cover
Contact Name
Nego Linuhung
Contact Email
aksioma.ummetro@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
aksioma.ummetro@gmail.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota metro,
Lampung
INDONESIA
AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika
ISSN : 20898703     EISSN : 24425419     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
AKSIOMA JOURNAL, e-ISSN: 2442-5419, p-ISSN: 2089-8703 is an information container has scientific articles in the form of research, the study of literature, ideas, application of the theory, the study of critical analysis, and Islāmic studies in the field of science Mathematics Education. AKSIOMA JOURNAL published two times a year, the period from January to June and July to December, published by the Scientific Publication Unit FKIP University of Muhammadiyah Metro.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 73 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 11, No 2 (2022)" : 73 Documents clear
PENELUSURAN POLA ASOSIASI PENALARAN ADAPTIF DENGAN ALGORITMA APRIORI Khotimah Khotimah; Yani Supriani; Rina Oktaviyanthi
AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Vol 11, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH METRO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (582.945 KB) | DOI: 10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.4787

Abstract

Penalaran adaptif adalah salah satu komponen kunci dari kemahiran matematika. Dalam perkembangannya diketahui penalaran adaptif didukung oleh aspek non-kognitif individu yakni affective dan behavioral. Sejumlah teori mengungkapkan peluang optimalisasi aspek non-kognitif untuk pengembangan kemampuan penalaran adaptif. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menelusuri faktor non-kognitif yang berpeluang memberi dampak pada optimalisasi kemampuan penalaran adaptif melalui pola asosiasi yang muncul pada basis data. Pendekatan penelitian data mining dengan teknik penemuan pola asosiasi (Association Rule Mining) atau Algoritma Apriori digunakan sebagai metode penelusuran faktor. Langkah penelitian yang dilakukan yakni persiapan data (fiksasi instrumen dan penentuan sampel penelitian), pengolahan data (preprocess dan transformation), dan mining dan analisa (menentukan nilai support dan nilai confidence serta interpretasi hasil). Subjek penelitian yakni siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas di lingkungan Kota Serang yang memiliki rentang usia 16-17 tahun. Adapun untuk sampel penelitian diambil sebanyak 100 orang siswa yang mengisi tes kognitif dan non-kognitif. Berdasarkan hasil pengujian dan analisis data diketahui bahwa seorang siswa memiliki kemungkinan 100% berada di level tinggi kemampuan penalaran adaptif jika memiliki dominasi penggunaan otak kiri, self-efficacy di level yang minimal sedang, kecenderungan kepribadian Melankolis dan ­self-directed learning berada di level tinggi. Adaptive reasoning is one of the key components of mathematical proficiency. In its development, it is known that adaptive reasoning is supported by individual non-cognitive aspects, namely affective and behavioral. A number of theories reveal opportunities for optimizing non-cognitive aspects for the development of adaptive reasoning skills. The purpose of this study is to explore non-cognitive factors that have the possibility to impact on optimizing adaptive reasoning skills through association rule appeared in the database. Data mining research approach with association rule mining technique or Apriori Algorithm is used as a factor tracing method. The research steps carried out were data preparation (fixation of instruments and determination of research samples), data processing (preprocess and transformation), and mining and analysis (determining support values and confidence values and interpretation of results). The research subjects were high school students in Kota Serang who have an age range of 16-17 years. As for the research sample, 100 students were taken who filled out cognitive and non-cognitive tests. Based on the results of testing and data analysis, it is identified that a student has a 100% probability of being at a high level of adaptive reasoning skills if he has left brain dominance, self-efficacy is at a minimum level of moderate, Melancholic personality tendencies and self-directed learning are at a high level.
ANALISIS PELAKSANAAN SIMULASI R DALAM KETERBATASAN PANDEMI Andhika Ayu Wulandari; Dewi Susilowati; Joko Sungkono
AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Vol 11, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH METRO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (502.352 KB) | DOI: 10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.4686

