Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 19 Documents
Search

PELUANG DAN TANTANGAN SARJANA SYARIAH DALAM MENGGELUTI PROFESI ADVOKAT PASCA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 18 TAHUN 2003 Muslim Zainuddin
PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH Vol 1 No 1 (2016)
Publisher : LKKI Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2327.432 KB) | DOI: 10.22373/petita.v1i1.82

Abstract

Before the establishment of Act Number 18 of 2003 on the Advocate, the graduates from faculty of Sharia were treated unequal in law profession instead of law faculty’s students. The establishment of Act Number 18 of 2003 on the Advocate give chances for sharia faculty’s graduate to professionally become advocate. However this chance has not significantly been used by sharia’s graduates. The figure showed in 2007 that only seven of sharia’s graduates became advocate. The hesitation of choosing advocate has been caused by unwilling to do a vows profession, and also unable to hear public censure. It is also caused by curriculum earned in sharia faculty has not been integrated with other legal professions. Financially, advocate incomes has no certainty in term of sustainability. In society perspective being a civil servant are more promising rather than an advocate. Thus the sharia advocate association (APSI) has significant role to promoting and motivating sharia’s graduate to become advocate. Abstrak. Sebelum disahkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 tentang Advokat, lulusan fakultas syariah diperlakukan diskriminatif daripada lulusan fakultas hukum. Setelah pemberlakuan Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 tentang Advokat memberi peluang alumni fakultas syariah untuk bergabung menjadi advokat. Peluang tersebut tidak dimanfaatkan dengan sebaik-baiknya, tapi masih disia-siakan oleh lulusan fakultas syariah. Pada tahun 2007 dari 1137 calon advokat hanya 7 orang yang berasal dari sarjana syariah. Keengganan memasuki dunia advokat dikarenakan tidak berani melaksanakan sumpah profesi advokat dan tidak sanggup menerima celaan dari masyarakat. Di samping itu kurikulum yang diajarkan di fakultas tidak terkoneksi dengan bantuan hukum lainnya. Secara finansial pendapatan advokat juga tidak menentu, ditambah lagi profesi sebagai pegawai negeri sipil lebih menjanjikan dalam opini masyarakat umumnya. Peran Asosiasi Pengacara Syariah Indonesia memiliki kontribusi besar dalam rangka menggalakkan lulusan fakultas syariah untuk memasuki profesi advokat serta memotivasi supaya tertarik bergabung ke dalam profesi ini. Kata Kunci: sarjana, syariah, advokat
Analisis Kepentingan Terbaik Bagi Anak dalam Hukum Jinayat Aceh Salman Abdul Muthalib; Mansari Mansari; Mahmuddin Mahmuddin; Muslim Zainuddin; Hasnul Arifin
Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Vol 9, No 02 (2021): Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Islam
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al Hidayah Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30868/am.v9i02.1621

Abstract

Qanun Jinayat tidak hanya diberlakukan bagi orang dewasa, bagi anak yang telah berumur 12 tahun dan belum sampai 18 tahun atau telah melangsungkan perkawinan dapat dikenakan sanksi jinayat bila melakukan pelanggaran ketentuan yang diatur dalam Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat. Kajian ini menganalisis secara komprehensif dengan metode kontens analisis ketentuan yang diatur dalam Qanun Hukum Jinayat berkaitan dengan kepentingan terbaik bagi anak. Kajian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan menjadi Qanun Hukum Jinayat sebagai bahan hukum primernya. Analisis data dilakukan kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Qanun Hukum Jinayat belum sepenuhnya mengakomodir kepentingan terbaik bagi anak. Aspek yang belum terakomodir yaitu: Pertama, penyelesaian anak berhadapan dengan jinayat menggunakan system peradilan pidana anak, adanya restitusi bagi korban pemerkosaan, independensi hakim dalam menjatuhkan ‘uqubat  ,’uqubat   Bagi Anak 1/3 dari Orang Dewasa, Hukuman Bagi Pelaku yang Korbannya Anak Lebih Tinggi, Anak Memungkinkan Dijatuhi ‘uqubat   Tindakan. Aspek yang belum mencerminkan kepentingan terbaik bagi anak meliputi, anak dapat memungkinkan dijatuhkan hukuman cambuk, batasa usia anak, restitusi harus diminta oleh korban pemerkosaan anak, hakim terikat pada Qanun Hukum Jinayat, adanya peluang bagi hakim menjatuhkan hukuman cambuk dalam kasus pelecehan seksual dan pemerkosaan.
Partisipasi Perempuan dalam Penyusunan Reusam Perlindungan Anak di Tingkat Gampong di Aceh Besar Mansari Mansari; Muslim Zainuddin
Kafa`ah: Journal of Gender Studies Vol 9, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15548/jk.v9i1.218

