Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
3.307
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Patrika Masalah-Masalah Hukum LAW REFORM Wacana Hukum Pandecta Yustisia JURNAL FIAT JUSTISIA Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Qistie: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Unram Law Review Bina Hukum Lingkungan JOURNAL OF PRIVATE AND COMMERCIAL LAW Jurnal Yudisial PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Cepalo Hermeneutika : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Mulawarman Law Review JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Keadilan Yuridika Perspektif Hukum Bina Hukum Lingkungan Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Derita Prapti Rahayu
Universitas Bangka Belitung
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 36 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 36 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP NELAYAN PEREMPUAN: STUDI KASUS DI KABUPATEN DEMAK, PROVINSI JAWA TENGAH Esmi Warassih Pujirahayu; Sulaiman Sulaiman; Dyah Wijaningsih; Derita Prapti Rahayu; Untoro Untoro
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 47, No 2 (2018): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3478.926 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.47.2.2018.157-166

Abstract

Nelayan perempuan sudah lama dikenal di Indonesia. Nelayan perempuan umumnya berkiprah dalam hal pengolahan hasil perikanan. Keberadaan nelayan perempuan sangat membantu kondisi ekonomi keluarga disebabkan aktivitas nelayan yang ditentukan oleh waktu dalam melaut. Penelitian ini ingin menjawab bagaimana perlindungan hukum yang diberikan terhadap nelayan perempuan dalam melaksanakan aktivitasnya. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan sosio-legal, dengan melihat aspek hukum yang tidak terlepas dari berbagai aspek lain seperti ekonomi, politik, dan sosial-budaya. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa negara belum sepenuhnya melindunginelayan perempuan. Kerangka hukum perlindungan nelayan belum sepenuhnya tersedia. Keterbatasan berbagai fasilitas telah menyebabkan nelayan tidak bisa mendapatkan haknya sebagai warga negara. Penelitian merekomendasikan agar pemerintah kabupaten segeramelaksanakan secara utuh perlindungan nelayan terhadap nelayan perempuan.
REFORMULASI SYARAT DIVERSI: KAJIAN IDE DASAR SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK Faisal Faisal; Derita Prapti Rahayu
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 50, No 3 (2021): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.50.3.2021.331-338

Abstract

Formulasi syarat pelaksanaan diversi menghendaki ancaman pidana dibawah tujuh tahun dan bukan pengulangan pidana. Paper ini bertujuan mengkaji pelaksanaan diversi agar sesuai dengan nilai dan asas dari ide dasar sistem peradilan pidana anak. Persoalan yang muncul apakah syarat diversi sudah sejalan dengan ide dasar tersebut? Lalu bagaimana tawaran reformulasi syarat diversi? Terhadap syarat diversi melakukan pengulangan pidana tidak memiliki makna berarti bahkan berpotensi mengurangi makna ide dasar utamanya prinsip ultimum remedium. Reformulasi syarat diversi menitikberatkan pada perbuatan kategori tindak pidana serius seperti terorisme, pembunuhan berencana, pemerkosaan, dan peredaran narkoba.
Legal of Permission Folk Mining in Indonesia Derita Prapti Rahayu; Faisal Faisal
Wacana Hukum Vol 26 No 1 (2020): Wacana Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Slamet Riyadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33061/1.wh.2020.26.1.3630

Abstract

Juridically the people's mining is recognized in the law. This paper will discuss  the regulation of people's mining permits in Indonesia that permision on folk mining regulated on the act number 04 year 2009 about coal mineral. The criteria and nature of community mining are the mining business activities of the local people, carried out simply and in a small way, not using sophisticated equipment, the production is sufficient for the daily needs of the miners, the extent is very limited. IPR is given for a maximum period of 5 (five) years and can be extended. Regents / mayors give IPR especially to local residents, both individuals and community groups and / or cooperatives, (2) Regents / mayors can delegate the authority to administer IPR as referred to in paragraph (1) to the camat in accordance with the provisions of the legislation, (( 3) To obtain an IPR as referred to in paragraph (1), the applicant must submit a request letter to the regent / mayor.
Countermeasure Policy on Mining Crime under The Legal Progressive Perceptive Faisal Faisal; Derita Prapti Rahayu
Yustisia Vol 10, No 2: August 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v10i2.47189

