ACADEMOS Jurnal Hukum dan Tatanan Sosial
ACADEMOS Jurnal Hukum dan Tatanan Sosial is a journal in the field of Law managed and developed by Students, Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Surabaya, Indonesia. Since it was first published in 2022, the journal is intended to facilitate and provide a legal study development forum for lecturer, Researchers, and students. This journal publishes articles in the field of law with a theme specific to each problem. The specialty of this journal is to publish articles in contemporary legal studies with an interdisciplinary approach. The journal is also intended to publish a variety of studies on social justice and crime in a broad perspective. ACADEMOS Jurnal Hukum dan Tatanan Sosial publishes fallen theoretical contributions in the field of social-law, as well as contributions that are the result of empirical and interdisciplinary research. ACADEMOS journal is published twice a year (in February and August) by the Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Surabaya.
Articles
34 Documents
<![CDATA[Legal Accountability of Budget Authorities in Refocusing Corona Virus Disease 19 ]]>
<![CDATA[Rindi Aprilianti]]>;
<![CDATA[Satria Unggul Wicaksana Prakasa]]>
<![CDATA[ Academos Vol 1 No 2 (2022): ACADEMOS Jurnal Hukum dan Tatanan Sosial ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyaha Surabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30651/aca.v1i2.14329
<![CDATA[ABSTRACTThis study focuses on analyzing the legal accountability of budgetary power in refocusing covid-19. According to data from Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW), state losses in 2020 amounted to Rp. 18.173 trillion, while in 2021, state losses due to corruption cases amounted to Rp. 26.83 trillion. this is in line with the case of social assistance provided by the government including the PKH (Hope Family Program), the Basic Food Card Program, the Bulog Rice Assistance Program, and the BST (Cash Social Assistance) Program. Related legal issues raised and analyzed, 1) Discussion on legal accountability (KSSK) in the analysis of article 27 paragraph (2) Perppu No.1 of 2020 and 2) Legal efforts in enforcing the COVID-19 budget refocusing. Using social-legal methods. The results of the study based on 1) Article 27 paragraph (2) of Perppu No.1 of 2020 and Government Regulations of Presidential Instruction No. 4 of 2020 show the enforcement of budget refocusing by placing the position of regional heads or executive organs in budgeting and budget execution issues. With criminal justice with imprisonment and fines in accordance with Article 12 letter a of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption as amended in Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2001. 2) Strengthening the mechanism of the role of law enforcement in the budget refocusing system is needed by maximizing implementation of the rules of corruption during the Covid-19 pandemic effectively and provide a deterrent effect through a letter of claim.]]>
<![CDATA[Eksistentsi Pidana Mati Bagi Pelaku Korupsi Pada Saat Bencana ]]>
<![CDATA[Muh Anugerah Latjeno]]>;
<![CDATA[Ahmad Yulianto Ikshan]]>;
<![CDATA[Muridah Isnawati]]>
<![CDATA[ Academos Vol 1 No 2 (2022): ACADEMOS Jurnal Hukum dan Tatanan Sosial ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyaha Surabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30651/aca.v1i2.14339
<![CDATA[Corruption has always been the pros and cons of imposing the death penalty, which can be imposed on perpetrators of budget corruption during disasters. The purpose of this study was to find out the existence of the death penalty for Corruption Perpetrators during the Covid-19 disaster. In addition, this study uses a normative juridical research method using a statutory approach and a case approach. The results of this study show that the Covid 19 outbreak that hit in 2020 yesterday was a non-natural disaster. Therefore, it is not uncommon to be a parameter in imposing the death penalty for perpetrators of budget corruption during a national natural disaster as in the Tipokor Law. The law mentions that the reason for the death penalty could be carried out under certain circumstances such as in a state of a national natural disaster. However, the Covid 19 outbreak is not a national natural disaster but a non-natural disaster other than that the amount of state losses is not clear. Hence, the existence of the threat of capital punishment is still very difficult to pass on to the perpetrators because the parameters that are the benchmark are not yet clear from the conditions in question.]]>
<![CDATA[Sexual Harassment of Workers in The Workplace ]]>
<![CDATA[Khoiriah Mistirah]]>;
<![CDATA[Asri Wijayanti]]>
<![CDATA[ Academos Vol 1 No 2 (2022): ACADEMOS Jurnal Hukum dan Tatanan Sosial ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyaha Surabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30651/aca.v1i2.14344
<![CDATA[Sexual harassment in the workplace that is not taken seriously causes unsolved issues of widespread sexual harassment and unsafe workplace for people.This legal research uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The legal questions asked are: 1) What is the form of legal protection for workers who experience sexual harrasment in the work place? 2) what legal remidies can be taken by workers who experience sexual harassment in the workplace? The results of the study show that the protections given to sexual harassment victims are; 1) being able to file for layoffs if the sexual harassment is carried out by entrepreneurs, the termination of layoffs for workers who are perpetrators of sexual harassment, and the threat of criminal sanctions against perpetrators of sexual harassment. Workers who are victims of sexual harassment who file for layoffs are entitled to one-time severance pay, one-time work award and compensation. 2) Legal remedies that can be taken by victims of sexual harassment in the workplace are civil law action through non-litigation or litigation and can also take criminal legal action by submitting a complaint to the police.]]>
