Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Tindak Pidana Penipuan dengan Menggunakan Sarana Akta Perjanjian yang Dibuat di Hadapan Notaris Helmi Abdul Azis; Dahlan Ali; Suhaimi
AT-TASYRI': JURNAL ILMIAH PRODI MUAMALAH Vol. 10, No. 1 (Juni 2018)
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah STAIN Teungku Dirundeng Meulaboh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (610.307 KB)

Abstract

Notarial deed as an authentic deed has an important function in the life of society. The need for authentication in writing, in the form of an authentic deed is increasing in line with the growing demand for legal certainty which is one of the principles of the state of law. Notarial deed is the perfect tool of verification so as to ensure legal certainty, but in recent times it often used as a tool to commit crimes of fraud or other crimes. The results show that the deed of agreementmade in front of the notary can serve as a means to commit fraud criminal acts. For example, a deed made without the presence of complete parties, unclear object of the agreement and contains an unlawful causa element in the agreement which would potentially cause harm to either party in terms of misusing of the deed. The use of notarial deed as a tool for committing fraud crimes is a development of the modus operandi of crime by taking refuge behind thesanctity of the agreement, meaning that it is nothing other than to be protected from criminal penalties. A notary may be held accountable for crimes of fraud committed by another person by using the deed of agreement made in front of him as a tool of fraud crime. Certainly, with a note that a notary has issued a deed which he knows contains legal defects and then the deed is used by others as a tool of fraud crime, the act is included in the qualification of crime aids(medeplichtigheid).
The Position Of Regional Notary Honorary Council In Providing The Approval Toward The Notary Audit In The Investigation Process Nurhasaniah Nurhasaniah; Rizanizarli Rizanizarli; Suhaimi Suhaimi
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 22, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (78.803 KB) | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v22i1.4843

Abstract

Abstrak: Notaris mempunyai kewajiban untuk menjaga kerahasian terkait akta yang dibuatnya, oleh karenanya UUJN memberikan perlindungan terhadap Notaris melalui Pasal 66 yang menentukan bahwa untuk kepentingan Penyidikan, Penuntut Umum dan Hakim dengan persetujuan MKN dapat mengambil fotokopi Minuta Akta dan/atau surat-surat yang dilekatkan pada Minuta Akta atau Protokol Notaris dalam penyimpanan Notaris dan memanggil Notaris untuk hadir dalam pemeriksaan yang berkaitan dengan Akta atau Protokol Notaris yang berada dalam penyimpanan Notaris. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui serta menjelaskan tentang kedudukan MKNW dalam sistem hukum Indonesia dalam memberikan surat persetujuan terhadap pemeriksaan Notaris dalam proses Penyidikan. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang, pendekatan konseptual dan  pendekatan sejarah. Hasil penelitian ini adalah bahwa MKNW memenuhi unsur-unsur sebagai Badan/Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara yang diatur dalam UU PTUN dan UU Administrasi Pemerintahan. MKNW menjalankan urusan pemerintahan berdasarkan UUJN. Selainjutnya Surat persetujuan MKNW terhadap pemeriksaan Notaris dalam proses Penyidikan juga memenuhi unsur-unsur sebagai Surat Keputusan Badan/Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara yang diatur dalam UU PTUN dan UU Adminitrasi Pemerintahan.Kata Kunci: Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Wilayah, kedudukan MKNW, Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara, Notaris, Penyidikan. Abstract: Notaries should maintain the confidentiality of the deed and the Notary Protocol that is to be stored based on the provisions of the Law on Notarial Position (UUJN) and the Notary Position Code of Ethics. In essence, the UUJN protects Notaries through Article 66 of the UUJN which stipulates that for the investigation, the Public Prosecutor and Judge with the approval of the Notary Honorary Council (MKN) can have a copy of the Minutes of Deed and/or letters attached to the Minutes of Deed or the Notary Protocol in the Notary's storage.  Additionally, it also can summon the Notary to be present in the inspection related to the Notary Deed or Protocol that is in the Notary's storage. This study aims to explain the position of the Regional Notary Honorary Council (MKNW) in the Indonesian legal system related to the MKNW approval letter for the examination of a Notary in the Investigation process. This study also explains the court's Absolute Competence in examining, deciding, and resolving lawsuits against the MKNW approval letter. This research used normative juridical through utilizing the law, conceptual, and historical approaches in conducting the data. The sources of legal materials in the study are secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The result of this study indicates that MKNW fulfills the elements as a State Administrative Agency/Officer based on the provisions of the Law on State Administration and the Law on the State Administrative Court. This also shows that the MKNW approval letter for the Notary Examination in the Investigation Process fulfills the elements as a State Administrative Decree. Furthermore, based on the provisions in the Government Administration Law and the State Administrative Court Law, it can be determined that the lawsuit dispute related to the MKNW approval letter against a Notary examination in the Investigation process is the Absolute Competence of the State Administrative Court in order to examine, decide and resolve the disputes. The suggestion derived from this study is the hope that there will be administrative efforts that can be taken by a Notary to resolve the problems related to objections to the MKNW approval letter against a Notary examination in the Investigation process. In addition, it is hoped that the Supreme Court will be able to stipulate the Supreme Court Regulations concerning Guidelines for Judicial Body Dispute Resolution. In this case, the settlement of lawsuits against the MKNW approval letter is the Absolute Competence of the State Administrative Court.Keywords: Regional Notary Honorary Council, MKNW Position, State Administrative Court, Notary, Investigation
PERLINDUNGAN SAKSI DALAM BEBERAPA TINDAK PIDANA DAN PENGADILAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA suhaimi suhaimi
Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan Vol 15 No 2 (2020): Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Samudra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33059/jhsk.v15i2.3042

