Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, with registered number p-ISSN: 2086-5872 (print), e-ISSN: 2540-7562 (online), is a scientific journal published by Mathematics Education IAIN Raden Intan Lampung. The aim of this journal publication is to disseminate new theories and research results that have been achieved in the area of mathematics education. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, particularly focuses on the main issues in the development of the sciences of mathematics education, mathematics education, and applied mathematics. Al-Jabar, has been published since 2010, and starting from 2015, has been published online. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika published twice a year, the period from January to June and July to December. This publication is available online via open access.
Articles
10 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 9, No 1 (2018): Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika"
:
10 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[The Mathematics Learning Media Uses Geogebra on the Basic Material of Linear Equations ]]>
<![CDATA[Qurnia Syafitri]]>;
<![CDATA[Mujib Mujib]]>;
<![CDATA[Netriwati Netriwati]]>;
<![CDATA[Chairul Anwar]]>;
<![CDATA[Wawan Wawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 9, No 1 (2018): Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Raden Intan Lampung, INDONESIA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (399.458 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24042/ajpm.v9i1.2160
<![CDATA[This research aims to develop a mathematical learning media using Geogebra software. The research method is used the 4D (Four D Model) research method adopted by Siva sailam Thiagarajan, Dorothy S. Semmel, and Melvyn I. Semmel. namely, define, design, develop. The data collection techniques are used to obtain the data on questionnaires response and interviews. The instruments in this research used questionnaires. The data analysis method using descriptive method. This research is conducted by describing the results of product development in the form of learning media for small groups and large groups with media that has been validated by some validators. The Experts of validation results on the content quality aspect to obtain results with very good criteria and on aspects of the language to obtain results with very good criteria. Trial students VII class in small classes and large classes obtained results with interesting criteria for small groups.]]>
<![CDATA[Discovery Learning to Develop Student Reflective Thinking Ability and Self-Efficacy ]]>
<![CDATA[Mega Kusuma Listyotami]]>;
<![CDATA[Sri Hastuti Noer]]>;
<![CDATA[Een Yayah Haenilah]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 9, No 1 (2018): Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Raden Intan Lampung, INDONESIA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (324.178 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24042/ajpm.v9i1.2839
<![CDATA[The research and development aims to produce a discovery learning model that is oriented towards the student ability of reflective thinking and self-efficacy. The research was conducted using the Research and Development (R and D) method. The research and development model used refers to the procedure of R and D development by Gall and Borg by Sukmadinata that is ADDIE. The steps for implementing the research and development strategy include; (1) analysis, (2) design, (3) development, (4) implementation, (5) evaluation. The Data collecting methods and instruments are used tests and non-tests. The Data collection techniques using observation, interviews, questionnaires, and tests. The Data analysis techniques used in research and development are quantitative and qualitative descriptive. The results showed that the discovery learning model that was oriented towards the student ability of reflective thinking and self-efficacy was effective to improve the student ability of reflective thinking and self-efficacy respectively by 77% and 30%.Keywords: Discovery Learning, Relative thinking, dan Self-Efficacy]]>
<![CDATA[The Differences of Mathematics Learning Outcomes between Think Pair Share (TPS) and Number Heads Together (NHT) ]]>
<![CDATA[Arie Purwa Kusuma]]>;
<![CDATA[Maskuroh Maskuroh]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 9, No 1 (2018): Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Raden Intan Lampung, INDONESIA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (239.156 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24042/ajpm.v9i1.2246
<![CDATA[The low learning outcomes of mathematics are not appropriate thought of learning models in the classroom. Therefore, the NHT and TPS learning models can be applied to improve the learning of outcomes of the student. This study aims to determine the differences in learning outcomes using the NHT learning model with the TPS learning model. The sampling technique is used as a random sampling cluster with 2 groups of experiments for the first experimental group (classroom view of TPS model) and the second experimental group (classes of NHT modeling). The instrument of this research uses the test of mathematics learning result. The hypothesis test is used T-Test. The conclusion of research that are differences in the outcomes of the two learning models (NHT and TPS) on learning outcomes, based on the marginal mean of the TPS learning model is better learning outcomes than the NHT learning model. ]]>