Abstract

AbstrakPenelitian bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana penerapan pembelajaran distribusi peluang melalui simulasi R dalam keterbatasan pandemi covid-19. Metode yang digunakan deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif melalui angket dan wawancara terbuka terhadap subyek penelitian terpilih sebagai triangulasi metode. Wawancara dilakukan dengan 3 mahasiswa yang mewakili kategori kemampuan pemahaman tinggi, sedang dan rendah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan respon baik dari mahasiswa untuk seluruh aspek dan indikator capaian dengan persentase 72,684%. Respon kurang baik datang dari aspek bakat mahasiswa dengan persentase 61,765%. Respon baik pada aspek minat, sarana prasarana, dan kecakapan dosen masing-masing dengan persentase 75,919%, 69,669%, dan 75,441%. Pada aspek motivasi, mahasiswa memberi respon sangat baik dengan persentase 82,353%. Dari analisis wawancara disimpulkan bahwa keterbatasan pengetahuan mahasiswa mengenai bahasa pemrograman dan belum terbiasanya mahasiswa melakukan multitasking dalam suatu pembelajaran menyebabkan simulasi R dalam pembelajaran daring mendapat respon yang kurang baik dari aspek bakat. Selain itu, ketersediaan sarana dan prasarana seperti sinyal stabil, laptop dan HP yang compatible juga membuat pembelajaran daring berbasis R ini menjadi terbatas. Sebagai upaya perbaikan kualitas pembelajaran berikutnya, dosen akan mengenalkan mahasiswa bahasa pemrograman R dengan membuat scaffolding dalam bentuk buku panduan simulasi R, menyajikan perkuliahan dengan metode SAS (sinkron-asinkron-sinkron) untuk membantu mahasiswa yang memiliki keterbatasan sarana dan prasarana daring.AbstractStudy aims to analyze how to apply learning probability distribution through R simulation within the limitations of the covid-19 pandemic. The method used is descriptive with a qualitative approach through questionnaires and open interviews with selected research subjects as a triangulation method. Interviews were conducted with 3 students representing the categories of high, medium and low comprehension abilities. The results showed good responses from students for all aspects and indicators of achievement with a percentage of 72.684%. The unfavorable response came from the aspect of student talent with a percentage of 61.765%. The responses were good on the aspects of interest, infrastructure, and lecturers' skills with a percentage of 75.919%, 69.669%, and 75.441%. In the aspect of motivation, students gave a very good response with a percentage of 82.353%. From the interview analysis, it was concluded that the limited knowledge of students about programming languages and students' unfamiliarity with multitasking in learning caused the R simulation in online learning to get a poor response from the talent aspect. In addition, the availability of facilities and infrastructure such as stable signals, compatible laptops and cellphones also makes this R-based online learning limited. In addition, the availability of facilities and infrastructure such as stable signals, compatible laptops and cellphones also makes this R-based online learning limited. As an effort to improve the quality of subsequent learning, the lecturer will introduce students to the R programming language by making scaffolding in the form of an R simulation guidebook, presenting lectures using the SAS (synchronous-asynchronous-synchronous) method to help students who have limited online facilities and infrastructure.
KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA SMP DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) Ivent Astiantari; Didik Sugeng Pambudi; Ervin Oktavianingtyas; Dinawati Trapsilasiwi; Randi Pratama Murtikusuma
AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Vol 11, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH METRO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (785.227 KB) | DOI: 10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.5073

