Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Hukum Soft-dat, Terhadap Plagiarisme Budianto, Agus
LAW REVIEW Vol 6, No 2 (2006)
Publisher : Pelita Harapan University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Copyright is one of the intellectual which is protected by law, national and international. Copyright allows authors to make money off of their labor (economic right). It prevents others from taking there work for free. It also prevents people from altering the work without permission (moral right). Because of development of technology information, one can also easly get information from internet or web and use it for their own activities. Everybody has to know plagiarism and the Internet has dramatically increased the ease of and opportunities for plagiarism. "Cyber-plagiarism " is the term used to describe the process by which lecturer and students either copy ideas found on the Web without giving proper attribution and to copying by optical disc.
Kewenangan "Lebih" PPATK Sebagai Modal Penegak Hukum Money Loundry Budianto, Agus
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 46, No 2 (2012)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law - Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/asy-syir'ah.2012.%x

Abstract

Amandement to the Law on money laundry was based on weakness of law enforcement effectiveness resulting from the unsinergitas (disharmony) between the law enforcement agencies. Does not given the authority to the conduct investigations and inquiries to INTRAC, do not reduces the central role as the leader of INTRAC agent in the eradication of money laundry. Additional powers to the INTRAC as authority 'more' is the INTRAC can request information on the progress of investigation and the inquiries by criminal investigators of origin and / or money laundering. The more authority is run for the benefit of: Handling money laundering effective; Preparation typology and strategic analysis on money laundering and predicate offenses; preparation of consolidated progress in implementing anti-money laundering regime in the context of accountability, and/or the preparation of a report for a meeting National Coordinating Committee for the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering. The realization of the implementation these activities, INTRAC can be assistance and request for discussion or presentation, and a criminal investigation of origin and/or money laundering shall fulfill the information request. Thus, there is a relationship that is normative complementarity between investigators with INTRAC within the framework of the creation of a harmonized enforcement of money laundering.
IMPLEMENTASI HAK KONSUMEN PASCA PEMBERLAKUAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN: A BREACH OF SOCIAL JUSTICE? Budianto, Agus
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 19, No 2 (2012)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The implementation of Consumer Protection Act which has shown the struggle to create equality of social justice between business people and consumers still remains a binding norm. On the other hand, ignorance or infringement of consumer rights can be interpreted as a breach of social justice, because the breach of social justice is defined not as a infringement of social norms, but interpreted as an infringement of consumer rights stipulated in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in particular and the rights of the public in general, as mandated in the concept of welfare state. The concept of welfare state is not an abstract concept in consumer protection law, as mandated in Article 29 verse (1) Consumer Protection Act, that a state has roles in ensuring the fulfillment of consumer rights stipulated in the constitution or in other provisions. Thus, a  state has the obligation in creating equitable welfare through laws which is equal for all parties.Keywords: Consumer Protection, Social Justice
FORMALIN DALAM KAJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG KESEHATAN; UNDANG-UNDANG PANGAN DAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN FORMALIN IN HEALTH, FOOD AND CONSUMER PROTECTION LAWS STUDIES Budianto, Agus
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 8, No 1 (2011): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Maret 2011
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (197.997 KB)

Abstract

Aksi tindakan bisnis pencampuran bahan makanan dan atau minuman dengancampuran bahan berbahaya formalin adalah kejahatan sebagaimana telah diaturdalam Undang-Undang Pangan, Undang-Undang Kesehatan, danpenerapkan peraturan Nomor 1168/Menkes/PER/X/1999. Kejahatan inidipidana dengan pidana penjara selama 5 (lima) tahun atau denda sebesarUSD $ 600,000,000.00 (enam ratus juta rupiah). Demikian juga, dapat dilakukantuntutan terhadap badan usaha yang melakukan tindak pidana tersebut denganinstrumen Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang PerlindunganKonsumen.
IMPLEMENTASI HAK KONSUMEN PASCA PEMBERLAKUAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN: A BREACH OF SOCIAL JUSTICE? Agus Budianto
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 19, No 2 (2012)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.v19i2.101