<![CDATA[The Differences of the Student Learning Outcome Using Realistic Mathematics Learning Approaches (PMR) And Contextual Learning Approaches (CTL) on the Sets Material ]]>
<![CDATA[Nurina Kurniasari Rahmawati]]>;
<![CDATA[Amah Amah]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 9, No 1 (2018): Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Raden Intan Lampung, INDONESIA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (292.463 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24042/ajpm.v9i1.2243
<![CDATA[This research aims to determine differences in learning outcomes of students who use Realistic Mathematics Learning (PMR) and Contextual Approach (CTL) approaches on the set Material. This research method is quasi experiment with posttest only control design. The sampling technique was used cluster random sampling with 2 experimental classes These are experimental class 1 (the class was treated with the Realistic Mathematics Education (PMR) approach and experimental class 2 (the class was treated with the Contextual Learning (CTL) approach The hypothesis test is used the t-test. The results of the research is found that there were differences between the student learning outcome in the set material using Realistic Mathematics Learning (PMR) approach and the student learning outcome in the set material using the Contextual Learning approach (CTL). Because the student learning outcome in the set material using Realistic Mathematics Learning (PMR) approach better than the student learning outcome in the set material using the Contextual Learning approach (CTL).]]>
<![CDATA[The Implementation of E-Learning Web-based Model Centric Course (Edmodo) toward The Mathematics’ Interest and Learning Outcomes ]]>
<![CDATA[Bettri Yustinaningrum]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 9, No 1 (2018): Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Raden Intan Lampung, INDONESIA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (274.308 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24042/ajpm.v9i1.2175
<![CDATA[The aim of this research is to know the effect of application of E-Learning model based on Web-Centric Course with Edmodo application media to increase: (1) the interesting of learning mathematics, (2) The mathematics student learning outcomes. The research method is used in quantitative research with the quasi-type experimental design, as well as research design using the pre-test and post-test control group. The Instrument has used the test of mathematics learning outcomes and questionnaire interest in learning mathematics students. The data hypothesis test uses the t-test involving pre-requisite tests (normality and homogeneity) beforehand. The result of this research is the application of E-Learning model based on Web-Centric Course with Edmodo application media has an effect on: (1) the student learning outcomes of mathematics; (2) the interesting of learning mathematics students. ]]>
<![CDATA[Development of Humanistic Statistics Learning Devices Based one Inquiry and Mind Mapping Models ]]>
<![CDATA[Santika Lya Diah Pramesti]]>;
<![CDATA[Salafudin Salafudin]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 9, No 1 (2018): Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Raden Intan Lampung, INDONESIA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (189.358 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24042/ajpm.v9i1.2341
<![CDATA[The purpose of this research are: (1) to determine the characteristic of humanistic statistics learning, (2) to obtain a humanistic statistics learning tools based on valid, practical, and effective inquiry and mind mapping learning model. The research method uses 4D Thiagarajan which has been modified to 3D, namely: define, design, and develop. Implementation of the development and humanistic statistics learning tool trials using Inquiry and Mind Mapping learning model show that learning tools used in statistical learning activities were practical and effective. The trial shows an increase of students’ statistical problem-solving ability using humanistic learning based on Inquiry and Mind Mapping learning model. The improvement of statistical problem-solving on Inquiry learning model is better than humanistic statistics learning using Mind Mapping learning model. ]]>
<![CDATA[The effect of Cooperative Learning Model Think-Talk-Write Type on Mathematical Problem-Solving Abilities In Terms of Learning Habits ]]>
<![CDATA[Agus Slamet Susanto]]>;
<![CDATA[Haninda Bharata]]>;
<![CDATA[Syarifuddin Dahlan]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 9, No 1 (2018): Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Raden Intan Lampung, INDONESIA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (259.333 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24042/ajpm.v9i1.2235
