Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
7.042
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum WAJAH HUKUM Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris Unes Law Review Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI Buana Ilmu Hermeneutika : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik) Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law Justisi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Collegium Studiosum Journal Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia
Muhamad Abas
Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 61 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik)

 1 
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE BUSINESS COMPETITION SUPERVISORY COMMISSION IN HANDLING CASES OF ALLEGED UNFAIR BUSINESS COMPETITION CONDUCTED BY PT AERO CITRA CARGO Wike Nopianti; deny guntara; muhamad abas
JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik) Vol 11, No 1 (2023): JURNAL HUKUM REPLIK
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31000/jhr.v11i1.8124

Abstract

Allegations of a monopoly on the export of apparent lobster seeds originated from a case of corruption in evident lobster seeds committed by former Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Edhy Prabowo. In the indictment filed by the Public Prosecutor, Edhy allegedly founded and managed the Aero Citra Kargo Limited Liability Company as a shell company to collect profits from the export of apparent lobster seeds. At that time, the Business Competition Supervisory Commission suspected that the Aero Citra Kargo Limited Liability Company violated 17 and 24 of Law Number 5 of 1999. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission in handling cases of alleged unfair business competition carried out by the Aero Citra Kargo Limited Liability Company. And to find out the considerations of the Commission Council for the Supervision of Business Competition in deciding Case Number 04/Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition-I/2021. This scientific research uses normative qualitative research methods. The author uses a normative juridical strategy in this approach. The Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition has played an influential role in cases of unfair business competition/monopoly practices, especially in cases of unfair business competition for export shipping services for Clear Lobster Seeds carried out by Aero Citra Kargo Limited Liability Company, the Commission Council has correctly determined decision dictum based on facts, judgment, analysis, and conclusion. The Commission Council only provides sanctions in the form of stopping activities carried out by the Aero Citra Cargo Limited Liability Company, which following the legal basis, namely Law No. 5 of 1999Keywords: Effectiveness, Monopolistic Practices, export
IMPLEMENTATION OF REGULATION OF THE MINISTER OF MANPOWER NUMBER 6 OF 2020 CONCERNING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DOMESTIC APPRECIATION IN KARAWANG, WEST JAVA Listiono listiono; Deny Guntara; Muhamad Abas
JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik) Vol 11, No 1 (2023): JURNAL HUKUM REPLIK
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31000/jhr.v11i1.8146

Abstract

Indonesia is a constitutional state with a rule of law that is very useful for society, and the law must provide benefits and goals for humanity. In general, employment in apprenticeship practices results in that there are still many companies that do not give an allowance amount. In the corporate world, labor is one of the most significant expenses in the corporate world, so in this case, if the work (interns) is not paid, it can benefit the company. Meanwhile, interns also have other needs in their daily activities. This can harm both parties, namely apprentices (apprentices) and the company. The problem is how the apprenticeship program is implemented in Indonesia in terms of the Minister of Manpower Regulation Number 6 of 2020 concerning the Implementation of Domestic Apprenticeships and what are the inhibiting factors in implementing the apprenticeship program in Indonesia. The research method is qualitative, with the approach used in this study being normative juridical. The research results on implementing the Apprenticeship Program in Karawang in terms of the Minister of Manpower Regulation Number 6 of 2020 concerning the performance of Domestic Apprenticeships have been running according to the rules contained in the regulation. In practice, there are still many companies placing apprentices that are not under their competence or expertise, that have been carried out so that it is not in line with the objectives of the Organization of Domestic Apprenticeships. There are lacks that the specialists found in every part of adequacy, and these elements show that the execution of the Guideline minister of workforce regulations of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 of 2020 concerning the Execution of Homegrown Apprenticeships concerning the privileges of student members is as yet not successfully carried out in the field.Keywords: Implementation, Effectiveness, Apprenticeship
CONSUMER PROTECTION AGAINST WITHDRAWAL OF MOTOR VEHICLES BASED ON FIDUCIAN COLLATERAL Jannus Manurung; Yuniar Rahmatiar; Muhamad Abas
JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik) Vol 11, No 1 (2023): JURNAL HUKUM REPLIK
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31000/jhr.v11i1.8147