Abstract

Women have a smaller part  of participation in creating creating gampong reusam (village rules) that regulate the children. The women participation is crucial in meeting the gender based role representation. This research aimed to know more about women mechanism and their participatio now  and the process how they are actively involved in formulating Gampong Reusam in Aceh Besar. The compilation was done by doing the deliberation in meunasah and balee (balai) by involving the social elements, especially in gampong, involves women and children figures. To  invite the woman, the committee uses loudspeaker in meunasah and delivered orally by Keuchik (the village leader). Involvement of women is usually done by invited by loudspeakers in meunasah and also delivered orally by Keuchik (Village Head). The presence of women has not been maximized in the attempt of preparing the reusam gampong because the arrangement is done at night, time to rest, keeping the children at home, the weather is not supporting because of the rain. The role of women in the village reusam has been represented in the context of the handling of children against the law.
Peran dan Fungsi Kelembagaan Mukim dalam Penyelesaian Perselisihan: Analisis Praktek Hukum Adat di Aceh Muslim Zainuddin
Media Syari'ah Vol 19, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Sharia and Law Faculty

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/jms.v19i2.2025

Abstract

Mukim is one of the Acehnese customary institutions in charge of resolving disputes that occur in the community. Within Acehnese customary judicial process, the mukim is positioned at the second level after the gampong. One of the mukim's duties de jure, as stipulated in Article 4 letter (e) of Aceh Qanun No. 4/2003 on Mukim Government, is to provide judicial decisions in the event of customary disputes or cases and customary laws. However, the role of mukim has begun to decrease in terms of resolving community problems. The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors that influenced nonoptimal roles of the mukim, the mechanisms used by the mukim in resolving disputes within the Acehnese society, and the philosophical, juridical and sociological values of the dispute settlements implemented by the institutional mukim. The study used empirical legal method to describe the implementation of the laws on the mukim authority in resolving disputes. The study took place in five areas: Banda Aceh, Aceh Besar, Bireuen, Aceh Tengah, and Nagan Raya. The primary data came from interview and FGDs with Keuchik, Mukim, Police, NGOs, and academicians concerning on Aceh customary laws. The secondary data included primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The primary legal material was the Law regulating the Mukim, the secondary ones came from documentation study including books, journals, and research findings in the library on mukim, and the tertiary ones were from dictionaries and encyclopedias. The results of the study showed that the factors causing nonoptimal roles of the mukim included the human resources, poor training and development, lack of funding, and conflict in Aceh. The customary court at the mukim level had similar ways of resolution as that at the gampong. Likewise, the mechanisms to settle were the same i.e., mutual deliberation and mediation. The difference laid only in the procedural systems. In terms of the philosophical values, both mukim and gampong used the win-win solution principle, creating a harmony between the parties involved, saving time, saving cost, having a moment of connecting kinship between people (silaturahim), and following the teaching of Islam. These findings are hoped to provide insights to people to promote dispute settlement through customary institutions i.e., mukim and gampong prior to taking the cases to the police. It is also hoped that the police will not follow-up the case reports that do not use the customary procedures, and that the executive and legislative institutions can initiate a provincial Qanun which is oriented towards the mukim empowerment proportionally and professionally. Further, socialization on such customary practices should be done at every level of the community in order for the public to be more aware of the mukim’s dispute resolution.
Penjatuhan Hukuman Cambuk Terhadap Pelaku Pelecehan Seksual Terhadap Anak Muslim Zainuddin
Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam Vol 8 No 1 (2023): Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam
Publisher : IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/legalite.v8i1.5960

Abstract

Decision Number 6/JN/2023/MS.Lsk sentenced perpetrators of sexual abuse of children to be whipped 35 times. This sentence is different from the Supreme Court Circular and the Attorney General Circular which require prison sentences for perpetrators if the victim is a child in cases of sexual abuse and rape. The research aims to analyze why the panel of judges sentenced them to caning and how to protect children. The research method used is normative juridical research method. The primary legal material is in the form of decision Number 6/JN/2023/MS.Lsk, Jinayat Law Qanun and Jinayat Procedural Law Qanun. Data analysis was carried out qualitatively by providing an interpretation of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The results of the study show that the imposition of caning punishment on perpetrators of sexual harassment whose victims are children has not been in favor of child protection. The imposition of caning was in accordance with the QHJ and QHAJ, because the judge was given the authority to impose a sentence according to the prosecutor's demands or differently. However, this does not pay attention to SEMA Number 10 of 2020 which wants prison sentences for perpetrators of sexual abuse of children.
The Interpretation of the Hadith on the Characteristics of Women and Its Implications for Islamic Law Agusni Yahya; Muslim Zainuddin
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol 5, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/sjhk.v5i1.9593

