This Author published in this journals
All Journal HUMANIS E-Journal of Linguistics Nusa: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra Diglossia Journal of Innovation and Applied Technology International Journal of Local Economic Governance Erudio: Journal of Educational Innovation EDUCAFL : E-Journal of Education of English as a Foreign Language Jurnal Humanitas Transformasi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Proceeding of International Conference on Teacher Training and Education JEES (Journal of English Educators Society) Edcomtech Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching PRASASTI: Journal of Linguistics Indonesian EFL Journal SELAPARANG: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Berkemajuan Linguista: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pembelajarannya JOURNEY : Journal of English Language and Pedagogy Hasta Wiyata Al-Qalam MABASAN Journal of English Education and Teaching (JEET) AlphabetAlphabet: A Biannual Academic Journal on Language, Literary, and Cultural Studies Jurnal Kadera Bahasa Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education Journal (Birle Journal) JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching Britain International for Linguistics, Arts and Education Journal (BIoLAE Journal) Kode : Jurnal Bahasa Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies)
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif

Critical Thinking Levels of EFL Undergraduate Students of Universitas Brawijaya Esti Junining; Widya Caterine Perdhani; Moh. Hasbullah Isnaini; Nuria Setiarini
Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif Vol 12, No 3 (2022): Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1483.223 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: Critical Thinking Levels of EFL Undergraduate Students of Universitas Brawijaya. Objective: This study investigated the levels of CT of undergraduate students. Methods: Employing the mix-method design and two instruments (1)Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal and (2) interview, the study involved 352 students who are in the first year of their study. Findings: Related to CTS, it showed that most of the students can determine the answer correctly in terms of (1) Deduction 63.07% (2) Arguments 62.16 percent (3) Interpreting information 59,92 percent (4) Assumptions 50,19 percent and (5) Inferences 37.15 percent. In sum, only 54.40 percent of students in their first year indicate low CT ability. It is in line with the results of the interview which postulates that 57 percent of the students do not really understand what and how to improve their CTS and they need some help to improve it. Conclusion: The University should provide learning and activities which can increase their CTS, especially the inferencing dimension.Keywords: EFL, CTS, reading, assessment.Abstrak: Tingkat Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa S1 di Universitas Brawijaya. Tujuan: Penelitian ini menyelidiki tingkat berpikir kritis mahasiswa S1. Metode: Menggunakan desain penelitian campuran dan dua instrument (1) Penilaian Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking dan (2) wawancara, penelitian ini melibatkan 352 mahasiwa yang sedang berada di tahun pertama studi mereka. Temuan: Terkait keterampilan berpikir kritis, penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar mahasiswa dapat menentukan jawaban dengan benar dalam (1) Pengambilan kesimpulan 63.07 persen (2) Argumentasi 62.16 persen (3) Menginterpretasi informasi 59.92 persen (4) Asumsi 50.19 persen dan (5) Inferensi, 37.15 persen. Secara keseluruhan, hanya 54,40 persen mahasiswa tahun pertama yang menunjukkan kemampuan berpikir kritis rendah. Sejalan dengan hasil wawancara yang menyatakan bahwa 57 persen mahasiswa tidak begitu memahami apa dan bagaimana cara meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan mereka membutuhkan bantuan untuk meningkatkannya. Kesimpulan: Universitas seharusnya menyediakan pembelajaran dan aktifitas-aktifitas yang dapat membantu meningkatkan CTS mahasiswa, terutama dimensi inferensi.Kata kunci: EFL, CTS, membaca, penilaian.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v12.i3.202221