Abstract

The implementation of Consumer Protection Act which has shown the struggle to create equality of social justice between business people and consumers still remains a binding norm. On the other hand, ignorance or infringement of consumer rights can be interpreted as a breach of social justice, because the breach of social justice is defined not as a infringement of social norms, but interpreted as an infringement of consumer rights stipulated in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in particular and the rights of the public in general, as mandated in the concept of welfare state. The concept of welfare state is not an abstract concept in consumer protection law, as mandated in Article 29 verse (1) Consumer Protection Act, that a state has roles in ensuring the fulfillment of consumer rights stipulated in the constitution or in other provisions. Thus, a  state has the obligation in creating equitable welfare through laws which is equal for all parties.Keywords: Consumer Protection, Social Justice
PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN PENGELOLAAN LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN [Law Restoration and Policy Management of Correctional Institutions] Agus Budianto; Afdhal Mahatta Piliang
Law Review Volume XXI, No. 3 - March 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i3.4773

Abstract

Lembaga Pemasyarakatan (Lapas) are places to carry out guidance for inmates who have obtained permanent legal force to receive guidance. The presence of this institution is due to the fact that the inmates cannot be separated from their essence, namely humans who have to work to fulfill their daily needs. However, there are many incidents that indicate deficiencies in the management of prisons so far. In this case, the effort that must be made is to improve and strengthen the role and function of the Correctional System in Indonesia. The purpose of this paper is to look for management policy problems, both in terms of the existence of institutions, organizations and implementing management for reform of prison management. The writing of this article is designed using a mix method in the form of quantitative to support qualitative research with a case study approach. However, the type of research is prioritized in the form of qualitative, namely testing legal norms qualitatively. The National Penitentiary Agency as an independent institution to independently manage the implementation of the correctional system is an alternative idea for renewal and improvement.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Lembaga Pemasyarakatan (Lapas) adalah tempat untuk melaksanakan pembinaan terhadap warga binaan yang telah memperoleh kekuatan hukum tetap untuk mendapatkan pembinaan. Hadirnya lembaga ini disebabkan warga binaan juga tidak dapat lepas dari hakikatnya yaitu manusia yang harus bekerja untuk memenuhi kebutuhan kehidupannya. Namun demikian, banyak sekali kejadian yang mengindikasi kekurangan dalam pengelolaan Lapas selama ini. Dalam hal ini, upaya yang harus dilakukan adalah meningkatkan dan menguatkan peran dan fungsi Sistem Pemasyarakatan di Indonesia seperti pemberian sarana fasilitas yang memadai. Tujuan dari penulisan ini adalah mencari permasalahan kebijakan pengelolaan, baik dari sisi keberadaan kelembagaan, organisasi dan menejemen pelaksana untuk pembaharuan pengelolaan Lapas. Penulisan artikel ini didesain secara mix method berupa kuantitatif untuk mendukung penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Namun demikian, jenis penelitian diutamakan berupa kualitatif, yaitu menguji norma hukum secara kualitatif. Badan Pemasyarakatan Nasional sebagai lembaga yang mandiri dan independen untuk melakukan pengelolaan dalam penyelenggaraan sistem pemasyarakatan menjadi ide alternatif untuk pembaharuan dan perbaikan.
A Comparative Study of French, British, Dutch, and Russian External Supervisory Agencies of Investigators and Prosecutors within Integrated Criminal-Justice-System Agus Budianto
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 5, No 3 (2018): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (574.274 KB)