Abstract

This study discusses an analysis of the hadith about the characteristics of women and its implications for Islamic law. This article uses a study of the sanad (chain) and matan (wording or contents) of a hadith. It uses the theory of ma'anil hadithor science that discusses the meanings of a hadith, which allows the emergence of a textual and contextual understanding of a hadith. The understanding of a hadith is analyzed from the Islamic law perspective. This study concludes that the sanad (chain) and matan (wording or contents) of this hadith are authentic. The Sanad (chain) is authentic because it continues to the Messenger of Allah, the narrators are fair, dhabit and there is no zyudz or illat found. Nevertheless, this hadith should be understood contextually or symbolically-metaphorically, although there are scholars who understand it textually or literally. The content of the hadith teaches humans that when dealing with women, they should be careful and treat them wisely because their character and nature are like crooked ribs. They should neither be treated harshly because it will break, nor left unnoticed because it will make them go astray. However, the hadith cannot be understood textually because it leads to women subordination; the hadith should be interpreted contextually instead, and by so doing women will be treated equally and fairly. Therefore, it is important to understand this hadith contextually to allow a fair treatment for women and with dignity because it will affect the interpretation of the Islamic law and Islamic teachings in general are maintained.
Divorce Problems and Community Social Capital in Realizing Family Resilience in Aceh Muslim Zainuddin; Mansari Mansari; Nadhilah Filzah
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol 6, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.15080

Abstract

Divorce is a matter that is always fascinating to explore within Islamic law since it affects not only legal but also social and cultural issues. Therefore, various ways are carried out by the community to suppress the divorce rate so that family resilience should be maintained. This study aims to discuss to proleptic divorce practices that occur in Aceh, community response, and the socio-capital in the form of traditional values and religious leaders in Acehnese society to realize family resilience. This is an empirical legal study employing a sociology of law methodology. Interviews and literature reviews were utilized as methods of data collection. The data demonstrated that social changes in Aceh contributed to an increase in divorce rates. The response of the community to divorce is litigation, peudame (reconciling), and non-litigation (through the court). Traditional and gampong (village) officials with cultural and legal authority, such as the keuchik(village head), tuha peut, head Jurong (neighborhood chief), and teungku imuem, are involved in the resolution of disputes. Meanwhile, divorces that cannot be handled by customary means will be moved to the Religious Courts. In the context of legal sociology theory, however, customary and cultural values as social capital in the form of support from traditional and religious leaders can help the maintenance of family resilience.
Konstruksi Pemikiran Hukum Islam Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal: Pendekatan Sejarah Sosial Hukum Islam Muslim Zainuddin
Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Vol 12, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Islamic Criminal Law Department, Faculty of Sharia and Law, UIN Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/legitimasi.v12i2.19858

Abstract

Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal was one of the Hanbali mazhab philosophers who lived during the Abbasid dynasty. A number of ideas were followed by scholars after him. Though he suffered various rejections from other scholars and even rulers, Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal's thought is still relevant to the development of contemporary Islamic law. This article aims to analyze the influence of Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal's thinking in the context of the reformation of Islamic law. Data is obtained through the study of documents using descriptive methods and analyzed critically. The results of the research showed that Ahmad ibn Hanbal's strong tendency towards the hadiths undermined the formulation of hadith-based fikih. The intensity of the use of the hadith and the giving of sufficiently strong authority made Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, in the view of some fuqaha, a fuqaha muhadditsin. One thing that became the best practice in Ahmad Ibn Hanbal's character was his diligence in upholding opinions and not being easily influenced by the will of the ruler. This fact can be a reference to the society and the rulers that exist at this time.
The Cancellation of The Weddings for Pre-Marriage Pregnancy Women: An Evaluation of Decision 24/Pdt.G/2020/Ms. Ban Muslim Zainuddin
El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Vol 6, No 1 (2023): EL-USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/ujhk.v6i1.19859

Abstract

Marriage annulment is not limited to cases of polygamy without permission, remarriage during the 'iddah period, marriages without a guardian, or coerced marriages could also be annulled. In Decision Number 24/Pdt.G/2020/Ms. Ban, the court annulled the marriage of a minor who were pregnant pre-marriage. This is a normative legal research focusing on statutory regulations and legal concepts to address this issue. Legal sources used include primary, secondary, and tertiary sources, and a qualitative approach was used to analyze the data. The findings of this study indicate that the procedure for requesting an annulment of a marriage involves submitting a request to the Syar'iyah Court along with supporting evidence in the form of documents and the testimony of witnesses who witnessed the marriage event. The panel of judges declared the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent null and void at the conclusion of the trial, rendering the marriage certificate null and void. In addition, the judicial tribunal requested that the Religious Affairs Office (KUA) remove the marriage record from the register book. The reason for annulling a marriage is that it was performed by the sibling of the applicant’s father. However, the applicant’s father did not have the authority to be a marriage guardian because the applicant was an illegitimate child; therefore, he had only a relationship with his mother and her family. Legally, the annulment of the marriage is justified because the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent does not comply with the statutory requirements and conditions. One of the unfulfilled pillars is the lack of a guardian with the authority to solemnize the marriage. Supposedly, the guardian of children conceived outside of marriage should be a judge.