Abstract

Abstract, Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code puts witness statements first among other evidence. Witnesses in giving their statements, both at the level of investigation, prosecution and court proceedings, sometimes experience pressure, harassment, threats, terror and even violence perpetrated by certain parties. That is why witnesses need to obtain legal protection, namely as regulated in Law No. 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims as amended by Law No. 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law No. 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims. Several criminal acts that regulate the issue of witness protection include the crime of narcotics, the eradication of corruption, the crime of terrorism and the human rights court. Legal protection for witnesses, namely in the form of protection for the witness's personal security from physical and mental threats, so that the confidentiality and identity of the witnesses should be maintained. Witness protection is intended to be able to protect witnesses from interference, threats, terror and violence against witnesses. This will be the basis for legal certainty, law enforcement, justice and the creation of a feeling of security for witnesses.
Analisis Yuridis Putusan Praperadilan dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana Darwin Darwin; Dahlan Dahlan; Suhaimi Suhaimi
JURNAL MERCATORIA Vol 12, No 1 (2019): JURNAL MERCATORIA JUNI
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/mercatoria.v12i1.2363

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui perluasan kewenangan praperadilan diluar KUHAP serta akibat hukum terhadap putusan praperadilan dalam perspektif sistem peradilan pidana. Data yang diperoleh dalam penelitian ini dilakukan dengan penelitian kepustakaan. Penelitian kepustakaan dilakukan dengan cara mencari literatur (buku-buku), makalah, dan data yang diperoleh di internet atau bahan hukum yang terkait dengan pembahasan serta dokumentasi hukum mencari peraturan perundang-undangan yang mengatur tentang segala hal yang berkaitan materi pembahasan.  Hasil penelitian menjelaskan sebelum Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) menjatuhkan putusan Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 sejatinya terdapat beberapa putusan hakim praperadilan yang juga telah yang memperluas kewenangan praperadilan dalam Pasal 77 KUHAP. Perluasan objek Praperadilan tersebut menimbulkan akibat hukum antara lain Penyitaan, Penggeledahan dan Pemblokiran Rekening, Pelepasan Police Line atas Fasilitas Umum, Penetapan Tersangka sehingga lembaga praperadilan dalam proses pembuktiannya berpotensi terlalu jauh masuk dan ikut menguji pokok perkara yang harusnya baru diuji di proses pembuktian di persidangan.
Penolakan Permohonan Praperadilan Terhadap Penetapan Tersangka dan Penyitaan (Kajian Putusan Nomor 01/Pra.Pid/2016/PN-Mbo) Hendrawan Sofyan; Dahlan Ali; Suhaimi Suhaimi; Mansari Mansari
Media Syari'ah Vol 21, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Sharia and Law Faculty