Abstract

Criminal justice system consists of sub-systems that carry out different tasks and authorities. However, they have the same purpose to implement legal provisions against crimes. The sub-systems cover police, prosecutor, court, and correctional institution. However, in practice, especially in Indonesia, the relation of these sub-systems is not harmonious. It causes legal certainty becoming hard to achieve. One of the solutions is the establishment of supervisory institutions. Nevertheless, in Indonesia, the function of supervisory institution is still unbalanced. Police investigators and prosecutors are stationed at different institutions. The National Police Commission (Kompolnas –Komisi Kepolisian Nasional) and the Prosecutorial Commission (Komjak –Komisi Kejaksaan) are formed by Presidential Regulation, while the Judicial Commission as the Court supervisory institution is formed by the law. A comparison of France, The Netherlands, United Kingdom, and Russian reveals the fact that Police and Prosecutor are under the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Ministry of Justice. Therefore, the coordination between investigators and prosecutors can be harmonious under one coordination. This study employed a comparison method to observe the supervisory institutions to minimize the practice of judicial corruption in the sub-system. There are two opportunities. The first is to strengthen the main tasks and authorities of Kompolnas and Komjak by changing the existed legislation or establishing new supervisory institution that covering all supervisory functions in the activities of investigation, prosecution, and examination (by the judge) in one legislation.AbstrakDalam sistem peradilan pidana, terdiri dari sub-sub sistem yang menjalan tugas dan kewenangan yang berbeda, namun memiliki tujuan yang sama, yaitu melaksanakan ketentuan perundang-undangan untuk menanggulangi kejahatan. Sub system tersebut, diantaranya Kepolisian, Kejaksaan, Kehakiman dan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. Namun praktik di Indonesia, bekerjanya sub-sub system tersebut tidak harmonis, sehingga kepastian hukum menjadi sesuatu yang langka. Salah satu faktor bekerja sub-sub system tersebut adalah adanya lembaga pengawasan, namun di Indonesia, lembaga pengawasan tersebut masih timpang. Penyidik polisi dan jaksa penuntut berada pada lembaga pengawasan yang berbeda, yaitu oleh Komisi Kepolisian Nasional (Kompolnas) dan Komisi Kejaksaan (Komjak) yang dibentuk dengan sebuah Peraturan Presiden, sedangkan untuk pengadilan diawasi oleh Komisi Yudisial yang dibentuk dengan Undang-Undang. Perbandingan yang didapat dari negara Perancis, Belanda, Inggris dan Rusia didapat fakta, bahwa Kepolisian dan Kejaksaan berada dibawah Menteri Dalam Negeri dan Kehakiman, sehingga koordinasi antara penyidik dan penuntut dapat harmonis karena berada dibawah satu koordinasi. Metode yang digunakan adalah melakukan perbandingan pada konteks lembaga pengawas dalam sub system peradilan pidana terpadu untuk meminimalisir praktik judicial corruption. Terdapat dua peluang, yaitu memperkuat tugas pokok dan kewenangan Kompolnas dan Komjak di perubahan perundang-undangan atau membentuk lembaga pengawasan baru dengan sebuah Undang-Undang dengan menggabungkan menjadi satu lembaga fungsi pengawasan pada kegiatan penyidikan, penuntutan dan pemeriksaan di pengadilan (oleh hakim).DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v5n3.a7 
BARCODING DIGITAL SIGNATURE AUTHENCITY SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI PERKARA PIDANA Agus Budianto; Shinta Pangesti; Debora Pasaribu; Stephanie Faustina
Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 5 No 2 (2021): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (343.615 KB) | DOI: 10.24246/jrh.2021.v5.i2.p255-274

Abstract

Bisnis dan setiap layanan publik, dalam kondisi yang penuh ketidakpastian karena pandemi Covid-19, termasuk didalamnya konsep penggunaan cyber notary bagi pejabat pembuat akta otentik. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif, dengan menggunakan data primer dan data sekunder. Perolehan data primer melalui focus group discussion, interview secara langsung atau melalui seminar online, dengan teknik non-random purposive sampling. Cyber notary diselenggarakan untuk membuktikan dokumen pendukung dari suatu akta yang wajib dilengkapi dengan tanda tangan elektronik yang terdaftar. Suatu digital signature telah memenuhi unsur secara yuridis, yaitu seseorang yang membutuhkan tanda tangan digitalnya dianggap mengakui apa yang ditulisnya secara keseluruhan dalam dokumen elektronik yang bersangkutan. Oleh karenanya mendesak bagi Kemenkumham untuk segera membuat peraturan tentang digital signature dalam akta otentik notaris, mengingat sah secara hukum sebagai alat bukti surat sebagaimana disebutkan dalam Pasal 184 ayat (1) UU No. 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Hukum Acara Pidana.
LEGAL PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES DUE TO UNILATERAL TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT DUE TO FORCE MAJEURE COVID-19 PANDEMIC Ayun Kencana R; Agus Budianto; Hosiana Gultom
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL, POLICY AND LAW Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): February 2021
Publisher : INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL, POLICY AND LAW

