zaifi Surya Gemilang