Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JUSTISI: Journal of Law

Putusan Hakim Dalam Menuntaskan Sengketa Perkawinan Poligami Di Indonesia Nuryamin Nuryamin; Diana Farid; Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti; Hendriana Hendriana; Mohamad Hilal Nu'man
JUSTISI Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): JUSTISI: Journal of Law
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/jurnaljustisi.v9i2.2303

Abstract

Polygamy only applies to those who according to law and religion allow their husbands to have multiple wives. This is explained in the general description of the Marriage Law Point 4c, which states: As permissible by law and the religion concerned, a husband can have multiple wives only if the parties so desire. The court has absolute power to negotiate on the basis and conditions of the polygamy permit application and the court has the authority to try and make decisions in the form of legal considerations and reasons. The scholars, the Prophets of the Qur'an and Hadith, depending on the case. In order not to harm the parties in the proceedings, cases decided in court must have clear reasons. Courts need such evidence to determine their case. Article (1) Law Number 7 of 1989 concerning the Religious Courts regulates all court decisions with reasons, and special provisions or relevant legal written sources used as the basis for decisions.
Harmonizing the Iddah Period for Women Divorced Outside the Court According to KHI and Fiqh Law Diana Farid; Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti; Kemal Al Kautsar Mabruri; Alex Kusmardani; Elly Lestari
JUSTISI Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): JUSTISI: Journal of Law
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/jurnaljustisi.v10i1.2455

Abstract

Legal harmonization determining the iddah period for divorced women outside of court between Law No. 1 of 1974 and the Compilation of Islamic Law is still an unresolved issue in Indonesia. This study aims to identify the differences and similarities between the two laws, as well as provide recommendations on the proper harmonization of laws for divorced women outside the court. This study uses comparative analysis methods and interviews with Islamic jurists. The results of the study show that there are differences in determining the iddah period between the two laws, and the proper harmonization of law by enforcing Islamic law that is in line with the social and cultural context of Indonesian society. It is hoped that the results of this research can become input for legislators and the public in formulating legal policies that are fair and in accordance with Islamic teachings and the social context in Indonesia.