Abstract

AbstrakKemampuan berpikir kritis dengan tahapan focus, reason, inference, situation, clarity, dan overview serta kemampuan daya juang (adversity quotient) memiliki peranan sangat penting dalam aktivitas memecahkan masalah matematika. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah ditinjau dari adversity quotient (AQ). Penelitian deskriptif kualitatif ini dilakukan di sebuah SMP di Jember, Indonesia, pada bulan September 2021. Pengumpulan data menggunakan metode angket Adversity Response Profile (ARP), tes tertulis berpikir kritis, serta wawancara. Hasil pemberian angket ARP kepada 31 siswa kelas IXB, diketahui ada 10 siswa dengan tipe climber, 18 siswa dengan tipe camper, dan 3 siswa dengan tipe quitter. Dari tipe AQ tersebut dipilih enam siswa dengan 2 siswa tipe climber, 2 siswa tipe camper, dan 2 siswa tipe quitter untuk mengikuti tes tertulis dan wawancara. Triangulasi menggunakan triangulasi metode, yaitu mencari kesesuaian antara data dari hasil tes tertulis dengan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa dengan tipe climber memenuhi seluruh kriteria berpikir kritis FRISCO, yaitu focus, reason, inference, situation, clarity, dan overview. Siswa dengan tipe climber mampu menyelesaikan permasalahan yang diberikan dengan tepat waktu dan mengecek kembali jawaban. Siswa dengan tipe camper dapat memenuhi 5 dari 6 kriteria berpikir kritis FRISCO, yaitu focus, reason, inference, situation dan clarity. Siswa dengan tipe camper mampu menyelesaikan permasalahan yang diberikan tepat waktu. Kekurangannya adalah siswa camper tidak melakukan overview, yaitu tidak mengecek kembali jawaban sesudah menyelesaikan masalah. Adapun siswa dengan tipe quitter hanya mampu memenuhi 2 dari 6 kriteria berpikir kritis FRISCO, yaitu mereka hanya mampu melakukan focus, dan clarity, serta kesulitan memahami permasalahan sehingga tidak dapat menyelesaikan masalah tersebut. Dari hasil ini, maka guru perlu memberikan motivasi kepada siswa untuk mempunyai daya juang tinggi agar memiliki kemampuan berpikir kritis tinggi dalam memecahkan masalah matematika.AbstractCritical thinking skills which include the stages of focus, reason, inference, situation, clarity, and overview as well as the ability to fight (adversity quotient) have a very important role in solving mathematical problems. This study aims to describe students' critical thinking skills in solving problems in terms of the adversity quotient (AQ). This descriptive qualitative research was conducted at a junior high school in Jember, Indonesia, in September 2021. The data was collected using the Adversity Response Profile (ARP) questionnaire, a written critical thinking test, and interviews. The results of giving ARP questionnaires to 31 students of class IXB, it is known that there are 10 students with the climber type, 18 students with the camper type, and 3 students with the quitter type. From the AQ type, six students were selected with 2 climber type students, 2 camper type students, and 2 quitter type students to take written tests and interviews. Triangulation uses the triangulation method, which is to find a match between the data from the results of the written test and the interview. The results showed that the climber type students met all of the FRISCO critical thinking criteria, namely focus, reason, inference, situation, clarity, and overview. Students with the climber type are able to solve the problems given in a timely manner and recheck the answers. Camper type students can fulfill 5 of 6 FRISCO critical thinking criteria, namely focus, reason, inference, situation and clarity. Camper type students are able to solve the problems given on time. The drawback is that camper students do not do an overview, that is, they do not re-check the answers after solving the problem. As for students with the quitter type, they are only able to meet 2 of the 6 criteria for FRISCO critical thinking, namely they are only able to focus and clarity, and have difficulty understanding problems so they cannot solve the problems. From these results, the teacher needs to motivate students to have a high adversity quotient in order to have high critical thinking skills in solving mathematical problems. Keywords: Adversity Quotient, Critical Thinking, Mathematical Problem Solving.
BAGAIMANA MENGUKUR KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR TINGKAT TINGGI SISWA?: PADA MATERI BANGUN DATAR Eko Dody Setiawan; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Farida Nurhasanah
AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Vol 11, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH METRO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (562.513 KB) | DOI: 10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.4957