Abstract

The complexity of mining business governance affects rational actions to tackle mining crime using the criminal policies in a progressive legal dimension. This research focuses on dealing with mining crime using criminal policies and rational efforts in the progressive legal dimension. It was conducted using normative legal research method using secondary data obtained from primary and secondary legal materials. The urgency of this research is to provide guidance towards the application of appropriate rules of mining for the actors in the business. It was also directed to provide references in mining law enforcement through an integral policy. The results showed that criminal policy through penal means in the formulation stage has the ability to regulate licensing crimes, corporate crimes, crimes against reclamation, and criminal obstruction of mining businesses. Moreover, the application stage involves the legal construction of material and formal offenses while the execution stage requires integral law enforcement. It is also important to note that the non-penal means which focuses on prevention maps potential actors with the ability to create the victims while the secondary prevention maps the mining areas with potential conflicts. This means the progressiveness of mining criminal policies rationally in the progressive law dimension enforces certainty and basic ideas underlying the norms.
AKTUALISASI PANCASILA SEBAGAI LANDASAN POLITIK HUKUM INDONESIA Derita Prapti Rahayu
Yustisia Vol 4, No 1: April 2015
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v4i1.8634

Abstract

AbstractPancasila is a major cornerstone in the making of law (law and Legislation) with a new or replacement of laws (political law), so that the values of the Deity, Humanity and Society (nationalistic; democratic; social justice) must be actualized into the substance of the law, the legal structure and legal culture to be built, is expected to strengthen national integration, democratization of law, achieve prosperity and social justice by putting Pancasila, ranging from values, goals until the actualization of the various fields of existing law, whether criminal, civil, administrative and the other, as well as the internalization of the structures of law and legal culture of Pancasila.Keywords : Actualization, Pancasila, Politics of LawAbstrakPancasila merupakan landasan utama dalam pembuatan hukum (Peraturan Perundang-Undangang) baru maupun dengan penggantian hukum lama (politik hukum), sehingga nilai-nilai Ketuhanan, Kemanusiaan dan Kemasyarakatan (nasionalistik; demokratik; berkeadilan sosial) harus teraktualisasi kedalam substansi hukum, struktur hukum maupun kultur hukum yang akan dibangun, diharapkan dapat menguatkan integrasi bangsa, demokratisasi hukum, tercapainya kesejahteraan dan keadilan sosial dengan menempatkan Pancasila, mulai dari nilai, tujuan sampai dengan aktualisasi kepada berbagai bidang hukum yang ada, baik hukum pidana, perdata, tata usaha negara dan lain-lain, serta internalisasi pada struktur hukum dan budaya hukum Pancasila.Kata Kunci : aktualisasi, Pancasila, Politik Hukum
Kearifan Lokal Tambang Rakyat sebagai Wujud Ecoliteracy di Kabupaten Bangka Derita Prapti Rahayu
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 23 No. 2: APRIL 2016
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol23.iss2.art8

Abstract

The issues studied in this research included, first: how to build ecoliteracy for a sustainable environment? Second, how the local wisdom in people mining as a form of ecoliteracy in Bangka is. This research used a socio-legal approach with the techniques of data collection through documentation, participative observation and interviews. The result of the research concluded that first: ecoliteracy development for a sustainable environment can be done by reviewing the local wisdom of local communities. The participation of community in protecting and preserving local wisdom is in line with Article 70 paragraph (3) letter (e) of Law No. 32 Year 2009. Second, the local wisdom of people mining in the form of ampak tin is an essential element to build ecoliteracy in Bangka. The local wisdom in people mining in the form of ampak tin needs to be strengthened in the form of regulations of local governments to prevent Bangka Regency from the threat of environmental damages. In addition, the ampak tin must be preserved and used as a form ecoliteracy in Bangka for a sustainable environment.
Pengawasan Preventif Sebagai Kontrol Pusat Terhadap Daerah di Era Reformasi Derita Prapti Rahayu
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 2, No 3 (2015): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1520.984 KB)

