Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
2.636
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia Tadris: Jurnal keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan J-PEK (JURNAL PEMBELAJARAN KIMIA) JC-T (Journal Cis-Trans): Jurnal Kimia dan Terapannya Indonesian Journal of Chemistry Sainmatika: Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry JCER (Journal of Chemistry Education Research) Jurnal Pijar MIPA PREVENIRE: Journal of Multidisciplinary Science
Yahmin Yahmin
Universitas Negeri Malang
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
THE EFFECT OF 5E LEARNING CYCLE INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL USING SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES (SSI) LEARNING CONTEXT ON STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING Cahyarini, A.; Rahayu, S.; Yahmin, Y.
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia Vol 5, No 2 (2016): October 2016
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (FMIPA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jpii.v5i2.7683

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of 5E learning cycle instructional model using socioscientific issues (SSI) learning context on students’ critical thinking skills of acid-base. This study used quasi-experimental posttest only control group design. The sample consisted of three classes, which were XI MIA-4class (n = 32) that learned using 5E LC model, XI MIA-5 class (n = 33) that learned using 5E LC+SSI, and XI MIA-6 class (n = 32) that learned using conventional method. The samples were choosen by convenience sampling technique. The test instrument consisted of 15 multiple choice items which were valid and reliable (r = 0.806). The data were analyzed using one way ANOVA test and LSD posthoc test. The results of this study indicated that the students who learned using 5E LC+SSI model showed greater levels of critical thinking skills (  = 74,95) than both the student who learned using 5E LC model (  = 74,17) and  the student who learned using conventional method (  = 68,96). Based on statistics analysis, there was significant differences on students’ critical thinkings between students taught using conventional method and students taught either using 5E LC+SSI model and 5E LC model. However,  there was no significant differences on students’ critical thinking skills between students taught using 5E LC+SSI model and the students taught using 5E LC model.
THE EFFECT OF 5E LEARNING CYCLE INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL USING SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES (SSI) LEARNING CONTEXT ON STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING Cahyarini, A.; Rahayu, S.; Yahmin, Y.
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia Vol 5, No 2 (2016): October 2016
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (FMIPA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jpii.v5i2.7683

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of 5E learning cycle instructional model using socioscientific issues (SSI) learning context on students’ critical thinking skills of acid-base. This study used quasi-experimental posttest only control group design. The sample consisted of three classes, which were XI MIA-4class (n = 32) that learned using 5E LC model, XI MIA-5 class (n = 33) that learned using 5E LC+SSI, and XI MIA-6 class (n = 32) that learned using conventional method. The samples were choosen by convenience sampling technique. The test instrument consisted of 15 multiple choice items which were valid and reliable (r = 0.806). The data were analyzed using one way ANOVA test and LSD posthoc test. The results of this study indicated that the students who learned using 5E LC+SSI model showed greater levels of critical thinking skills (  = 74,95) than both the student who learned using 5E LC model (  = 74,17) and  the student who learned using conventional method (  = 68,96). Based on statistics analysis, there was significant differences on students’ critical thinkings between students taught using conventional method and students taught either using 5E LC+SSI model and 5E LC model. However,  there was no significant differences on students’ critical thinking skills between students taught using 5E LC+SSI model and the students taught using 5E LC model.
Pengaruh pembelajaran POGIL berkonteks socioscientific issues terhadap kualitas keterampilan berargumentasi siswa SMA pada materi ikatan kimia Anisyah Dasa Astarina; Sri Rahayu; Yahmin Yahmin
Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA Vol 5, No 1: April 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/jipi.v5i1.20890

