p-Index From 2019 - 2024
5.933
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Bestari Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan STUDIA ISLAMIKA Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Jurnal Kawistara : Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial dan Humaniora Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies IJTIHAD Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Jurnal Adabiyah Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies Wawasan : Jurnal Ilmiah Agama dan Sosial Budaya Jurnal Studi Agama dan Masyarakat Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Profetika Religious: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama dan Lintas Budaya Journal of Governance and Public Policy Jurnal Orientasi Baru Journal of Governance Jurnal Studi Komunikasi Journal of Government and Civil Society SOSIOHUMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English Al-Albab JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik) Al-Izzah: Jurnal Hasil-Hasil Penelitian Iseedu: Journal of Islamic Educational Thoughts and Practices Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan Society Jurnal Sosiologi Agama Al-Qalam MUWAZAH: Jurnal Kajian Gender Dialogia: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Sosial Journal of Local Government Issues Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat MEMBANGUN NEGERI Politicon : Jurnal Ilmu Politik Maarif Journal of Government and Politics (JGOP) Jurnal Magister Administrasi Publik East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAJMR) Mazahib: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin JRP (Jurnal Review Politik)
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies

Muhammadiyah’s Moderation Stance in the 2019 General Election: Critical Views from Within Haedar Nashir; Zuly Qodir; Achmad Nurmandi; Hasse Jubba; Mega Hidayati
Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies Vol 57, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Al-Jami'ah Research Centre

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajis.2019.571.1-24

Abstract

This study focuses on the way in which Muhammadiyah, one of Indonesia’s largest Islamic organizations, stood in the 2019 General Election. Like its counterpart Nahdlatul Ulama, Muhammadiyah has marked the moderation of Islam in Indonesia, different from Islam elsewhere in the Middle East. Since its establishment, Muhammadiyah has urged its members not to join any specific political party, but rather to take a moderate position in political pragmatism and support patriotism in broader national interest. Likewise, in the 2019 election, Muhammadiyah did not organizationally support any candidates, citing its “middle way” approach. However, this study identifies a dualism in the political attitudes of Muhammadiyah’s elites. Even without official orders or prohibitions from the central leadership, some Muhammadiyah members got involved and carried their organization’s attributes to support certain candidates, resulting in political division within the organization. Some members of the organization took a clear political stance, whereas others remain neutral. This created tension within the organization in both elite and grass-root level. The main data for this study were collected through interviews, unstructured discussions, and focus group discussions with several Muhammadiyah elites.[Artikel ini melihat posisi yang diambil salah satu organisasi Islam terbesar di Indonesia, Muhammadiyah, dalam Pemilu 2019. Bersamaan dengan Nahdlatul Ulama, Muhammadiyah menjadi penanda moderasi Islam di Indonesia yang berbeda dengan Islam di tempat lain. Sejak didirikan, Muhammadiyah telah menandaskan untuk tidak berafiliasi dengan partai politik tertentu, tetapi mengambil posisi moderat dalam perpolitikan dan mendukung patriotisme demi kepentingan nasional yang lebih luas. Demikian juga, dalam Pemilu 2019, Muhammadiyah secara resmi tidak mendukung calon mana pun berdasarkan konsep “jalan tengah”. Namun, penelitian ini mengidentifikasi adanya dualisme dalam sikap politik para elit Muhammadiyah. Tidak adanya perintah atau larangan resmi dari pusat, banyak anggota Muhammadiyah yang membawa atribut organisasi dan terlibat aktivitas politik serta mendukung kandidat tertentu. Ini berakibat munculnya keterbelahan politik dalam Muhammadiyah. Beberapa anggota mengambil sikap politik yang jelas, sedangkan yang lain tetap netral. Ini menimbulkan ketegangan dalam organisasi, baik di tingkat elit maupun akar rumput. Data utama untuk penelitian ini dikumpulkan melalui wawancara, diskusi tidak terstruktur, dan diskusi kelompok terfokus dengan beberapa elit Muhammadiyah.]
The Formalization of Sharia in Aceh to Discipline the Female Body Zuly Qodir; Hasse Jubba; Mega Hidayati; Dyah Mutiarin
Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies Vol 60, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Al-Jami'ah Research Centre

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajis.2022.601.63-90

Abstract

The formalization of sharia (particularly regional regulations on sharia in Aceh) since 2001 up to 2019 had incorporated economic and political contents between local and national elites. Such condition was a result of local and national elite interests gaining political advantages wherein sharia was utilized as a tool by the elites to dominate civilians. Due to political interests, civilians became marginalized by sharia. The current article demonstrates that local and national political elites had used sharia for their political interests without considering the substantial purpose of sharia itself. Women, in particular, are disadvantaged by the various regulations (qanun) issued by wilayatul khisbah as the guardians of sharia in Aceh. The article also aims to show existing contradictions between the ideal aspirations of wilayatul khisbah and the actual practice of regional regulations pertaining to sharia on the ground, namely the involvement of political elites in advocating sharia, which has not made people become more religious but provoked them to resist in secret instead. Data in the article were acquired through literature study, field observations, and in-depth interviews with a number of informants[Formalisasi syariah Islam di Aceh melalui Peraturan Daerah (Qanun) sejak 2001 telah melibatkan kolaborasi ekonomi dan politik antara elit lokal dan nasional. Situasi tersebut menyebabkan kepentingan elit lokal dan nasional berebut keuntungan politis sebagai alat mendominasi warganya, sehingga menyebabkan kepentingan warga termarjinalisasi. Artikel ini membahas elit lokal dan nasional yang memanfaatkan syariat Islam untuk kepentingannya sendiri tanpa mempertimbangkan tujuan utamanya. Perempuan sering dirugikan oleh sejumlah aturan yang dikeluarkan oleh tim penegak syariat Islam (wilayatul khisbah). Artikel ini juga memperlihatkan kontradiksi antara  aspirasi ideal dan praktik di lapangan lembaga wilayatul khisbah yang mana keterlibatan elit politik dalam advokasi syariat Islam tidak mendorong lebih religius tetapi justru mendorong warga melawan diam-diam. Data artikel ini didapatkan dari studi literatur, observasi lapangan dan wawancara mendalam dengan sejumlah informan.]