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/jms.v21i1.3923

Abstract

Abstrak: Hakim praperadilan Pengadilan Negeri Meulaboh melalui putusan Nomor 01/Pra.Pid/2016/PN-Mbo telah menolak permohonan praperadilan dengan objek perkaranya penetapan tersangka dan penyitaan. Padahal penetapan tersangka tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan yakni tidak adanya penetapan pengadilan untuk penyitaan dan tidak adanya bukti yang cukup untuk menetapkannya sebagai tersangka. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pertimbangan hakim menolak praperadilan pemohon dan tinjauan yuridis terhadap penolakan permohonan praperadilan. Penelitian ini ingin mengkaji pertimbangan hakim menolak praperadilan dan tinjauan yuridis terhadap penolakan tersebut. Penelitian ini termasuk ke dalam kategori penelitian yuridis normatif atau dokrtinal dengan tujuan mengkaji tentang asas-asas dan kaidah hukum sesuai dengan kajian ilmu hukum. Bahan hukum primer yang digunakan yaitu UU Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang KUHAP dan Putusan Nomor 01/Pra.Pid/2016/PN-Mbo, Putusan MK Nomor 21/PPU-XII/2014. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertimbangan hakim menolak praperadilan pemohon yaitu: Pertama, Penetapan tersangka baru menjadi objek praperadilan pada sejak dikeluarkannya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PPU-XII/2014 yang memperluas objek praperadilan yakni pada tahun 2015 dan penyitaan yang dilakukan oleh Polres Aceh Barat telah memenuhi dan sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Dalam perspektif yuridis, putusan hakim Nomor  01/Pra.Pid/2016/PN-Mbo masih banyak kelemahan dan kekeliruan. Pertama, hakim menyatakan bahwa penetapan tersangka bukanlah objek praperadilan sebelum adanya putusan MK, padahal praperadilan diajukan pemohon pada tahun 2016 setelah adanya putusan MK. Kedua, menurut hakim praperadilan penyitaan yang dilakukan telah sesuai padahal tidak adanya penetapan pengadilan untuk dilakukan penyitaan. Ketiga, penolakan praperadilan cenderung melanggar HAM, karena setelah ditolak hingga saat ini tahun 2018 tidak dilimpahkan kasus tersebut ke Pengadilan sehingga tidak adanya kepastian hukum bagi tersangka.Abstract: The pretrial judge of the Meulaboh District Court through Decision Number 01 / Pra.Pid / 2016 / PN-Mbo has rejected a pretrial application with the object of his case for the determination of a suspect and confiscation. Even though the determination of the suspect is not in accordance with the provisions of the legislation, namely the absence of a court's determination for confiscation and the lack of sufficient evidence to determine it as a suspect. This study aims to determine the consideration of judges rejecting pretrial applicants and juridical review of rejecting pretrial applications. This study wants to examine the consideration of judges rejecting pretrial and judicial review of the rejection. This research belongs to the category of normative or doctrinal juridical research with the aim of reviewing the principles and legal rules in accordance with the study of law. The primary legal material used is Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning KUHAP and Decision Number 01 / Pra.Pid / 2016 / PN-Mbo, Constitutional Court Decision Number 21 / PPU-XII / 2014. The results showed that the judge's judgment rejected the applicant's pretrial, namely: First, Determination of the suspect was only the object of pretrial since the issuance of the Constitutional Court ruling Number 21 / PPU-XII / 2014 which expanded the object of pretrial namely in 2015 and the seizure by the West Aceh Police fulfill and comply with applicable laws and regulations. In a juridical perspective, the decision of judge Number 01 / Pra.Pid / 2016 / PN-Mbo still has many weaknesses and errors. First, the judge stated that the determination of the suspect was not the object of pretrial before the Constitutional Court's decision, even though the pretrial was filed by the applicant in 2016 after the Constitutional Court's decision. Secondly, according to the pretrial judge, the seizure carried out was appropriate even though there was no court ruling for confiscation. Third, pretrial refusal tends to violate human rights, because after being rejected until now in 2018 the case has not been transferred to the Court so that there is no legal certainty for the suspect.
Pencegahan Jarimah Khalwat di Kota Sabang Webby Aditya; Dahlan Ali; Suhaimi Suhaimi
Media Syari'ah Vol 21, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Sharia and Law Faculty

