Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
2.502
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies Yustisia Al-'Adalah Rechtsidee Jurnal Asy-Syari'ah Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Konstitusi Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Islam JURNAL HUKUM ISLAM Jurnal Konstitusi Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas Al-Manahij : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu Zona Law And Public Administration Indonesia SASI
Dede Kania
Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Rechtsidee

 1 
Examining the Role of Indonesia's Constitutional Court as a Positive Legislator Makhyatul Fikriya; Dewi Sulastri; Dede Kania; Rania Nurul Rizqia
Rechtsidee Vol 12 No 1 (2024): June (In Progress)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v12i1.1022

Abstract

The judicial review process is pivotal in democratic governance, ensuring laws align with constitutional mandates. Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023, addressing amendments to Article 169, letter q of Law Number 7 of 2017 on Elections, has generated significant legal discourse. This study aims to analyze the legal dynamics within this judicial review, employing a descriptive-analytical methodology with a comparative approach. This involves comparing legal systems across different countries to understand the Constitutional Court's controversial role. Traditionally, the court's authority lies in acting as a negative legislator; however, in this case, it has taken on a role akin to a positive legislator, creating potential conflicts with the legislative body. The findings indicate a debate over the court's authority to add norms, revealing a fundamental tension between the judiciary and legislative functions. This decision introduces new legal implications, highlighting the necessity for further analysis to ensure the realization of substantial democracy. The study fills a knowledge gap by providing a comprehensive analysis of the court's expanded role, proposing solutive mechanisms to address the emerging legal challenges and maintain a balanced power dynamic between the judiciary and the legislature. This research underscores the importance of clear delineation of judicial and legislative responsibilities to uphold democratic principles. Highlights: The court's controversial role in amending election law norms. Debates over the court's authority and legislative implications. Need for solutions to maintain democracy and balance of power. Keywords: Judicial Review, Positive Legislator, Constitutional Court, Legal Authority, Democracy
Co-Authors Afriansyah, Mochammad Rizky Agam Jabar Rizky Kurnia Burhanuddin Burhanuddin Dede Mulyanto Deri Afwan Dewi Sulastri Dewi Sulastri Endeh Suhartini Fatoni, Siti Nur Galuh Puspaningrum Hafidah Ulya Adila Hazar Kusmayanti HAZAR KUSMAYANTI Hazar Kusmayanti Hazar Kusmayanti Hazar Kusmayanti Hazar Kusmayanti, Hazar Irfan Muhammad Ihsanuddin Litya Surisdani Anggraeniko Makhyatul Fikriya Mochammad Rizky Afriansyah Mohammad Hamidi Masykur Muhammad Miftahul Ikhsan Muhammad Qolbun Salim Nanik Prasetyoningsih Neni Nuraeni Neni Nuraeni, Neni Ramalinggam Rajamanickam Ramalinggam Rajamanickam Rania Nurul Rizqia Rizky Munandar Rusman Rusman Saepi Saepi Safira Nur Arifah Siti Nur Fatoni Siti Nurfatoni Siti Sarah Umi Kulsum Sofie Mayda Sugihfauzia Permana Suntana, Ija Syahrul Anwar Tedi Priatna Usep Saepullah Yoghi Arief Susanto Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol