Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JETL (Journal Of Education, Teaching and Learning)

Improving Problem-Solving Ability and Character in Subject-Specific Pedagogic with Heuristic Strategy Yudi Darma; Dede Suratman; Ahmad Yani T.; Utin Desy Susiaty
JETL (Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning) Vol 4, No 2 (2019): Volume 4 Number 2 September 2019
Publisher : STKIP Singkawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (284.765 KB) | DOI: 10.26737/jetl.v4i2.886

Abstract

This study aimed mainly at producing Subject Specific Pedagogic (SSP) Statistics based on Character-filled Heuristic Strategies to Improve Students' Qualified Problem-Solving Ability built on the level of validity, practicality, and effectiveness. The study at this time was in synergy with the previous research as a new frame of mind that became the concept of development in achieving the main objectives. The present study employed a quantitative descriptive method with logical, analytical, and descriptive reasonings supported with relevant literature data. The instruments used were a test of problem-solving abilities and a questionnaire that was then analyzed descriptively and inferentially with two-way ANOVA formula. The study concluded that the heuristic strategy through the stages of identification, plan, do and check is an alternative solution to learning mathematics with high strengths and potentials in integrating characters into learning scenarios to be able to improve students' problem-solving skills and develop their character containing Subject-Specific Pedagogic.
Student’s Covariational Reasoning in Solving Covariational Problems of Dynamic Events Sandie Sandie; Utin Desy Susiaty
JETL (Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning) Vol 5, No 2 (2020): Volume 5 Number 2 September 2020
Publisher : STKIP Singkawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (404.927 KB) | DOI: 10.26737/jetl.v5i2.2092

Abstract

One of the reasons for learners to have poor covariational reasoning is because learners understand covariation to the extent that it is procedural, while conceptually it is not fully understood. The goal to be achieved is to describe the process of student covariational reasoning in constructing graphs. This research uses a qualitative approach. This type of research is qualitative research in which the main data is written and/or spoken words. The subjects in this study were odd semester students consisting of 3, 5, and 7 Mathematics Education Study Programs, Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Technology IKIP-PGRI Pontianak. The research instrument consists of the main instrument, namely the researcher himself and the supporting instrument, namely the task of covariational problems in the form of a written test and interview guidelines. Data analysis by processing and preparing data from the assignment results to interpreting the data and making conclusions. This study examines the process of student covariational reasoning in solving dynamic incident problems. Students initially experience a pseudo error, however, along with the problem-solving process students can eliminate pseudo thinking that was initially experienced. Students have been able to solve covariational problems at Level 5, where these problems require students to be able to coordinate changes in the value of one variable against changes in the value of other variables. The problem at level 5 also requires students to be able to see changes in time and changes in water level that occur continuously by paying attention to the irregular shape of the bottle. The existence of the Covid-19 pandemic provides a limit for researchers in collecting data that should have been done directly online. This limits researchers to dig deeper into what students think in depth. The number of students who can solve this problem needs to pay attention to the IKIP PGRI Pontianak Institute to compile a curriculum or learning media that instils the concept of reasoning.