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/jms.v21i2.2491

Abstract

Abstrak: Pasal 18 huruf (b) Undang-Undang Dasar Negera Indonesia Tahun 1945 menjadi landasan hukum tertingi pengakuan wilayah Aceh sebagai daerah Syariat Islam, konsep hukum Islam mulai diterapkan, salah satunya mengenai Hukum Jinayat yang mana terdapat 10 (sepuluh) jenis jarimah yang termuat dalam Qanun Aceh No.6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat. Didaerah Kota Sabang, khalwat merupakan jenis jarimah yang mengalami peningkatan tiap tahunnya. Berdasrkan hasil penelitian setidaknya terdapat 3 (tiga) faktor kendala efetivitas hukum jinayat di Kota Sabang, pertama hukum jinayat yang lemah dalam hal penjatuhan uqubat/sanksi terhadap pelaku jinayah khalwat (tidak memberikan efek jera), dan terhadap anak yang bermasalah dengan hukum jinayat dapat dieksekusi dengan  hukuman cambuk didepan umum yang dapat mengakibatkan trauma terhadap anak dan mengganggu proses tumbuh kembangnya, serta subjek hukum yang kabur dalam qanun ini. Faktor kedua yang menjadi kendala personel penyidik Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja dan Wilayatul Hisbah Kota Sabang baru 1 (satu) orang, akibatnya proses penegakan hukum menjadi lambat, dan penyidik hanya menangani jarimah khalwat. Faktor ketiga belum terdapat ruang sel tahanan jinayah di Kantor Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja dan Wilayatul Hisbah Kota Sabang.  Abstract: Article 18 letters (b) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia become the highest legal basis for the recognition of the territory of Aceh as the area of Islamic Shari’a and the concept of Islamic law came into force, one of which concerns jinayat law in which there are 10 (ten) types of finger which is contained in Qanun Aceh No.6 Year 2014 on Jinayat Law. In the region of Sabang, khalwat is a kind of jarimah that experience increase every year. Based on the result of research there are at least 3 (three) constraints factor of jinayat’s legal effectivity in Sabang City, firstly jinayah law which is weak in the case of sanction/uqubat imposition on khalwat penpetrator (no deterrent effect) and to the chilad with problem jinayat law can be executed with public canning that can lead to trauma to children and disrupt the process of growing up, as well as the legal subjects that are vague in this qanun. The second factor becomes the personal obstacle of the investigator of the Civil Service Police Unit and the Wilayatul Hisbah the new Sabang City 1 (one) person, consequently the law enforment process becomes slow and the investigator only handles khalwat fingers. The third factor has not been contained jinayah prison cell cell in police officers office police station and Wilayatul Hisbah Sabang City.  
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL (HKI) DI INDONESIA Suhaimi Suhaimi; Kurniawan Kurniawan; Roslaini Ramli; Enzus Tinianus; Dedy Yuliansyah
Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 5, No 1 (2021): April
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Teuku Umar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35308/jic.v5i1.3276