Abstract

AbstrakEra reformasi ditandai dengan adanya pemberian hak, wewenang, dan kewajiban bagi daerah otonom untuk mengatur dan mengurus sendiri urusan pemerintahan serta kepentingan masyarakat setempat sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan. Penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah diarahkan untuk mempercepat terwujudnya kesejahteraan masyarakat melalui peningkatan pelayanan, pemberdayaan, dan peran serta masyarakat, serta peningkatan daya saing daerah dengan memperhatikan prinsip demokrasi, pemerataan, keadilan, dan kekhasan suatu daerah dalam sistem Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia. Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah, hubungan kewenangan antara pemerintah pusat dengan pemerintah daerah berimplikasi pada praktik pengawasan, khususnya pengawasan preventif yang cenderung terlalu ketat. Hal ini cenderung melemahkan otonomi dan resentralisasi.Preventive Control of Central Government to Local Government in Reformation EraAbstractThe reformation era marked by granting of rights, powers, obligations and autonomous regions to set up and manage the affairs and interests of their own local community reviewaccording to the rules. Directing local administration toaccelerate the establishment of public welfare through service improvement, empowerment, and community participation, as well as increasing competitiveness of the region viewed withprinciples of democracy, equality, justice, and the peculiarities of System The Unitary State The Republic Of Indonesia. In Law Number 23 of 2014 Concerning Local Government, the relation between central and local government, effects on preventive control, supervision particularly felt tend to be too tight. Too set how local government should be careful central government authority. It tends to weaken the autonomy and recentralisation.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v2n3.a2
TUJUAN PEMIDANAAN UNDANG-UNDANG MINERBA DALAM PERSPEKTIF KEBIJAKAN KRIMINALISASI Faisal Faisal; Derita Prapti Rahayu
Bina Hukum Lingkungan Vol 5, No 2 (2021): Bina Hukum Lingkungan
Publisher : Pembina Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia (PHLI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24970/bhl.v5i2.189

Abstract

ABSTRAKKetentuan pidana Pasal 162 UU Minerba menetapkan perbuatan menghalang-halangi kegiatan usaha pertambangan sebagai perbuatan pidana (delik). Tujuan penelitian ingin mengetahui secara kritis tujuan pemidanaan delik Pasal 162 dalam perspektif kebijakan kriminalisasi. Asas manfaat yang diharapkan agar dapat melihat secara objektif dalil teori kriminalisasi, sehingga dapat memberikan masukan bagi pembentuk undang-undang dalam memformulasikan ketentuan pidana. Metode penelitian menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan kebijakan kriminalisasi pada delik Pasal 162 tidak dapat dibenarkan menurut teori moral dan teori liberal individualistik. Hakikat nilai moralitas masyarakat terdistorsi dengan keberlakuan delik tersebut. Negara telah membatasi ruang kebebasan warga negara untuk hidup merdeka menyampaikan dan memperjuangkan hak-hak dasarnya. Bahkan kebijakan kriminalisasi yang dilakukan oleh pembentuk undang-undang tidak mendapat legitimasi yang kuat dari esensi tujuan pemidanaan yang sejalan dengan prinsip nilai, prinsip kemanfaatan, dan prinsip kemanusiaan. Rekomendasi kedepan agar kebijakan legislasi haruslah dilakukan dengan pendekatan rasional dan pendekatan kebijakan. Kata kunci: teori kriminalisasi; kebijakan; pemidanaan; pertambangan.ABSTRACTCriminal provisions Article 162 of the Minerba Law stipulates that obstructing mining business activities is a criminal act (offense). The research objective is to know critically the purpose of criminalization of Article 162 in the perspective of criminalization policy. The principle of benefit is expected to be able to see objectively the arguments of criminalization theory, so that it can provide input for legislators in formulating criminal provisions. The research method uses normative legal research. The results of the research conclude that the criminalization policy on the offense of Article 162 cannot be justified according to moral theory and liberal individualistic theory. The nature of the moral values of society is distorted by the enactment of this offense. The state has limited the space for the freedom of citizens to live in freedom to convey and fight for their basic rights. Even the criminalization policies carried out by legislators do not get strong legitimacy from the essence of the purpose of punishment which is in line with the principles of values, principles of benefit, and principles of humanity. Future recommendations so that legislative policies must be carried out with a rational approach and a policy approach.Keywords: criminalization theory; policy; criminalization; mining.
MODEL PEMILIHAN SERENTAK DI INDONESIA Muhammad Anwar Tanjung; Derita Prapti Rahayu; Putri Ade Tami
Jurnal Yudisial Vol 14, No 3 (2021): LOCUS STANDI
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v14i3.431

