Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian
SAPTANA -
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Economics, Econometrics & Finance

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
KEUNGGULAN KOMPARATIF-KOMPETITIF DAN STRATEGI KEMITRAAN SAPTANA -
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 8, No. 2 Juli 2008
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (129.11 KB)

Abstract

Change of strategic environment in the form of economic globalization, decentralization,change of consumer preference and sustainability of environment, claiming the existence of changeand also adjustment operate institution of agriculture. This article is addressed to study statuscomparative and competitive advantage some agriculture commodities, partner of business agricultureperformance, and revitalization institution of agriculture to realize comparative advantage becomecompetitive advantage through partner business strategy. Status comparative and competitiveadvantages show though most agriculture commodities till in this time remain to have comparative andcompetitive advantage, but advantages had progressively lower and rentan to change of external, withcoefficient value of DRCR and of PCR come near number 1 (one). Until so far not yet been woke upby institution partner of business which each other requiring, each other strengthening, and each otherprofiting, and also the nature of partner which do not have sustainable. Several weakness for exampleis lowering him of commitment among which was have partner, position bargaining not equality, andalso less him in pricing and division of added value or profit margin. Institution partnership ofbusiness agriculture conducting consolidation farm group; level of self-supporting farmer group up atformal institution (co-operation of association) and revitalization institute of counseling up at CenterService and Consultancy of Agribusiness, which one of the function are mediator and facilitator. Withexpected inwrought effort partner strategy can realize comparative advantage become competitiveadvantage either in local market, exporting and regional.
HUBUNGAN PENGUASAAN LAHAN DAN PENDAPATAN RUMAHTANGGA DI PEDESAAN (Kasus di Propinsi Jawa Tengah, Sumatera Barat dan Kalimantan Barat) SUPRIYATI -; SAPTANA -; YANA SUPRIYATNA
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 4, No. 1 Februari 2004
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (140.349 KB)

Abstract

Historically correlation between landowner and land holding structure with householdincome structure in the rural area is linearity. Land owner or land holding structure inequalitymain factors to cause income structure inequality. In condition, there are the opportunityemploy and economic activity to open up, why is the correlation between landowner and landholding structure with the income structure? This paper objective to study: (1) Land owneror land holding structure in the rural area; (2) Household income structure in the rural area;and (3) The correlation between landowner and land holding structure with the householdincome structure in the rural area. Location on this study to focused in the three district inthree provincial exes. Klaten, central Java; Pasaman, West Sumatera; and Landak, WestKalimantan. The study to analyze by descriptive, gini index, and correlation analyze. Ingeneral, land owner and land holding size in Klaten, central Java less than West Sumatera andWest Kalimantan. Gini index analysis relatively to indicate high equality, except in Pasaman,West Sumatera. Inequality on land holding lower than landowner does in all location. Totalincome in Klaten, Central Java to range Rp. 6,77 - 6,97 million/years; Pasaman, WestSumatera to range Rp. 7,30 – Rp. 8,10 million/years; and in Landak, West Kalimantan torange Rp. 5,90 – 6,65 million/years. Analyze gini index for household income to indicatehigh inequality income structure rural area in Klaten. On the other hand, rural area inPasaman, West Sumatera and Landak, West Kalimantan gini index result reflecting lowinequality. There are deferent factors by location to cause inequality of landowner or landholding and household income structure, in Klaten rural area caused by high proportionincome source from non-agriculture. On the other hand, in Pasaman and Landak rural areacaused by level of technology adoption and kind of commodity planting by farmers.Statistically, correlation between landowner and land holding structure with householdagriculture income is not significant. Correlation between total income with the landowner orland holding in Pasaman, West Java is significant, but in Klaten, Central Java and Landak,West Java is not significant.
TRANSFORMASI KELEMBAGAAN GUNA MEMPERKUAT EKONOMI RAKYAT DI PEDESAAN: SUATU KAJIAN ATAS KASUS DI KABUPATEN TABANAN, BALI SAPTANA -; TRI PRANADJI; SYAHYUTI -; ROOSGANDA ELIZABETH
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 4, No. 1 Februari 2004
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (139.205 KB)