Abstract

In everyday life, whether we realize it or not, we will always come into contact with the use of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) on the products we consume or use. In the current era of globalization, IPR has become a very important issue and has always received the attention of various parties, both national and international levels. IPR is the only right that is specifically granted to the inventor / creator, while other parties are prohibited from using the invention / creation. For this reason, IPRs need to be legally protected. The formulation of the problem in this research is what are the steps in providing legal protection for IPR in Indonesia and how is Indonesia's concern as a member of the WTO in providing legal protection for IPR. As a normative juridical research, to obtain data, literature research is carried out in order to obtain legal material, both primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The approach method used is the statutory approach, namely by examining the applicable legal provisions which are related to the issue of legal protection of IPR in Indonesia. In the legal protection of IPR, several routes can be taken, namely national, regional, European and international routes. As an effort to protect IPR, Indonesia has ratified several international conventions and harmonized several laws and regulations in the IPR sector. However, the legislation that has been produced should be supported in the form of law enforcement, so that it will have a positive impact on creators. Especially now that there are more and more practices of IPR violations, CD and VCD piracy, song or art piracy and so on. Likewise, violations in the field of brands that are rife with the development of online businesses such as Shopee, Lazada, Tokopedia, Bukalapak, JD.ID, OLX and others, both officially registered and unregistered.
PPAT'S Legal Responsibility For The Creation Of Empty Deed Wirantia Wirantia; Darmawan Darmawan; Suhaimi Suhaimi
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 4, No 3: Desember 2020
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4073.402 KB) | DOI: 10.24815/sklj.v4i3.19087

Abstract

Article 53 of the Regulation of the Head of the National Land Agency Number 1 Year 1960, which states that the PPAT deed is made by filling in the complete available deed blanks in accordance with the instructions for filling it. In practice carried out by a small number of PPAT there is a deed that has been prepared in advance, and has had some contents emptied containing agreements or general and standard agreements, which the purpose of which is to facilitate the work of PPAT in terms of administration and in terms of providing services by PPAT to interested parties or faces. The results showed that, Responsibility for authentic deed which is partially subtansinya empty, because PPAT is a public official who is given the authority to make authentic deed and PPAT has rules that must be obeyed by all PPAT in Indonesia regulated in Government Regulation No. 24, 2016 and the IPPAT Code of Ethics, and the position of PPAT deed which is partially subtansinya vacant in the event of degradation of PPAT deed even though the PPAT deed is a perfect evidence tool, but in the ppat certificate can experience degradation of the deed that can not be enforced as an authentic deed, but is considered a deed / handwriting under the hands caused by violation of the provisions of Article 1869 KUHPerdata.
Pengawasan dan Pembinaan Majelis Pengawas Daerah Terhadap Notaris Yang Melakukan Pelanggaran Irma Mulia Fitri; Ilyas Ismail; Suhaimi Suhaimi
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 3, No 1: April 2019
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (261.715 KB) | DOI: 10.24815/sklj.v3i1.12323

Abstract

Pengawasan atas Notaris dilakukan oleh Menteri dalam melaksanakan pengawasan, menteri membentuk Majelis Pengawas, Majelis Pengawas berjumlah 9 (Sembilan) orang terdiri  atas unsur pemerintah sebanyak 3 (Tiga) orang, Organisasi Notaris sebanyak 3 (Tiga) orang dan ahli atau akedemisi sebanyak 3 (Tiga) orang. Pengawas terhadap notaris meliputi perilaku notaris dan pelaksanaan  jabatan notaris yang diatur dalam  pasal 67  Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang jabatan notaris. Berdasarkan aturan pasal 70 (a) Tentang  Majelis Pengawasan Daerah (MPD) berwenang menyelenggarakan sidang untuk memeriksa adanya dugaan pelanggaran kode etik atau pelanggaran pelaksanaan jabatan notaris. Jenis Penelitian yang digunakan adalah Penelitian Yuridis Empris.Supervision towards notaries is conducted by a Minister by foundingsupervisory council which consists of 9 members; 3 are from the government agency; 3 are from the notary agency;and 3 other are from experts or academics. The supervision includes the notaries’ attitude and how the notaries conduct their duties which are regulated in Article 67 of Law No.30 of 2004 and Law No.2 of 2014 about notary position. Based on the regulation in article 70 (a) about Regional Supervisory Council mentions that this council is authorized to hold a meeting to investigate if there are any suspicions about codes of ethics violations or the violation towards notary duties. The type of this study is a Juridical Empirical.
Penertiban Terhadap Hak Milik Atas Tanah Yang Terindikasi Terlantar Di Kota Banda Aceh Suhaimi Suhaimi; Herawati Herawati; Mujibussalim Mujibussalim
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 1, No 1: April 2017 (Print Version)
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (324.779 KB) | DOI: 10.24815/sklj.v1i1.12301

