Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2019 - 2024

1.896

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA LAW REFORM Pandecta Yustisia Arena Hukum Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum International Journal of Supply Chain Management Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan Abimanyu: Journal of Community Engagement Yuridika

Bagus Oktafian Abrianto

Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Author-ID : 596701

Arts Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Transportation

Published : 16 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

1 2

Perlindungan Hukum Non Yudisial terhadap Perbuatan Hukum Publik oleh Pemerintah Hari Sugiharto; Bagus Oktafian Abrianto
Yuridika Vol. 33 No. 1 (2018): Volume 33 No 1 January 2018
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

The enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration had given the changes to the authority of the State Administrative Court. There are two mechanism of the case investigation in the State Administrative Court in providing legal protection against a lawsuit or petition filed by the public. The first mechanism is to file a lawsuit directly to the State Administrative Court. The second mechanism is to resolve internal disputes within the government before filing a lawsuit to the Administrative Courts. There are two mechanisms of the case investigation prove that the existence of discrimination for people who seek justice in the case investigation system in the State Administrative Court. This research focus on an issues first the nature of public legal action by the government in government administration and second Ratio legis non-judicial legal protection against public legal acts by the government. The results which have to be achieved are to provide the prescription of essential truth. There are several problems approach used in this study, such as statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach.

Pendampingan Hukum dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Desa tentang Badan Usaha Milik Desa dalam Rangka Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Ekonomi Desa Gondanglor, Lamongan Bagus Oktafian Abrianto; Wilda Prihatiningtyas Prihatiningtyas
Abimanyu : Jornal of Community Engagement Vol 1 No 2 (2020): August 2020
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah disebutkan bahwa œDesa dapat mendirikan badan usaha milik desa sesuai dengan kebutuhan dan potensi desa. Substansi UU ini menegaskan tentang janji pemenuhan permintaan dalam konteks pembangunan tingkat desa. Logika pendirian BUMDes didasarkan pada kebutuhan dan potensi desa, sebagai upaya peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat. Disisi lain sesuai dengan asas negara hukum yaitu bahwa segala tindakan pemerintahan harus berdasarkan atas hukum, maka dalam konteks pemerintahan desa, berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014, disebutkan bahwa Kepala Desa bersama-sama BPD dapat membentuk Peraturan Desa. Permasalahan yang sering muncul yaitu bahwa tidak semua Kepala Desa maupun BPD memiliki kompetensi atau kemampuan dalam penyusunan peraturan perundang-undangan (khususnya Peraturan Desa), termasuk di wilayah Desa Gondanglor Kabupaten Lamongan. Padahal Peraturan Desa merupakan dasar legalitas bagi setiap tindakan pemerintahan desa, termasuk manakala Pemerintah Desa ingin membentuk suatu BUMDes. Berdasarkan studi awal di lapangan dimana belum ada Peraturan Desa tentang BUMDes di wilayah mitra, maka menjadi penting untuk dilakukan pendampingan hukum berupa penyusunan peraturan desa tentang BUMDes dalam rangka pemberdayaan ekonomi masyarakat desa.

Pendampingan Hukum Dalam Upaya Hukum Keberatan Dan Banding Ke Pengadilan Pajak Sebagai Upaya Untuk Meningkatkan KemampuanMasyarakat Desa Pohjejer Kecamatan Gondang Kabupaten Mojokerto Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pajak Deddy Sutrisno; Bagus Oktafian Abrianto
Abimanyu : Jornal of Community Engagement Vol 1 No 1 (2020): February 2020
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Upaya hukum keberatan dan banding ke Pengadilan Pajak merupakan bentuk perlindungan hukum preventip dan represip yang diberikan oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2009. Namun di masyarakat, khususnya di Desa Pohjejer Kecamatan Gondang Kabupaten Mojokerto, upaya hukum keberatan dan banding tersebut kurang dipahami dan dimengerti sehingga mereka hanya bisa berkeluh kesah manakala menerima surat ketetapan pajak yang dirasakan kurang adil. Berdasarkan studi awal di lapangan tersebut, maka perlu dilakukan pendampingan hukum dalam upaya hukum keberatan dan banding ke Pengadilan Pajak bagi masyarakat Desa Pohjejer Kecamatan Gondang Kabupaten Mojokerto dalam penyelesaian sengketa pajak.

