Honeste Vivere
Honeste Vivere is an open access and peer-reviewed journal that aims to offer an international academic platform for cross-border legal research in multiple governance policies and civil rights law, particularly in developing and emerging countries. These may include but are not limited to various fields such as civil law, criminal law, constitutional and administrative law, customary institution law, religious jurisprudence law, international regime law
Articles
9 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 33 No 2 (2023): July"
:
9 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[ANALISA PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP PENGEMUDI KENDARAAN BERMOTOR YANG KARENA KELALAIANNYA MENGAKIBATKAN ORANG LAIN MENINGGAL DUNIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Yosephine Elizabeth]]>;
<![CDATA[Inri Januar]]>;
<![CDATA[Lonna Yohanes Lengkong]]>
<![CDATA[ Honeste Vivere Vol 33 No 2 (2023): July ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55809/hv.v33i2.197
<![CDATA[Traffic Accident is an incident on the streets that happened out of nowhere that can cause damage, injuries, and even death. The research problem of this thesis are to know the criminal liability of the act of Negligence Caused Death in Indonesian’s Law and the application of its criminal liability towards someone’s behavior of negligence caused death in the Medan District Court Verdict No: 3569/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Mdn). The research method that is used by the author is the method of normative juridical which uses case approach and statute approach. The data sources that is used by the author is the secondary data in which are primary materials, secondary materials, and tertiary material. For the outcome, the author concluded that the Prosecutors can’t proof the Defendant actions in details. In the Medan District Court Verdict No: 3569/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Mdn, there is nothing that can be use a proof or something that can be convincing enough to proof that the Defendant is indeed driven the Vehicle above the Speed Limit. So because of that, the Judges should’ve made the verdict as a free verdict.]]>
<![CDATA[KEBERADAAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DI INDONESIA DALAM PERANNYA MENJAGA HAK ASASI MANUSIA DAN HAK KONSTITUSIONAL WARGA NEGARA (SUATU PERWUJUDAN NYATA) ]]>
<![CDATA[Francois Geny Ritonga]]>
<![CDATA[ Honeste Vivere Vol 33 No 2 (2023): July ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55809/hv.v33i2.210
<![CDATA[The Constitutional Court is one of the judicial institutions in Indonesia, which was formed based on Article 24C of the 1945 Constitution and Law no. 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court. The powers of the Constitutional Court, such as: 1) Reviewing laws against the 1945 Constitution, 2) Deciding disputes over the authority of state institutions whose powers are granted by the 1945 Constitution, 3) Deciding the dissolution of political parties; and 4) Resolving disputes about the general election results. The purpose of writing is to see how far the authority of the Constitutional Court is applied in carrying out its functions and powers by using the normative juridical writing method. The findings prove that the Constitutional Court has carried out as stipulated in the 1945 Constitution and legislation and implemented a rule of law that recognizes and protects and guarantees the basic rights of citizens to the need for justice (access to justice) and equality before the law (equality before the law).]]>
<![CDATA[SAHKAH HUKUM YANG BURUK SECARA MORAL ? PERDEBATAN ANTARA LON LUVOIS FULLER DAN H.L.A. HART ]]>
<![CDATA[Petrus Bello]]>
<![CDATA[ Honeste Vivere Vol 33 No 2 (2023): July ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55809/hv.v33i2.238
<![CDATA[The concept of natural law, which was inherited by Thomas Aquinas, is still attractive. In the 20th century, his thoughts were re-examined and used as a basis by several legal philosophers, one of whom was Lon Luvois Fuller. Fuller is considered successful in actualizing Aquinas' thoughts in the realm of 20th century thought. Natural law is understood as a theory which states that law and morality have an absolute relationship (necessary relation); that the validity of law (rules, precedent, judge's decision) depends on its conformity with morality. The absolute link between law and morality according to Fuller is evident in the procedures that apply in the contemporary legal system which according to him reflects moral principles or legal morality. Fuller's thoughts were met with strong resistance from H.L.A. Hart stated that the moral principles according to Fuller are legal morality not as moral principles, but as legal principles.]]>