Abstract

Weak national economy is resulted from powerless rural economy, and the main cause isfragile supporting institution. If rural economy is not transformed to strong one, the future ofrural economy will be insignificant. There are three pillars in rural community, namely localor traditional communal institution, private sector, and public sector. The research aimed (1)to study characteristics and performance of traditional institution historically, (2) to evaluateprograms related with public economy development in rural areas, (3) to assess the structureof three pillars institution, (4) to find critical points of traditional institutional transform tostrengthen rural economy along with globalization and regional autonomy, and (5) toformulate traditional institution transform model along with globalization and regionalautonomy. The Steps of Rural Economic Institutional Tranformation i.e. : communal societyera, destroyed communal society era, and new communal era. Some Types of InstitutionalTranformation. This research find that the institutional tranformation still in transition stage.There are some type of traditional instiutional transformation, those are: replaced structurewith new structure, adding structure, new missions and objectives, and new norm system.The Mode of Institutional Transformation. As explained in think frame, instituional changeis depend on three of power, i.e. government, market, and community. This research alsofind that community power in market institution have replaced the government support, i.e. incooperatives organization (KUD). Deminishing of the government support gave positiveimpact to KUD, where they are more creative and autonom in planning and action program.Succesfull of development LPD due to the local leadership support and communityparticipation. This is fenomenon where the community principle use in market isntitution,especially in credit program. Institutional transformation mode have five aspects, those areagricultural instituional and organization, leadership, human resources, the value system, andsocio culture.
ANALISIS KELEMBAGAAN PENGENDALIAN HAMA TERPADU MENDUKUNG AGRIBISNIS KOPI RAKYAT DALAM RANGKA OTONOMI DAERAH SAPTANA -; HERLINA TARIGAN; ADI SETIANTO
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 5, No. 2 Juli 2005
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (109.528 KB)

Abstract

Integrated Pest Management Program (IPM) that is strategic operational measure. Inthe micro farm level, IPM operational measure can be answered both capital problem in thefarm level and international commodity coercion on environmental and food safetyconsumption simultaneously. That paper objective to analysis : (1) historical governmentpolicy on IPM related the decentralization of development; (2) performance, constrain, andprospective IPM program in the decentralization era; (3) comparative farming performanceIPM cooperator, inter success farms group and least success farms group; (4) factors thataffected dissemination and adoption IPM technology; (5) synopsis on IPM sustainableinstitution in the decentralization era; and (6) to formulate police IPM sustainabledevelopment alternative supporting small coffee agribusiness in the decentralization era.Rates of participation of the IPM program participants varied among activities, i.e., planning,implementation, monitoring and evaluation. Low participation rate was found in planning,that of implementation was high, while that of monitoring and evaluation was low tomoderate. Program explanation during the planning stage was not properly carried out. Theother weaknesses were management of post harvest, processing, and marketing. After theIPM program average net benefits from coffee bean and additional in-rows plants were toincrease, respectively. Economic factors positively affecting IPM technology adoption were:(1) decreasing costs of inputs (fertilizers and pesticides); (2) improving farmers’ incomethrough higher yield and better quality; (3) improving stability and continuity of farmers’income due longer harvest and productive periods, and the products were sold periodically.In the future, development of IPM program for smallholding coffee plantation is based on theclear vision, namely IPM technology for improving rural people welfare. This vision has toreplace the old vision, namely IPM technology is created just to show that the researchers areable to show their ability in developing technology. Therefore, in the future IPM developmenthas to implicate directly to improved competitive economy and rural people welfare.
Co-Authors A. Husni Malian ADI SETIANTO Edi Basuno ENDANG L. HASTUTI HERLINA TARIGAN I Wayan Rusastra JULIA FORCINA SINURAYA KURNIA SUCI INDRANINGSIH Roosganda Elizabeth SUMARYANTO - SUMEDI - Supena Friyatno Supriyati - SYAHYUTI - TRI BASTUTI P. Tri Pranadji YANA SUPRIYATNA Yusmichad Yusdja