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh pembelajaran POGIL berkonteks SSI terhadap kualitas argumentasi siswa kelas X. Rancangan penelitian adalah mixed-methods. Data kuantitatif berupa tingkat kualitas argumentasi siswa yang diperoleh melalui instrumen tes keterampilan berargumentasi. Data kualitatif berupa hasil wawancara siswa tentang sikap siswa terhadap SSI dan argumentasi siswa pada proses pembelajaran. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan keterampilan berargumentasi antara siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan POGIL berkonteks SSI dengan siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan POGIL dan konvensional. Pembelajaran POGIL berkonteks SSI lebih efektif dalam membelajarkan keterampilan berargumentasi siswa dibandingkan dua kelas lainnya berdasarkan nilai rata-rata kualitas argumentasi. The effect of POGIL with socioscientific issues context for high school argumentation skills quality in chemical bonding AbstractThe aim of the study was to examine the influence of POGIL with SSI context on the quality of high school students argumentation. The research design was mixed-methods. Quantitative data in the form of level of students’ argumentation quality collected by instrument of argument skills. Qualitative was the students’ transcript of interview about their attitude toward SSI and their argumentation in process of learning.The results showed that there was a difference in the skills of argumentation between the students who taught with the POGIL with SSI context and the students taught by POGIL and conventional instruction. POGILS with SSI context was more effective in teaching students’ argumentation skills compared to the other classes based on the average score of student argumentation.
Pengaruh Kelompok Peminatan Mata Pelajaran dan Gender terhadap Hasil Belajar dan Keterampilan Proses Ilmiah Siswa pada Materi Laju Reaksi Muhammad Syaiful Hadi; Suhadi Ibnu; Yahmin Yahmin
Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Vol 3, No 1: Maret 2015
Publisher : Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang (UM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (150.251 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/jps.v3i1.4836

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed to analyze the effect of subject majoring and gender on learning outcomes and scientific process skills. This research applied an expost facto with a 2 x 2 factorial design. The sam-ple were the 11th grade students of a Senior High School in Gresik, Indonesia. The number of students’ were 65 majoring in MIA(math and science) and 68 majoring in IIS (social science). The data were collected using observation and test and analyzed using Multivariate Analysis of Variance (Manova). The result showed that the students’ learning outcomes and scientific process skills of those majoring in MIA was higher than of the group majoring in IIS. There were no differences in students’ learning outcomes and scientific process skills between groups of males and females.Key Words: subject majoring, gender, learning outcomes, scientific process skillsAbstrak: Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui: 1) pengaruh kelompok peminatan mata pelajaran ter-hadap hasil belajar dan keterampilan proses ilmiah dan 2) pengaruh kelompok gender terhadap hasil belajar dan keterampilan proses ilmiah siswa. Penelitian ex-post fakto dengan desain faktorial 2 x 2. Sub-jek penelitian adalah siswa kelas XI SMA Assa’adah Kabupaten Gresik yang terdiri dari kelas XI MIA 65 siswa dan XI IIS 68 siswa. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan observasi dan tes. Pengujian hi-potesis menggunakan prosedur statistik manova. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hasil belajar dan keterampilan proses ilmiah lebih baik pada kelompok peminatan MIA dibanding kelompok peminatan IIS. Kelompok gender tidak memberikan pengaruh terhadap hasil belajar dan keterampilan proses ilmiah.Kata kunci: peminatan mata pelajaran, gender, hasil belajar, keterampilan proses ilmiah
Comparing Cognitive Learning Outcomes as the Impact of ADI-S and ADI Learning Models with Different Scientific Reasoning Abilities Rena Amelia; Endang Budiasih; Yahmin Yahmin
Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Vol 8, No 2: June 2020
Publisher : Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang (UM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/jps.v8i2.14144

Abstract

Abstract: This aims of the study to compare the cognitive learning outcomes of students who learned with Argument Driven Inquiry-Scaffolding (ADI-S) and Driven Argument Inquiry (ADI) with different scientific reasoning abilities. This research is a quasy experimental design. The instruments were used cognitive learning outcomes test and the test of scientific reasoning abilities. Data were analyzed using two way ANCOVA (2x2 factorial). The results showed: (1) learned with ADI-S on the reaction rate material get cognitive learning outcomes higher than learned with ADI, (2) student with high scientific reasoning abilities have better cognitive learning outcomes rather student with low scientific reasoning abilities both in ADI-S’s class and ADI’s class.Key Words: ADI; ADI-S; scientific reasoning abilities; cognitive learning outcomesAbstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar kognitif siswa yang dibelajarkan menggunakan model Argument Driven Inquiry-Scaffolding (ADI-S) dan model Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) dengan kemampuan penalaran ilmiah berbeda. Rancangan penelitian yang digunakan adalah quasy eksperimental design. Instrumen yang digunakan yaitu tes hasil belajar kognitif dan tes kemampuan penalaran ilmiah. Data dianalisis menggunakan ANCOVA dua jalur (faktorial 2x2). Hasil analisis menunjukkan: (1) pembelajaran dengan model ADI-S pada materi laju reaksi memberikan hasil belajar kognitif yang lebih tinggi jika dibandingkan dengan model ADI, (2) siswa dengan kemampuan penalaran ilmiah tinggi memberikan hasil belajar kognitif lebih tinggi dibandingkan kemampuan penalaran ilmiah rendah baik pada kelas ADI-S maupun ADI.Kata kunci: ADI; ADI-S; kemampuan penalaran ilmiah; hasil belajar kognitif
Pengaruh Pembelajaran Kimia Kelarutan dengan LC-5E Berkonteks SSI terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA Halimah Mustika Nurhayati; Sri Rahayu; Yahmin Yahmin
Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Vol 4, No 4: Desember 2016
Publisher : Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang (UM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (275.836 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/jps.v4i4.8192