Abstract

ABSTRAKKajian ini mengeksplorasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 55/PUU-XVII/2019 mengenai beberapa model dalam penyelenggaraan pemilihan umum dan pemilihan serentak di Indonesia. Fakta pemilu serentak lima kotak suara sebagai model penyelenggaraan pemilu serentak bukanlah satu-satunya gagasan yang berkembang dan diperdebatkan selama perubahan UUD NRI 1945. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 55/PUU-XVII/2019 tentang Uji Materiil Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum terhadap UUD NRI 1945 telah memberikan pilihan model pemilihan serentak di Indonesia. Oleh sebab itu, rumusan masalah dalam kajian ini ialah bagaimana pertimbangan hakim dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 55/PUU-XVII/2019 dapat menjadi landasan normatif yang mengarah kepada transformasi pemilihan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan UUD NRI 1945 dan putusan hakim sebagai bahan hukum primer dan hasil penelitian terkait sebagai bahan hukum sekunder. Temuan penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa transformasi pemilihan di Indonesia dilakukan dengan memperhatikan batasan/defenisi rezim pemilu dan rezim pemilu daerah/lokal. Rezim pemilu berdasarkan UUD NRI 1945 yakni Pemilu Presiden dan Wakil Presiden, DPR, DPD dan DPRD. Rezim pemilihan daerah/lokal adalah pemilihan gubernur dan wakil gubernur dan bupati/wakil bupati maupun walikota/wakil walikota. Landasan normatif menuju transformasi pemilu dan model pemilihan di Indonesia dilakukan dengan penerapan e-rekap, penyederhanaan jumlah partai politik atau penggunaan proporsional tertutup, penataan ulang kelembagaan penyelenggara pemilu, model sosialisasi yang efektif, rekrutmen penyelenggara pemilu yang berintegritas, pengawasan dan penegakan hukum pemilu melalui khusus pemilu.Kata kunci: pemilu lima kotak; pemilihan serentak; peradilan khusus pemilu; uji materiil. ABSTRACTThis study explores the Constitutional Court Decision Number 55/PUU-XVII/2019 regarding several models in holding general elections and simultaneous elections in Indonesia. The fact that the simultaneous election of five ballot boxes as a model for simultaneous  elections is not the only idea that has developed and been debated during the amendment to the 1945 Constitution. The Constitutional Court Decision Number 55/PUU-XVII/2019 on the Judicial Review of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia has provided a choice of simultaneous election models in Indonesia. Therefore, the formulation of the problem in this study is how the judges’ considerations in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 55/PUUXVII/2019 can be a normative basis that leads to the transformation of elections in Indonesia. This study uses a normative legal method with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and the judges’ decisions as primary legal sources and the relevant research results as secondary legal sources. From the results of this study, it can be concluded that the electoral transformation in Indonesia is carried out by taking into account the boundaries/ definitions of the electoral regime, and the regional/local election regime. The election regime is based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, which includes the elections for the President and Vice President, DPR, DPD and DPRD. Regional/local election regimes cover the election of governors and deputy governors and regents/deputy regents as well as mayors/deputy mayors. The normative basis for the transformation of elections and electoral models in Indonesia is carried out by implementing e-recap, simplifying the number of political parties or using closed proportional, reorganizing election management institutions, implementing effective socialization models, logistics management, recruitment of election organizers of integrity, supervision and law enforcement through a special election court.Keywords: election of five ballot boxes; simultaneous election; special election court; judicial review.
NEGARA: ANTARA PENGUSAHA TAMBANG DAN TAMBANG RAKYAT Derita Prapti Rahayu; M Shidqon Prabowo; Faisal Faisal
Jurnal Yudisial Vol 14, No 2 (2021): SUMMUM IUS SUMMA INIURIA
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v14i2.492