<![CDATA[Law Enforcement for Crime of Pornography Widespread on Social Media Based on lex specialis derogat legi generalis ]]>
<![CDATA[Ahmad Hidayat]]>;
<![CDATA[Anang Dony Irawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Academos Vol 1 No 2 (2022): ACADEMOS Jurnal Hukum dan Tatanan Sosial ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyaha Surabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30651/aca.v1i2.14353
<![CDATA[The spread of pornography cases that are rampant on social media has resulted in an increase in immoral acts and obscenity. As in the case of the spread of Vina Garut's nasty video between a woman and three men circulating on social media. The crime of pornography is an act related to images, illustrations, photos, writings, sounds, moving images, gestures, or other forms of messages through various forms of communication media and/or public performances. Specifically, social media that contains obscenity or exploitation of sexual behavior violates the norms of decency in society. The formulation of the problem in this paper is first, how is the responsibility for the crime of pornography that spreads it through social media. Secondly, how to enforce the law against criminal acts for perpetrators of spreading pornographic content through social media.]]>
<![CDATA[Peran Dewan Keamanan Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa Dalam Penyelesaian Invasi Rusia Atas Ukraina Tahun 2022 ]]>
<![CDATA[Baby Christina Martasari Rudolf Willems]]>;
<![CDATA[Levina Yustitianingtyas]]>
<![CDATA[ Academos Vol 1 No 2 (2022): ACADEMOS Jurnal Hukum dan Tatanan Sosial ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyaha Surabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30651/aca.v1i2.14434
<![CDATA[Perserikatan bangsa-bangsa sendiri merupakan suatu organisasi Internasional yang memiliki tujuan utama untuk menjaga keamanan dan perdamaian dunia. Seperti halnya serangan yang dilakukan oleh negara Rusia terhadap negara Ukraina sebelumnya telah diprediksi oleh berbagai pihak, termasuk negara-negara yang tergabung di dalam NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization). Rusia melakukan serangan terhadap Ukraina karena merasa bahwa kedaulatan negaranya sedang terancam dengan adanya deklarasi Ukraina ingin bergabung dengan NATO. Negara Rusia melakukan invasi terhadap Ukraina pada tanggal 24 Februari 2022. Dampak yang ditimbulkan dari adanya invasi Rusia terhadap Ukraina yaitu adanya pelanggaran HAM dalam kategori berat karena invasi yang dilakukan telah menyebabkan banyaknya penduduk sipil yang meninggal dunia. Rumusan masalah dari pembahasan ini adalah ditemukannya peran dari dewan keamanan PBB dalam mengatasi konflik antara Rusia dengan Ukraina. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan hukum normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan merupakan pendekatan secara perundang-undangan (statuta approach). Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa peran dewan keamanan PBB berhak memberikan sanksi kepada Rusia yang melakukan invasi terhadap Ukraina yaitu dengan membuat Resolusi Konflik.Kata kunci: Invasi, Dewan Keamanan PBB, Sanksi.]]>
<![CDATA[the covid-19 pandemic as a force majeure reason for flight service users based on Law No. 1 of 2009. ]]>
<![CDATA[Iwan Widi Setiawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Levina Yustitianingtyas]]>
<![CDATA[ Academos Vol 2 No 1 (2023): ACADEMOS Jurnal Hukum dan Tatanan Sosial ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyaha Surabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30651/aca.v2i1.15081
<![CDATA[The unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic has caused people all over the world to panic. The World Health Organization (WHO) is taking proactive measures to prevent the spread of the virus, by directing countries around the world to take measures such as social distancing, physical distancing, quarantine, and regional restrictions or known as lock down which ultimately affects various sectors of life. This research discusses the covid-19 pandemic as a force majeure reason for flight service users based on Law No. 1 of 2009. This paper focuses on the issue of how the airline's responsibility for the unilateral cancellation of the Covid-19 reason based on Law No. 1 of 2009, and how is consumer legal protection for unilateral departure cancellations by airlines on the grounds of covid-19. This writing uses normative juridical research methods with data collection and is more emphasized on secondary sources of material, in the form of laws and regulations, examining legal principles and legal science theory. While the specifications in this study are descriptive analysis and analyzed by qualitative methods. This study seeks to analyze and answer problems regarding the COVID-19 pandemic as a force majeure reason for flight service users based on Law No. 1 of 2009.]]>
<![CDATA[Criminal Liabilty for Perpetrator Who Escaped During Covid-19 Quarantine: Case Study of Rachel Vennya ]]>
<![CDATA[Erika Sukmawati]]>;
<![CDATA[Nur Azizah Hidayat]]>
<![CDATA[ Academos Vol 1 No 2 (2022): ACADEMOS Jurnal Hukum dan Tatanan Sosial ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyaha Surabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30651/aca.v1i2.15158
