Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
5.47
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Humanika : Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora Litera Humanus: Jurnal ilmiah Ilmu-ilmu Humaniora Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL) LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Lingua Cultura Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra Journal of Language and Literature Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics Humaniora Linguistik Indonesia Metalingua: Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics Britain International for Linguistics, Arts and Education Journal (BIoLAE Journal) Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics DINAMIKA ILMU: Jurnal Pendidikan JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies) Studies in English Language and Education
Erna Andriyanti
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 36 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Language and Literature

 1 
Negative Politeness Strategies in What Would You Do? TV Show Meidiana Suyono; Erna Andriyanti
Journal of Language and Literature Vol 21, No 2 (2021): October
Publisher : Universitas Sanata Dharma

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (37.221 KB) | DOI: 10.24071/joll.v21i2.3430

Abstract

Being polite is significant to maintain good communications as well as social relationship and therefore various strategies are applied to show language politeness. This sociopragmatic study deals with negative politeness found in What Would You Do? TV show to describe the types of negative politeness strategies and investigate the reasons of choosing those strategies. This research applied a descriptive qualitative approach supported by statistics. The data were in the form of utterances containing negative politeness strategies, sourced in the conversations and the scripts between the participants and the actors. There were 106 data collected by note-taking technique from the show’s YouTube channel. The trustworthiness was attained through analyst triangulation. The findings show that seven negative politeness strategies are used by the participants in their responses to the actors: Being Indirect (12), Questions, Hedges (40), Minimizing the Imposition (12), Apologizing (25), Giving Difference (9), Being Pessimistic (6), and State the FTA as General Rule (2). The dominance of Questions, Hedges relates to the options provided to the addressee to accept or refuse the speaker’s request and to make utterances sound more polite. Related to reasons, the payoffs factor was dominant (with 84 occurrences) because it is the basic factor the participants might think about what they will get by applying a certain strategy. The circumstances factor has 22 occurrences, consisting of social distance (14), social power (5), and rank of imposition (3).
Co-Authors Aji Seno Suwondo Ani Maghfiroh Annisa Nurul Firdausi Arifah Prima Satrianingrum Ashadi Ashadi Ashadi Ashadi Ashadi Ashadi Ashadi Ashadi Aulia Rahmatika Nur Azizah Benni Setiawan Christina Lhaksmita Anandari Edith Romano Galindo Eisha Jamila Qomariyah Ikhwan Emi Nursanti Ihtiara Fitrianingsih Ikha Adhi Wijaya Indah Permatasari Jannatussholihah, Siti Kartika Pratiwi Khaira Liza Khairani Ade Guswita Lucky Amatur Rohmani Mehdi Riazi Meidiana Suyono Naomi Dwi Aprina Paulus Kurnianta Pratomo Widodo Pratomo Widodo Rahmi D Andayani Refi Rizki Radian Rizki Meliani Rustan Saiful Anwar Santi Fitriyani Siti Jannatussholihah Siti Jannatussholihah Siti Lutfiah Rabiyatul Adawiyah Siti Mukminatun, Siti Sulis Triyono Titik Sudartinah Try Mahendra Siregar Widyastuti Purbani