Abstract

ABSTRAKTulisan ini dilatarbelakangi oleh Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 25/PUU-VIII/2010, yang merupakan putusan mengenai uji materiil terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batu Bara. Substansi yang krusial dalam putusan tersebut adalah telah membatalkan bunyi Pasal 52 ayat (1) yang mengatur mengenai luas wilayah izin usaha pertambangan seluas 5.000 hektare tidak berlaku lagi, di mana konsekuensinya untuk wilayah izin usaha pertambangan tidak memiliki luas minimal untuk ditambang. Permasalahan yang akan dibahas adalah pertama, bagaimanakah akibat hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 25/PUU-VIII/2010? Kedua, bagaimanakah arah keberpihakan negara melalui putusan ini? Permasalahan akan dianalisis menggunakan metode hukum normatif, dengan data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum tersier. Hasil analisis menemukan bahwa akibat hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 25/PUU-VIII/2010 antara lain, menjadi tidak ada bedanya antara luas wilayah minimal bagi wilayah izin usaha pertambangan dan wilayah pertambangan rakyat. Arah keberpihakan negara melalui Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 25/PUU-VIII/2010 dinilai lebih berpihak pada pengusaha tambang, karena melalui putusan ini ada ketidakcermatan hakim terkait kata “rakyat” yang dimaksud lebih mengarah pada pengusaha tambang, bukan penambang rakyat. Putusan ini posisi negara membingungkan, membela hak rakyat atau membela hak pengusaha. Dengan tidak adanya minimal luas wilayah untuk usaha pertambangan. akan semakin menjadi tidak jelas perbedaan tambang rakyat dan usaha pertambangan, di luar juga terkait dampak lingkungan.Kata kunci: wilayah izin usaha pertambangan; izin pertambangan rakyat; wilayah pertambangan rakyat; tambang timah inkonvensional. ABSTRACT This writing is inspired by the Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/PUU-VIII/2010, which is the decision towards the judicial review of Law Number 4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining. The crucial substance in the decision is it annuls Article 52 paragraph (1) which regulates the range of the concession area of mining business for 5,000 hectares is invalid. As a result, the concession area of mining business doesn’t have a minimum range area for mining activities. The problems that will be discussed are rst, what are the legal consequences from the Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/PUU-VIII/2010? Second, what direction does the state stand through this decision? The problems will be analyzed using normative legal methods with secondary data consisting of primary and tertiary legal materials. The analysis nds that the legal consequences of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/PUU-VIII/2010, among others, there is no distinction between the minimum range area for the concession area of mining business and the people mining area. The state position tendency through the Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/PUU-VIII/2010 is considered more likely in favor of mining entrepreneurs. There is a judge’s inaccuracy in the decision regarding the word “people” which tends to point to the mining entrepreneurs, not the people miners. The state position in this decision is ambiguous, whether it stands for the people’s rights or the entrepreneurs’ rights. With the absence of the minimum range area requirement for mining business, it becomes more obscure of the difference between people mining and corporate mining, likewise the environmental impact. Keywords: concession area of mining business; concession of people mining; area for people mining; unconventional stannary.
Co-Authors . Faisal Ahda Muttaqin Amir Dedoe Anri Darmawan Darwance, Darwance Dyah Wijaningsih Esmi Warassih Pujirahayu Faisal Faisal Faisal Faisal Faisal Faisal Faisal Fauzan Hakim Ferdian, Komang Jaka Hasmonel Hasmonel Hasmonel Ita Rosdiana Mieke Yustia Ayu Ratna Sari Muchammad Shidqon Prabowo Muhamad Irfani Muhammad Anwar Tanjung Mulya Nopriansyah Ndaru Satrio Putri Ade Tami Rafiqa Sari Sigit Nugroho Sulaiman Sulaiman Sulaiman, Sulaiman Toni, Toni Tony Tony Untoro Untoro Winanda Kusuma Wiragian timabad Yokotani Yokotani