Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa

TRANSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ RECOUNT TEXTS Elsie, Kadek Fredina; Adnyani, ni luh putu sri; Suarnajaya, I wayan
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Vol 9, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa
Publisher : IKIP PGRI Pontianak

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (308.917 KB) | DOI: 10.31571/bahasa.v9i1.1681

Abstract

This study aimed at identifying the process types that characterize the students’ recount texts, identifying the process types which are dominantly used, and identifying the circumstantial elements that characterize the students’ recount texts. This study applied a descriptive qualitative method with a case study research. The recount texts written by class XI Usaha Perjalanan Wisata (UPW) 2 at SMK Wira Harapan were used as the sources of data collection of the study. There were 26 students taken as the subjects of the study. The data of the study which are in the form of sentences and clauses were analyzed based on transitivity system, and the problems experienced by the students in writing the recount texts were discussed through focus group interview in order to determine whether the students made mistakes or errors in their texts. The study discovers that, first, the process types that characterize the students’ recount texts are material process, intensive attributive process, mental process, circumstantial attributive process, verbal process, possessive attributive process, intensive identifying process, existential process, circumstantial identifying process, and behavioral process, which respectively appears 566 times (60.66%), 149 times (15.97%), 100 times (10.72%), 35 times (3.75%), 29 times (3.11%), 21 times (2.25%), 17 times (1.82%), 9 times (0.96%), 4 times (0.43%), and 3 times (0.32%). Second, the process type which is dominantly used in the students’ recount texts is material process with the frequency of occurrence of 565 times (60.82%). The material process was used dominantly since the topics written by the students were related to past activities. Third, the circumstantial elements characterizing the students’ recount texts are location, cause, manner, extent, accompaniment, matter, and role. The results of the focus group interview and the text analysis show that the students made many mistakes and errors in their recount texts, such as the uses of past tense, article, spellings, modal auxiliary, capital letter, plurality, and preposition in a clause. The two aspects leading the deviations are interlingual and intralingual errors.  
TRANSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ RECOUNT TEXTS Kadek Fredina Elsie; ni luh putu sri Adnyani; I wayan Suarnajaya
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Vol 9, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa
Publisher : IKIP PGRI Pontianak

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31571/bahasa.v9i1.1681

Abstract

This study aimed at identifying the process types that characterize the students’ recount texts, identifying the process types which are dominantly used, and identifying the circumstantial elements that characterize the students’ recount texts. This study applied a descriptive qualitative method with a case study research. The recount texts written by class XI Usaha Perjalanan Wisata (UPW) 2 at SMK Wira Harapan were used as the sources of data collection of the study. There were 26 students taken as the subjects of the study. The data of the study which are in the form of sentences and clauses were analyzed based on transitivity system, and the problems experienced by the students in writing the recount texts were discussed through focus group interview in order to determine whether the students made mistakes or errors in their texts. The study discovers that, first, the process types that characterize the students’ recount texts are material process, intensive attributive process, mental process, circumstantial attributive process, verbal process, possessive attributive process, intensive identifying process, existential process, circumstantial identifying process, and behavioral process, which respectively appears 566 times (60.66%), 149 times (15.97%), 100 times (10.72%), 35 times (3.75%), 29 times (3.11%), 21 times (2.25%), 17 times (1.82%), 9 times (0.96%), 4 times (0.43%), and 3 times (0.32%). Second, the process type which is dominantly used in the students’ recount texts is material process with the frequency of occurrence of 565 times (60.82%). The material process was used dominantly since the topics written by the students were related to past activities. Third, the circumstantial elements characterizing the students’ recount texts are location, cause, manner, extent, accompaniment, matter, and role. The results of the focus group interview and the text analysis show that the students made many mistakes and errors in their recount texts, such as the uses of past tense, article, spellings, modal auxiliary, capital letter, plurality, and preposition in a clause. The two aspects leading the deviations are interlingual and intralingual errors.  
Co-Authors Anak Agung Sri Barustyawati Ayu Kadek Surya Maharani Bagus Yuda Prawira Brenda Khanadi DB. Kt. Ngr. Semara Putra Dewa Ayu Novi Kusumawardani Dewa Gde Rudy Dewa Putu Ramendra Dewa Putu Ramendra Dewi, Gusti Putu Rustika Drs. Wayan Sugiartha, M.Si. . Eka Anastasia Wijaya Elsie, Kadek Fredina Gede Aditra Pradnyana Gede Rasben Dantes I Gede Budasi I Gusti Agung Sri Rwa Jayantini I Gusti Ayu Puspawati I Gusti Bagus Wiksuana I Made Ardwi Pradnyana I Made Suta Paramarta I Nyoman Adi Jaya Putra I Nyoman Pasek Hadisaputra I Nyoman Pasek Hadisaputra5 I NYOMAN SUPARWA I WAYAN PASTIKA I Wayan Suarnajaya I Wayan Swandana I.B Surya Manuaba Jelimun, Maria Olga Jennet Senawati Kadek Eva Krishna Adnyani Kadek Eva Krishna Adnyani Kadek Fredina Elsie Kadek Puspa Ariantini Ketut Pande Bagus Wahyu Surya Dharma Luh Putu Artini M.Si Drs. I Ketut Margi . M.Si. Drs. Wayan Sugiartha . Made Astawa Kusuma Mandala Made Hery Santosa Maheswari, Putu Ayu Masita Maria Olga Jelimun Ni Komang Arie Suwastini Ni Komang Ratna Purwanti Ni Komang Sri Mariati Ni Luh Devi Wimayanti Ni Luh Sutjiati Beratha Ni Luh Sutrisna Diyani Ni Made Rai Wisudariani Ni Made Ratminingsih Ni Nyoman Artini Ni Nyoman Padmadewi Ni Wayan Nilam Puspawati Paramarta, I Made Suta Prof. Dr. Ni Nyoman Padmadewi,MA . Purniawati, Sang Ayu Putu Ari Putu Ayu Prabawati Sudana Putu Ayu Prabawati Sudana Putu Dika Pratiwi Putu Dinia Suryandani Putu Dita Marantika Putu Eka Dambayana Suputra Putu Kerti Nitiasih Putu Pande Novita Sari Putu Suarcaya Rima Andriani Sari Rima Andriani Sari Sahrullah Sahrullah Sang Ayu Putu Ari Purniawati Sari, Putu Pande Novita Sebastianus Menggo Sri Rwa Jayantini, I Gusti Agung Tri Ery Murniasih Ummi Kultsum Veronika Genua Zulidyana Dwi Rusnalasari