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengembangkan instrumen yang dapat mengukur dengan tepat dan efektif pada tiap-tiap indikator kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi (High Order Thinking Skills). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pengembangan dengan model 4D (Define, Design, Develop, Disseminate). Untuk melihat keefektifan soal dalam menguji indikator kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi, dilakukan validasi expert judgment. Responden uji expert judgment adalah dua dosen matematika dan satu guru mata pelajaran matematika SMP. Berdasarkan hasil uji validitas expert judgment juga diketahui bahwa instrumen ini layak untuk digunakan dengan presentase rata-rata hasil validasi sebesar 82,83% dengan kategori sangat valid. Sehingga dapat dikatakan bahwa instrumen kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi ini layak untuk digunakan sebagai alat ukur kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi.The purpose of this research is to develop an instrument that can measure accurately and effectively on each indicator of higher order thinking skills. This research is a development research with 4D model (Define, Design, Develop, Disseminate). To see the effectiveness of the instruments in measuring the indicators of higher order thinking skills, expert judgment validation was carried out. The respondents for the expert judgment test were two mathematics lecturers and one junior high school mathematics teacher. Based on the results of the expert judgment validity test, it is also known that this instrument is feasible to use with an average percentage of validation results of 82.83% with a very valid category. Accordingly, it can be said that this higher-order thinking skills instrument is feasible to be used as a measuring tool for higher-order thinking skills.
HONEY-MUMFORD LEARNING STYLE: REVIEW OF MATHEMATICAL COMMUNICATION FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS IN PROBLEM SOLVING Awal Nur Kholifatur Rosyidah; Umar Umar; Vivi Rachmatul Hidayati; Mohammad Archi Maulyda; Lalu Wira Zain Amrullah
AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Vol 11, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH METRO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (586.813 KB) | DOI: 10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.4526

Abstract

Mathematical communication skills are very important for students, especially for elementary school students. Students' communication skills in each student are always different, as are different learning styles for each student. The purpose of this study is to describe the mathematical communication process carried out by students in each type of learning style they have. The learning styles referred to refer to Honey-Mumford, namely; (1) Theoretical; (2) Pragmatic; (3) Activist; and (4) Reflective. The research was carried out at SDN 44 Ampenan, with the subjects being all of the fifth-grade students, totaling 39 students. Data collection was carried out by providing 2 instruments, namely a learning style questionnaire and math problems followed by semi-structured interviews to students who had finished. The results showed that the number of students with theoretical learning styles was the highest and students with active learning styles were the least. The results of the study also show that there are differences in mathematical communication in each learning style, but mathematical communication errors made by all types of learning styles are errors in writing formulas and conclusion sentences
PENALARAN ALJABAR MAHASISWA CALON GURU MATEMATIKA DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA MENGGUNAKAN PISA FRAMEWORK Muhammad Syawahid
AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Vol 11, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH METRO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1124.975 KB) | DOI: 10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.5006

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan penalaran aljabar Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika (MCGM) dalam pemecahan masalah matematika dengan menggunakan PISA framework. Penelitian ini menggunkan pendekatan penelitian kualitatif dengan metode studi kasus. Penelitian dilaksanakan dengan memberikan tes matematika kepada 40 MCGM semester 2 UIN Mataram. MCGM yang menjawab dengan benar dikelompokkan berdasarkan strategi yang digunakan dan dilakukan wawancara untuk memperoleh data secara mendalam. Analisis data dalam penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tiga tahap yaitu reuksi data, penyajian data dan verifikasi/penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa MCGM melakukan penalaran aljabar dalam pemecahan masalah matematika dengan dua tipe yaitu functional thinking dan deductive-formalization. Pada tipe functional thinking, pada tahap formulating, MCGM membuat persamaan dua kuantitas. Pada tahap employing, MCGM menggunakan tabel fungsi dan manipulasi angka. Pada tahap interpreting dan evaluating, MCGM melakukan justifikasi dan pengambilan keputusan. Pada tipe deductive-formalization, pada tahap formulating, MCGM membuat persamaan dua kuantitas dengan variabel. Pada tahap employing, MCGM melakukan pengkondisian atau permisalan untuk variabel bebas dan manipulasi angka. Pada tahap interpreting dan evaluating, MCGM melakukan justifikasi dan pengambilan keputusan.This study aims to describe MCGM algebraic reasoning in solving mathematical problems using the PISA framework. This study used a qualitative research approach with a case study method. The study was carried out by giving mathematics tests to 40 MCGM semester 2 UIN Mataram. MCGMs who answered correctly were grouped according to the strategy used and interviews were conducted to obtain in-depth data. Data analiyze in this study conducted by data reduction, display data and verification or conclution. The results showed that MCGM performed algebraic reasoning in solving mathematical problems with two types, functional thinking and deductive-formalization. In the type of functional thinking, in the formulating stage, MCGM makes an equation of two quantities. In the employing stage, MCGM uses function tables and numerical manipulation. At the interpreting and evaluating stages, MCGM performs justification and decision making. In the ductive-formalization type, in the formulating stage, MCGM makes an equation of two quantities with variables. At the employing stage, MCGM performs conditioning or example for independent variables and manipulation of numbers. At the interpreting and evaluating stages, MCGM performs justification and decision making.
ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN ALJABAR SISWA DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN MASALAH (PBL) DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA Amanda Dinda Arum Nissa; Ali Mahmudi
AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Vol 11, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH METRO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (733.088 KB) | DOI: 10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.4835

