Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal HAYATI Journal of Biosciences EDUSAINS Bioedukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA Jurnal Biolokus: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi dan Biologi JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains) International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability
Yuke Mardiati, Yuke
Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi FITK Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Education Physics

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Higher Order Thinking Skills: Student Profile Using Two-Tier Multiple Choice Instrument Indri Andriyatno; Zulfiani Zulfiani; Yuke Mardiati
International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability Vol 3, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Gemilang Maju Publikasi Ilmiah (GMPI) 

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53889/ijses.v3i1.79

Abstract

This research aimed to analyze students' Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) using a two-tier multiple choice (TTMC) test instrument. This study used a descriptive quantitative method with a purposive sampling technique. The instruments used are multiple-choice tests with free reasoning, the TTMC test for quantitative data, interview guides, and learning observations for qualitative data. Anderson and Krathwohl's Bloom taxonomy revision (2001) cognitive instrument used to classify HOTS. The results showed that the higher-order thinking skill profile has an average score of 63,21 and dominated good. Students' cognitive level of analyzing/C4 (74,35%) is more dominant compared to cognitive evaluating/C5 (68,90%) and creating/C6 (63,24%). The hormonal regulatory subconcept gets the highest correct answer average with a percentage of 89,74%, and the contraceptive method subconcept gets the lowest correct answer average with 35,90%. One factor that influences the high and low percentage of the correct answer for each subconcept is the level of difficulty of the question; medium (enough) in the contraceptive method and too tricky in the contraceptive method. Analysis of answer patterns based on the results of a TTMC test shows that students are better able to answer questions on the first tier than answering on the second tier.
POE LEARNING MODEL: THE EFFECT ON STUDENT SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS ON THE COORDINATION SYSTEM CONCEPT Siti Hartini Yulianti; Nengsih Juanengsih; Yuke Mardiati
JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jpps.v8n1.p%p

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of POE (Predict-Observe-Explain) learning models on students' science process skills on the coordination system concept. This research was carried out in SMA Negeri 9 Tangerang Selatan in the 2017/2018 school year. This research method is quasi-experimental with nonequivalent control group design. Sampling using purposive sampling technique. The study sample consisted of 73 students:  37 experimental group and 36 control group. The research instrument used is a test of science process skills in the form of a description test and observation sheet. The results of data analysis of students' science process skills using ANACOVA, showed that there were significant differences between the experimental and the control group. This shows that there was an effect of the application of the POE (Predict-Observe-Explain) learning model on students' science process skills on the concept of coordination system.
Student argumentation skills’ analysis on the discussion of socio-scientific issues in the concept of viruses Yuke Mardiati; Yanti Herlanti; Alfi Lailatul Qodriyah
Jurnal Biolokus: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi dan Biologi Vol 5, No 2 (2022): December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/biolokus.v5i2.1945

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the argumentation skills of students in learning through discussion of socio-scientific issues with the concept of viruses. This research is descriptive which describes the quality of oral and written arguments. The research was conducted in class of  X MIPA at SMAN Jakarta. There were 34 students involved in this study. The method of analysis to determine the pattern of arguments used is the Toulmin Analysis. The analysis of collaborative oral arguments in class used Erduran's analysis framework. Meanwhile, the quality of individual written argumentation was Dawson and Venville's analysis. The results showed that the quality of students' oral arguments reached level 5. This means that students have been able to make a claim accompanied by a warrant and rebuttal quite well. The quality of the students' written arguments reaches levels 2 and 3. This means that students' arguments consist of arguments in the form of claims (claims) accompanied by guarantors of claims (warrants) and evidence (data) and rebuttals that are still weak.. The augmentation process verbally and collaboratively in class has reached the highest level, but individually and in writing it is still at a moderate level.
Co-Authors , Triadiati Ahmad Sofyan Ahmad Sofyan Alfi Lailatul Qodriyah Annisaa Meyrizka Kusumo Putri dhuhana putri ramadhani Egi Ramadah Holyness Nurdin Singadimedja Indri Andriyatno Irma Suryani Maulida, Resha Miftahuzzakiyah Miftahuzzakiyah Nengsih Juanengsih Nengsih Juanengsih Nengsih Juanengsih Nengsih Juanengsih Nengsih Juanengsih, Nengsih Nuri Shabania Nurlaelah Jamil Resha Maulida Siti Hartini Yulianti Soekisman Tjitrosoedirdjo Sugiarti Sugiarti Yanti Herlanti Yanti Herlanti Yanti Herlanti Yulianti, Siti Hartini Zulfiani Zulfiani Zulfiani Zulfiani