Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
3.912
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Karya Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal EDUTECH Undiksha JURNAL INOVASI EDUKASI M A T H L I N E : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling At-Tarbawi : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Kebudayaan Range : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Pedagogi dan Pembelajaran Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application Indonesian Journal of Counseling and Development Rengganis Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Edumatika MATHEMATIC EDUCATION AND APLICATION JOURNAL (META) Kilmatuna: Journal Of Arabic Education JDIME: Journal of Development and Innovation in Mathematics Education Al Waraqah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab
Rhomiy Handican
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 31 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Pedagogi dan Pembelajaran

 1 
Thinking Trajectory of Students with Thinking and Feeling Personality Types in Solving Algebra Problems Rhomiy Handican; Laswadi; Jamaris Jamna; Solfema
Jurnal Pedagogi dan Pembelajaran Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): April
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jp2.v6i1.53957

Abstract

The strategies students use in solving mathematical problems are quite diverse, so they affect students' personality types. This research focuses on analyzing the trajectory of students' thinking in solving algebraic problems in terms of thinking and feeling personality types. This research is qualitative research with a descriptive method. The population is 34 students; the sampling is done by purposive sampling—data collection techniques through personality questionnaire sheets, algebraic test questions, and interviews. Qualitative data analysis was done through data reduction, display, and conclusion/verification stages. The results showed that the students' thinking path in solving algebraic problems in terms of thinking and feeling personality types is that in the problem analysis cycle, thinking students can correctly show what is known from the problem. The problem-solving process is made sequentially up to the simplification cycle. In the completion cycle, students think until they get the final answer by completing the steps properly and correctly. Based on these results, students need help solving algebra problems properly compared to students with the thinking personality type. It is because students feel that the steps could be more sequential in solving problems with algebraic forms, and it is difficult to consider based on right or wrong (objective). Therefore, sometimes he needs to be more wishy-washy or even needs clarification in taking a stand.
Co-Authors Ade Putra Hayat Ahmad Fauzan Ali Asmar Amanda Putri Anggi Desviana Siregar Desviana Siregar, Anggi Desviana Siregar Desviana Anna Nurbaiti Annisa Diana Salsabila Annisa Tri Wahyuni Atika Rahayu Azahra Rahmadia Azwar Ananda Desi Fitriani Dewi Murni Dian Refdelina Eline Yanty Putri Nasution Elni Putri Gunawan, Rilla Gina Herdi Setiawan I Made Arnawa Ice Dwi Novelza Icha putri Jamaris Jamaris Laswadi Latifa Yunisca Miftahul Jannah Mudjiran Mudjiran Mukhaiyar Mukhaiyar Nia Monika Sari Noorin Nisdawati Nurhizrah Gistituati Nuri Ria Sri Wahyuni Putri Yulianti Ravico Ravico, Ravico Reri Seprina Anggraini Rian Rafiska Rurisman Rurisman Rusdinal Rusdinal Rusdinal Rusdinal Salsabila, Nilza Humaira Siti Riva Siti Riva Darwata Solfema Suryani, M.Pd, Ade Irma Tabita Wahyu Triutami Tuti Rafsanjani Ulfa Lu’luilmaknun Wahyu Setyaningrum Wulandari, Nourma Pramestie Zakkya Zakkya