Abstract

AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan proses penalaran aljabar siswa sebagai hasil dari pelaksanaan pembelajaran problem based learning (PBL) dalam pembelajaran matematika.  Jenis penelitian ini adalah menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan subjek penelitian 3 orang siswa yang diambil dari 27 siswa kelas VII B SMP N  2 Ambarawa. Data hasil penelitian dianalisis dengan mendeskripsikan kemampuan penalaran aljabar siswa sesuai dengan indikator dan tingkat level penalaran siswa pada pembelajaran matematika. Teknik pengumpulan data yang dilakukan dengan observasi, tes dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pembelajaran matematika menggunakan model (PBL) tingkat kemampuan penalaran aljabar siswa pada kemampuan tinggi mampu mengenal pola, mencari pola, dan menggeneralisasikan pola. Siswa kemampuan sedang tidak dapat menggeneralisasikan pola tetapi mampu mengenal dan mencari pola. Siswa kemampuan rendah hanya mampu mengenal pola.AbstractThis research aims to describe the process of students’ algebraic reasoning as result the implementation of problem based learning (PBL) in mathematics learning. This type of research is using qualitative methods with 3 students' research subjects drawn from 27 students of class VII B junior high school N 2 Ambarawa. The data was analyzed by describing students' algebraic reasoning skills according to indicators and the level of reasoning of students in math learning. Data collection techniques are carried out with observation, test and documentation. The results of this study showed that mathematical learning using models (PBL) levels of algebraic reasoning ability students at high ability are able to recognize patterns, look for patterns, and generalize patterns. Students of moderate ability are unable to generalize patterns but are able to recognize and search for patterns. Low-ability students are only able to recognize patterns.  
MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING DAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS Rhona Febriany Sary; Dadang Juandi; Al Jupri
AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Vol 11, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH METRO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (550.127 KB) | DOI: 10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.4765

Abstract

Penelitian primer terkait implementasi model Discovery Learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa telah banyak dilakukan. Penelitian-penelitian tersebut perlu diidentifikasi, dianalisis perkembangannya, dan ditarik kesimpulan secara umum sehingga dapat dimanfaatkan sebagai saran bagi kemajuan peneliti dan praktisi di bidang pendidikan matematika. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat tren penelitian dengan mengidentifikasi dan mengklasifikasikan seluruh hasil penelitian yang berkaitan dengan penerapan model Discovery Learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa di Indonesia pada tahun 2012-2021. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR). Terdapat 33 artikel terkait yang dianalisis dalam penelitian ini. Hasil SLR ini menunjukkan penelitian implementasi model pembelajaran Discovery Learning terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa paling banyak dilakukan pada tahun 2017 dan 2019 dan subjek penelitian terbanyak pada siswa SMP/MTs dengan didominasi oleh materi bangun ruang. Metode penelitian yang paling banyak dilakukan adalah metode kuantitatif dan secara umum hasilnya menunjukkan model Discovery Learning mampu memberikan dampak positif atau meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa lebih baik dibandingkan model pembelajaran lainnya. Hasil penelitian ini dapat menjadi pertimbangan bagi para peneliti dalam melakukan penelitian dan bagi guru dalam melaksanakan pembelajaran di kelas.There have been many primary studies on the application of the Discovery Learning model to improve students' mathematical reasoning abilities. All of these studies need to be identified, analyzed and concluded to produce suggestions for researchers and practitioners of mathematics education. This study aims to observe research trends by identifying and classifying studies related to the application of the Discovery Learning model to improve the mathematical reasoning abilities of students in Indonesia from 2012 to 2021. This study uses the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method. There are 33 related articles analyzed in this study. The results of this SLR show that most on this topic were carried out in 2017 and 2019 as well the research subjects were Junior High School students, dominated by solid figures material. The most widely used research method is the quantitative method. Based on the analysis of the research results of each article, it shows that the Discovery Learning model can have a positive impact or improve students' mathematical reasoning abilities better than other learning models. The results of this study can be considered for researchers in conducting further research and for teachers in carrying out classroom learning.
ANDROID-BASED MOBILE LEARNING MEDIA WITH CHARACTER Ahmad Yani; Anggi Pramita; Hartono Hartono; Hodiyanto Hodiyanto
AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Vol 11, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH METRO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (727.213 KB) | DOI: 10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.4790

