p-Index From 2019 - 2024
9.828
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Jurnal Teknoin JURNAL SISTEM INFORMASI BISNIS Jurnal Buana Informatika Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro Komputer dan Informatika (JITEKI) Jurnal Algoritma Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer Jurnal Transformatika Khazanah Informatika: Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informatika Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi InfoTekJar (Jurnal Nasional Informatika dan Teknologi Jaringan) Journal of Applied Geospatial Information Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi) INTENSIF: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Penerapan Teknologi Sistem Informasi JURNAL MEDIA INFORMATIKA BUDIDARMA Information System for Educators and Professionals : Journal of Information System SELAPARANG: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Berkemajuan JURNAL TEKNIK INFORMATIKA DAN SISTEM INFORMASI Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi dan Komputer) GUIDENA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Psikologi, Bimbingan dan Konseling Indonesian Journal of Computing and Modeling Jurnal Informatika jurnal teknik informatika dan sistem informasi Abdimasku : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Aiti: Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Jurnal Teknik Informatika (JUTIF) JOINTER : Journal of Informatics Engineering Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro dan Teknologi Informasi Jurnal INFOTEL
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro Komputer dan Informatika (JITEKI)

Comparison of IDW and Kriging Interpolation Methods Using Geoelectric Data to Determine the Depth of the Aquifer in Semarang, Indonesia Brilliananta Radix Dewana; Sri Yulianto Joko Prasetyo; Kristoko Dwi Hartomo
Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro Komputer dan Informatika Vol 8, No 2 (2022): June
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26555/jiteki.v8i2.23260

Abstract

Several areas in Semarang City have been unable to get a clean water supply through the Local Water Company (PDAM) channel. One of the solutions that can be done to overcome this problem is by utilizing groundwater, which can be obtained by building a deep well made to obtain rock layers that can accommodate and drain groundwater (aquifer layer). To find out the approximate depth of the aquifer layer, it is necessary to conduct a preliminary investigation before drilling. There are so many methods that can be done, and one of them is by using the geoelectric method. After using the geoelectric method, we can determine the distribution of the depth of the aquifer in Semarang City by using interpolation analysis. In this study, the IDW and Kriging interpolation methods were used. The two methods were then compared to show the difference in the distribution of aquifer depths in areas that lack clean water using the two interpolation methods above. Besides that, we are using RMSE and MAPE analysis to find the error rate of the two methods. The results obtained were the RMSE of the IDW and Kriging methods amounting to 5,829 and 5,433, and the MAPE results were 10.90% and 10.34%. Based on this, the Kriging method tends to have better results when interpolating using geoelectric data. With this research, it is hoped to provide knowledge to determine the most suitable interpolation method used in determining the depth of the aquifer and also can be used as an illustration of the depth of the aquifer in the area that lacked clean water in Semarang City, so that it can be used as a reference in estimating the design of deep good development more accurately.
Evaluating Sampling Techniques for Healthcare Insurance Fraud Detection in Imbalanced Dataset Joanito Agili Lopo; Kristoko Dwi Hartomo
Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro Komputer dan Informatika Vol 9, No 2 (2023): June
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26555/jiteki.v9i2.25929

Abstract

Detecting fraud in the healthcare insurance dataset is challenging due to severe class imbalance, where fraud cases are rare compared to non-fraud cases. Various techniques have been applied to address this problem, such as oversampling and undersampling methods. However, there is a lack of comparison and evaluation of these sampling methods. Therefore, the research contribution of this study is to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the different sampling methods in different class distributions, utilizing multiple evaluation metrics, including , , , Precision, and Recall. In addition, a model evaluation approach be proposed to address the issue of inconsistent scores in different metrics. This study employs a real-world dataset with the XGBoost algorithm utilized alongside widely used data sampling techniques such as Random Oversampling and Undersampling, SMOTE, and Instance Hardness Threshold. Results indicate that Random Oversampling and Undersampling perform well in the 50% distribution, while SMOTE and Instance Hardness Threshold methods are more effective in the 70% distribution. Instance Hardness Threshold performs best in the 90% distribution. The 70% distribution is more robust with the SMOTE and Instance Hardness Threshold, particularly in the consistent score in different metrics, although they have longer computation times. These models consistently performed well across all evaluation metrics, indicating their ability to generalize to new unseen data in both the minority and majority classes. The study also identifies key features such as costs, diagnosis codes, type of healthcare service, gender, and severity level of diseases, which are important for accurate healthcare insurance fraud detection. These findings could be valuable for healthcare providers to make informed decisions with lower risks. A well-performing fraud detection model ensures the accurate classification of fraud and non-fraud cases. The findings also can be used by healthcare insurance providers to develop more effective fraud detection and prevention strategies.
Co-Authors Ade Iriani Agus Bambang Nugraha Ahmad Ashifuddin Aqham Andeka Rocky Tanaamah Andreas Arga Rinjani Saputro Angelia Destriana Anggara Cahya Putra April Firman Daru Ariel Kristianto Aryanata Andipradana Brilliananta Radix Dewana Chandra Husada Danny Sebastian Dearmelliani Tarigan Desyandri Desyandri Dian Widiyanto Chandra Diky Candra Muria Pratama Dwi Anggono Winarso Suparjo Putra Dwi Hosanna Bangkalang Eko Sediyono Enik Muryanti Estie Grace Melisa Sinulingga Evi Maria Ezra Julang Prasetyo Gabriel Kenisa Meqfaden Baali Gerry Santos Lasatira Gladiola Lavinia Ambayu Gogo Krisatyo Hanna Prillysca Chernovita Hendri Suryo Prakoso Hindriyanto Dwi Purnomo Irwan Sembiring Ismanto, Bambang Ismanto Joanito Agili Lopo Joshua Rondonuwu Josua Josen Alexander Limbong Kevin Benedictus Simarmata Kevin Hendra William Kevin Stevian Hermawan Kezia Sharent Kodoati Kuncoro, Wreda Agung Martin Teddy Sihite Matheus Supriyanto Rumetna Mila Chrismawati Paseleng Mozad Timothy Waluyan Muhammad Rizky Ramadhan Muhammad Sholikhan Murry Albert Agustin Lobo Myra Andriana Neilin Nikhlis Nina Setiyawati Nining Fitriani Nurrokhman Nurrokhman Nuzhah Al Waaidhoh Penidas Fodinggo Tanaem Pramudhita Tunjung Seta Prasianto, Kornelius Reinand Purnomo, Andreas Wisnu Adi Purwanto Purwanto Raditya Ditto Aryaputra Radius Tanone Rahmat Abadi Suharjo Raymond Elias Mauboy Rizaldi, Alexander Sandy Pratama Septian Silvianugroho Sri Yulianto Sri Yulianto Joko Prasetyo Sri Yulianto Prasetyo Stevan Hamonangan Hardi Suhandi, Nicolas Evander T. Arie Setiawan P Teguh Wahyono Triloka Mahesti Winarko, Edi Wiwien Hadikurniawati Yansen Bagas Christianto Yedija Sada Ukurta Sinulingga Yohan Maurits Indey