<![CDATA[Can perpetrators who run away during the Covid-19 quarantine be subject to criminal liability and then What are the legal consequences for perpetrators who run away during the Covid-19 quarantine. The purpose of this article is to find out criminal liability and legal consequences for perpetrators who run away from the Covid-19 quarantine. The research methodology used in this research is normative legal research by statute approach to law is based on primary and secondary legal materials. This research resulted in an explanation of how criminal liability and legal consequences are for perpetrators who run away during the Covid-19 quarantine. From the results of the study, it can be seen that : a. Perpetrators of violations who escape from quarantine can be subject to criminal liability. b. Criminal sanctions for violating health quarantine are regulated in Article 93 of Law no. 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine, which regulates parties who violate Article 9 paragraph (1) are threatened with a maximum imprisonment of one year and/or a maximum fine of Rp. 100 million.]]>
<![CDATA[KONFLIK AGRARIA DALAM PENGADAAN TANAH UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM “STUDI KASUS DESA WADAS PURWOREJO†]]>
<![CDATA[Diyan Sejarot]]>;
<![CDATA[Achmad Hariri]]>
<![CDATA[ Academos Vol 2 No 1 (2023): ACADEMOS Jurnal Hukum dan Tatanan Sosial ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyaha Surabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30651/aca.v2i1.15242
<![CDATA[The designation of Wadas village as an andesite rock mining area to support the construction of the Bener Dam national strategic project in Purworejo, Central Java, is the reason for the emergence of agrarian conflicts between the community and the initiators of the project. This study aims to find out how the Land Acquisition Arrangements for Development for the Public Interest and whether andesite rock mining in Wadas Village, Bener, Purworejo Regency, Central Java does not require a rock mining permit (SIPB) and how certain Rock Mining Arrangements for certain purposes are based on the prevailing laws and regulations in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative research method with a Statutory approach and a Conceptual approach. The results of this study show that Land Acquisition for Development for The Public Interest is regulated in Law Number 2 of 2012, andesite Rock Mining in wadas village does not include land acquisition for the public interest so that it requires a rock mining permit (SIPB) so that the rock mining plan can be implemented. The implementation of Rock Mining is regulated in Law Number 3 of 2020 and its implementing regulations. Mining activities or businesses that are currently occurring have violated Law Number 32 of 2009, Law Number 3 of 2020, Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia of 2021, and Regulation of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Number 5 of 2021.Keywords: Agrarian Conflict, Land Acquisition, Rock Mining, Wadas]]>
<![CDATA[Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif Pada Kasus Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga ]]>
<![CDATA[Zeniza Mar Azizana]]>;
<![CDATA[Nur Azizah Hidayat]]>
<![CDATA[ Academos Vol 2 No 1 (2023): ACADEMOS Jurnal Hukum dan Tatanan Sosial ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyaha Surabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30651/aca.v2i1.15297
<![CDATA[Domestic violence is a problem that has not abated. Many countries currently use a system of applying restorative justice in the completion of the criminal justice process to handle cases of domestic violence. According to Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence, it proves that the settlement of domestic violence cases emphasizes how sanctions against perpetrators are criminal in nature but the preventive, protective, and consolidation objectives have not been fulfilled. The purpose of this study is to find out how criminal policy in Indonesia is in resolving domestic violence, to whether the application of restorative justice is appropriate for use in criminal justice in Indonesia while still referring to the legislation. This research is a normative juridical research that uses a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that the criminal law policy in Indonesia in the case of domestic violence has not shown a restorative approach. Which only focuses on criminal sanctions only.Keywords: Domestic violence, Crime, Restorative Justice  ]]>
<![CDATA[Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak Sebagai Pelaku Penyalahguna Narkotika ]]>
<![CDATA[Dimas Ade Prayogo]]>;
<![CDATA[Ahmad Yulianto Ihsan]]>;
<![CDATA[Muridah Isnawati]]>
<![CDATA[ Academos Vol 2 No 1 (2023): ACADEMOS Jurnal Hukum dan Tatanan Sosial ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyaha Surabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30651/aca.v2i1.15463
<![CDATA[Drug abuse by children is currently a concern of many people and continues to be discussed and published. In fact, the problem of drug abusers is of concern to various groups. Almost all of them have reminded and wanted the Indonesian people, especially children, to never try and consume narcotics. The purpose of this study is to determine the criminal responsibility of children as narcotics abusers and the legal consequences that can be imposed on children as narcotics abusers. This study used a normative juridical method using a statutory approach. The results of the study indicated that children as perpetrators of narcotics abusers with methamphetamine type can be subject to criminal penalties according to Article 127 number 1 point (a) of Law no. 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics. The explanation of Article 127 number 1 point (a) of the Narcotics Law is that every narcotics abuser of class I for himself can be subject for a maximum imprisonment of 4 (four) years and the legal consequences that can be imposed on a child as a narcotics abuser is that he gets ½ (one half) criminal witness of the maximum threat of imprisonment for adults in accordance with Article 81 number (2) of Law no. 11 of 2012 concerning the juvenile criminal justice system. In this case, if the prosecutor sues the child as a class I of narcotics abuser based on Article 127 number 1 point (a) of the Narcotics law, the crime penalty which is originally 4 years becomes 2 years.Keywords: Narcotics abusers, Criminal, Children ]]>
