Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Artemis Law Journal

PERBANDINGAN RATIO DECIDENDI PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP PEMBERIAN KOMPENSASI KEPADA KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA PERDANGANGAN ORANG DI INDONESIA ( TINJAUN YURIDIS PUTUSAN NOMOR: 12/PID.SUS/2021/PN KPG DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR:584 K/PID.SUS/2013/PN,SBY) Lorens Soli Daud Bangkole; Rudepel Petrus Leo; Adrianus Djara Dima
Artemis Law Journal Vol 1 No 1 (2023): Artemis Law Journal Vol.1, No.1, November 2023
Publisher : Law Faculty, Nusa Cendana University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35508/alj.v1i1.13427

Abstract

Human Rights (HAM) is a fundamental right of all mankind as a gift of God inherent in human beings, natural, universal, eternal associated with human dignity, equally owned by all people, regardless of gender, nationality, religion, age, language, social status, political views, etc. One of the problems related to human rights in Indonesia is the crime of trafficking in Persons which is one form recruitment, delivery, transfer, protection or acceptance of a person, by threat or use of force or any form of coercion, kidnapping, deception, lying, or other abuse of power, or vulnerable position or giving or receiving payments or obtaining benefits to obtain the consent of someone who has power over others, for the purpose of exploitation. the purpose of this article is to determine the ratio decidendi judge's decision against the provision of compensation to victims of trafficking in persons of decision number: 584/K/pid.Sus/2013/Pn Sby and to determine the recidendi ratio which is an inhibiting factor so that it does not deberikannya compensation to victims of trafficking in Persons Decision No. 12 / Pid.Sus / 2021 / PN Kpg. The results showed that: (1) based on the consideration of the Supreme Court in the decision of the trafficking in persons case above, the ratio decidendi used in providing compensation to victims of trafficking in persons in the above decision is the provision of compensation is a citizen's right, the distribution of compensation is intended as assistance or to ensure the welfare of victims of crime and as Social Security. (2) inhibiting factors so that the crime of trafficking in Persons is not given in decision Number 12/Pid.Sus / 2021 / PN Kpg namely: legal factors and the unavailability of compensation implementation guidelines.
Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Tindak Pidana Korupsi Serta Dasar Pertimbngan Hakim Terhadap Putusan Bebas Pada Perkara Korupsi Dalam Surat Putusan No. 40/Pid/Sus-TPK/2020/PN-KPG Lukas Stefanus Nani Raga; Rudepel Petrus Leo; Heryanto Amalo
Artemis Law Journal Vol 1 No 2 (2024): Vol.1 No.2, Mei 2024
Publisher : Law Faculty, Nusa Cendana University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35508/alj.v1i2.13743

Abstract

The Defendant in the Corruption Case on Land belonging to the Kupang City Government, Thomas More, committed a criminal act of corruption with witness Jonas Salean in accordance with the contents of the Kupang Class IA District Court decision in 2020 and in this case the Defendant and the Witness in question issued the land title certificate and signed the assets. belongs to the State in order to enrich oneself, so that in the District Court decision letter Number: 40/Pid/Sus-TPK/2020/PN-KPG. The defendant Thomas More was sentenced to a criminal sentence while the witness Jonas Salean was given an acquittal. The main problems in this research are: (1) What are the factors that cause the occurrence of criminal acts of corruption? (2) What is the basis for the judge's consideration in handing down an acquittal decision in this case? This research is empirical legal research, namely reviewing and analyzing data obtained from the research location. The results of this research show that (1) the factors causing corruption in land belonging to the Kupang City Government are (a) Internal Factors, namely the feeling of wanting to enrich oneself. (b) External Factors, namely the existence of opportunities/opportunities which are seen from the position of the defendant at the time of committing the crime corruption and also the closeness of the defendant to witnesses who participated in committing criminal acts of corruption. (2) The basis of consideration used by the judge in handing down an acquittal decision is seen from: (a) the elements of the primary indictment article and (b) the elements of subsidiary coercion.