Abstract

Pasal 27 huruf a angka 3 Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-pokok Agraria, menegaskan bahwa hak milik hapus bila tanahnya jatuh kepada negara karena diterlantarkan. Tanah dikatakaan diterlantarkan, menurut Pasal 6 ayat (1) PP No. 11 Tahun 2010 tentang Penertiban dan Pendayagunaan Tanah Terlantar, hak milik tersebut diidentifikasi dan diteliti terlebih dahulu. Apabila upaya penertiban yang diatur dalam PP No. 11 Tahun 2010 tidak dipatuhi oleh pemiliknya, menurut Pasal 9 ayat (2) PP No. 11 Tahun 2010 Kepala BPN atas usul Kepala Kantor Wilayah BPN menetapkan tanah tersebut sebagai tanah terlantar, sehingga menjadi tanah yang dikuasai langsung oleh Negara. Walaupun penelantaran tanah dapat mengakibatkan hapusnya hak atas tanah, akan tetapi dalam kenyataannya di Kota Banda Aceh masih dijumpai adanya hak milik atas tanah yang diterlantarkan (terindikasi terlantar). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hak milik atas tanah yang terindikasi terlantar di Kota Banda Aceh belum dapat dikategorikan sebagai tanah terlantar, karena penelantaran tersebut bukan dilakukan dengan sengaja. Penelantaran tanah termasuk hak milik atas tanah dapat mengakibatkan terganggunya keindahan Kota Banda Aceh dan dapat mengganggu warga masyarakat di sekitarnya. Upaya yang ditempuh pihak Kanwil BPN Provinsi Aceh terhadap hak milik atas tanah yang terindikasi terlantar di Kota Banda Aceh sampai saat ini hanya baru sebatas melakukan pemantauan di lapangan, yang dilakukan oleh pihak Kantor Pertanahan Kota Banda Aceh.Article 27 of the Act Number 5, 1960 on the Fundamental Agrarian Rules states known as the Agrarian Act (later celled as UUPA) that the right of owning the land title right states that the right is void if it is owned by a state one of those is it is abandoned. The land can be deemed as abandoned land, pursuant to Article 6 (1) of the Government Regulation Number 11, 2010 regarding the Enforcement and Empowerment of Abandoned Land,the Right is identified and investigated in order to determine whether the land can be deemed as abandoned land. If the effort of enforcement base don the mechanism ruled in the Government Regulation Number 11, 2010 is not obeyed by the land owners, hence Article 9 (2) of the Government Regulation Number 11, 2010 the Head of the Land Authority Agency base don the reference of the Head of Regional National Land Authority could determine that the land is deemed as abandoned land and it becomes the land owned directly by a State. Despite the fact that he abandonment of the land causes the void of the right in Banda Aceh can be found the right that is abandoned (indicated abandoned). The research shows that the right, which is indicated abandoned in Banda Aceh, has not been grouped as abandoned land as the abandonment is not done intentionally. The abandonment of the land might be said as the factor causing the insight views of Banda Aceh and it can disturb the society around the land. The efforts done by the National Land Authority of Aceh Province towards the land’s right that is indicated abandoned in Banda Aceh till now is only observation that is done by the National Land Authority office of Banda Aceh.