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of the study were to understand the effect of differences in chemistry learning with Learning Cycle-5E (LC-5E) instructional model using Socio-scientific Issues (SSI) context toward critical thinking skill of senior high school students on solubility material. This was a quasi-experimental with pretest-posttest control group design. The research data was from test results with critical thinking instruments that have been developed (R = 0.7319). The test results were analyzed using independent sample t-test. The results showed that there was significant difference of students’ critical thinking skills between students that learned with LC-5E using SSI context and that learned with conventional learning. Significance of differences can be seen from the effect size of each critical thinking indicator that is worth a weak, moderate and strong.Key Words: LC-5E, SSI, critical thinking Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan pengaruh pembelajaran kimia dengan Learning Cycle-5E berkonteks SSI terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMA pada materi kelarutan. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah desain eksperimental semu pretest-posttest control group design. Data penelitian dari hasil tes dengan instrumen berpikir kritis yang telah dikembangkan (R=0,7319). Hasil tes dianalisis dengan uji-t dua kelompok bebas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan ada perbedaan signifikan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa kelas XI yang dibelajarkan dengan LC-5E berkonteks SSI dan yang dibelajarkan dengan pembelajaran konvensional. Kebermaknaan perbedaan dapat dilihat dari effect size masing-masing indikator berpikir kritis yang bernilai lemah, sedang dan kuat.Kata kunci: LC-5E, SSI, berpikir kritis
Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Pendekatan STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) untuk Pemahaman Konsep dan Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa SMA pada Materi Laju Reaksi Astrid Kinantya Paramita; Yahmin Yahmin; I Wayan Dasna
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan Vol 5, No 11: NOVEMBER 2020
Publisher : Graduate School of Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/jptpp.v5i11.14189

Abstract

Abstract: Argumentation is an important activity in scientific exploration which has been agreed as a major component in science education. Quality argumentation skills are formed with the understanding of concepts owned by students. The current low level of argumentation skills is caused by the learning process. Application of guided inquiry learning with the STEM approach is expected to provide space to practice arguments based on the results of the constructs of students' concepts during learning. The results of the study stated that differences in initial abilities, the application of guided inquiry with the STEM approach affect the concepts understanding and argumentation skills of students. Also there is no interaction, between models and learning approaches and initial abilities towards understanding concepts and argumentation skills.Abstrak: Argumentasi merupakan aktivitas penting pada eksplorasi ilmiah yang telah disepakati sebagai komponen utama dalam pendidikan sains. Keterampilan argumentasi yang berkualitas dibentuk dengan modal pemahaman konsep yang dimiliki siswa. Rendahnya keterampilan argumentasi saat ini salah satunya disebabkan oleh proses pembelajaran. Penerapan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing dengan pendekatan STEM diharapkan dapat menyediakan ruang untuk melatih argumentasi berdasarkan hasil konstruk konsep siswa selama pembelajaran. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa perbedaan kemampuan awal, penerapan inkuiri terbimbing dengan pendekatan STEM berpengaruh terhadap pemahaman konsep dan keterampilan argumentasi siswa namun tidak ditemukan adanya interaksi antara model maupun pendekatan pembelajaran dan kemampuan awal terhadap keterampilan argumentasi dan pemahaman konsep.
ANALISIS MISKONSEPSI ASAM BASA PADA PEMBELAJARAN KONVENSIONAL DAN DUAL SITUATED LEARNING MODEL (DSLM) Urwatil Wutsqo Amry; Sri Rahayu; Yahmin Yahmin
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan Vol.2, No.3, Maret 2017
Publisher : Graduate School of Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (462.839 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/jptpp.v2i3.8636