<![CDATA[The purpose of this research are: (1) to know the influence of Think Talk Write (TTW) model of learning ability to solve mathematical problems of learners; (2) to know the effect of learning habit on students' mathematical problem solving ability; (3) to know the interaction between learning model and study habit to students' mathematical problem solving ability. The type of research used is quasi experiment with 3 × 3 factorial research design. The hypothesis test used is a parametric test with data analysis technique using Anova test. The result of the research for the prerequisite test is based on normality test which can be known by using Liliefors test and homogeneity test can be known by using Barlett test, it is obtained that the test result data from both groups are normal and homogeneous, so it can be continued for parametric test by using anava test two paths with unequal cells. Based on data processing, it is found that: (1) there is influence of Think Talk Write (TTW) learning model to students' mathematical problem-solving ability; (2) there is the influence of learning habit on the ability of mathematical problem of learners; (3) there is no interaction between the learning model and the learning habits of the mathematical problems of the learners. This means that the learning model Think Talk Write (TTW) is more effective than the conventional model so that Think Talk Write (TTW) model more influence on the problem-solving ability of learners. ]]>
<![CDATA[The Effects of Reciprocal Teaching Learning Strategy and Self efficacy on Learning Outcomes of Early Childhood (AUD) Mathematical Logic ]]>
<![CDATA[Erwanto Erwanto]]>;
<![CDATA[Anastasia Sri Maryatmi]]>;
<![CDATA[Agung Budiyanto]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 9, No 1 (2018): Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Raden Intan Lampung, INDONESIA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (284.738 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24042/ajpm.v9i1.2567
<![CDATA[The purpose of this research is to learn about the influence of Reciprocal Teaching and Self Efficacy on learning outcomes of AUD mathematical logic. This research is experimental research designed using treatment by level 2 × 2. The research method used is a variance analysis of two different cell paths. The results of this research are: (1) learning outcomes of students using Reciprocal Teaching strategy is higher than Ekspository strategy, (2) there is an interaction influence between learning strategy and self efficacy on learning outcomes of AUD mathematical logic, (3) there is an influence of self efficacy on learning outcomes of AUD mathematical logic. ]]>
<![CDATA[Analysis of Student Problem Solving Skill and Activity Concentration on a Senior High School ]]>
<![CDATA[Heris Hendriana]]>;
<![CDATA[Ratni Purwasih]]>;
<![CDATA[Erwin Triawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Yudi Prasetio]]>;
<![CDATA[Tri Satria]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 9, No 1 (2018): Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Raden Intan Lampung, INDONESIA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (303.459 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24042/ajpm.v9i1.2068
<![CDATA[The aim of the research to know the level of student problem solving skill of Senior high school students on their mathematical problem and activity concentration. The object of the research was conducted at one of Senior high school of Cimahi. the Subject of the research is all twelve grades of Senior high School Students of Science Program in Cimahi. The research used descriptive qualitative research to describe the student analysis error on doing the question of problem solving ability. The data of the research was found using diagnostic of series and rows and also student questionnaire. Data collecting technique used Miles and Huberman concept that are reduction data, reporting data and draw the conclusion. The result of the research are: (1) the level of the ability to solve the problem is still low (2) the common student error did not understand the questions and have no ability to communicate in mathematical form. (3) the student’s activity is rated strong. Some solutions can be given to increase student problem solving ability through practice or question drill structured and gived the variety questions as material practice. ]]>
<![CDATA[The Students' Creative Thinking Process based on Wallas Theory in Solving Mathematical Problems viewed from Adversity Quotient /Type Climbers ]]>
<![CDATA[Yanti, Avissa Purnama]]>;
<![CDATA[Koestoro, Budi]]>;
<![CDATA[Sutiarso, Sugeng]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 9, No 1 (2018): Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Raden Intan State Islamic University of Lampung, INDONESIA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (302.42 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24042/ajpm.v9i1.2331
<![CDATA[This research aims to describe the creative thinking process of students based on Wallas theory in solving mathematical problems. This type of research is qualitative research using qualitative descriptive methods. This research will begin by determining the type of Adversity Quotient using the Adversity Response Profile (ARP) test. The sampling technique is used positive sampling, selected 2 subjects to represent the climber type . The Data collection techniques are used written tests and interviews then analyzing the result based on indicators that fulfill Wallas creative thinking process and its level. The data analysis technique used is according to Milles and Huberman and the data validity technique uses technical triangulation Based on the results of data analysis, it was found that climber 1 is the climber with the creative thinking level that is very creative, Climber 1 is able to fulfill all stages of the creative thinking process by Wallas and its complete characteristics include fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration. Whereas Climber2 is a climber with creative thinking level that is creative, Climber 2 is able to fulfill all stages of the creative thinking process by Wallas but incomplete on its characteristics. ]]>