PENAL MEDIATION BY POLICE INSTITUTION IN HANDLING HATE SPEECH THROUGH ELECTRONIC MEDIA: A LEGAL EFFORTS TO RESOLVE WITH A RESTORATIVE JUSTICE APPROACH Toni Harmanto; Bagus Oktafian Abrianto; Xavier Nugraha
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research Vol 6, No 1.2 (2022)
Publisher : International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research

In the era of the industrial revolution 4.0 which caused the information to be easily spread, it turned out to have a bad impact, which led to the birth of the post-truth era. The post-truth era is an era in which objective facts become blurred because of broad public opinion. This makes it easy to spread hooks and expressions of hatred in society. The high perpetrators of hoax distribution and expressions of hatred make a legal solution needed that not only focuses on the deterrent effect for the perpetrators but the recovery of the community in its original condition. To restore the community's condition to its original condition, a restorative justice approach is used, one of which is through mediation by the police. This article will discuss, firstly related to the concept of mediation of penalties by the police in Indonesia and secondly it will discuss the approach of mediation of penalties by the Indonesian police in the handling of criminal acts of hate speech in electronicmedia. This article is a legal article that uses a statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. Based on the analysis in this article, it was found first the police nowdasy have an authority to solve the problem with restorative justice secondly that the first approach that pollice need to use in handling hate speech is by mediating in order to realize restorative justice by police agencies in Indonesia.

Reformulating The Concept of State Principles Based on Ideological and Technocratic Strategic as A Sustainable Development Direction Bagus Oktafian Abrianto; Farid Ibrahim; Xavier Nugraha
LAW REFORM Vol 16, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

National development planning model with its long-term time dimension in Indonesia is carried out with the National Long-Term Development Plan (RPJPN) which replaces the Planned Overall National Development (PNSB) and the General Outlines of the Principles of the State (GBHN). Based on the analysis of the data obtained, it can be seen that since 2004 the use of the RPJN has turned out to cause fluctuating dynamics in the existing development outcomes. The occurred changes resulted in inconsistencies in the direction of development when there was a change of state development actors such as President, Governor, Regent/ Mayor, and other state institutions. The reason for this is that there is no permanent structure that can be used as a reference for a long-term development program that will be carried out by the managing state institutions, particularly the government. Based on this, the aim of this study was to create a form of reformulation of the principles of the state. This research was a normative research with a statutory, historical and conceptual approaches. To answer this problem, the idea of the state principles was born which departed from combining the advantages of PNSB, GBHN, and RPJPN which were then packaged into a new state principle system, with ideological principle and technocratic strategy.

THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FIQH SIYASAH WITH THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF GOOD GOVERNMENT IN INDONESIA Prawitra Thalib; Bagus Oktafian Abrianto
Arena Hukum Vol. 12 No. 2 (2019)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2019.01202.1

Abstrak Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik saat ini menjadi salah satu dasar penilaian bagi hakim di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara untuk menguji suatu tindak pemerintah tersebut mengandung unsur kerugian bagi masyarakat atau tidak. Adanya UU 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan telah memperluas kompetensi Peradilan Tata Usaha negara dimana obyek gugatan dalam PTUN tidak hanya KTUN (beschikking) akan tetapi juga tindakan faktual dari pejabat atau badan tata usaha negara. Dengan adanya perubahan UU No. 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara yaitu UU No. 9 Tahun 2004 dan UU No. 51 Tahun 2009 mempertegas keberadaan Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik sebagai alasan menggugat di PTUN. Tidak bisa dipungkiri saat ini konsep hukum Islam banyak dipakai dan diterapkan dalam tindakan-tindakan hukum, baik dalam ranah hukum bisnis atau privat maupun hukum publik. Oleh karena itu maka konsep pemerintahan yang baik menurut Islam perlu dikaji secara mendalam, sering disebut dengan konsep fiqh siyasah. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk meneliti perbandingan antara konsep Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik di satu sisi dengan konsep fiqh siyasah di sisi yang lain.Â Abstract The General Principles of Good Government are currently one of the assessment bases for the judges in the Administrative Court to examine whether or not actions of the government contains the elements of harm for the community. The existence of Law No.30 of 2014 on Government Administration has expanded the competence of The Administrative Court (PTUN) in which the object of lawsuit in the Administrative Court is not only the Decisions of Administrative (beschikking) but also factual action from official or administrative institutions. With the amendment of Law No.5 of 1986 on the Administrative Court namely Law No. 9 of 2004 and Law No.51 of 2009 affirms the existence of The General Principles of Good Government as one of reasons to sue in the Administrative Court. It is inevitable today that the concept of Islamic law is widely used and applied in legal actions, whether in the realm of business law, private law or public law. Therefore, the concept of good government according to Islam needs to be studied further, often referred to as the concept of fiqh siyasah. This study is aimed to examine the comparison between the concept of The General Principles of Good Government with the concept of fiqh siyasah.

Co-Authors Aditya, Kukuh Leksono Ave Maria Frisa K Deddy Sutrisno Faizal Kurniawan Farid Ibrahim Fikri, Muhammad Azharuddin Ghansam Anand Ghansam Anand, Ghansam Hari Sugiharto hezron sabar rotua tinambunan Kukuh Leksono S. Aditya M. Syaiful Aris Nathanael Grady Nugraha, Xavier Prawitra Thalib Ramadhanti, Syifa Risdiana Izzaty Suparto Wijoyo Syifa Ramadhanti Toni Harmanto Wilda Prihatiningtyas Xavier Nugraha Xavier Nugraha Xavier Nugraha Xavier Nugraha Xavier Nugraha

Title

Found 16 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 16 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 16 Documents
Search