Abstract

This study aims to produce a android-based mobile learning media with character. The research method is a research and development method with a 4D design which is limited to Define, Design, and Develop. The subjects in this study were students of class VIII of Public Junior High School 10 Sungai Kakap as many as 14 students. The instruments were validation sheets, questionnaires of teacher and student and posttest questions. Learning media is said to be valid, practical and effective if the percentage is above 60%. Based on the results of the research, it is found that the android-based mobile learning media is valid, practical and effective. The validation of it has a validity level of 90.53% with very valid criteria, while the practicality level of learning media is 90.16%. with very practical criteria, and the effectiveness of learning media is 85.71% with very effective criteria.
KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR TINGKAT TINGGI (HOTS) SISWA MADRASAH TSANAWIYAH Maifalinda Fatra; Muhamad Anang Jatmiko; Adison Adrianus Sihombing; Umy Zahroh
AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Vol 11, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH METRO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (566.373 KB) | DOI: 10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.4909

Abstract

Cita-cita utama pemerintah menggunakan kurikulum K-13 adalah menciptakan generasi yang cerdas berpengatahuan, kompeten dan trampil. Studi ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan dan menganalisis keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi (HOTS) siswa madrasah tsanawiyah dalam pembelajaran matematika setelah diberlakukannya kurikulum K-13. Studi ini difokuskan pada TIMSS Assessment framework yang terdiri atas empat materi matematik yaitu bilangan, aljabar, geometri, data dan peluang. Dimensi kognitif yang diukur meliputi kemampuan penerapan dan penalaran. Data penelitian ini berasal dari studi literatur tentang penerapan kurikulum K-13 dan survey yang melibatkan sebanyak 1.317 siswa madrasah tsanawiyah dari tujuh kota di pulau Jawa. Sampel tersebut berasal dari 439 Madrasah Tsanawiyah DKI Jakarta, Bandung, Serang, Semarang, Yogyakarta, Malang dan Surabaya. Analisis inferensial untuk menguji perbedaan antar kelompok data menggunakan uji ANAVA satu jalur. Data dari survey dan studi literatur dianalisis melalui tahapan restatemen, deskripsi dan interpretasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan tingkat keterampilan HOTS matematis siswa madrasah tsanawiyah. Hal ini mengacu pada hasil uji empiris menggunakan ANAVA satu jalur yang menunjukan nilai signifikansi perbedaan kemampuan HOTS matematis sebesar 0,048 < 0,05. Nilai rata-rata tertinggi untuk aspek penerapan diperoleh siswa madrasah Tsanawiyah Yogyakarta. Sedangkan untuk aspek penalaran nilai rata-rata tertinggi siswa dari Surabaya. Dua kemampuan HOTS tersebut masih tergolong rendah.  Tulisan ini menyarankan perlunya penelitian lanjutan untuk melihat secara khusus penerapan kurikulum K-13 di madrasah untuk dimungkinkannya suatu analisis komparatif.