Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan

Investigasi Miskonsepsi pada Materi Perkembangbiakan Tumbuhan Menggunakan Metode CRI (certainty of response index) di Sekolah Dasar Milati Darmastuti; Anatri Desstya
Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Vol 7 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Jayapangus Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37329/cetta.v7i1.3033

Abstract

Science is material that is closely correlated with experiments and observations, as well as the complexity of living things and their lives, including plants. Plant reproduction is considered to be an area of material that is classified as difficult to convey because it is dense and requires long observations. This difficulty then becomes the trigger for misconceptions among students. This research aims to desCRIbe the level of misconceptions among elementary school students regarding plant reproduction material. This type of research is qualitative with a data collection method using a test instrument using the Certainty of Response Index (CRI) method, with a total of 25 questions that have been tested for validity and reliability, with a validity score of 0.468 and a reliability score of 0.60. The validity of this research was checked by testing the validity and reliability of the test instrument, checking the consistency of filling in the CRI values during the research, and using a formula to calculate the incidence of misconceptions. Based on the results of the discussion, it can be concluded that the questions can be declared valid and reliable. The research results showed that 32% had misconceptions, 28% knew the concept with certainty, 29% didn't know the concept correctly, and 4% guessed the answer. The percentage of misconceptions at 32% can be categorized as moderate. The highest misconception in the material explaining perfect flowers was 89%, while the lowest misconception in the material explaining the meaning of vegetative plant reproduction was 0%, which means that no students experienced misconceptions about the material.
Co-Authors A Azizunniza Achmad Fathoni Achmad Fathoni Achmad Fathoni, Achmad Agustina Wahyuningsih Agustina Wahyuningsih Aldi Farhan Razak Alfauziah Rahmadani Ali Ma'shum Fuadi Ali Muckromin Alifia Nugrahaning Saputri Amin Lestari Anam Sutopo Andy Ariyanto Angga Eko Novanto Ani Budiarti Anip Dwi Saputro, Anip Dwi Anisa Fitri Rahmawati Arief Setyo Nugroho Arief Setyo Nugroho Arum Susilowati Atika Azzahro Hazima Audrine Yohand Shalsa Bila Ayu Putri Ivana Bambang Sumardjoko Bektiningsih Bektiningsih Choiriyah Choiriyah Widyasari Dani Rahma Harfiani Danita Novian Permatasari Dhevi Anastia Richakza Indrajatun Dhita Dwilestari Diah Wulandari Dine Vita Ayu Setyaputri Djalal Fuadi Endang Fauziati Esti Nur Qorimah Faisal Yusuf Bakhtiar Faridatun Nashiroh Fitri April Yanti Fitri April Yanti Fitri Puji Rahmawati Fitria Bekti Nurhandayani Harun Joko Prayitno Heni Nur Hayati Honest Ummi Kaltsum Ika Candra Sayekti Ipung Purwati Isnaini Anami Istiani Indah Novitasari Khrisna Adhi Pradana Kukuh Sandy Sudrajat Kus Suryandari Laili Etika Rahmawati Lastiadi Muhtadin Ma'rifatul Jannah Markhamah Markhamah Marlina Rizky Suryaningsih Melyani Sari Sitepu Milati Darmastuti Minsih Muhammad Abduh Nafiah Nur Shofia Rohmah Naufal Ishartono Novitasari, Istiani Indah Purwanti Purwanti Ratnasari Diah Utami Razak, Aldi Farhan Refitrika Verganingtia Retno H Rifta Nabila Wahyu Agustina Rikana Sulistyaningrum Rikana Sulistyaningrum Rini Budiwati Ririn Tri Utami Rita Eryani Ros Dwi Armiyanti Rosita Husna Ryzal Perdana Sekar Mustika Arum Sinta Devi Kusuma Ardi Siti Nurjanah Siti Zubaidah Sudrajat, Kukuh Sandy Sukartono Sukartono Sumini Sumini Surtikawati, Erma Suryadin Hasyda Sutama Tansa Giri Asmaniah Tina Mardiyana Umi Hapsari WR Ummi Tadzkiroh Ummu Aiman Winu Galih Puspito Wisnu Cahyo Laksono Yasir Sidiq Yoni Ernawanto Yoni Ernawanto Yulia Maftuhah H Yulia Maftuhah Hidayaati Yulia Maftuhah Hidayati Yulia Maftuhah Hidayati Yulita Atikasari