Abstract

Acid base is one of chemical topic that explain about concrete concepts, non concreteconcepts and concepts which involve symbolic representation. Complexity of acid base concept can create student misconceptions trend. DSLM can be an alternative of learnings’ model that can decrase misconceptions, so that identification of acid base misconceptions with learning become important to do. The research design is qualitative descriptive design. The research instrument is two-tier diagnostic test with reliability 0,869. There are seven misconceptions found in this research.Materi asam basa membahas konsep yang teramati jelas (konsep konkrit), konsep yang tidak terlihat, dan konsep yang melibatkan representasi simbolik. Kompleksnya cakupan konsep pada materi asam basa dapat menimbulkan kecenderungan miskonsepsi bagi siswa. DSLM dapat menjadi alternatif model pembelajaran yang dapat diterapkan untuk meminimalisir miskonsepsi, maka identifikasi miskonsepsi pada konsep asam basa dengan pembelajaran DSLM menjadi penting untuk dilakukan. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah desain penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Instrumen penelitian berupa instrument tesdiagnostik two-tier dengan reliabilitas sebesar 0,869. Ditemukan tujuh miskonsepsi siswa terhadap materi asam basa.
HOTS & Problem-Based Learning (PBL) with blended learning Laili Mei Sulistiyani; Habiddin Habiddin; Yahmin Yahmin
J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia) Vol 7, No 1 (2022): J-PEK (JURNAL PEMBELAJARAN KIMIA)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/um026v7i12022p001

Abstract

In the world of education, attainment of competence does not only involve increasing knowledge but must be equipped with creative abilities, high-level thinking, strong character, and supported by the ability to utilize information and communication. One way to achieve these competencies is by using blended learning-based problem-based learning methods. This study seeks to review articles on improving students' higher-order thinking skills using blended learning based on problem-based learning methods to investigate the combination of these two methods in increasing students' HOTS.
Chemical Literacy of First Year Students on Carbon Chemistry Nursida Djaen; Sri Rahayu; Yahmin Yahmin; Muntholib Muntholib
J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia) Vol 6, No 1 (2021): J-PEK (JURNAL PEMBELAJARAN KIMIA)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/um026v6i12021p041