<![CDATA[KONSTRUKSI MOTIF DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PIDANA ]]>
<![CDATA[Adrianus Herman Henok]]>
<![CDATA[ Honeste Vivere Vol 33 No 2 (2023): July ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55809/hv.v33i2.242
<![CDATA[Hans Jonas in the Ethics of Responsibility states that "Every time you take an action, also imagine the consequences of that action, meaning that if the action is bad then also imagine the bad consequences that will occur, conversely if the action is good then also imagine the good consequences that will occur, or in other words every action has good consequences such as rewards, as well as bad consequences, such as punishment." The purpose of this study is to examine the construction of motives in proving a criminal case based on positive law in Indonesia. The method used is normative juridical with analytical descriptive analysis by searching secondary data through various relevant legal materials. From the research it was concluded that motive plays an important role in proving the elements of a crime in a criminal case, especially those associated with elements of error and in the future motives will be increasingly relevant in relation to the goals and guidelines of sentencing.]]>
<![CDATA[Penerapan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2016 Dalam Sengketa Pembelian Tanah Yang Belum Terdaftar/Bersertifikat di Pengadilan Negeri Tanjung Balai ]]>
<![CDATA[Haposan Sahala Raja Sinaga]]>
<![CDATA[ Honeste Vivere Vol 33 No 2 (2023): July ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55809/hv.v33i2.250
<![CDATA[There is a development in the understanding of buyers with good intentions in buying and selling land, namely with the issuance of SEMA Number 4 of 2016 concerning the Enforcement of the Formulation of the Results of the 2016 Indonesian Supreme Court Chamber Plenary Meeting as a Guideline for the Implementation of Duties for the Court. The formulation of the problem to be studied is: first, how is the formulation of the law of the civil chamber regarding the definition of a good faith buyer in the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 4 of 2016. Second, how is the application of SEMA No. 4 of 2016 in Court Decisions and Judge Considerations in Case Number 11/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Tjb. This research uses normative legal research, the main object of this normative legal research is court decisions related to good faith land buyers in the Tanjung Balai District Court decision No. 11/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Tjb. The results of this study, the first: "Specifically regarding the understanding of a good faith buyer as stated in the civil chamber agreement in SEMA No. 4 of 2016 at number 4, which completes the civil chamber agreement dated 9 October 2014 in letter a as follows: Conducting buying and selling of land objects belonging to customary / unregistered carried out according to customary law provisions.]]>
<![CDATA[Hasil Dari Harta Bawaan, Hadiah dan Warisan Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan ]]>
<![CDATA[Poltak Siringoringo]]>;
<![CDATA[Paltiada Saragi]]>;
<![CDATA[Inri Januar]]>
<![CDATA[ Honeste Vivere Vol 33 No 2 (2023): July ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55809/hv.v33i2.251
<![CDATA[Harta benda dalam perkawinan memerlukan pengaturan agar memberikan kepastian dan perlindungan dan kepastian hukum bukan hanya bagi suami istri tetapi juga untuk pihak ketiga yang akan mengadakan hubungan hukum. Pembedaan harta bawaan dan harta bersama membuat penguasaan hukum atas harta bersama dan harta bawaan menjadi berbeda. Pengaturan mengenai hasil dari harta bawaan, hadiah dan warisan apakah tetap dikategorikan harta bawaan, hadiah atau warisan bila diusahakan bersama-sama antara suami dan isteri telah menimbulkan ketidakjelasan. Pasal 35 ayat 2 dan pasal 36 ayat 1 dan 2 hanya memberikan batasan mengenai pengelolaan harta bersama dan harta bawaan, hadiah dan warisan tetapi dalam peraturan perundangundangan tidak ada penjelasan lebih lanjut mengenai hasil pengembangan harta bawaan atau warisan atau hadiah yang didapat dalam perkawinan apakah masuk kategori harta bersama atau harta bawaan. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode penelitian normatif yang menelaah terkait tidak adanya penjelasan norma mengenai hasil dari harta bersama, hadiah atau warisan sebagaimana dalam pasal 35 sampai 37 UU perkawinan. Hasil dari penelitian ini menyimpulkan bila hasil atau pengembangan dari harta bawaan, warisan dan hadiah masuk kedalam kategori harta bersama.]]>
<![CDATA[PENERAPAN OMKERING VAN BEWIJSLAST DALAM PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Mery R.L Sibarani]]>
<![CDATA[ Honeste Vivere Vol 33 No 2 (2023): July ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55809/hv.v33i2.254
