Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Keadilan

ANALISIS KONSINYASI TITIPAN UANG DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SEBAGAI BENTUK PENYELESAIAN GANTI KERUGIAN PEMBEBASAN LAHAN JALAN TOL SUMATERA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI KALIANDA Dilla Nandya Oksitania; Erlina B; Yulia Hesti
Keadilan : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tulang Bawang Vol 19 No 2 (2021): Keadilan : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tulang Bawang
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tulang Bawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37090/keadilan.v19i2.483

Abstract

Abstract Land is the most important element for humans to be able to live, this is because it is where natural and man-made resources grow and are also built. Indonesia regulates land ownership through this land law so that land use or management can be carried out carefully now and in the future. The land issue concerns the most basic rights of the people. The purpose of the study was to determine the consignment process in the District Court as a form of settlement of compensation for toll road land acquisition and its legal consequences. The results showed that the consignment process for compensation began with an application for consignment safekeeping, then an offer was made by the court bailiff accompanied by 2 (two) witnesses at the respondent's residence. The consignment waives the obligation as the debtor, because the consignment can be equated with making payments. All processes must be carried out in a manner that has been regulated by laws and regulations. Consignment is carried out so that government projects continue to run, through a deliberation mechanism that should be a means to find a middle way in determining the amount of compensation, often no agreement is reached. Keywords : Sumatra Toll Road, Consignment, Land Acquisition.
ASPEK KRIMINOLOGI TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA MENGALIHKAN OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA TANPA PERSETUJUAN TERTULIS TERLEBIH DAHULU DARI PENERIMA FIDUSIA BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI TANJUNGKARANG NOMOR : 740/PID.SUS/2020/PN.TJK Tami Rusli; Yulia Hesti; Heru Andrianto
Keadilan : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tulang Bawang Vol 20 No 2 (2022): Keadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tulang Bawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37090/keadilan.v20i2.722

Abstract

A person in a consumer financing agreement with a fiduciary guarantee is prohibited from transferring the object of the fiduciary guarantee to another party without the consent of the fiduciary recipient. This study discusses the problem of what are the factors causing the perpetrator and how criminal responsibility for the perpetrator of a criminal act transfers the object of the fiduciary guarantee without prior written consent from the fiduciary recipient. This study uses a normative juridical approach and an empirical juridical approach. Collecting data by field studies and literature studies. Data analysis was carried out in a qualitative juridical manner, namely the analysis was carried out descriptively. Consumer finance companies should control, supervise and review the object of fiduciary security every month so that it can be seen whether the object of the fiduciary guarantee is in the control of the debtor, is not damaged and is not transferred to a third party, thereby reducing the losses that will be suffered by the creditor and is expected to be necessary. there is awareness of the public who enter into consumer financing agreements with fiduciary guarantees to pay more attention to their responsibilities in fulfilling achievements, because acts of breach of contract cannot always be resolved by deliberation. The imposition of imprisonment if it can provide a deterrent effect and become a motivation for good intentions. Keywords : Criminal Liability, Criminal act, Fiduciary Guarantee