Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
1.958
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis PNJ (JEKBIS PNJ) Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Pelita Bangsa Pelestari Pancasila Journal of Biology Education AdBispreneur Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation Jurnal EDUTECH Undiksha Menara Ilmu Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies Telaah Bisnis Jurnal Administrasi Profesional
Syamsurizal Syamsurizal
Politeknik Negeri Jakarta
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 16 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation

 1 
The Analysis of the Teacher-Made Multiple-Choice Tests Quality for Natural Science Subject Putra, Erik Nanda; Syamsurizal, Syamsurizal; Lufri, Lufri; Zulyusri, Zulyusri
Journal of Education Research and Evaluation Vol 5, No 3 (2021)
Publisher : LPPM Undiksha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jere.v5i3.33219

Abstract

This study aims to determine the quality of the questions quantitatively (reliability, discriminating power, difficulty level, and distractor effectiveness). This research is descriptive research. The population in this study were all student answer sheets in the Middle Semester II Science Assessment Exam class VIII SMP Negeri 2 Koto XI Tarusan Academic Year 2020/2021. The sampling technique used total sampling with a sample size of 107 student answer sheets. Data were analyzed using ANATES ver. 4.0.2 program. Based on the research results obtained: 1) reliability of 0.50 with sufficient criteria; 2) the distinguishing power of the bad and good categories which dominates, namely 30% while 25% is moderate and 7.5% is very good; 3) the level of difficulty obtained by the criteria was medium with 62.5%, while the easy questions were 15%, the difficult questions were 12.5% and the very difficult questions were 2.5%; 4) the effectiveness of the distractor, there were 35 items or 87.5% of the effectiveness of the distractor which was functioning properly. Meanwhile, for 5 items, the quality of the distractor does not function or has very poor effectiveness. Thus, it can be concluded that these questions have met the criteria for good questions, but some questions need to be revised.
Co-Authors Anwar Mustofa Apriyeni, Olda Attifah, Yusni Dedy Kurniawan Ernita Siambaton Ernita Siambaton, Ernita Erwin Permana Ferdyan, Rhavy Fortunasari, Fortunasari Fuadiyah, Sa’diatul Heffi Alberida Helendra Helendra Jefri Marzal Lativa, Veren Lufri Lufri Margo Purnomo Marlius, Yoni Muhammad Rafiq Putra, Erik Nanda Ratna Wardani Riskon Ginting Riskon Ginting Rizka Sakinah Rosdialena Rukun Santoso Sri Isnaeni Achmad Supentri Supentri, Supentri Yanita Ella Nilla Chandra Yosi Laila Rahmi Yudistira, Olla Krisliani Zulyusri Zulyusri