Abstract

This research aims to develop and validate chemical literacy test instruments on competency and knowledge aspects and to measure the chemical literacy of first-year science education students. Instrument development involved expert consultation, expert judgment, and testing of 114 first-year students majoring in chemistry for the analysis of item validity and instrument reliability.  The instrument was developed using the  Research& Development model by Borg and Gall (1989). The developed instrument consisted of 30 valid item items with Cronbach's Alpha reliability coefficient of 0.718. The analysis was carried out on 28 first-year students of the Jember State University Science Education Study Program who had studied carbon chemistry. Data analysis showed that the average score of students' chemical literacy was 59.7 in the moderate category.ReferencesAdawiyah, R., & Wisudawati, A. (2017). Pengembangan instrumen tes berbasis literasi sains. Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies, 5(2), 112–121.Akengin, H., & Sirin, A. (2013). A comparative study upon determination of scientific literacy level of teacher candidates. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(19), 1882–1886.Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan edisi 2. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.Assessment, P. for I. S., & service), S. (Online. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Publications de l’OCDE.Barnea, N., Dori, Y. J., & Hofstein, A. (2010). Development and implementation of inquiry-based and computerized-based laboratories: Reforming high school chemistry in Israel. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(3), 218–228.Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. ERIC.Celik, S. (2014). Chemical literacy levels of science and mathematics teacher candidates. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 1.Cigdemoglu, C., Arslan, H. O., & Cam, A. (2017). Argumentation to foster pre-service science teachers’ knowledge, competency, and attitude on the domains of chemical literacy of acids and bases. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(2), 288–303.Cigdemoglu, Ceyhan, & Geban, O. (2015). Improving students’ chemical literacy levels on thermochemical and thermodynamics concepts through a context-based approach. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 302–317.De Ovira, E. (2018). PENGEMBANGAN DAN VALIDASI TES KIMIA DENGAN FRAMEWORK PISA PADA MATERI KELAS XI SEMESTER 1. Menara Ilmu, 12(80).DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education.Gall, M. D., & Borg, W. R. (1989). Educational Research. A Guide for Preparing a Thesis or Dissertation Proposal in Education. ERIC.Gerlach, K., Trate, J., Blecking, A., Geissinger, P., & Murphy, K. (2014). Valid and reliable assessments to measure scale literacy of students in introductory college chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(10), 1538–1545.Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008.Impey, C. (2013). Science literacy of undergraduates in the united states. Organizations, people and strategies in astronomy, 2(2), 353–364.Kemendikbud, R. I. (2014). Permendikbud No. 49 Tahun 2014 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.Laugksch, R. C., & Spargo, P. E. (1996). Development of a pool of scientific literacy test-items based on selected AAAS literacy goals. Science Education, 80(2), 121–143.Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, 29–48.Muntholib, M., Ibnu, S., Rahayu, S., Fajaroh, F., Kusairi, S., & Kuswandi, B. (2020). Chemical Literacy: Performance of First Year Chemistry Students on Chemical Kinetics. Indonesian Journal of Chemistry.Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science education, 87(2), 224–240.Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2009). Scientific literacy. The Cambridge handbook of literacy, 271–285.OECD, F. (2016). FDI in Figures. Organisation for European Economic Cooperation Paris.OECD, P. (2015). Assessment and analytical framework: Science. Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy,(Interscience: Paris, 2016), 24–25.Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections (Vol. 13). London: The Nuffield Foundation.Permendikbud, R. I. (t.t.). Nomor 59 tahun 2014 Tentang Kurikulum 2013 Sekolah Menengah Atas. Madrasah Aliyah, Jakarta: Depdikbud.Rahayu, S. (2017). Mengoptimalkan aspek literasi dalam pembelajaran kimia abad 21. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia UNY, 319–324.Rifal, M., & Rauf, W. (2018). Analisis Penggunaan Bahan Bakar Etanol-Pertalite Pada Motor Honda Scoopy 110 cc. Gorontalo Journal of Infrastructure and Science Engineering, 1(1), 55–64.Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). The use of scientific literacy taxonomy for assessing the development of chemical literacy among high-school students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(4), 203–225.Sumarni, W., Supardi, K. I., & Widiarti, N. (2018). Development of assessment instruments to measure critical thinking skills. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 349(1), 012066.Sunarti, T. (2015). Pemahaman literasi sains mahasiswa calon guru fisika Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Pembelajarannya, 2015, 34–39.Tarhan, L., & Sesen, B. A. (2010). Investigation the effectiveness of laboratory works related to “acids and bases” on learning achievements and attitudes toward laboratory. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2631–2636.Thummathong, R., & Thathong, K. (2018). Chemical literacy levels of engineering students in Northeastern Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(3), 478–487.Traiwichitkhun, D., & Wongwanich, S. (2014). Causal Model of Research Competency via Scientific Literacy of Teacher and Student Lertporn Udompong. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1581–1586.Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110–116.
Co-Authors A. Cahyarini, A. Adilah Aliyatulmuna Aninda Indriani Anisyah Dasa Astarina Astrid Kinantya Paramita Astrid Kinantya Paramita Bernada Uni Tatya Akmal Dhea Fairuza Zahirah Eli Khusmawardani Endang Budiasih Endang Ciptawati Eva Kurnia Fauziatul Fajaroh Habiddin Halimah Mustika Nurhayati Harno Dwi Pranowo Hayuni Retno Widarti Herunata Herunata I Wayan Dasna Ida Bagus Suryadharma Khoirul Faqih Krisma Dewi Firdaus Indasari Lailatul Ilmiyah Laili Mei Sulistiyani Mashfufatul Ilmah Mohd Shafie Rosli Muhammad Syaiful Hadi Muntholib Muntholib Nazriati Nazriati dkk. Nuchrurita Rosida Nuril Mega Musfita Nursida Djaen Oktavia Sulistina Rena Amelia Ria Armunanto S. Rahayu, S. Samudra Mutiara Hasanah Sri Rahayu Suhadi Ibnu Suhadi Ibnu Suharti Suharti Sumari Sumari Supriadi Supriadi Suryani Indah Permatasari Taufiq Kurniawan Urwatil Wutsqo Amry Urwatil Wutsqo Amry