<![CDATA[In criminal procedural law, criminal proof law is provisions regarding evidence which include evidence, evidence, methods of collecting and obtaining evidence up to submitting evidence in court as well as the strength of evidence and burden of proof in criminal cases. Evidence in criminal procedural law is generally regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code, but in its development, the evidentiary provisions in the Criminal Procedure Code are distorted by the Corruption Crime Law. The Corruption Law in regulating its evidence uses the omkering van bewijslast principle or balanced proof. This research is compiled with a normative juridical research method and is structured to determine the principle of omkering van bewijslast in the legal theory of evidence and its regulation in the Indonesian Corruption Law.]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS YURIDIS PENEGAKAN HUKUM DAN KEADILAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN ANAK YANG BARU LAHIR OLEH SEORANG IBU ]]>
<![CDATA[Joshua Jou Radja]]>;
<![CDATA[Radisman Saragih]]>;
<![CDATA[Adrianus Herman Henok]]>
<![CDATA[ Honeste Vivere Vol 33 No 2 (2023): July ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55809/hv.v33i2.255
<![CDATA[Pasal 1 angka (3) Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia menyatakan bahwa Indonesia adalah negara hukum, sehingga seluruh pelanggaran hukum yang terjadi harus ditindak berdasarkan hukum yang berlaku dan seluruh penduduk Indonesia mendapatkan perlakuan yang sama di depan hukum. Negara hukum atau rechstaats menurut Julius Stahl mencakup empat elemen penting yaitu, perlindungan hak asasi manusia, pembagian kekuasaan, pemerintahan berdasarkan Undang-Undang dan peradilan tata usaha negara. Masalah yang akan difokuskan dalam tulisan ini adalah penegakan hukum dan keadilan dalam perkara tindak pidana pembunuhan anak yang baru lahir oleh seorang ibu berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku di Indonesia dan pemenuhan rasa keadilan berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Padangsidempuan Nomor 285/PID.B/2021/PN PSP tertanggal 04 November 2021, dan menegnai vonis hakim aapakah sudah memenuhi keadilan. Dari penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa penegakan hukum dan keadilan dalam perkara tindk pidana pembunuhan anak yang baru lahir oleh seorang ibu di Indonesia masih kurang maksimal.]]>
<![CDATA[PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA BERDASARKAN UNDANG – UNDANG NOMOR 23 TAHUN 2004 DI PENGADILAN NEGERI BREBES ]]>
<![CDATA[Michael Mauliutus Silitonga]]>;
<![CDATA[Aartje Tehupeiory]]>;
<![CDATA[Andree Washington Hasiholan]]>
<![CDATA[ Honeste Vivere Vol 33 No 2 (2023): July ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55809/hv.v33i2.256
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini berjudul “Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga Berdasarkan Undang – Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Brebes Nomor 87/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn.Bbs). Ada 2 Permasalahan yang diteliti dalam penelitian ini adalah (1) Bagaimana upaya penegakan hukum terhadap tindakan kekerasan rumah tangga? (2) Apakah pertimbangan hakim dalam studi kasus nomor perkara: Nomor 87/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn.Bbs sudah sesuai dengan Undang-Undang KDRT?. Dari penelitian hukum yang telah dilakukan dapat disimpulkan bahwa, pada permasalah yang pertama mengenai upaya penegakan penegakan hukum dalam UU Penghapusan KDRT melibatkan sanksi pidana berupa penjara dan denda yang ditentukan oleh Hakim. Selain itu, Hakim juga dapat menjatuhkan pidana tambahan, seperti pembatasan gerak pelaku dan program konseling. Pengadilan juga memiliki kewenangan untuk menetapkan perlindungan sementara bagi korban sebelum persidangan dimulai. Selain itu, belum ada putusan pengadilan yang menjatuhkan pidana tambahan sebagaimana diatur dalam UU tersebut. Perlindungan bagi korban KDRT melalui penetapan pengadilan juga belum banyak dikenal dan diterapkan oleh masyarakat. Sedangkan, dalam permasalah kedua disimpulkan bahwa berdasarkan Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor 87/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Bbs, telah terjadi tindak pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT) yang sesuai dengan definisi dalam Pasal 1 Ayat (1) UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan KDRT. Korban dalam kasus ini memenuhi syarat sebagai korban KDRT berdasarkan Pasal 1 Ayat (3) UU tersebut. Namun, dalam penilaian hakim berdasarkan surat dakwaan, terdakwa hanya didakwa dengan dakwaan subsidair, yaitu Pasal 44 Ayat (2) UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan KDRT yang mencakup unsur perbuatan kekerasan fisik dalam lingkup rumah tangga.]]>
