Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
3.082
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Edutech LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education) PREMISE: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics English Review: Journal of English Education Panrita Abdi - Jurnal Pengabdian pada Masyarakat UICELL Conference Proceeding JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri) Voices of English Language Education Society Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature Language-Edu Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran
Alfan Zuhairi
Universitas Islam Malang
Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 20 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Edutech

 1 
WHICH ONE IS BETTER BETWEEN PAPER-BASED OR COMPUTER-BASED TOEFL?: TEST TAKERS’ PERSPERCTIVES Faridatul Istighfaroh; Junaidi Mistar; Mutmainnah Mustofa; Sonny Elfiyanto
EDUTECH Vol 22, No 3 (2023)
Publisher : Prodi Teknologi Pendidikan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17509/e.v22i2.56033

Abstract

Due to the lack of current study numbers discussing English proficiency tests such as TOEFL, this study aims to investigate the test takers’ point of view on the TOEFL ITP test, mainly paper based-test and computer-based TOEFL, the similar TOEFL ITP test but employing computer screen as media. The latest study about those two assessments is necessary since both kinds of TOEFL media are massively implemented, particularly backward and after the pandemic Covid19. A survey methodology is employed in this study by spreading questionnaires. The scores gained from those two disparate TOEFL tests are described statistically. The gathered data were then analyzed using descriptive statistics and factor analysis to outline the perspectives of the test-takers on TOEFL PBT and CBT. Fifty-two participants from various education background levels, ages and genders partaking in this study. As a result, this study reveals that the implementing a computer screen for TOEFL obtained more positive percentages than paper-based TOEFL tests. Further discussion concerning prior study and implications are presented
Co-Authors Afra Nadya Putri Insani Ana Lutfiana Farida Ari Ambarwati Dian Fajariyah Damayanti Dita Aulia Rahmah Dwi Fita Heriyawati Dwi Fita Heriyawati Dzul Fikri Dzul Fikri Dzulfikri Dzulfikri Eko Suhartoyo Elfiyanto, Sonny Faridatul Istighfaroh Ika Hidayanti Imam Wahyudi Karimullah Imam Wahyudi Karimullah Iva Yuanita Andriani Kurniasih Kurniasih Moh Sirril Athar Muhammad Hamdan Fakhrudin Mustofa, Mutmainnah Nuse Aliyah Rahmati Putri Kurniawan Aprilia Rona Laili Ulil Ishlah S Rizal Yazid Siti Hajar Sri Wahyuni Suci Sahriyah Sunismi . wafiya ula Wanda Siti Nurchaliza Wardatuz Zakiyah Wensi Alka zafira Ramdayani SA. Kadir