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.8888/ijospl.v2i1.26

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has brought a significant impact on various sectors, including the economy. Many companies suffered setbacks losses which led to layoffs for reasons of the Covid-19 pandemic which was categorized as a force majeure. However, the decision was actually detrimental to workers as it was not in accordance with the provisions of Law No.13 / 2003. Therefore, this study tries to examine the legal protection and legal consequences of termination of employment under the reasons of the Covid-19 pandemic force majeure. The aim of this study is to analyze and trace the legal protection of workers who have been unilaterally laid off during the Covid-19 pandemic and the legal consequences that arise from layoffs based on Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower. This study uses empirical normative legal research methods and uses secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. This study is classified as a qualitative research, with the type of methodology used is an approach to legal systematics and an approach to legal cases. The data used in this analysis are secondary data obtained through literature study techniques and supported by primary data obtained by interview techniques. In view of Presidential Decree No. 12 of 2020, the results of the analysis show that the Covid-19 pandemic is regarded as a force majeure. Subject to the provisions of Law No. 13 of 2003, the legal protection for workers who are laid off due to force majeure is regulated in Article 164 paragraph (1) with the provisions in Article 156. It is necessary to note that when a layoff occurs due to law, employers are obliged to provide severance pay to workers. In this regard, in maintaining business continuity in the current situation, the government's efforts regarding the fulfillment of severance pay are contained in SE M / 3HK.04 / III / 2020, which fundamentally employers and workers can make a mutual agreement.
JURIDICAL ANALYSIS ON BIPARTITE NEGOTIATION IN THE EMPLOYEE TERMINATION PROCESS AT PT. J RESOURCES BOLAANG MONGONDOW, INDONESIA Theresa B. Tulende; Hosiana D. A. Gultom; Agus Budianto
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL, POLICY AND LAW Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): April 2021
Publisher : INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL, POLICY AND LAW

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.8888/ijospl.v2i2.39

Abstract

The disputes over termination of employment are common in the industrial relations. Many industrial relations actors settle disputes by filing lawsuits to the Industrial Relation Court. They assume that bipartite negotiation is ineffective in settling disputes of termination of employment in particular. In contrary, a company In Indonesia, named PT. J Resources Bolaang Mongondow, experiences it differently where the bipartite negotiation is well-emphasized in settling disputes of termination of employment. This is also supported by various strategies implemented inside the company to prevent any disputes, particularly the termination of employment that leads to the Industrial Relation Court. This paper uses descriptive analysis as well as normative-empirical legal as the research method. The data was collected through literature review, research papers, essays, national journal, interview, website as well as legal studies. The termination of employment is regulated under Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower, while the Law No. 2 of 2004 regulates the Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement. Likewise, the Regulation of the Minister of Manpower and Transmigration of the Republic of Indonesia No. PER.31/MEN/XII/2008 concerning the Guideline for Settlement of Industrial Relations Dispute through Bipartite Negotiations. The disputes of termination in industrial relations emerge due to the violation of company regulation in the employment contract done by the employee. Nonetheless, PT. J Resources Bolaang Mongondow has been successfully implementing the bipartite negotiations to settle disputes. Law No. 2 of 2004 concerning the Industrial Relations Disputes Settlement requires that it has to be resolved first through bipartite bargaining in deliberation to reach consensus. Strategy determines the effectiveness of bipartite negotiations in a company.