Abstract

In the current era, all people can own a motorized vehicle in an easy and fast way. This is triggered by the way to buy a motorized car with credit. In terms of withdrawing vehicles, finance companies use the role of a third party (a debt collector) to carry out their actions in collecting creditors and also carrying out forced withdrawals of collateral objects, where the financing company feels that the actions taken are safe. A debt collector is a third party who assists a finance company in resolving a credit problem that the finance company cannot determine. The problem is how the collector department's implementation of the motorized vehicle withdrawal process is linked to law number 42 of 1999 concerning fiduciary guarantees and how consumer protection for motorized vehicle withdrawals by the collector department is linked to law number 42 of 1999 concerning fiduciary contracts. The research method is qualitative, with the approach used in this research being normative juridical. The results of his study show that Consumer Protection Against Motor Vehicle Withdrawal has not gone well because when a consumer's motorized vehicle has been withdrawn, there is no further information on the vehicle's whereabouts, whether it is being sold or auctioned. So that when the car is going to be auctioned or sold, the consumer needs to know that the result is more than or sufficient to pay off the consumer's debt. Many unscrupulous debt collectors do not have a clear professional status and sometimes threaten consumers, which causes harm to consumers and the most crucial factor they register. A fiduciary Guarantee is the registration of a motorized vehicle as a fiduciary guarantee to have legal certainty for both the party providing the financing and the party receiving the funding. No legal counseling is carried out to the Financing Company related to fiduciary guarantees, especially in registering fiduciary collateral goods, where registration of fiduciary warranties is basically to obtain legal certainty over the object's position fiduciary as well as confidence for the parties agreeing within it.Keywords: Legal Protection, Consumers, Debt Collector
Co-Authors Abd. Rasyid Syamsuri Abdul Kholik Ade Ahmad Fauzan Adyan Lubis Adyan Lubis Agusra Ahmad Sopian Sauri Andri Susanto Anwar Hidayat Anwar Hidayat Anwar Hidayat Arif Wicaksono Astri Safitri Nurdin Dahrul Manalu Deny Guntara Deny Guntara Deny Guntara Deny Guntara Deny Guntara Deny Guntara deny guntara Deny Guntara Deny Guntara Deny Guntara Deny Guntara Destia Ayuning Thias Desyifa Nurhidayah Farhan Asyahadi Farhan Asyahadi Firman Aji Pamungkas Hendri Gunawan Imam Budi Santoso Imam Budi Santoso Imam Sofii Toha Ina Malia Putri Insan Supriyatin Irma Garwan Jannus Manurung Jihan Alfadia Khoirul Ummam Lia Amaliya Lia Amaliya Lia Amaliya Lilis Setiani Listiono listiono M. Gary Gagarin Akbar Mochamad Agus Antoni Moh. Shofi Anan Muhamad Jiia Fauzi Muhammad Gary Gagarin Akbar Muhammad Shidqi Mubarok Nadia Syahida Nanik Narya Suryadi Narya Suryadi Narya Nova Desi Ratnasari Nurdin Nurdin Nuryanah Tirostiah Meidah Raden Lita Nur Elita Rr. Winarti Pudji Lestari Rr. Winarti Pudji Lestari Sartika Dewi Sartika Dewi Sartika Dewi Siska Mariza Siti Dhiafajaazka Sopyan Sopyan Sopyan Sopyan Sri Wahyuni Sutras Budi Prayogo Suyono Sanjaya Tanti Alfareza Herdianti Tatang Targana Tatang Targana Taufik Caniago Taufiqoh Bina Ariani Tri Setiady Wahyu Hidayat Wahyu Koswara Wahyu Mulyandaru Wawan Indra R. Wike Nopianti Wike Nopianti Wike Nopianti Wulan Cahya Ningrum Yuniar Rahmatiar Yuniar Rahmatiar Yuniar Rahmatiar Yuniar Rahmatiar Yuniar Rahmatiar Yuniar Rahmatiar Yuniar Rahmatiar Yuniar Rahmatiar Yuniar Rahmatiar Yuniar Rahmatiar Yuniar Rahmatiar Yuniar Rahmatiar Yustya Laraswati Yusuf Rizki Zarisnov Arafat Zarisnov Arafat Zatmika Nur Farhan